The Computer Audiophile Posted January 12, 2021 Share Posted January 12, 2021 5 hours ago, firedog said: Just put on "Abbey Road"(2019 remaster). This was my first album, back 51 years ago. I've for sure listened to it more than any other music in existence. Sounds fantastic on my system. Can hear things better than ever - more detail, more clarity - even with my old ears. My foot is tapping and I have a grin on my face. Fantastic! Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted January 12, 2021 Share Posted January 12, 2021 2 hours ago, Archimago said: Absolutely. There was a time when artists, audio engineers, and record labels seemed to know how to judge "good sound". It's very sad how despite production technology improving, playback systems improving, so many artists these days - probably all in the popular music genre - have not been able to release albums with good sound in recent decades. Despite all our audiophile debates and inordinate amounts of time spent on silly stuff like $$$$ cables, MQA, 24-bits, high samplerates, etc. I get the feeling that we simply have not been focusing enough on the importance of the recording/production quality itself. All the while, remasters have been released to the public typically with even worse sound and lower dynamic range than the originals. Notice how few words have been spent in the pages of Stereophile or TAS addressing the issue of poor dynamic range or actually being critical of inherently poor sonic quality in the albums these days. If there is one thing audiophiles could do that is of benefit to all music lovers, it would be to make sure listeners, and the music industry are well aware of the concerns we have about what they release. I have a feeling that artists and the Industry these days are just thinking about the short term sales of albums, or creating hype for live performances (whenever those restart again). Maybe one day they will take sound quality seriously to create a product with longevity done with skill and of enduring quality again. But I doubt that can happen without a groundswell of music lovers complaining online, Industry media publishing articles about this, streaming companies hearing from fans that they're streaming a poor mastering, and fans hounding their favourite artists about improving the sound of their recordings. Imagine if all those product reviews hyping the sound quality of MQA instead took a snipe at poor remaster quality instead, reminding readers to actually fight a worthwhile battle instead of promulgating a scam. Alas, one can only dream... :-) I agree @Archimago, but as audiophiles we tend to focus on that which is under our control. We can easily purchase the next audio widget hoping to get that extra 0.000001% improvement, but we have little to no influence on how the music is made. botrytis 1 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Popular Post The Computer Audiophile Posted January 14, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 hour ago, sandyk said: Jud Are those who subscribe to these services in effect resulting in the paying of "slave wages" to many artists , or don't most subscribers care ? This extract from the attached link worries me. Regards Alex https://www.planetarygroup.com/do-artists-get-paid-every-time-song-played-spotify/ Artists signed contracts with record labels. The labels are the entities not paying artists. It has zero to do with streaming services. The labels dictated the terms to the streaming services and got everything they wanted. Bottom line: Don't sign a record deal then complain that streaming services aren't paying you. Thuaveta and lucretius 2 Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now