TheAttorney Posted August 2, 2020 Share Posted August 2, 2020 On 7/30/2020 at 2:19 PM, nevillekapadia said: The AES/EBU output with a Grimm digital cable is all one needs to go to the DAC. Did this cable come bundled with the server? As far as I can tell, there's no USB or optical outputs, which seems rather restrictive. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 I still have the MU1 in my sights as a potential upgrade to my existing tweaked NUC with Euphony Stylus server, But Covid restrictions has meant that my intended 3-way comparison of MU1, Innuos Statement and Taiko Mini Extreme have been pushed into the new year. And as the Mini has taken a priority back-step in Taiko's pipeline, the comparison will probably be with the Extreme itself. I have no intention of buying the Extreme because of excessive size, weight and cost, but I am nevertheless curious how the MU1 will compare. One of the features I like about the MU1 is that volume can controlled from the roon app, but the actual volume change is made by the MU1 (maybe in the fpga?). Which is important because roon's internal volume control significantly impacts SQ IMO. Whilst waiting for this comparison, can anyone allay a couple of nagging concerns: 1. How does the MU1 perform with an m-scaler/DAVE DAC? Which has it's own fpga-based upscaler that upscales to a greater extent than MU1's. To reduce box count, I'd quite like to drop the m-scaler if the MU1 makes it largely redundant. But the details of the upscaling process are very different and I don't know how this multi-way synergy would work. 2. Bearing in mind that roon's internal volume control sounds poor IMO, has anyone tried other roon DSP functions such as PEQ or cross-feed? It would be a big bonus if the MU1's magic somehow managed to minimise any loss of transparency in roon's DSP. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 On 12/4/2020 at 4:00 PM, matthias said: Interesting to include in your comparison would be a source with a good USB output into a Chord Hugo M Scaler. Basically the MU1 is an Intel NUC with a Grimm reclocking/up-/downsampling board and AES/SPDIF output. I've already demonstrated to myself that the M-Scaler's USB input is very susceptible to upstream differences. At the dealer's, the MU1's AES output will be compared to the Statement's and Extreme's USB outputs (both top notch apparently and not needing additional re-clockers etc). If the MU1 does well in this comparison, I'm aiming to to take it for a home trial against my tweaked NUC with ISORegen and Sablon 2020 USB cables. Actually, I'm very pleased with my NUC source - Euphony Stylus seems to get the best out of it. I'm only considering an upgrade because... it's what audiophiles do 🙂. And to reduce spaghetti. If the MU1 doesn't do well, then I'm back to square one, as the Extreme and (to a lesser extent) the Statement are too big and heavy for my downsizing aspirations. beautiful music 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 For the comparisons at the dealer, I'll be using whatever the dealer has set up. Which most likely will be Roon on Extreme and whatever default Innuos use for their servers. I'll bring along my own music files on a thumb drive in case I can't find what I want from the dealer's selection. The fact that TAS sounds better Roon is immaterial for this comparison. If Extreme+Roon doesn't easily win this comparison then something is seriously wrong. I'll bring my own M-scaler/DAVE and HEK SE headphones as the downstream components. But while I'm there, I may as well try out the new T+A DAC/Headphone amp that the dealer is raving about. I've looked at all the recommended alternatives from Antipodes, Pink Faun etc. Most of them (or at least their top models) are bigger and more expensive than the MU1. But the main issue is getting them all together for a comparison. And getting home trials from several different dealers is a major hassle in time, effort and negotiation - and certainly not free in terms of shipping and travel. So I have to draw a short list to keep me sane. And from everything I've read, the MU1 has a good chance of doing the giant killer act. So although the Extreme should win in absolute terms, the MU1 will hopefully display it's own unique charms and musical enjoyment that hold its own against even the most expensive competition (which is what the dealer has already hinted at). If it doesn't work out like that, then I'll have to regroup and think again - but with lots of newly gained experience of top class servers. beautiful music 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 1 hour ago, matthias said: What I absolutely dislike about the MU1 is that it is more or less bound to Roon. Well, as Roon has the best UI bar far, that's a good thing - AS LONG AS the MU1 with Roon can beat competing servers with competing apps. I happen to have a lifetime Roon license, but currently only using for background listening. There's some speculation that the Grimm team are considering writing their own app (as well as an internal DAC module and probably all sorts of other goodies). But I can't rely on speculation and good intentions, so my comparison will assume that the SQ I hear now will not necessarily be improved in the future. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted December 7, 2020 Share Posted December 7, 2020 17 hours ago, FredM said: With the recent firmware update up- and down sampling to 2FS is now supported, this matches the AES input of your DAC (also both AES outputs are volume controlled since the last firmware) I've only just realised the significance of this. My DAVE AES input's limit is 96kHz. And I've just checked that my M-Scaler doesn't even have an AES input! Which severely restricts the options I have with MU1's AES output. The proof of the pudding will be in the hearing, but these limitations (not particularly MU1's fault) mean that I may not get the full potential of the MU1 with my Chord equipment, so may need a Plan B sooner than I had expected ☹️. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted May 4, 2021 Share Posted May 4, 2021 I'm still waiting for the MU2, with the hope that Grimm can provide great synergy between its FPGA and internal DAC, e.g. by upscaling higher than is practical via its AES output - the end result to surpass the likes of Tambaqui. If the MU2 can pull that off, then it will be top contender for my next purchase. Ideally, to fulfill my single-box-solution aspirations, the MU2 would also include a top quality headphone output, but unfortunately that option does not appear to be on the horizon. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted May 9, 2021 Share Posted May 9, 2021 On 5/5/2021 at 12:52 PM, Kenkuan said: I was told MU2 could be one year away, if you can wait😅 I don't really have a choice - the MU1 isn't a good fit for my existing DAVE system, as detailed a while back. And the other main contender, Mini-Extreme, also keeps disappearing into the horizon. And others like K50/K30/Statement I suspect won't quite deliver what I'm looking for. On a happier note, some recent free config changes to Euphony Stylus on my tweaked NUC server have given unexpectedly big improvements 🙂. From a purely SQ point of view, I feel I could live with this indefinitely, but I do still want to reduce my box count and spaghetti count, and any change in that direction also must improve SQ to make it worthwhile. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted May 10, 2021 Share Posted May 10, 2021 19 hours ago, FredM said: Besides the AES/EBU output, did you know that the MU1 now also has a S/PDIF digital out? Perhaps this is useful in your situation. Link to announcement DAVE doesn't have an RCA S/PDIF input, but it does have BNC and Optical. Of these, BNC has the highest rate at up to 384 kHz. I expect a converter box/plug would work, but it's just another bit of faff that I'd rather not do. I'm not discounting the idea of getting an MU1 and then upgrading to MU2 in the future - Grimm seems to make that option very easy. I'm just setting my own expectations to a more realistic level of what I can achieve right now. FredM 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted June 3, 2021 Share Posted June 3, 2021 8 hours ago, Evo1668 said: I am really looking forward to this coming weekend - as have an MU1 coming to visit And one weekend later I will be visiting a dealer to demo MU1 vs Statement and possibly Taiko Extreme. With a subsequent home trial if the demo shows promise. I'm taking my DAVE and headphones with me. And will also be trying various T+A headphone components while I'm there. If the MU1 works out, then I've counted I can have 1 box + 1 cable to replace 4 boxes and 7 cables (NUC, ISORegen, M-Scaler, 3-rail Power Supply, 2xUSB cables, 2xBNC cables, 3xDC cables), which a a good step towards my downsizing objectives. The only thing that spoils it is that MU1 doesn't have WiFi input (my NUC does), so I will then have to add a WiFi bridge and ethernet cable back into the mix (plus possibly a super switch and super cable) - unless I can persuade Grimm to activate the WiFi that I believe is already built-in to the NUC board they use. However that WiFi limitation is the same for most top end servers, so I'll have the same issue whichever top end server I go for. FredM 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted June 4, 2021 Share Posted June 4, 2021 17 hours ago, Fourlegs said: I wonder, is your three rail power supply feeding dc to your Dave 😜 ? That has been just about the biggest improvement in my system in recent years. Don't be put off my the MU1 not having wifi. I would certainly not want an RF transmitter in my streamer. The 3 rails power NUC, IR and M-Scaler. I have no doubt that a DC 4 powering DAVE would be a major upgrade, but it is also a majorly big and expensive box that does nothing to help me downsize ☹️. Not out of the question in the future if I stick with DAVE, but I may not stick with DAVE if the MU2 DAC component turns out to be as good as its makers expect. It's "common knowledge" that wifi is bad for hifi. But Euphony Stylus on my NUC has an option to disable networking during play (after buffering the music tracks) - and I can't reliably tell the difference whether wifi is active or not. So to my mind it is possible for certain wifi implementations to not be any worse than ethernet and anyway I'm prepared to take a slight hit for the sake of convenience (as long as it is very slight). If Grimm can make Roon sound great, maybe they can do the same for wifi? Most likely through, they won't want to be bothered with my request, so I'll need a solution like FredM has suggested. 15 hours ago, FredM said: When a wifi connection is preferred, you could use a TP Link TL-WR802N. You can set this small device as a ‘client’, after it is connected with your wireless home network (quick search on ‘how to’), just connect a short network cable between the TP Link ‘client’ and MU1. The great thing about this device is that it is powered via USB. So use the USB out from the MU1, et voila, you have a clean direct feed as a bonus 👍 Thank you for that - it looks like a good, simple solution. A USB dongle with antenna would be even simpler, but I'm not sure that linux-based systems (which I assume MU1 to be) could support networking into a USB port. Anyway, I have options, but any box with an ethernet cable is subject to improvement, as SackATK has demonstrated - and my natural audiophile tendency would be to faff around with tweaking it. The big plus of integrated wifi is that there's not much to tweak 🙂. Link to comment
Popular Post TheAttorney Posted June 16, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted June 16, 2021 My Grimm MU1 impressions - Round 1 I took my DAVE and HEKse's to the dealer last Saturday. To get a reference point, we first attached DAVE to Innuos Statement (via USB and running latest 2.0 o/s and latest 795 Roon). This sounded very good, although, compared to the memory of my Euphony NUC, there seemed to be a very slight "digital" aspect to the presentation - not at all bright, just a touch unnatural - which could have been due to one of Roon's typical SQ characteristics that I remember from the past. Next, replace Statement with MU1 via AES. This sounded better, with a more effortless, expansive sound and no digital artifacts. This brief comparison was not intended to give a definitive result between Statement vs MU1. All I needed to know was that the MU1 was in same ballpark as the Statement - because the latter is significantly bigger, heavier and more expensive, with no future integrated DAC option - and therefore a less desirable contender for my downsizing objective. The fact that MU1 also happened to sound better was a real bonus (I'm sure Innuos' own music app would have sounded better than Roon, but that wasn't the point of this exercise). The next steps were to see if MU1 had good synergy with DAVE: I replaced DAVE with T+A HA200 DAC/headphone amp and tried my HEK's vs the two T+A headphones. And also tried the acclaimed Mola Mola DAC/headphone amp. All tests with MU1 set to 4FS. Again, this was a broad-brushed comparison - I would only replace DAVE if either of the other 2 gave me a compelling reason to do so. And they did not succeed in this, so DAVE is staying. I'll write more about the T+A DAC/amp and headphones in a few days on the T+A thread over at head-fi. In conclusion, Round 1 has demonstrated to me that MU1 can take on highly regarded, more expensive, rivals, and it also has good synergy with DAVE. And it made Roon sound great. So I've taken the MU1 back with me for a home trial, which will be the subject of Round 2 in a few days. FredM, BTO, LTG2010 and 1 other 1 2 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted June 16, 2021 Share Posted June 16, 2021 2 hours ago, Nenon said: I might be stating the obvious here, but keep in mind that the DAVE sounds very different via USB and vis AES or SPDIF. Fair enough, but the point about the MU1 is that you HAVE to use AES (or the recently added rca socket spdif) in order to use it's all-important FPGA output that provides all the magic. Whereas the Statement has a great USB output, so in both cases we were giving each server the best chance - even if DAVE may treat them differently. FWIW, the supplied USB cable was a pricey TQ Diamond and the AES was a pricey Audioquest Diamond. Also supplied was a no-name, but solidly made, AES to BNC converter cable that connected to DAVE's BNC input. This didn't sound quite as good as the (probably much more expensive) Audioquest, which re-enforces that cables make a difference. Link to comment
Popular Post TheAttorney Posted June 22, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted June 22, 2021 On 6/21/2021 at 4:02 AM, kaka said: Would have been interesting if you had tested the Statement playing without Roon Yes it would have been interesting - but I've tried to explain in my previous posts that my primary objective was to decide if the MU1 (plus a collection of T+A headphones and amps) gave a sufficiently impressive performance to take it (and them) for a home trial. It would have taken too much time, and would have confused me with too many variables, had I diverted from whatever defaults the dealer had prepared. So Round 1 absolutely does not conclude whether MU1 is better or worse than the best that Statement could potentially offer. OTOH, if Roon on Statement is so unimpressive, then the Innuos guys are clearly missing whatever magic sauce the Grimm guys have concocted. And it appeals to my minimalist tendencies that Grimm have managed to achieve this with a tiny lightweight SMPS (compared to the Statement's massive, heavy power supply designed by the top class Sean Jacobs). In the meantime, I've had the MU1 at home for over a week now and have come to a firm conclusion, but I'm on the road for a while, so won't be publishing Round 2 for a couple of days. The suspense.... spotforscott and Confused 1 1 Link to comment
Popular Post TheAttorney Posted June 24, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted June 24, 2021 My MU1 impressions - Round 2. The MU1 on home trial replaced my existing components as follows: SR7 p/s with 3 DC cables powering: NUC > USB cable > IsoRegen > USB cable > M-scaler > 2 x BNC cables > DAVE was replaced with: MU1 > AES cable > DAVE Both MU1 and M-Scaler were set to their maximum upscaling (4FS and 16FS respectively) as this sounded best in both cases. As start point, I was feeling pretty good about my NUC-based system. Although many here at AS have gone much further than I at optimising their NUCs, I still felt I had a high performing system, with the excellent Euphony Stylus carefully tweaked to give a well balanced sound with no obvious downsides. And the superb Mundorf gold/sliver DC, Sablon 2020 USB and Vertere Pulse HB BNC cables all being "end game" cables IMO that significantly lifted overall performance. However, much of the NUC was still stock, such as the USB output coming straight off the board, so I knew that further improvement was possible. So on balance, I had no idea how this test would go. The worst possible outcome would be that MU1 sounded a bit better, but that I had to strain to hear the difference. In which case, I would be in a dilemma between my downsizing objective vs only minimal SQ improvement for the high cost of change. As it turns out, it took only seconds of the first track to realize that the MU1 was performing in a higher division. To sum it up in a single phrase, I would say that "the MU1 is an open window into the recording studio". Every tiny detail, at any frequency, was presented untarnished and without smearing. I was having to re-appraise albums that I thought I knew well. The most worthwhile change was for my "ok" albums (ones that were fairly good but unremarkable) - these could take on a new lease of life. Audiophile recordings also improved, but these had previously sounded great anyway. No recording ever got worse, but some changed character as the "open window" exposed every characteristic of that recording. There are some caveats: 1. The above WOW effect occurred with the dealer-supplied Audioquest Diamond AES cable (around £900). The SQ went down significantly (softer with loss of fine detail) when I tried the AES>BNC converter cable. My understanding was that this was supplied by Grimm, but the wire was by Belden, with Neutrik XLR plug at one end and Canare RCA plug at other end, onto which was a hard RCA>BNC converter. From my spares box I had some sensible, no-nonsense "pro" microphone XLR cables (in the £20-£40 range). The Van Damme sounded slightly better than the Belden, and the Sommer Carbokab 225 sounded quite a bit better than the Van Damme, but not as good as the AQ. So the AES cable is critical to get the best out of the MU1 and I'm undecided what to do about it. Sticking with the Sommer for the moment. 2: I tried Roon's DSP for PEQ and cross-feed and this was an obvious step down from bit-perfect (as it has been every time I've tried Roon's DSP in the past). So MU1's magic does not extend to Roon's internal DSP algorithms, which is a great shame, but not surprising. 3. I felt that MU1's "gold disc" volume control slightly reduced transparency (compared to leaving it at 0dB and solely using Dave's volume control). This was subtle and requires further tests to be conclusive. That's all for now folks. In Round 3, I'll comment on MU1's look&feel and practicalities. PS. I did buy the MU1 🙂 simorag, shahed99, nevillekapadia and 7 others 2 7 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted July 11, 2021 Share Posted July 11, 2021 My MU1 impressions - Round 3. Look&feel and practicalities. The MU1 in real life looks just like I expected from the photos. It doesn't scream heavy weight "high end" extravagance. It's more about simple, restrained elegance. Grimm wisely chose well to give the gold disc a very matt finish so it doesn't look too blingey against the matt black enclosure. That restrained gold disc helps give a Japanese Zen-like vibe to the minimalist enclosure. With the display switched off in standby mode and cables hidden round the back, the MU1 doesn't even look much like a hifi component - which resulted in an unexpectedly high WAF rating from my wife. The display is clear and unexpectedly useful. It's great to use Roon's "music magazine" UI for discovery etc, but sometimes I want to just listen to music, and for those times I queue up a couple of albums, enable roon-radio, and then close my control laptop. The MU1 display shows, amongst other things, the artist/album/track/progress and one can pause/restart by pressing the gold disc. Even better would be if one could skip track forward and back - I understand this feature will come with the IR Remote Control functionality due in the next firmware release (due around August). My downsizing objective insists that networking is via WiFi (direct to my broadband router in another room), so I don't have to bother with long ethernet cables, super switches, super clocks, super power supplies etc etc. The tiny Wifi dongle recommended by Grimm (TP-link WR802N) is matcbbox sized and works better than I could have hoped for: it's powered by one of MU1's USB ports, with the supplied ethernet cable plugged into the ethernet socket. It consumes less than 0.5W power and automatically comes off and on when MU1 is put in/out of standby. But best of all, I can barely tell the difference in SQ (when playng local music files) whether or not this dongle is active - not bad for £26 including the skinny USB and ethernet cables. There could be some wishful thinking clouding my judgement here. In a future firmware release (after remote control), Grimm are aiming to provide USB-only WiFi support, at which point I will be able to try an even simpler WiFi solution. The MU1 consumes about 17W AC power when playing music (no DSP), which drops slightly to 16W when music stops. And drops to just under 5W in standby mode. Before removing the power cord, the instructions are to press a tiny button round the back. This definitely does something because the LED light goes out, but interestingly the power consumption stays at 5W, so I'm guessing that this micro switch isolates a particularly sensitive bit of circuitry, without fully switching off the whole unit, which leads me onto the fuse.... The back fuse drawer contains 2 fuses (630mA and, unusually for AC, rated as FAST BLOW). The first one you come to is a spare. All this is important because I've confirmed to myself that the fuse does impact SQ (I'm a committed fuse-o-phile, so this should be no surprise). More about that on my 4th and final round about cables and tweaking. Any downsides? Not much. I find the LED light, even at its lowest setting, too bright for night-time listening. Grimm told me it can't be set any lower with current hardware, so this won't be changed any time soon. I've carefully dabbed the tip of the LED with a black marker pen and this helps tone down the brightness. The main display is also too bright for my liking (to be fair, most manufacturers' LED/displays are too bright for me). Grimm are aiming to add some adjustment for this at a future firmware release (after the remote control one). In short, I'm very happy with my MU1 🙂. FredM 1 Link to comment
Popular Post TheAttorney Posted July 17, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted July 17, 2021 My MU1 Impressions - Round 4. Cables and tweaks. AES Cable. In my earlier rounds I had confirmed to myself that the AES cable is critical to MU1's performance. It's not that a stock cable will sound bad, more a case that a top cable really brings out the goose-bump factor. The £900-ish AQ Diamond sounded great, but was a bit too cumbersome for my liking, so in the meantime I lived with the sensibly priced Sommer microphone cable. But I was missing that goose-bump factor, so I tried a local dealer for some Shunyata cables - none were readily in stock for demo, so instead I tried on loan his favourite AES cable, Esprit Elite, as well as a Cardas Clear. And, because I had previously been impressed with the superb Sablon 2020 USB cable, I also managed to get my hands on a Sablon AES cable. All 3 were in the same ball-park price range. The Cardas Clear gave a well balanced sound, but rather unremarkable against the better sounding Esprit. But inserting the Sablon AES was like upgrading a major component - goosebumps appearing all over the place! This Sablon had the very large and pricey optional Bocchino platinum-plated connectors (which apparently every Sablon customer now goes for). The other notable feature is that the cable is thin, reasonably flexible and has no screening! Whatever, the Sablon sounds fantastic and is staying. Compared to the memory of the AQ Diamond, the Sablon has at least as much (probably more) detail and dynamics, but presented in a more full-bodied, "organic" and natural manner. What's not to like? Well, the over-sized, no-nonsense, industrial-style Boccchino connectors don't have any "bling" features like carbon-fibre, gold or chrome detailing that you typically get with other TOTL connectors. It's all about the sound. Fuses. From my spares box, I tried the SR Blue and Orange. I kept any mains-related swaps to a minimum and also rigorously followed the recommended shut-down procedure. Nevertheless, it was easy to tell that both Blue and Orange were a worthwhile step or two above the stock fuse. These were only used temporarily as they didn't have the exact fuse rating. I'm undecided what rating to actually buy - as SR fuses have a reputation of prematurely failing at the recommended rating, which is an expensive hobby. The other thing I noted was that fuse direction matters in this situation as it has in previous situations - which any Sound Scientist will gleefully tell you that this is simply impossible by the laws of physics. Power Cord. To my existing elderly Audience Powercord E and ClearerAudio Silverline (both around £500), I had on loan a Vertere Redline and Shunyata Delta V2. The striking thing was that I could easily tell the different characteristics between each of these power cords. The Delta sounded best, but I wasn't convinced that the SQ improvement was worth spending £1k to replace my ClearerAudio (not the same goose-bump factor as the Sablon AES gave), so no decisions made at this point. But having established that power cords do matter, I'm strongly considering the pricier Sablon Elite as a next step. Any other tweaks? I'm tempted to open up the MU1, but it's not obvious how to do it (anyone tried this?), so I'm leaving that alone. Which means I won't try replacing the stock RAM with my "industrial" Apacer RAM that proved so successful in my previous NUC. And I won't try lining the inside of the enclosure with EMI/RFI-absorbing paper. And I don't want to spoil the MU1's Zen-like elegant appearance, so I'm in no rush to by-pass the stock footers with any inevitably clumsier-looking audiophile footers. So, apart from the power cord next stage, no more tweaks from me, but I'm always interested in what others have done. beautiful music, FredM and Kenkuan 2 1 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted July 18, 2021 Share Posted July 18, 2021 4 hours ago, Kenkuan said: So far, I've gather from some of the helpful feedback in this forum that synergies can be gotten to ekk out "something" extra by using the PhoenixNet and Sablon AES. Really intrigues me... May I know what DACs do you folks use with MU1? My MU1 goes AES direct to a DAVE DAC/headphone amp. But I think it's an oversimplification to imply that PhoenixNet or Sablon are the only things that have great synergy with the MU1. For example, a while back someone raved over the Shunyata Omega AES cable. I would have liked to try that one, but its price was way more than I'm prepared to pay for a single cable. From what I've learned so far, the MU1 is affected by much the same surrounding components as any another digital device I've come across. I had wished it wasn't so. Because the MU1 had successfully isolated the noise created by Roon, I did wonder whether it could also isolate the noise from the mains supply etc. It would have saved me much money if I could have connected stock everything to the MU1. But I'm not complaining - making Roon sound so good is a big step further than just about any other manufacturer has managed to achieve (I don't think the $25k Extreme would be a fair comparison here). Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted July 21, 2021 Share Posted July 21, 2021 7 hours ago, SackATK said: For your next tweak, I would highly recommend a very good network switch designed for audio. From many posts here at AS, I have no doubt than super switches and super ethernet cables can make a big difference to networked hifi. And several people have raved over the PhoenixNet, so I'm sure it's one of the best. But some still say that disconnecting the network entirely from the server (after buffering the music file) sounds best of all. So even the best switch/cable is still not perfect. But as I stated in earlier posts, I've bypassed all that cable spaghetti by using a WiFi dongle that connects by WiFi to the broadband router in another room. This dongle's impact on SQ is insignificant compared to say, upgrading the fuse - and I've proven this to myself by unplugging the dongle whilst listening to a local music file - I can't reliably tell the difference. TBH, I do hear differences, but I can't reliably say which one I prefer. For just £26 that must be the bargain of the century. It is possible that once I restart streaming services like Qobuz, I might then notice more clearly what impact this WiFi dongle is having, but in the meantime I really don't care and just enjoy what's in front of me 🙂. Link to comment
Popular Post TheAttorney Posted August 23, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted August 23, 2021 On 8/20/2021 at 7:15 PM, Cacto C said: Hi TheAttorney, Any updates of your experience of MU1? I enjoy reading all yours very much. Regarding power cord upgrades, I decided to save money at this stage by simply upgrading the plugs of my modest ClearerAudio Silverline. In my earlier shoot-out, the ClearerAudio was beaten by the £1k Shunyata Delta V2, but not by such a big margin that justified the cost. The new plugs for my ClearerAudio seem to be going through the longest burn-in period I have ever encountered, so I need a few more days to be sure it's been worth the change. In the meantime, I've been reading with interest the K50 thread at WBF, which had a link to HFA's Christiaan's comparison of MU1 vs Antipodes K50. Plus a June update to HFA's more detailed MU1 review in https://www.hifi-advice.com/blog/review/digital-reviews/network-player-reviews/grimm-mu1/4/ which on page 4 describes recent incremental improvements to series 003 (that I already have). Anyway, on that WBF thread @kennyb123 (a K30 owner I think) gave a list of reasons why MU1 didn't even get to his shortlist: low powered CPU, Roon-only, SMPS, etc. The thing is, I looked at this from a completely different angle by using much the same criteria to give the MU1 a try because I was so intrigued that such seemingly mundane components could add up to a giant-killing performance. Which is only valid if the performance is indeed great, so what did the reviewer say?.... On the video, Christiaan effectively called it a draw, with the MU1 being more neutral/open/transparent/dynamic (yes, even with a low-powered i3 CPU!) and the K50 being more characterful/warmer/relaxed. He maybe should have also pointed out that the K50 costs around 50% more than the MU1 (but does have more features). The more detailed written review seems to pull the MU1 slightly ahead as per this summary on page 3: "I certainly would not have expected it after raving about the K50 relatively recently, but the MU1 has impressed me deeply. It may not offer all of the big Antipodes server’s functionality, but sonically, it takes what the K50 does, which is to sound like music, not clinical computer replay, while further adding to it to provide the best I’ve heard yet from a Music Server!" Anyway, this is not a competition. These and the Statement etc are all great products and we each have our own preferences and we each will be delighted with whatever we choose - it's all good. The purpose of me bringing it up is a reminder not to make judgements based on specifications - wait until you actually hear the product under consideration. In some ways, this is Grimm's biggest hurdle to be accepted in the high-end community. And yes, we all have to make a short list because it's highly impractical to listen to every possible rival. So maybe Kenny has missed out by not hearing the MU1, and maybe I missed out by not hearing the K50, but it doesn't matter as long as we each enjoy whatever we ended up with. Kenkuan and aangen 2 Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted August 23, 2021 Share Posted August 23, 2021 3 hours ago, kennyb123 said: I upscale all my music to 16FS so this would be another reason I’d have to eliminate the Grimm from my shortlist. I think he’s right though that the Grimm might be the better choice for some people. Like if they have an older DAC that accepts only as high as 4S on AES, then this could be a great match. USB is where all the action is happening though on newer DACs (for the most part). I think a server with more options will be more future proof. Being a HMS/DAVE owner, I was also concerned that MU1's 4FS would be at a disadvantage against my existing 16FS. But as described in earlier posts, my concerns were unfounded - 4FS out of MU1 easily beat 16FS out of the HMS. This I think is more to do with the inherent goodness of the MU1 server vs my previous NUC than it has to do with any failure of HMS' up-scaling. The K50 is definitely more flexible, so more future-proof in some ways. However, for my downsizing objective to reduce box count, the built-in DAC option (MU2) coming up next year for MU1 owners will eliminate the digital interface entirely. So it won't matter what FS is used, as I'm sure the designers will choose the best FS for their built-in DAC, without cable limitations. I'm not trying to change your mind or objectives because they all make sense, just again reminding that relying on past experience is fine to a point, but it's also good to be open-minded when coming across a company that doesn't necessarily follow current trends and dares to do things differently. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted August 24, 2021 Share Posted August 24, 2021 The W20SE didn't make my shortlist because it was too expensive and some of its features didn't excite me. Much more a rival for the Statement or K50 than the MU1 I think. I would have tried all of these rivals if it was easy to do, but the best I could find was one dealer who could demo MU1, Statement and Extreme at the same time (although unfortunately the Extreme was away being reviewed on the day I auditioned). However, in the spirit of open-mindedness 😁, I did try PGGB against my HMS into DAVE. And PGGB didn't give me the wow factor that others have experienced, despite using the settings specifically recommended for DAVE. Certainly not enough wow to overcome the high faff factor (for me) of enormous files and RAM-intensive conversions. But others love PGGB so what do I know? This was before I tried MU1 vs Statement at the dealer. I don't think the MU1 is at all suitable for PGGB, which is why I was at an important cross-roads when I tried PGGB - had I loved it I would have gone down a different path (maybe even a K30?). Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted September 7, 2021 Share Posted September 7, 2021 The display panel of my MU1 is showing that a software upgrade is available. Anyone tried this yet? I'm expecting remote control support, but is there anything else? I'm holding off because I don't want to confuse any potential sound changes with the burn-in phase of my power cord connectors upgrade (which have redefined my expectations on how long a component burn-in can take, but after an elapsed 6 weeks, last night I felt I was finally there - I just hope it stays like that now). Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted October 6, 2021 Share Posted October 6, 2021 On 10/3/2021 at 10:44 PM, edwardsean said: All may serious listening is done with locally stored files wavs that are heavily preprocessed for my system. Does the MU1 have built in player software that can access a local drive like the dCS Bartok, or does it depend exclusively on Roon? There's no other app (that's visible), but the MU1 does come with a couple of shared folders (including the music folder used by roon) that are visible on your home network). So you can manually copy files onto the MU1. When I received my demo MU1, I just logged onto the pre-installed roon with my account and used Windows explorer to copy my FLAC and WAV files from the master music folder on my Windows laptop to the shared music folder on MU1. Roon then automatically adds these to its own library (this takes a long time so start with a few files to prove the process). I didn't bother with roon backup and restore to populate MU1. I just copied the music files as above, which means that i did lose any roon-specific metadata that I may have had on my old roon database, but that was minimal so it didn't bother me to rebuild roon database from scratch. Link to comment
TheAttorney Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 On 10/28/2021 at 8:20 PM, FredM said: Important firmware update for MU1 From the Grimm website: “Roon Labs has announced that an update in November demands extra software that was not installed in many Roon servers based on Linux, and this also affects the MU1. I get concerned that SQ may be impacted every time Roon does an update, although the small Roon updates since I got my MU1 have been fine. This upcoming one on November 3rd has every chance of impacting SQ, possibly in a good way as it's claimed to improve performance on Linux. We shall see. FWIW, I felt the SQ of the latest MU1 s/w update resulted in a fractionally smoother/darker presentation. This could just be imagination as I was comparing to the memory of the previous night's listening, and there's no way to return to the previous version to be sure. I couldn't decide if this new presentation was better or worse than before - just slightly different. aangen 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now