Jump to content
IGNORED

Are Class D Amplifiers really "digital"?


Recommended Posts

On 9/13/2020 at 7:11 AM, Rexp said:

Yes but the signal is off or on which is a definition of a digital signal. Analog signals are continuous. 

This is really another pointless audiophile debate that gets us nowhere.

But I agree with Paul M.: a PWM signal can be played back directly by analog equipment and produce sound. Poor quality sound, but sound. Therefore it is analog.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
1 hour ago, 57gold said:

Thanks Firedog -  Read the article, comprehension was low on my part.  Understood that the positive aspects of GaN is offset by some negatives...so they didn't want to use them in their Purifi product.  

Their basic position seems to be that GAN also has disadvantages and they feel they can get superior results at a lower price point without it. At the very least, they are claiming it isn't the panacea that audiophiles assume it to be b/c of the high switching rate - that there are other factors involved in the end result.

Personally, seems to me like around $2-$3K can get you a very well made dual mono/stereo Purifi amp with a nice case. Not audiophile bling, but certainly quite respectable. If you are OK with Class D, that's probably all you need for today's state of the art.

 

I assume at some point they will make more models of the amp module if it is successful. Those wanting really high power can get an NCore 1200 based amp.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
53 minutes ago, 57gold said:

 

Thanks, thought I read that somewhere. 

 

Some one like Nord or Apollon or... will make a nice sounding, reasonably priced higher powered Purifi based amp when the new units are available. 

At some of the other sites, it seems the Apollon and the March Audio are considered the better built/layout of the "reasonably priced" models.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
  • 4 weeks later...
10 hours ago, 57gold said:

 

Wow, I though I was the only one who held the opinion that 6moons reviews made absolutely no sense.  

 

Random babble for many paragraphs and sometimes, though rarely, a few words about how the gear being reviewed sounds in comparison to other similarly priced gear.  And even then, usually overwhelmed by one or more tangents about some tweak or cable or obscure recording...have given up reading their reviews out of frustration; when I get to the end of a review, I wonder why I bothered.

 

Believe the first review I read was one on the McCormack DNA-500, which was actually very informative and accurate.  I still have my DNA-500 and it rocks. It was written by Chip Stern, an outlier, who has a history of audio reviews and seems to understand how to describe the musical character of audio gear.

 

 

 I find it funny/ironic that they call themselves the site for audiophiles who "like to read".... Apparently they have a minimum length for reviews, and in addition to length, the text must be obtuse.

 

That said, I think they do provide some useful info: they review products from small producers from all over the world that many other sites don't or won't. They also compare the sounds of products, so if you get to know the reviewers and have some idea of what the products sound like you can figure out which ones go on your audition list or don't go on your audition list.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...