The Environmental thread + Conventional (HI-FI) wisdom is almost always invariably wrong

[shtf]

On 5/26/2019 at 4:54 AM, daverich4 said:

 

In other words:

Most people who listen to my demonstrations are ignorant and so profoundly riddled with cognitive biases, that they are totally unable to recognize the awesome sound of the system I put together. 

 

Of course, Peter Djordjevic could only possibly be talking about people in other galaxies, right?   

 

Peters article was right on the money in perhaps every major point.  It would serve all of us well to study and grasp the various points Peter is trying to convey.  Because it is this very same "conventional wisdom" as he puts it that among other things has kept the entire industry far closer to its infancy from a performance perspective.

[shtf]

5 hours ago, esldude said:

Yes, I've read a few of the bits of DoD literature.  Always funny to have a Republican administration denying global warming is a thing while its military is planning for exactly that. 

 

Is it mere coincidence that the "the environment" topic and the "conventional wisdom is usually wrong" topic were combined into a single thread?   It makes sense to me since "global warming" er, ummm, "climate change" has been perhaps the most expensive hoax ever perpetrated on mankind.  In fact, on a relative scale and a few drinks under my belt, I could easily equate MQA and high-end audio with Global Warming and the world.

 

Perhaps you should try researching who first invented the global warming concept and when, why they invented it, and why and when they ceased using the term global warming in favor of climate change.

 

Here's a partial hint.  Google "climategate" and you'll see how some "scientists" were caught helping to perpetuate this hoax.

 

Be very leery / wary of conventional wisdom as it "is almost always invariably wrong".  Wherever you find it.  Isn't that the real point of this thread?

 

 

 

[shtf]

10 minutes ago, esldude said:

So are you saying the global warming concept was invented in the early 2000's?   Or the early 1990's?  And why pray tell was it invented?

 

Interesting.  You laugh at my post and then ask questions.  It would seem you didn't bother to first perform the simple google search I suggested.

 

Why should I answer these new questions?  Haven't you already made up your mind?  

 

I say, why let facts get in the way of your conventional wisdom?

[shtf]

1 hour ago, esldude said:

...

Climategate is presumably about the hacked emails in what 2008 and 2009 from climate researchers.

...

 

 

Now that's funny.  You won't even iterate what really happened as a result of climategate, i.e. what data and directives the several thousand hacked emails contained.  Nothing quite like an incomplete sentence or thought to perpetuate your false narrative i.e. conventional wisdom, eh?  

 

The reality is that Climategate is about the fact that Russians hacked into the Climate Research Unit's (a UN funded institution) email system and exposed to apparently only those with ears to hear how these scientists at the CRU were taking global cooling data and replacing it with global warming data over extended periods of time like years. 

 

And though the director of the CRU (a "scientist") was fired, it was not for perpetuating this hoax as they continue perpetuating this hoax to this day but rather they needed a scape goat.  And it was within weeks of this exposure that they ceased using the term "global warming" and have since used the term "climate change". 

 

In fact, this incident occurred just 1 week prior to some global summit in Copenhagen where Obama was to deliver a big speech on global warming but as a result of this incident, it was taken out of his speech which in itself is evidence of another topic.  But I digress.

 

Besides climategate substantiating my claims about global warming being a huge hoax, it also demonstrates that those in the scientific community are potentially just as corrupt as any other community.  Maybe more so.

 

Sorry to reign on your conventional wisdom parade.     Would you like to bet I'm right about the rest of global warming too?

 

Hint.  It was started in the 70's in Rome while somebody was on vacation there.

 

 

[shtf]

Before some of you get too worked up over Greta's angry speech, why not spend some time reading up on Club of Rome?  If you do, you should discover that it was David Rockefeller (the grand daddy of US globalism) and his globalist buddies who in I think 1978 at Rockefeller's vacation home in Rome conceived of the idea of creating a global crisis that the entire world could rally around and contribute their resources to.  They called it Global Warming.  If you do your research there, you should easily discover why they did it (it ain't pretty) and why some of you are evidence that their strategy is working rather well.

 

Maybe then you can fast forward to 2009 and google ClimateGate and there you should discover that some of you have been duped for decades (by scientists no less) and there you'll also discover why overnight they ceased using the phrase Global Warming and now use the phrase Climate Change.

 

And if you think all this is joke, why not spend a few moments to research what some of the globalists' ultimate goals are.  Try googling Georgia Guidestones and there you'll see in 10 languages the globalists 10 tenets / suggestions for mother earth.

 

I know, I know.  Some of you are thinking I'm just another nutty conspiracy theorist but that's not true at all.  I'm just smarter than some of you. 

[shtf]

9 hours ago, firedog said:

 

Comparing her to Nazis is just sick and puerile. She's blonde, because a lot of people in that area of the world are. And she has pigtail braids: just like millions of girls all over the world - before the Nazis ever existed. 

 

As far as your globalist conspiracy theories, I was waiting for you to blame it on Soros and the Jews. But what a relief that you are such a smart guy that you didn't do that. 

 

 

It's nonsensical that you think I somehow was comparing Greta to Nazis.  I was merely illustrating how perverted governments and globalists use similar tools to promote their propaganda.  See below.  Perhaps I could have substititued your charicature in place of Greta's but I don't have one.  Please send me one.

 

In case you're unaware, one of the Third Reich's many strategies was first indoctrinate the women, then the children, and the men will follow.  Have you noticed in recent weeks all the children protesting climate change?  If you wanna' follow the leadership of a brainwashed / indoctrinated 16-year old  girl with autism, that is your choice. 

 

As for George Soros, yes, to the best of my knowledge he's a major player in this new world order / globalist movement.  Far more engaged than even somebody like David Rockefeller, if that were even possible.  But he's still a puppet.  As for jews, not sure why you bring them up, except that Soros himself is jewish and was a traitor to his own. 

 

What are you insinuating?  That Soros doesn't exist?  That he's not a globalist or that he's not caused great damage to the US and to other nations?  That globalism is good thing led by those who care about you and your family?

 

It's been said that condemnation without investigation gives clear evidence of indoctrination and I'd venture you've substatiated that with your response here.  Then again, if all of your news comes from NPR and mainstream media, well, that's still a choice you made long ago and you have only yourself to blame. 

 

Speaking of which, feel free to research operation mockingbird that was started in the 1950's and continues to this day.  Or since you don't seem too keen on research maybe you can learn something from this 43 sec excerpt of a speech David Rockefeller gave at the Council on Foreign Relations back in 1991.  That could give you some insight.  Unless of course you think the CFR itself is a branch of gov't including a group of really nice people who have your best interest in mind. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZD7pDPK7N8

 

[shtf]

8 minutes ago, Jud said:

 

This libel against a child in the hands of monsters is repeated only by insufferable fools. I don't have the time to bother with such people. On the ignore list you go.

 

Ummmm.  Greta herself admits she has Aspergers which is a variation of autism and is nothing to make fun of.

 

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/greta-thunberg-is-facing-attacks-over-her-aspergers-but-heres-why-companies-want-to-hire-people-on-the-autism-spectrum-2019-09-25

 

Then again, NPR won't tell you that.  Among the many other things they won't tell you.

 

Hey, did I mention that condemnation without investigation is indoctrination?  I'm pretty sure I already said it but I'm guessing you missed it.