CPU Load and Sound Quality

[marce]

6 hours ago, sandyk said:

 

 

So what ? I have been a member here for more than 10 years

Ralf 11 from your know-it-all side has been here only 3 years and has 12,453 posts already. 

 That's more than 3 times my post rate !

oooooh tetchy....😊

[marce]

6 hours ago, sandyk said:

 

 

 

 from your know-it-all side

Whens half term over....

[kumakuma]

1 hour ago, marce said:

Whens half term over....

 

???

[marce]

59 minutes ago, kumakuma said:

 

???

It's a UK school holiday, one of many...😀

[marce]

And yes I am also being rather childish... Consider me grounded.

[Ralf11]

floating ground, or ??

[Ralf11]

and BTW what sort of %^&*() pays attention to post count???

[christopher3393]

7 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

and BTW what sort of %^&*() pays attention to post count???

 

10 hours ago, marce said:

>14,000 posts! 😂

 

 

[sandyk]

5 hours ago, marce said:

oooooh tetchy....😊

 

No. You got back exactly what you deserved.

It was blatantly obvious that you weren't congratulating me on reaching that number of posts over a more than 10 year period.

[marce]

12 hours ago, christopher3393 said:

 

 

 

Consider yourself Entreqed...

[marce]

10 hours ago, sandyk said:

 

No. You got back exactly what you deserved.

It was blatantly obvious that you weren't congratulating me on reaching that number of posts over a more than 10 year period.

No, correct, its called humour. It's about not taking it so serious all the time...

[sandyk]

1 hour ago, marce said:

No, correct, its called humour. It's about not taking it so serious all the time...

 

I don't find anything humorous in posts like that, knowing how you and several other closed minded participants in this thread, and other threads in the General Forum area really feel about virtually all of my posts in this forum. 

[mansr]

2 hours ago, sandyk said:

I don't find anything humorous in posts like that, knowing how you and several other closed minded participants in this thread, and other threads in the General Forum area really feel about virtually all of my posts in this forum. 

There's an easy way for you to change that.

[marce]

3 hours ago, sandyk said:

 

I don't find anything humorous in posts like that, knowing how you and several other closed minded participants in this thread, and other threads in the General Forum area really feel about virtually all of my posts in this forum. 

Maybe if you backed off a bit with the constant outrage and chilled out a bit, after all as Nelson Pass says about audio, its only entertainment...

[kumakuma]

8 hours ago, sandyk said:

 

I don't find anything humorous in posts like that, knowing how you and several other closed minded participants in this thread, and other threads in the General Forum area really feel about virtually all of my posts in this forum. 

 

Your use of the insult "closed minded participants" in your post suggests that you believe folks here are responding primarily to the content of your posts.

 

This is an assumption that you may wish to reconsider in the interest dialing back the noise level on this forum.

[Ralf11]

a "closed minded participant" is anyone who doesn't agree with crazy ideas that violate known laws of physics

[Blackmorec]

 

32 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

a "closed minded participant" is anyone who doesn't agree with crazy ideas that violate known laws of physics

I’d be really interested to hear which laws of physics are violated by the following:

• Interconnecting cables whose sound differs from one another
• USB cables whose sound differs from one another
• Vibration control of electronics and transport
• Removal of LF and HF noise
• Sound that changes during the first 100 hours of operation of newly manufactured components.

So here you go Ralf. Here’s your opportunity to switch gears and get scientific and factual....have at it  

 

[kumakuma]

1 minute ago, Blackmorec said:

 

I’d be really interested to hear which laws of physics are violated by the following:

• Interconnecting cables whose sound differs from one another
• USB cables whose sound differs from one another
• Vibration control of electronics and transport
• Removal of LF and HF noise
• Sound that changes during the first 100 hours of operation of newly manufactured components.

So here you go Ralf. Here’s your opportunity to switch gears and get scientific and factual....have at it  

 

 

I'm pretty sure that Ralf was referring to Alex's beliefs in regards to bit-identical files, AKA the "third rail" of Audiophile Style.

[marce]

26 minutes ago, Blackmorec said:

 

I’d be really interested to hear which laws of physics are violated by the following:

• Interconnecting cables whose sound differs from one another
• USB cables whose sound differs from one another
• Vibration control of electronics and transport
• Removal of LF and HF noise
• Sound that changes during the first 100 hours of operation of newly manufactured components.

So here you go Ralf. Here’s your opportunity to switch gears and get scientific and factual....have at it  

 

All discussed before, ad nauseam, if the reality of the physical universe does not fit your audiophile beliefs it will be dismissed. No point going round in circles, maybe a new thread to discuss the reality of audio.

[Ralf11]

yes, but blackmo is another anti-science poster

 

if Interconnecting cables sound different you have really effed up somewhere

[Ralf11]

Just now, marce said:

All discussed before, ad nauseam, if the reality of the physical universe does not fit your audiophile beliefs it will be dismissed. No point going round in circles, maybe a new thread to discuss the reality of audio.

 

yes, ad nauseam

 

try teaching evolution to a quick creationist sometime - very similar

[Blackmorec]

Hmmm, ducking and diving aplenty, but so far no physics. Cumon guys, you can do better than this. Surely? Which known laws of physics are violated and how? 

I’ll tell you what’s been said ad nauseum is that audiophile ideas violate the known laws of physics. I’ve given you five classical audiophile ideas.....all I’m asking you to do is match them up with the laws they violate and explain why or how. 

 

[kumakuma]

Just now, Blackmorec said:

 

all I’m asking you to do is match them up with the laws they violate and explain why or how. 

 

 

Even if Ralf or someone else went to the trouble of doing this, would it change your mind in any way?

[sandyk]

9 hours ago, mansr said:

There's an easy way for you to change that.

 

 Put the know-it-alls like yourself on IGNORE may be the best way, however I will never back down to your demands, because you are ANTI Audiophile, and treat reports from even other highly qualified E.E.s such as John Swenson with contempt and refer to their designs as Snake Oil.

 You are attempting to turn this forum into a sub branch of Hydrogen Audio where Subjective reports are not permitted !

 

[sandyk]

47 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

yes, but blackmo is another anti-science poster

 

if Interconnecting cables sound different you have really effed up somewhere

 That is utter BS.

Neither Blackmorec or myself are Anti Science. We are against Outdated or plain incorrect scientific information, even in such areas as the currently accepted minimum audible differences in dB.  Highly qualified E.E. John Dyson and others like myself working with John in his Dolby A S/W project are currently reliably perceiving audible differences in the order of a fraction of 1 Decibel !