The Brinkman Ship MQA Listening Results

[rickca]

44 minutes ago, Brinkman Ship said:

It seems some "reviewers" are still doing "research". No rush. Only been 3.5 years.

Yeah, it's like climate change.  The only research they are doing is looking into why their talking points aren't working.

[rickca]

2 hours ago, Samuel T Cogley said:

The ones of the forum you have to be the most mindful of are the self-appointed Civility Police. 

I didn't know we had such a crew.  They're probably on my ignore list.

 

[rickca]

2 minutes ago, realhifi said:

So your contention is that their MQA coverage will be the straw that broke the camels back and that it will be the demise of print audio journalism?

There will always be plenty of people who just believe what they are told and won't listen to someone whose name is unfamiliar.

[rickca]

39 minutes ago, Brinkman Ship said:

It is clear that Pro MQA forces acted quickly to remove the thread.

The MQA thought police are omnipresent.  Reputation management.

[rickca]

MQA really seems to have some cult-like characteristics.  It's OK.  We're badasses here at CA.  Well informed badasses.

[rickca]

7 minutes ago, Indydan said:

I believe it is the bullshit and lies about MQA that anger people

I just resent the amount of time I spent trying to understand Bob Stuart's technobabble before I realized it didn't make any sense.

[rickca]

30 minutes ago, Brinkman Ship said:

I did my homework, no spoon feeding to forum police or trolls.

Mani is neither. 

 

54 minutes ago, beetlemania said:

BTW, it is a fair question to know more about the songs/albums you compared and how you were able to confirm the same mastering.

This is a perfectly legitimate question.

 

I like your conclusions because I don't like MQA.  I'm just not sure they are valid without this input.