Jump to content
IGNORED

This weird trick lowers DAC distortion


mansr

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, mansr said:

I was goofing around with a PCM1794A chip when the idea occurred to me to see what happened if I hit it with some freezer spray. Monitoring with the REW real-time analyser, I gave it a quick blast. The reported THD dropped a little. Another blast lowered it some more. I kept going. The chip got covered in ice crystals. At a temperature of about -25 °C (according to thermal camera), the THD was some 5 dB lower than the starting point.

 

The lesson here is clear. We need silent-running audiophile freezers with stylish looks and convenient cable inlets.

 

Here you go: https://hothardware.com/news/evga-closed-loop-liquid-nitrogen-cooling-system

 

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, esldude said:

I ran across this somewhere else at one time.  My suggestion was to put a peltier like people use on overclocked CPU's onto the DAC chip.  Should do the trick silently if not in an energy efficient manner. 

 

Still requires a radiator and a fan. In amateur astronomy, peltier-cooled CCD chips are a must to reduce noise during a long exposure. The better ones use nitrogen-filled electronics compartment to prevent condensation. Some do use water cooling to remove heat from the hot side of the peltier. Professional cameras usually use liquid nitrogen.

Link to comment
15 minutes ago, PeterSt said:

From close to the past year of "development" (and public forum posts about it) I by now have the proof the other way around: heating up the lot by means of break-in which can be repeated each and every day, deteriorate THD.

 

Heat-up: not measurable by thermal measurement (unless by means of whatever behind the decimal point).

 

Break-in: Just keep the lost under normal playback means and constraint / strength (mimic impedance is tough without sound).

 

So all 'n all, software-wise I have created a repeatable situation (measured on a per day term) that keeping all under the tension of 24/7 payback, deteriorates sound.

The other way around seems obvious indeed. But for me a long shot because e.g. heating up the lot with a föhn, surely does not speed up real breaking-in.

 

 

I have all that stuff laying around and will apply that to the D/A chips readily tomorrow now.

 

FYI (again): I have been testing with this idiocy for almost a year by now (software incurred). So it is high time to apply the opposite.

 

Funny thing is that this afternoon I was discussing the invention of the Warmth Wheel and mentioned Peltier and how it works. Time to have a real application for the latter. Or at least a test of it for the better SQ.


Report the results, Peter! 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...