Jump to content
IGNORED

Building a PC to improve SMS-200 Ultra


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Johnseye said:

 

Whether it's Roon pr HQplayer, it's the PC that does the upsampling.

closer to dac, allo sparky does upsampling,think better than pc does via Ethernet.like chord upscaling closer to dave,no Ethernet.

but sparky get hungry,i feed 5v 4Amper ultracaps psu.Result just a m a z I n g

Link to comment
On 28-12-2017 at 6:01 AM, austinpop said:

 

You would be using the 2 remaining sCLK-EX points for the switch and the tX-USBhubEX respectively. The latter effectively gives you a tX-USBultra. In my experience, both the the modded switch AND the tX improve SQ over the base improvements you got from the sMS-200ultra.

 

 

So in summary:

  1. send sMS-200ultra and a Netgear switch ($30) to SOtM
  2. modify sMS-200ultra to expose 2 clock taps - 25MHz for the switch, 24MHz for the tX. These will be 2 SMB ports on the back of the chassis.
  3. have them add the reference clock input for future clock upgrade. This will be a BNC input port on the back. This is $200 for future proofing. I highly recommend it.
  4. add a tX-USBhubEX to your SOtM order, and have them mod it to accept the 24MHz clock from the sMS-200ultra
  5. have them mod the Netgear switch to accept the sCLK-EX 25MHz clock, as well a upgrade the regulators and capacitors
  6. assuming the sMS-200ultra and the modded tX-USBhubEX are 12V, you should be able to share a single sPS-500 between them - although check with May first.
  7. Get a good  PSU like the LPS-1 to power the modded switch.
  8. Get the grounding right. Note that the sPS-500 output is already shunted (i.e. DC negative terminal is shunted to ground), as confirmed by SOtM.
    • Shunt the DC input to the switch, even if the PSU is an LPS-1
    • Shunt DC output of the energizing Meanwell SMPS for the LPS-1

 

 

Thank you for sharing this keen setup, by reusing the EX clock in the SMS Ultra one gets the TX USB Ultra performance ánd add a clock modded switch for about the price of a single TX USB Ultra. Very smart!

 

This setup even enables the option to use a dx-USB HD (instead of the tX-USBhub) after the SMS-200 Ultra so an coax output is created. I'll have a look around how the dx-USB HD compairs to the tX-USBhub, I guess it will be also DAC dependant (what is the quality /march with the Coax respectively USB input)

 

As for the recommendation for adding a BNC clock input for an even better Clock then the EX, do you perhaps know if a better external Clock would also be a direct upgrade for the other connected devices (tX-USBhub and switch)? Or would the additional external clock only be beneficial for the one device it is connected with?

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
On 12/28/2017 at 1:19 PM, austinpop said:

 

I’ll leave it to the OP @Advieira to decide. 

 

I've talked with Kamal, from SOTM USA, he said can do all its stuff for US$ 1.050 (modding the sms200ultra 2 clock and master clock + sotm switch mod + TX-USB-hubEx mod + Y cable). And I'm inclined to do all, but let me ask you more questions:

 

- SMS200ultra cleans and clock the signal from server. Is there sense in clock it again? My first concerns was about to clean the signal prior the sms200ultra, in the server or in the mid of server and sms200ultra.

I mean, that US$ 1k more would bring real sound quality returns? I was very impressed with the sms200ultra from the first moment I plugged it between my mac mini and the dac.

 

I'm already using the direct connections suggested by Romaz (bridging the ethernet/thunderbolt ports). 

 

I wonder if it is possible to have a new clear and noticeable increase in sound quality as I had with the SMS200ultra.

 

Link to comment
8 hours ago, Advieira said:

 

I've talked with Kamal, from SOTM USA, he said can do all its stuff for US$ 1.050 (modding the sms200ultra 2 clock and master clock + sotm switch mod + TX-USB-hubEx mod + Y cable). And I'm inclined to do all, but let me ask you more questions:

 

- SMS200ultra cleans and clock the signal from server. Is there sense in clock it again? My first concerns was about to clean the signal prior the sms200ultra, in the server or in the mid of server and sms200ultra.

I mean, that US$ 1k more would bring real sound quality returns? I was very impressed with the sms200ultra from the first moment I plugged it between my mac mini and the dac.

 

I'm already using the direct connections suggested by Romaz (bridging the ethernet/thunderbolt ports). 

 

I wonder if it is possible to have a new clear and noticeable increase in sound quality as I had with the SMS200ultra.

 

 

Since you have heard the improvement wrought by the sMS-200ultra, think of the modded switch and tX-USB as "more of the same."

 

Please actually read the links I sent you in my previous post here: https://www.computeraudiophile.com/forums/topic/37329-building-a-pc-to-improve-sms-200-ultra/?do=findComment&comment=758767

 

If you don't, you are missing the context.

 

Link to comment
54 minutes ago, austinpop said:

 

Please actually read the links I sent you in my previous post here: https://www.computeraudiophile.com/forums/topic/37329-building-a-pc-to-improve-sms-200-ultra/?do=findComment&comment=758767

 

If you don't, you are missing the context.

 

 

Ok, I read a few pages and I´m convinced.

A last question:

- Are my books refined enough for show the benefits this new upgrade?

 

My system today is: Mac mini>SMS200-ultra(SPS500)> Auralic Vega>Electrocompaniet ECI-5Mkii > Monitor audio Pl100

 

Within this chain of clocks, is it worth the money to mod a mac mini for a Linear PSU (uptone)?

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/2/2018 at 9:58 PM, austinpop said:

 

Since you have heard the improvement wrought by the sMS-200ultra, think of the modded switch and tX-USB as "more of the same."

 

Please actually read the links I sent you in my previous post here: https://www.computeraudiophile.com/forums/topic/37329-building-a-pc-to-improve-sms-200-ultra/?do=findComment&comment=758767

 

If you don't, you are missing the context.

 

 

Hi Austin, I´m modding the sms200ultra 2 and buying Tx-USBhubex mod and switch modded, just like you said. I will order too a Y cable for my SPS-500 power Ultra and Tx-Usbhub.

 

After doing that, do you think it would be worth modifying the mac mini with uptone MMK kit and boot for a SD 2000x card? or will it be silly and not worth the investment? To power the mini I was thinking a new SPS-500, which can deliver 12V, 5A continuous. Or maybe a chinese toroidal LPSU. But I do not know if after doing all clock and switch and usb mods, a LPSU for a mac mini can improve anything audible.

What do you think?

Link to comment
On 1/2/2018 at 12:20 AM, FredM said:

 

Thank you for sharing this keen setup, by reusing the EX clock in the SMS Ultra one gets the TX USB Ultra performance ánd add a clock modded switch for about the price of a single TX USB Ultra. Very smart!

 

This setup even enables the option to use a dx-USB HD (instead of the tX-USBhub) after the SMS-200 Ultra so an coax output is created. I'll have a look around how the dx-USB HD compairs to the tX-USBhub, I guess it will be also DAC dependant (what is the quality /march with the Coax respectively USB input)

 

I'm afraid I missed this post at the time, but hopefully better late than never!

 

It's very hard to compare the dX-USB HD Ultra with the tX-USBultra, since you are also (necessarily) changing the DAC input from USB to coax/Toslink/AES. So it boils down to which input the DAC is best at. If you have a DAC whose USB input is known to sound superior to its S/PDIF input, then absolutely, the tX-USBultra  is the way to go.

 

I have heard the dX-USB HD ultra in a friend's system, outputting AES to his Yggdrasil DAC. Suffice it to say the benefit of sCLK-EX is very evident in this path too. Ultimately, the answer of which one is best is: it depends.

 

Quote

As for the recommendation for adding a BNC clock input for an even better Clock then the EX, do you perhaps know if a better external Clock would also be a direct upgrade for the other connected devices (tX-USBhub and switch)? Or would the additional external clock only be beneficial for the one device it is connected with?

 

Yes, absolutely, that is the beauty of the sCLK-EX approach. Think about what the sCLK-EX board is. It is a clock frequency synthesizer, with the ability to simultaneously generate 4 independent frequencies, that are programmable - usually by SOtM, although I suppose with the right tools and the instructions, others can do it too. This synthesizer is driven by an onboard 10 MHz reference oscillator. SOtM haven't published specs for this oscillator that I'm aware, but clearly it is of good enough quality to yield the reported SQ improvements.

 

The final piece of this architecture is the fact that the sCLK-EX board can accept an external reference clock, via its master clock input, to override the internal oscillator. This is where external OCXO clocks like the Mutec Ref 10 and Cybershaft come into play. Some of these external clocks have astoundingly low phase noise. Attaching a reference clock of this quality not only raises the quality of the sCLK-EX proportionately, it does so on all its outputs.

 

So yes - an external reference clock improves all the devices in the chain that are driven from that sCLK-EX board.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Advieira said:

 

Hi Austin, I´m modding the sms200ultra 2 and buying Tx-USBhubex mod and switch modded, just like you said. I will order too a Y cable for my SPS-500 power Ultra and Tx-Usbhub.

 

Awesome! I hope you enjoy the SQ improvements.

 

1 hour ago, Advieira said:

After doing that, do you think it would be worth modifying the mac mini with uptone MMK kit and boot for a SD 2000x card? or will it be silly and not worth the investment? To power the mini I was thinking a new SPS-500, which can deliver 12V, 5A continuous. Or maybe a chinese toroidal LPSU. But I do not know if after doing all clock and switch and usb mods, a LPSU for a mac mini can improve anything audible.

What do you think?

 

I have not personally had any experience with Mac Mini and the MMK mods, although I have only heard good things about it.

 

One would think that with the modded chain in place, and proper ground shunting, you should be immune to anything upstream of your chain. In my experience, this is still not the case. BUT - again, in my experience, as this may be system dependent - the impact of the upstream changes is muted, and subtle at best. Here are 2 concrete things that still make an impact in my system - upstream of my modded, shunted switch:

  • A bridged Ethernet connection. For details, look at the first post index here.
  • Running Audiophile Optimizer and Process Lasso on Windows 10 on my upstream Roon Core
  • Even further upstream, I have ground-shunted LPSes on my router, and my NAS.

These improvement are still audible, but not of the magnitude of the clock and PSU improvements closer to the DAC.

 

So eventually - yes, everything matters, but whether they are worth the cost is debatable. 

Link to comment
12 hours ago, austinpop said:

 

I'm afraid I missed this post at the time, but hopefully better late than never!

 

It's very hard to compare the dX-USB HD Ultra with the tX-USBultra, since you are also (necessarily) changing the DAC input from USB to coax/Toslink/AES. So it boils down to which input the DAC is best at. If you have a DAC whose USB input is known to sound superior to its S/PDIF input, then absolutely, the tX-USBultra  is the way to go.

 

I have heard the dX-USB HD ultra in a friend's system, outputting AES to his Yggdrasil DAC. Suffice it to say the benefit of sCLK-EX is very evident in this path too. Ultimately, the answer of which one is best is: it depends.

 

 

Yes, absolutely, that is the beauty of the sCLK-EX approach. Think about what the sCLK-EX board is. It is a clock frequency synthesizer, with the ability to simultaneously generate 4 independent frequencies, that are programmable - usually by SOtM, although I suppose with the right tools and the instructions, others can do it too. This synthesizer is driven by an onboard 10 MHz reference oscillator. SOtM haven't published specs for this oscillator that I'm aware, but clearly it is of good enough quality to yield the reported SQ improvements.

 

The final piece of this architecture is the fact that the sCLK-EX board can accept an external reference clock, via its master clock input, to override the internal oscillator. This is where external OCXO clocks like the Mutec Ref 10 and Cybershaft come into play. Some of these external clocks have astoundingly low phase noise. Attaching a reference clock of this quality not only raises the quality of the sCLK-EX proportionately, it does so on all its outputs.

 

So yes - an external reference clock improves all the devices in the chain that are driven from that sCLK-EX board.

"usually by SOtM, although I suppose with the right tools and the instructions, others can do it too. This synthesizer is driven by an onboard 10 MHz reference oscillator. SOtM haven't published specs for this oscillator that I'm aware, but clearly it is of good enough quality to yield the reported SQ improvements. "

 

That's would be fantastic!!!! 

Link to comment
On 14-1-2018 at 5:42 PM, austinpop said:

I'm afraid I missed this post at the time, but hopefully better late than never!

 

It's very hard to compare the dX-USB HD Ultra with the tX-USBultra, since you are also (necessarily) changing the DAC input from USB to coax/Toslink/AES. So it boils down to which input the DAC is best at. If you have a DAC whose USB input is known to sound superior to its S/PDIF input, then absolutely, the tX-USBultra  is the way to go.

 

I have heard the dX-USB HD ultra in a friend's system, outputting AES to his Yggdrasil DAC. Suffice it to say the benefit of sCLK-EX is very evident in this path too. Ultimately, the answer of which one is best is: it depends.

 

Thanks, unfortunally I can check the DAC inputs at the moment. I haven't got a decent front end to make the comparison (currently I'm using a standard PC USB out..).

 

Based on reviews/user experiences, it seems the AES/EBU and the (new) I2S inputs are superior (Metrum Acoustics Onyx DAC), so on paper not an ideal match with SOtM Ultra's. The SOtM dX USB-HD with EX clock mod could be an alternative, although this is a rather old model (5 years). Without any recent user reports around its hard to say if it's is the same proximity as the Ultra's. Ideal would be an Ultra model with I2S output option, fingers crossed (or wishful thinking..)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...