Popular Post Nordkapp Posted April 12, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 12, 2019 6 minutes ago, Axial said: What would be the perfect name/title in your opinion for this special community here and abroad...everywhere where music lovers are walking this Earth and beyond (in space, by planes, private jets, by trains, by automobiles, by transit buses, metros, suspended tramways, bicycles, boats, jogging, walking, canoeing, skiing, ...@ home in front of the télé, computer screen, dedicated hi-fi stereo room, surround sound system setup, SSSS, ...)? Meanoldaudiophilesarguingonlinealldaylong Style Superdad, christopher3393 and AudioDoctor 3 Link to comment
MetalNuts Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 I am indifferent to the name, be it Computer Audiophile or Audiophile Style. It is just a name. If the owner of the forum cannot choose the name for his forum, then why should the members are allowed to choose his/her own user name. Is it a double standard again? MetalNuts Link to comment
crenca Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 This place is a sweet smelling rose, and would be by any other name. Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math! Link to comment
Axial Posted April 12, 2019 Share Posted April 12, 2019 Audio forums are like computers; they do require updates once in a while, and a new refresh start in safe mode. Audiophiles are sound explorers; they test new gear, new cables, new electric junction boxes, new fuses, tubes, tweaks, fine-tuning and asimuth adjustment, proper balance level, volume control, acoustic room treatments, power chords, etc. Some are even music collectors (tapes, LPs, CDs), others expand their music server library. We keep buying the same album (DSOTM) over and over to get the best version (multichannel) and the best format (tape). ...Even the best pressing (LP from Germany and Japan). Computer audiophiles are not material physical people; they are interactive cyber space audiophiles with a spiritual audio philosophy (DAC implementation and FLAC). Computer audiophiles encompasse digital audio. Style audiophiles encompasse both digital and analog audio. It's not black & white because computer audiophiles (some) use CD/SACD HYBRID Universel 4K Blu-ray players (Pure Audio BR format included). Plus, computer audiophiles (some) use a screen display to view and listen to music video concerts recorded live (ballets, operas, symphonies, rock concerts, amphitheater shows, cathedral/church chorales and organs). ...Bach, Beethoven, Botticelli and all...even Coltrane, Davis and Amadeus. Teresa 1 Sound Matters Link to comment
PeterSt Posted April 27, 2019 Share Posted April 27, 2019 ? 4est 1 Lush^3-e Lush^2 Blaxius^2.5 Ethernet^3 HDMI^2 XLR^2 XXHighEnd (developer) Phasure NOS1 24/768 Async USB DAC (manufacturer) Phasure Mach III Audio PC with Linear PSU (manufacturer) Orelino & Orelo MKII Speakers (designer/supplier) Link to comment
Popular Post One and a half Posted April 27, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted April 27, 2019 does a subscription to Audiophilestyle.com remove that red eyesore superphonica banner? lucretius, Ralf11, esldude and 1 other 2 1 1 AS Profile Equipment List Say NO to MQA Link to comment
esldude Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 Maybe this is better something like a gold color. Either that or why not have it flash rapidly between this and red. That way it would be even more noticeable as an eyesore. Of course when it was CA having the unfilled CA was a nice touch at the end. So maybe it needs a name change too. Superphonistyle lucretius 1 And always keep in mind: Cognitive biases, like seeing optical illusions are a sign of a normally functioning brain. We all have them, it’s nothing to be ashamed about, but it is something that affects our objective evaluation of reality. Link to comment
Paul R Posted April 30, 2019 Share Posted April 30, 2019 55 minutes ago, esldude said: Maybe this is better something like a gold color. Either that or why not have it flash rapidly between this and red. That way it would be even more noticeable as an eyesore. Of course when it was CA having the unfilled CA was a nice touch at the end. So maybe it needs a name change too. Superphonistyle Really cold dude- like liquid hydrogen cold.... esldude 1 Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
Summit Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 I think that we should embrace the success passion associated to MQA as well as attract new generations of audiophiles. I wherefore suggest a name change of this site to the more contemporary sounding: Millennial Quality Audiophiles 🤩 esldude 1 Link to comment
Summit Posted May 4, 2019 Share Posted May 4, 2019 I admit MQA may not be super attractive after all, but what about: Splendid Audio - SA Splendid Audio Sense - SAS Audiophile Insight - AI Link to comment
christopher3393 Posted May 4, 2019 Share Posted May 4, 2019 TECHNOPHILIAC AUDIO SMACK TAS Link to comment
jriver Posted June 25, 2019 Share Posted June 25, 2019 On 4/11/2019 at 9:47 PM, Axial said: Audiophiles are sound explorers; they test new gear, new cables, new electric junction boxes, new fuses, tubes, tweaks, fine-tuning and asimuth adjustment, proper balance level, volume control, acoustic room treatments, power chords, etc. Audiophiles are people who love music. The rest you describe can generate a lot of noise. Jim Hillegass / JRiver Media Center / jriver.com Link to comment
Axial Posted June 30, 2019 Share Posted June 30, 2019 Yes, music first and azimuth next. Sound Matters Link to comment
Popular Post extracampine Posted September 4, 2019 Author Popular Post Share Posted September 4, 2019 The problem here is the use of the term "style". This term serves to make our hobby sound superficial, image-oriented and somewhat ostentatious. The obvious connotation is to fashion - image-obsessed and transient. The use of this term here would seem to undermine the purpose of this site - taking the focus away from an approach based in science, electronics or computers and reinforcing the image of audiophiles being concerned with "style over substance". Ralf11, esldude and fas42 3 There are 2 types of people in this world - those who understand binary and those who don't. Link to comment
rando Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 @extracampine Go chase Kingmaker Darko around an audio show. The attempt at flattery in the site name doubles as insulation from unkind assessments in other quarters. I'm pretty sure neither of us are the intended target being gathered under the tent. "AS" certainly has an element of Paul Allen hobnobbing with rockstars in his later, not younger years. Link to comment
Samuel T Cogley Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 1 hour ago, extracampine said: The problem here is the use of the term "style". This term serves to make our hobby sound superficial, image-oriented and somewhat ostentatious. Audiophilia can be just that to some. Just have a look here and see how many times you encounter the word "style" in not only the marketing copy, but also the "articles". And besides, "style" rhymes with "audiophile". You didn't notice that? 🙂 Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted September 4, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 4, 2019 29 minutes ago, Samuel T Cogley said: And besides, "style" rhymes with "audiophile". You didn't notice that? 🙂 He could have called it Audiophool Stool. Teresa, Ralf11, Samuel T Cogley and 4 others 1 6 Link to comment
accwai Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 2 hours ago, extracampine said: The problem here is the use of the term "style". This term serves to make our hobby sound superficial, image-oriented and somewhat ostentatious. The obvious connotation is to fashion - image-obsessed and transient. The use of this term here would seem to undermine the purpose of this site - taking the focus away from an approach based in science, electronics or computers and reinforcing the image of audiophiles being concerned with "style over substance". Audio Science Substance has already been proposed before Link to comment
rando Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 23 minutes ago, accwai said: Audio Science Substance has already been proposed before Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 How about <glyph> it would also serve as an homage to another Minnesotan Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 I think Audiophile Style is just fine, but we need a tag line... I propose.. "We're not Minnesota nice, and we'll prove it! edit: @The Computer Audiophile this isn't to say you're not nice, you are, just a general commentary... The Computer Audiophile 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 Minnesota spice The Computer Audiophile 1 Link to comment
AudioDoctor Posted September 4, 2019 Share Posted September 4, 2019 If you guys all lived in MN, you could be outside on your deck, BBQing dinner, enjoying the beautiful sunny 68 degrees and low humidity, and arguing about audio wouldn't seem so important... The Computer Audiophile 1 No electron left behind. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now