Jump to content
IGNORED

Why do most audiophile prefer passive speakers?


Recommended Posts

When I bought my Linn system, oh so many years ago, I wanted an active system.  ATC was too expensive (for me), PMC unobtainable, and the Paradigm Active40 seemed to be discontinued as soon as it was released.  I was really interested in the Active 40s but not obtainable.  The Linn and Naim active systems are a bit different where they mount the crossovers in another box or in the amps so not really reducing system size.  I have read where this xover mounting in external boxes can be done with numerous speakers.  I went with Linn as I liked the sound and I could go Aktiv if I desired.  I should have when upgraded with the 2250 amp a few years later.  Now I am not sure I want to sink money into a 20+ year old system.

 

Nowadays the active systems are obtainable.  While the Kiis and D&Ds are a bit rich for me, but if my system crashed tomorrow, I would look at the Dynaudio Xeo line.  May not have all the DSP the higher cost alternatives but I think I would be just fine.

QNAP TS453Pro w/QLMS->Netgear Switch->Netgear RAX43 Router->Ethernet (50 ft)->Netgear switch->SBTouch ->SABAJ A10d->Linn Majik-IL (preamp)->Linn 2250->Linn Keilidh; Control Points: iPeng (iPad Air & iPhone); Also: Rega P3-24 w/ DV 10x5; OPPO 103; PC Playback: Foobar2000 & JRiver; Portable: iPhone 12 ProMax & Radio Paradise or NAS streaming; Sony NWZ ZX2 w/ PHA-3; SMSL IQ, Fiio Q5, iFi Nano iDSD BL; Garage: Edifier S1000DB Active Speakers  

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...