Jump to content
IGNORED

EtherREGEN: The long development thread. [Some Gen2 dev. pics and update starting on page 92.]


Recommended Posts

  • Superdad changed the title to EtherREGEN: Early general details [We are late but getting closer! ;-)]
  • 2 weeks later...
1 hour ago, jos said:

Thanks, but I was meaning the additional staterskit with the switch inside.

 

It’s been mentioned several times, it’s the TRENDnet TEG-S51SFP which one can buy at any shop for cheap. The starter kit with switch, fiber optic cable and SFP module is just there to take out the guess work for people who are computer illiterate but still want to venture beyond their simple CD players. ;) 

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...

What many call modems are often bridges. What many call routers are are often bridge, switch, WiFi accesspoint and router all-in-ones. Some call the all-in-one routers modems etc. Complete chaos! :)

 

In a nutshell (and not 100% correct let alone complete which is not the point here):

Bridge: to ‘bridge’ data from one type of network to an other e.g. cable/DSL to ethernet (layer 1+2)

Switch: to transfer ethernet frames from one port on that switch to an other (layer 2)

Router: to transfer IP packets from one network segment or subnet to an other (layer 3)

 

You’ll need a router for Internet communications but not necessarily for a home network if all your devices are in one segment/subnet (e.g. 192.168.1.0/24).

 

You’ll need a switch if you want more than two devices communicating with each other in a (‘hub and spoke’) network.

 

You’ll need a WiFi accesspoint if you want to connect a device to your ethernet network using radio. Most WiFi routers (with built in switches and/or WAN-LAN routers and sometimes ‘modems’) can also be purely used as access points.

 

One can connect multiple switches together, if the devices connected to those switches are operating in the same network segment/subnet, as long as one doesn’t create loops.

 

Link to comment
12 minutes ago, DelsFan said:

My preference would be for my streamer to NOT be part of the network in any way.

 

Why? If you want it to have Internet access for Tidal and want to control it using an iPad/laptop you’ll need to make it a part of your network.

 

Of course you could configure a more advanced network using multiple subnets and thus -logically- separate your streamer from other devices. They all need to come together though at the same router/modem which connects your home to the Internet. If you don;t want that you’ll need an additional cable/DSL/fiber connection in your home. ;)

 

If you want to ‘isolate’ your streamer from your network or better said provide it with an ethernet signal with optimal signal integrity get the etherREGEN and connect the streamer to the isolated port and one of the other etherREGEN ports to any other switch in your home network.

Link to comment

@DelsFan, I think you take the ‘isolation’ part too literal. The purpose of the etherREGEN is to provide devices the best quality ethernet connection Uptone knows. Since it is a network consisting of multiple devices full isolation is not what we want since then it is no longer a network. We need those devices communicating with each other and through our Internet router/modem with the Internet. Your iPad is most probably communicating with your streamer using WiFI and your streamer has access to the Internet for Tidal.

 

So in your case I’d forget the word isolation and just think about what you want from a functional viewpoint. I’m thinking you want to keep everything as it is right now since it works like you want but also want to increase the sound quality of your streamer by optimizing it’s connection to your network. That’s what the etherREGEN is designed to do.

 

The etherREGEN is a switch and you can connect multiple switches together. So you can connect the etherREGEN to any other switch (a device with say three, four or more ethernet ports) in your home. It’s also possible to take the ethernet cable from your streamer (or is it using WiFi?) and plug that into the etherREGEN and add a new cable which you connect to the isolated port on the etherREGEN and your streamer.

 

So no need to get additional Internet connections into your home or physically or logically separate networks. It’s an add-in solution.

 

——

NB. There’s Uptone with the etherREGEN but to be fair there’s also Sonore which has a different solution which they say is effective as well. They create fully galvanically isolated network connections using fiber optic cables (still ethernet) and their ‘opticalModule’. That’s different from what’s discussed above or in this topic. What’ll be the best sounding solution will differ from case to case and may differ as well when compared in the same situation. Time will tell what’ll be the best solution.

 

 

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...
15 hours ago, DelsFan said:

Sadly I'm not a networking person, so I have a question.  I use my iPad as a "remote control" for my DMS-500 Streamer - the iPad communicates with the Streamer via the wireless network.  I was hoping to isolate "everything" from the Streamer (to the extent of: I considered a "dedicated" internet supply with its own modem that serviced nothing but the Streamer) but it seems that isn't possible.

 

However, it seems I need to utilize the wireless network in order to use the Streamer (with the iPad, because using the Streamer's remote is cumbersome).  Will the EtherREGEN, used as shown in the diagram below, allow the wireless router (and the iPad) to talk to the Streamer?  I guess my question is: will the wireless router allow communication back "out" through its Ethernet "In" port?  Thanks very much for your assistance; if I need to go another direction I might as well start thinking about it now! 

 

I guess plan B would be to place the wireless router between the Modem and the EtherREGEN ?  Coming from an analog background, my instinct is to keep everything possible out of the path between the Modem and the Streamer!  Thus the layout shown in the diagram below, where the path from the box on the side of my house to the Streamer is as direct as possible.

 

 

 

Schematic

 

 

 

Hi Delsfan, this setup will absolutely work but you can view any ethernet port as both in and output port. You may confuse the single separate clock domain ‘isolated’ port on the etherregen as an out port as that port is advised to be connected to the ethernet device closest to your DAC. Functionally though it’ll operate as any other port on an etherregen or any other switch.

Link to comment

Regarding @DelsFan’s question, I had been assuming the modem is also the Internet router (and firewall, switch). In my country this is near to 100% the case. If not Lmitche is right and this won’t work. If it’s really just a modem bridging cable to ethernet than absolutely the router has to come directly ‘behind’ the modem.

 

I remember similar questions perhaps it was you (delsfan) too. It’s quite difficult to advise online when not knowing what function each device has. Perhaps it’s easiest to get someone over or open a separate topic specifiying in detail the types of devices you have, what functions they perform and how they’re connected now.

 

Communications between wireless devices and wired devices are not subject to filtering/security when the wireless router is in the same network/subnet as the switches for the wired network. So there has to be an ethernet link between the wireless router (LAN) and the switches.

Link to comment
  • Superdad changed the title to EtherREGEN: We are in final beta; About to enter production!
5 minutes ago, Superdad said:

Here is a typical post that appears--oddly from another small manufacturer--over on a "science-based" forum, in a thread devoted to attacking the whole concept of the EtherREGEN, or anything related to improvements in this realm


That, I guess, same small manufacturer (who is now on my “never buy anything from”-list :D) is writing the same rubbish on the AU/NZ edition of the Stereonet Forum.. :(

Link to comment
  • 3 weeks later...

@octaviars, it appears you may have read the thread below in which power saving features were mentioned by Miska as a good thing for SQ. I’d like to add here that most tuning/optimization guides I’ve read for DAW’s and music servers/streamers suggest to disable power saving features of the NIC. It could as well be a good thing if these features are not enabled in the etherREGEN.

 

For me it’s almost a ‘pity’ the etherREGEN is unmanaged when it has the feature to be managed (I love to tweak a bit :)) but of course I can understand Uptone Audio’s decision here.

 

Link to comment
11 hours ago, Ehsu said:

Hi John;

 

Thanks for sharing your deep knowledge here. I am wondering if better shielded copper LAN cables upstream into A side makes EtherRegen's job easier?

The logic here is that EtherRegen would have an easier job to filter out all the noise if there is less noise RF etc.. got into A side cables. If the answer is yes to my logic above, then wouldn't it improve sound quality further at outputs?

 

Cheers

 

Eddie


I *think* John answered that here :)

 

 

 

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Ehsu said:

 

@Dutch Exactly why I asked the question because John Swenson said the purpose of the ER is to " greatly reduce effects from upstream system" so I was wondering wouldnt it be better off to have " less " noise upstream for EtherRegen to deal with? Say ER can reduce 90% of noise from upstream but imagine if your upstream system generate much less noise to begin with.... 

 


I understand, did not know if you read that post.
 

And yes, if something is not fully blocked (like EM noise when using fiber optics) the next best thing is attenuation. So, you’re right if it reduces noise by say 60dB it’s still not zero and the outcome is better when there’s less noise to begin with. Of course the question is,mhoe much or how little is audible.

 

I can’t wait for it to be in everyone’s hands, we’ll probably only then learn how effective it is in several different use cases and setups.

Link to comment
10 hours ago, Superdad said:

FedEx is fast, so assuming no delays in customs, our overseas friends should be receiving their EtherREGENs be early next week.


Fedex has scheduled the delivery to me (in The Netherlands) for tomorrow..if they make it that is incredibly fast! :)
 

Thank you Alex and your employees for your hard work! 👍

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, nonesup said:

Emile de Taiko audio, has just received her EtherRegen and has posted a very positive review on WBT.

https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/the-uptone-audio-etherregen-audiophile-switch.29106/page-3#post-608363.  

This should also be (according to ASR) a fool who does not make measurements and only trusts his ears.


Thanks for posting. Though I’m not sure it’s Emile’s personal feedback since he wrote it’s the first feedback from Hong Kong. I suspect it’s from one of his customers.

Link to comment
9 minutes ago, Bricki said:

The reason I ask is just because I still prefer the Supra cat8... It has better layering than the Audioquest Pearl and both have a bigger soundstage than a standard no name 1 meter long $3 cat 6 cable... Not sure that I want to dismember my Supra cat8 cables 😕


I understand but really don’t know. Also your application is very different than mine (in my case this cable is used way upstream near my DSL modem/router after I upgraded it).
 

I just gave this as a tip for anyone who has the cable and had not thought about it. Perhaps use some electrical tape around the connector to test first.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...