Popular Post MetalNuts Posted December 29, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 29, 2020 Are u kidding, MQA? Teresa, barrows, MikeyFresh and 1 other 4 MetalNuts Link to comment
Popular Post MetalNuts Posted December 29, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 29, 2020 8 minutes ago, GUTB said: I mean...this IS an audiophile forum...right? Yes, it is! But with respect, let's agree to disagree. MQA is not audiophile to me but snake oil or may be even worse. Siltech817, barrows, botrytis and 2 others 3 2 MetalNuts Link to comment
MetalNuts Posted December 29, 2020 Share Posted December 29, 2020 16 minutes ago, sandyk said: Perhaps his Vacuum Tube preamplifier makes MQA sound better ? 😉 It is not his fault. I would blame there no rules or standard governing the use of certain names which will convey to consumer the idea of superiority over the others. It is a possible case of misrepresentation. MikeyFresh 1 MetalNuts Link to comment
MetalNuts Posted December 29, 2020 Share Posted December 29, 2020 1 hour ago, GUTB said: What hardware and music did you use to come to this conclusion about MQA? My friend, I believe if you are interested to discover my audio system you can click on my avatar and discover yourself. But for your sake I copied and showed it to you below. However, I do not believe my current audio system make me arrived at the conclusion cos' I have changed gears along these years since MQA surfaced in the market. It is the source that matters. Stereo: NAS & MSB Premier Dac (Isotek EVO3 Acension PC) --> Crystal Future Dream XLR --> Soulution 525 (Crystal Future Dream PC) --> Crystal Future Dream XLR --> Soulution 311 (Isotek EVO3 Acension PC) --> Crystal Kondo Operia SPs 2.7--> Audio Physic Midex AV: OPPO 203 / Pioneer LX500 --> Pioneer LX-901--> ELAC CC 241.3, KEF LS-50, KEF R-50, JL 110 Power Conditioner for Stereo: Isotek EVO3 Mosaic Genesis & Isotek EVO3 Genesis One Power Conditioner for AV: Isotek EVO3 Sigmas MetalNuts Link to comment
Popular Post MetalNuts Posted December 29, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 29, 2020 1 hour ago, GUTB said: The MSB Premier supports MQA through the renderer module and it obviously has the resolution to expose hi-res recordings. This systems seems like it should have no problem with revealing MQA qualities (or lack thereof) unless you didn't have a MQA DAC at the time. Can you think of some albums that you were unimpressed with that made you discard MQA? Really? Should I be glad to have my MSB supporting MQA? Why should I bother to explore MQA more knowing that it has been proved and shown that it has no evidence to support its claim of improving the SQ? You believe what you believe but stop trying to believe you know better than others without supporting evidence, yet try to convince others to your belief. Thank you very much! botrytis, Teresa and MikeyFresh 3 MetalNuts Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now