Jump to content
IGNORED

High quality power supplies for single board computers


Recommended Posts

I can make power supplies optimized specifically for these types of loads, with standard leading low noise and output impedance.

But, I would caution folks to understand that one is never going to get the best performance for audio by using the commercial computer gears suggested here.  Even with an ultra low noise pre-regulated supply, these boards are going to have noisy DC/DC switching regulators onboard, so they are going to make a lot of noise on the board.

Higher performance solutions are available, built for audio purposes, which do not use noisy DC/DC converters.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
1 hour ago, rikhav said:

 

Do laptops have same noisy dc/dc converters ?

If yes then what would kind of computer would be best for audio for someone who can't spend big bucks on music servers or likes of it 

Yes.  All commercial computers are built to compete in very competitive markets and to the lowest possible price point.  And all computers need various voltages at the main board level.  To get these different voltages they use switching DC/DC converters (regulators) at the board level.  this is especially the case wit laptops, as switching converters are more efficient than linear ones, and battery life is a very big consideration for laptop makers.  The commercial computer companies will do whatever is most affordable and still able to work (and pass EMI emissions standards), they have no reason to use more expensive, ultra low noise linear regulators as they are not building computer products for the bets possible audio quality.

 

This is why we have high end music servers and Ethernet Renderers, to overcome the limitations of standard commercial computers.  (But even most "high end" servers still use an off the shelf motherboard with noisy DC/DC converters on board as it is too expensive for most high companies to invest enough R and D into developing their own MoBo).

 

The most affordable solution to get the best possible sound at the lowest price would be to use an affordable Ethernet Renderer (like the Sonore microRendu) combined with ordinary commercial computer gear you already own.  the microRendu then provides a good deal of noise isolation from the computer and feeds the DAC a very low noise, very clean USB stream.  Be sure to place the noisy commercial computer gear well away (in another room) from the audio gear.

 

Putting an expensive power supply on a commercial computer product can help, but it is a kind of backwards approach, like putting a band aid on a fractured leg.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
11 hours ago, nbpf said:

Good point but I am not aware of currently available S/PDIF server or network renderer solutions that are designed to match or exceed the performance of the DigiOne. If I am overseeing some products, please let me know! Of course, we do have excellent network renderers and, lately, servers with USB outputs. But these devices need to be complemented with USB to S/PDIF interfaces in order to deliver S/PDIF streams. The quality of the results depends then crucially on the quality of the interface and of its power supply! Other major limitations of currently available devices built for audio purposes are their very limited customizability and the lack of certifications for publicly available operating systems: many users would not mind investing in high performance servers built for audio purposes if they knew that, beside running the manufacturer's proprietary OS, these devices can also boot a standard Linux distribution. For users that need S/PDIF outputs and/or some control and customization options, commercial SBCs and dedicated interfaces like the ones mentioned in my original post are, if not optimal, at least viable solutions.

There are High End Ethernet Renderers which include SPIDF output: Like Bricasti and dCS, and Sonore used to make the Sonore Signature Rendu which is a superb SPDIF source if you can find one on the used market.  Both of these will easily outperform ordinary commercial computer solutions like Allo, etc.

 

Additionally, SPDIF basically sucks, but that is another topic...  It is too bad that some DACs do not put a well engineered USB input in their DAC... especially now as the way to do it is fairly well understood.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, nbpf said:

Agree but ... what can you do? There are some good old DACs that have S/PDIF inputs ...

Agreed, if you must use SPDIF then use one of the Renderers which has a SPDIF output, or use a good USB-SPDIF converter.  The converter, if well designed, offers the additional advantage of another stage of noise isolation (for example the Sonore ultraDigital is isolated between USB receiver section and SPIDF output), and the converter also performs a s a re-clocker.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, chauphuong said:

Is it true that Sotm SMS 200 still uses switching dc-dc converter?

You would have to ask SOtM about that...

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
58 minutes ago, nbpf said:

DAC apparently overrides the clocking of the SPDIF stream with its internal clocks before this enters the DSP and DAC stages

I doubt that is the case with your DAC.  Even if it internally resamples the data to the DAC clock, it still has to reconcile the DAC clock with the SPDIF clock.  Typically this is done with a PLL, and these circuits effectively couple the incoming SPDIF jitter to the DAC clock.  This is different form async USB, where the DAC clock can be the true master and does not have to sync with any incoming clock (because async USB is two way, and the rate the data is being sent can be adjusted by the DAC).

 

There are some DACs with fully async SPDIF receivers, but they are very rare.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
7 minutes ago, hopkins said:

 

If the DAC is not using the 5v does that change anything? 

No.  Having a really clean, low noise, USB data stream is still just as important.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, hopkins said:

 

Thanks for your reply. I would assume having a self-powered DAC would probably still help (assuming the power supply within the DAC is good). 

 

One more question, aside for the voltage regulators within the PC doesn't the processors themselves generate noise? In that sense, why would a Microrendu, or any SBC, behave any differently than a regular Mac/PC? 

Yes, absolutely, the processors generate a lot of high frequency noise.  Also, the more powerful the processor, the more noise they make.  In the case of the Sonore Rendu products, the processor is chosen such that it has the lowest possible noise footprint (by using a specially selected processor and by using one with just enough power to do the job).  A general purpose computer will use a much more powerful processor, as it has to be able to do much more than what is required just to serve music files from Ethernet.  So in a purpose built design you can tailor the processor to be just sufficient for the task at hand.  Additionally, by taking care of all the power supply details (using ultra low noise linear regulators and multiple power supply rails) the processor noise is kept contained (for the most part) and not allowed to propagate to the rest of the circuitry (example: each section of the circuit has its own dedicated ultra low noise linear regulator, providing circuit isolation from the different sections).  As commercial computer builders are not building in order to produce high end sound, they only do the minimum necessary to make a computer work and pass EMI standards.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment

Linux is a very flexible computing platform.  Really, the OS used for our (Sonore) products, and most Linux based servers as well, is as you describe: designed from the ground up for audio purposes.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment
1 hour ago, nbpf said:

I'll have then to get one of those expensive beasts, I'm afraid! I have not mentioned the LPS1.2 because it appears to be limited to 1.1A. That should not be enough for a Raspberry Pi 3B+ with DigiOne and  HDD. Thanks for sharing your findings! 

I would not recommend using a single power supply for multiple components if your goal is best performance, as this just shares the noise from one component to the next.  SBooster linear supplies are good performers at less cost.  "Best" power supplies are going to cost some $$ though, no way around that: still do not spend a bunch of money on an expensive supply and then share it amongst multiple components, as that just defeats the purpose.

SO/ROON/HQPe: DSD 512-Sonore opticalModuleDeluxe-Signature Rendu optical with Well Tempered Clock--DIY DSC-2 DAC with SC Pure Clock--DIY Purifi Amplifier-Focus Audio FS888 speakers-JL E 112 sub-Nordost Tyr USB, DIY EventHorizon AC cables, Iconoclast XLR & speaker cables, Synergistic Purple Fuses, Spacetime system clarifiers.  ISOAcoustics Oreas footers.                                                       

                                                                                           SONORE computer audio

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...