Jump to content

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, wgscott said:

I recall @4est saying something like this at one time.  (Apologies if that is wrong.)

Well sort of. All I assume I was getting at is some things are easier to discern because of averaging. Overall intelligibility, frequency balance and PRaT for example. It should draw you in even from another room. If it doesn't you likely have issues IME.

Forrest:

Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA

DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP>

Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Cornan said:

Don’t get me wrong. The SQ always gets better in the dead center of the speakers, but the evaluation process is just easier to determine outside the triangle.

 

Since this is an honest question I would appreciate honest replies! ?

 

And then if I might elaborate, we are not wowed by the system forgiving other faults due the the spectacularity of change.

Forrest:

Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA

DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP>

Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...