Jump to content
daverich4

Chris's Objective/Subjective moat seems one-sided

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

I guess the OP of a thread in the “objective” section can be granted moderator rights to remove off topic content just like any other, but judging by your observation (I haven’t checked myself) they haven’t seen the need to so far, while the discussion hadn’t got so heated as to merit an intervention from CC.

 

Judging by the number of occasions that threads on this site get referenced, it looks like Chris has, in effect, just contracted out “objectivist” participation in AS threads to ASR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Norton said:

I guess the OP of a thread in the “objective” section can be granted moderator rights to remove off topic content just like any other, but judging by your observation (I haven’t checked myself) they haven’t seen the need to so far, while the discussion hadn’t got so heated as to merit an intervention from CC.

 

Judging by the number of occasions that threads on this site get referenced, it looks like Chris has, in effect, just contracted out “objectivist” participation in AS threads to ASR.


I think your analysis is pretty spot on. The back and forth in the objective discussion seems to be measured and to me is way more interesting than the lack of any kind of discussion in the comments section of the article. Hopefully, the disappearance of the members whose idea of a conversation was to “body slam” the person they disagreed with will allow the discussions to be a little less vanilla than they appear to be headed for now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, sandyk said:

Please show me what is inappropriate or technically incorrect in this statement I made, 

 

 Both Alex C and Vortecjr posted additional technical information too, which is necessary in order to have a balanced technical discussion.

 


I never suggested that what you posted was wrong, just pointed out that you were allowed to post a counter argument in an objective thread. And yes, @SuperDad and @Vortecjr did contribute to a BALANCED discussion in an Objective thread, something that is not allowed in a Subjective thread such as the comments section of Austinpops article. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:


Anyone is free to disagree in the comments. If you’ve tried an ER and don’t like it, feel free to express yourself. 
 

 


Nobody own objective information. The individuals you mention aren’t prohibited from offering objective information. 
 

 

 


Excellent. The new sub-forum is a great place for you. Comments that you found informative were hard to come by without the new rules in place. You’d have had to weed through several pages of fighting per comment. 


I apparently didn’t express myself clearly in my initial post as you (and @sandyk) completely missed the point I was trying to make. No reason for me to pursue clarification, it was just my 2 cents. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, sandyk said:

 

DUPLICATE DELETED

 


How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file.

 

PROFILE UPDATED 26-12-2019

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...