Original Design Speakers.

[RickyV]

I have have always disliked these speakers.

 

Why? Because the plastic was so thin they resonated al over the place, so looks only.

With speaker design the shape of the speaker has a purpose also the material and sturdiness etc. So for me it it’s form meets function.

 

[RickyV]

34 minutes ago, sphinxsix said:

How about:

 

 

 

or:

 

or (not for depressive music I believe 😞

 

 

 

Spheres are actually a good form, shape, for a speaker. On the outside for defraction and on the inside for standing waves, resonances. But only if the cabinet wall thickness is sufficient.

[RickyV]

35 minutes ago, sphinxsix said:

How about:

 

 

 

or:

 

or (not for depressive music I believe 😞

 

 

 

 

First pic:

In case of form meets function, I like the first one. Nice point source MTM configuration. Narrow at the tweeter, wider at the mids. Never the same distance from the middle of the driver to the edge of the cabinet. Mmmm not sure of the time alignment of the woofer.

 

Second pic:

Nice point source coaxial driver raindrop shape cabinet.

Third pic:

Probably crap, driver time alignment, un sturdy hinges, thin plastic, distance from tweeter to mid to big. Spheres are good.

 

 

[RickyV]

 Nice, although I don’t speak French. 
You see than with one of the older models they lowered the tweeter into the sphere mid cabinet to schorten the difference. It depends on the wavelength, from mid to woofer is not so problematic.

[RickyV]

😁 shorten, I meant......... ... .. of course.

 

And schorten means aprons in dutch 🙄

[RickyV]

And look like,

 

[RickyV]

Are those “The angry speakers” 😀