Popular Post DuckToller Posted January 4, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted January 4, 2021 It sounds to me like the derogative term "not peer reviewed" indicates (for many not involved within the scientific environment) that "peer reviewed" carries intrinsically the knighthood & highest order of trust level for available scientific objectivity ... and forgoes to review the many different processes behind that term. Given the position of AES you described above, they may not be ultimately unhappy about that ... Given how many money changes annually from industry to source academic research a peer reviewed paper receives its value imho from the credibility of the peer and not genuinly from the journal it is published in . .. i could be wrong with this biased view, pls challenge ... MikeyFresh and KeenObserver 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now