Jimmy3993 Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I brought my BADA to a friend's house today to hear it in the context of a much higher end system. He writes reviews and gets to spend time with "samples". I also suspect that he gets good pricing on the items that he purchases but that is the subject for another post. We inserted the BADA between his esoteric x-01 and his JRDG Criterion pre and listened to redbook using the bada to decode and then letting the x-01 do the work. Everyone's taste is different but fo rme I preferred the esoteric doing its own decoding in his system. The test was far from scientific. All I really took away from it was that I wanted to hear an esoteric dac in my system taking data from a lynx card. He suggested the d-03. I am pretty sure it is also about 3x time cost but I am curious if anyone here has used one. The x-01 sounded so much better doing it's own decoding that it almost makes me want to have a disk player again (almost.). Thanks in advance for your comments. Link to comment
catastrofe Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 I have a D-05 and G-03X, both purchased pre-owned. The G-03X clocks both the D-05 and my Lynx AES16e. I think the combo is awesome. . .the D-03 would be somewhat better. BPT 3.5 Ultra/Reference 3A Reflectors/MSB Technology S201 Amplifier/MSB Technology Analog DAC/MSB Technology Network Renderer/Audirvana + Link to comment
Jimmy3993 Posted January 22, 2010 Author Share Posted January 22, 2010 I have the same lynx card. im not sure that I knew one of those 10,000 xlr plugs was for a clock. interesting. I will need to poke around to see what the pair goes for used. Is the clock effective? Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Hi Jimmy - You'll actually want to use the one BNC cable for external clocking. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
catastrofe Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Honestly, it's difficult for me to get a handle on the effect of the stand-alone clock. The D-05 can also serve as a master clock, but I've never taken the time to make a comparison. I've also never tried to compare externally clocked vs. using the Lynx's clock feeding the D-05. I'm fooling around with that now, as one downside of using an external clock is that you sacrifice the convenience of automatic sample rate adjustment. I just started using the latest (unstable) release of Play which has this feature, but comparisons are not easy to make due to the need to switch settings on both the D-05 and the Lynx. BPT 3.5 Ultra/Reference 3A Reflectors/MSB Technology S201 Amplifier/MSB Technology Analog DAC/MSB Technology Network Renderer/Audirvana + Link to comment
GuidoCorona Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Greetings, I am the friend that Jimmy has mentioned. Berkeley was inserted in my system consisting of Esoteric X-01 Limited, Jeff Rowland Criterion pre, Rowland 312 stereo amp, Vienna Mahler speakers, all wiring/cabling/pc was Furutech Flux seires, power distribution was Furutech ETP-309. All components were powered from 309. 309 was connected to a dedicated outlet. Only heterogeneous connection was coax for connectin Alpha to X-01 provided by Jimmy with a BNC2RCA converter at the X-01 end. Furutech material are review samples. Rest of system is my own. Breakin on all components in several thousand hrs. including relevant inputs on Criterion pre. Breakin of wiring is approx 1,000 hrs. Pure X-01 connected to XLR input 2 on Criterion. Alpha connected to Criterion XLR input 1. Alpha DAC appears to have slightly better deep bass definition/handling than X-01 Limited. But starting with mid bass, a hump appears that creates non specificity and a humming on string bass, percussion etc. . . the hump appears to continue into the midrange. Treble of Alpha is slightly more emphasized than on X-01, but suffers of some slight raggedness and can intermodulate on chords and transients. General impression is of a slightly more energetic but also fatiguing presentation and less transparency than X-01. Granted, the coax wire we used may not have been ideal. Regards, Guido Guido Link to comment
Jimmy3993 Posted January 22, 2010 Author Share Posted January 22, 2010 much more clearly put guido. It was a truly ear opening experience. For me, the next step is to try and seperate "transport" limitations from "dac" limitations if that makes any sense. I really like the user interface that I have with the pc based system. I have a little netbook that I use as a remote and I like media monkey. But for me the steo up in quality that we experienced yesterday was just too big to ignore. I hope that my equiment envy didnt read through too much in my original post... Link to comment
Jimmy3993 Posted January 22, 2010 Author Share Posted January 22, 2010 back at home, I can still hear most of what we heard at your place. my speakers are leaner (audio physic scorpios) and that changes the experience of the mid bass hump but the top end issues are there. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now