Shadders Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 5 hours ago, mansr said: Precisely. Low-pass filtering this signal produces properly interpolated samples. The MQA "rendering" normally starts with a sample rate of 88.2/96 kHz, so the aliases will begin at 44.1/48 kHz. Any real signal content at these frequencies was lost in the MQA encoding process. It is likely that the 0-48 kHz spectrum encoded by MQA also contains aliases of higher frequencies if they were present in the recording, assuming the downsampling filters are similarly poor. The band splitting at 24 kHz might also introduce aliases. That's almost exactly what I said too. Hi, Thanks for confirming. I am surprised the MQA system is so poor, given the claims made for the superiority. Regards, Shadders. Link to comment
Fitzcaraldo215 Posted July 6, 2017 Share Posted July 6, 2017 45 minutes ago, Shadders said: Hi, Thanks for confirming. I am surprised the MQA system is so poor, given the claims made for the superiority. Regards, Shadders. It is all a question of who you wish to believe. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 I'm inclined believe someone who has compared a regular recording with an MQA one. It's been 21 pages now, so has anyone been able to do that? Link to comment
Don Hills Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 38 minutes ago, Ralf11 said: I'm inclined believe someone who has compared a regular recording with an MQA one. It's been 21 pages now, so has anyone been able to do that? If you mean, has anyone actually compared them by listening, then probably not. That's not what this thread is for. It's about how it works, not how it sounds. "People hear what they see." - Doris Day The forum would be a much better place if everyone were less convinced of how right they were. Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 Understood. But at some point the 2nd clause must come into play. Link to comment
PeterSt Posted July 7, 2017 Share Posted July 7, 2017 5 hours ago, Ralf11 said: It's been 21 pages now, so has anyone been able to do that? Audibly you mean ? Many. Lush^3-e Lush^2 Blaxius^2.5 Ethernet^3 HDMI^2 XLR^2 XXHighEnd (developer) Phasure NOS1 24/768 Async USB DAC (manufacturer) Phasure Mach III Audio PC with Linear PSU (manufacturer) Orelino & Orelo MKII Speakers (designer/supplier) Link to comment
mansr Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 As Archimago notes on this blog, he has obtained recordings of some MQA impulse responses from the Mytek Brooklyn DAC. Here are these impulse responses overlaid with those used by the Bluesound for 4x upsampling. Again, it's a very close match. tmtomh 1 Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted July 12, 2017 Author Popular Post Share Posted July 12, 2017 I've made some software tools to help explore MQA files and devices: https://code.videolan.org/mansr/mqa mqascan: parse the control bitstream of an MQA file mqbscan: parse the renderer instructions of a decoded MQA file mqbgen: encode renderer instructions in an existing file If you have a suitable ARM system and a copy of the Bluesound MQA library, wrappers to decode and render MQA files are also built. Have fun. oPossum and tmtomh 1 1 Link to comment
labjr Posted July 12, 2017 Share Posted July 12, 2017 Keep up the good work. When you get served with a gag order, you'll know you're getting close tmtomh 1 Link to comment
Popular Post mansr Posted July 12, 2017 Author Popular Post Share Posted July 12, 2017 6 minutes ago, labjr said: Keep up the good work. When you get served with a gag order, you'll know you're getting close There's a reason I picked Videolan to host this. Ran, lucretius, labjr and 3 others 6 Link to comment
mansr Posted July 13, 2017 Author Share Posted July 13, 2017 I checked the 2L MQA samples for which rendering (aka upsampling) filter they request: 2L-038_01_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 6 2L-038_MQA2016-352k-24b_01.mqa.flac 5 2L-048_14_stereo_96kHz_FLAC.mqa.flac 4 2L-050_01_stereo_DXD_WAV.mqa.flac 8 2L-053_04_stereo-DXD.mqa.flac 8 2L-056_03_stereo_DXD_mqa.flac 8 2L-056_04_stereo_DXD_mqa.flac 8 2L-064_08_stereo_DXD_WAV.mqa.flac 8 2L-082_stereo_DXD_01.mqa.flac 8 2L-087_06_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 8 2L-092_01_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 8 2L-106_04_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 8 2L-109_05_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 6 2L-110_04_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 6 2L-111_15_stereo_DXD_FLAC.mqa.flac 6 2L-120_01_stereo-44k-24b.mqa.flac 4 2L-125_stereo-352k-24b_04.mqa.flac 4 Filter 8 is by far the most commonly used here with 6 and 4 in distant second and third places. Curiously, the remastered version of 2L-038 uses a different filter (5) than the original version (6). The two samples, 2L-048 and 2L-120, that are not originally 352 kHz both use filter 4, although that may well be a coincidence. Shadders 1 Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 Very interesting mansr. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
AJ Soundfield Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 On 7/10/2017 at 7:58 AM, mansr said: As Archimago notes on this blog, he has obtained recordings of some MQA impulse responses from the Mytek Brooklyn DAC. Btw, I have one of those now if you still need measurements Link to comment
mansr Posted July 13, 2017 Author Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 hour ago, AJ Soundfield said: Btw, I have one of those now if you still need measurements Do you have a recording interface capable of better than 192 kHz? That could yield some additional insight. Link to comment
mansr Posted July 13, 2017 Author Share Posted July 13, 2017 I have spotted filter 11 in the wild. Stay tuned. Link to comment
Jud Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 1 minute ago, mansr said: I have spotted filter 11 in the wild. Stay tuned. Sounds like the comments pages of Audubon Magazine. Rt66indierock 1 One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
soxr Posted July 13, 2017 Share Posted July 13, 2017 On 12/7/2017 at 5:39 PM, mansr said: I've made some software tools to help explore MQA files and devices: https://code.videolan.org/mansr/mqa mqascan: parse the control bitstream of an MQA file mqbscan: parse the renderer instructions of a decoded MQA file mqbgen: encode renderer instructions in an existing file If you have a suitable ARM system and a copy of the Bluesound MQA library, wrappers to decode and render MQA files are also built. Have fun. Great job! Can't get the .so file from the BS firmware working, not recognised as dynamic library even though it is a dynamic lib using 4 others: $ ldd /usr/lib/libbluos_ssc.so not a dynamic executable $ ./mqadec ./mqadec: error while loading shared libraries: libbluos_ssc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Strace: open("/usr/lib/libbluos_ssc.so", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3 read(3, "\177ELF\1\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0(\0\1\0\0\0\10\32\0\0004\0\0\0"..., 512) = 512 lseek(3, 220932, SEEK_SET) = 220932 read(3, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 1080) = 1080 lseek(3, 220648, SEEK_SET) = 220648 read(3, "A4\0\0\0aeabi\0\1*\0\0\0\0057-A\0\6\n\7A\10\1\t\2\n\3\f"..., 53) = 53 close(3) = 0 stat64("/usr/lib", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 writev(2, [{"./mqadec", 8}, {": ", 2}, {"error while loading shared libra"..., 36}, {": ", 2}, {"libbluos_ssc.so", 15}, {": ", 2}, {"cannot open shared object file", 30}, {": ", 2}, {"No such file or directory", 25}, {"\n", 1}], 10./mqadec: error while loading shared libraries: libbluos_ssc.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ) = 123 exit_group(127) = ? +++ exited with 127 +++ $ uname -m armv7l $ ldd ./mqadec linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7eff7000) /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libarmmem.so (0x76fae000) libsndfile.so.1 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libsndfile.so.1 (0x76f3c000) libbluos_ssc.so => not found libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 (0x76dfb000) libFLAC.so.8 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libFLAC.so.8 (0x76dbf000) libvorbisenc.so.2 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libvorbisenc.so.2 (0x76d2d000) libm.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libm.so.6 (0x76cb1000) /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 (0x54b0a000) libogg.so.0 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libogg.so.0 (0x76ca3000) libvorbis.so.0 => /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libvorbis.so.0 (0x76c6b000) readelf -a /usr/lib/libbluos_ssc.so Dynamic section at offset 0x35a60 contains 28 entries: Tag Type Name/Value 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libasound.so.2] 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libstdc++.so.6] 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libm.so.6] 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6] 0x00000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libgcc_s.so.1] What ARM hardware are you building and/or testing on? Link to comment
mansr Posted July 13, 2017 Author Share Posted July 13, 2017 There might be some incompatibility with your system. What does "readelf -A" say for libbluos_ssc.so and /lib/libc.so? Link to comment
soxr Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 6 hours ago, mansr said: There might be some incompatibility with your system. What does "readelf -A" say for libbluos_ssc.so and /lib/libc.so? Libc is in several places on raspberry, but it is pi@mqb:~ $ ldd /bin/ls ... libc.so.6 => /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 (0x76df1000) LIBC: pi@mqb:~ $ readelf -A /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6 Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes Tag_CPU_name: "6" Tag_CPU_arch: v6 Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-1 Tag_FP_arch: VFPv2 Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t: 4 Tag_ABI_FP_rounding: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_denormal: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_number_model: IEEE 754 Tag_ABI_align_needed: 8-byte Tag_ABI_enum_size: int Tag_ABI_HardFP_use: SP and DP Tag_ABI_VFP_args: VFP registers Tag_CPU_unaligned_access: v6 BLEUSOUND: pi@mqb:~ $ readelf -A /usr/lib/libbluos_ssc.so Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes Tag_CPU_name: "7-A" Tag_CPU_arch: v7 Tag_CPU_arch_profile: Application Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-2 Tag_FP_arch: VFPv3 Tag_Advanced_SIMD_arch: NEONv1 Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t: 4 Tag_ABI_FP_denormal: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_number_model: IEEE 754 Tag_ABI_align_needed: 8-byte Tag_ABI_align_preserved: 8-byte, except leaf SP Tag_ABI_enum_size: int Tag_ABI_HardFP_use: SP and DP Tag_ABI_optimization_goals: Aggressive Speed Tag_DIV_use: Not allowed Now looking at the firmware of BLEUSOUND, it seems their LIBC is also cpu v7: # readelf -A libc.so.6 Attribute Section: aeabi File Attributes Tag_CPU_name: "7-A" Tag_CPU_arch: v7 Tag_CPU_arch_profile: Application Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-2 Tag_FP_arch: VFPv3 Tag_Advanced_SIMD_arch: NEONv1 Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t: 4 Tag_ABI_FP_denormal: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions: Needed Tag_ABI_FP_number_model: IEEE 754 Tag_ABI_align_needed: 8-byte Tag_ABI_align_preserved: 8-byte, except leaf SP Tag_ABI_enum_size: int Tag_ABI_HardFP_use: SP and DP Tag_DIV_use: Not allowed Technically the raspberry 2 and 3 can do chroot into an untarred bluesound rootfs, and run v7 code. So all we need to do is find a raspberry pi 2 or 3 "specific" distro which has a v7 glibc. I believe this distro is still v6 to make it compatible with the older raspberrry 1. Link to comment
mansr Posted July 14, 2017 Author Share Posted July 14, 2017 Yes, it looks like your system libraries aren't compatible with the Bluesound one. You can always use chroot or other tricks to pick up everything from the Bluesound rootfs. Link to comment
AJ Soundfield Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 15 hours ago, mansr said: Do you have a recording interface capable of better than 192 kHz? That could yield some additional insight. I don't think so sorry. Will double check, but since I don't do any recording, its doubtful. Link to comment
mansr Posted July 14, 2017 Author Share Posted July 14, 2017 To those wishing to use my mqadec and mqarender tools with the Bluesound library, note that there are (at least) two versions of this library with incompatible interfaces. If it doesn't work properly, you likely have the older variant. For copyright reasons, I can unfortunately not redistribute the file. Link to comment
mansr Posted July 14, 2017 Author Share Posted July 14, 2017 To get some idea of the filter and sample rate distribution, I grabbed some samples from the Tidal Masters Essentials and New Arrivals playlists. The table below shows the number of tracks with each combination of filter and sample rate, totals on the right and bottom. | 44.1 48 88.1 96 192 352.8| --+------------------------------------------------+---- 4| 36 14 4 35 | 89 6| 1| 1 8| 19 | 19 11| 2 | 2 --+------------------------------------------------+---- | 36 14 4 35 21 1| 111 A few observations: Nearly half the tracks (50 of 111) have an original sample rate of 44.1 or 48 kHz. All tracks with an original rate of 96 kHz or less use filter 4. In tracks with an original rate above 96 kHz filter 8 is the most common. Filters 6 and 11 make rare appearances. We have previously seen filter 6 in a few of the 2L samples. Here it is used in a track from the INTERACTIONS album, also a 2L recording. Filter 11 is found on The Doors and New York by Lou Reed. Looking at the Lou Reed album, we find this distribution: | 192| --+--------+---- 8| 5| 5 9| 3| 3 11| 6| 6 --+--------+---- | 14| 14 In addition to filter 11, we also find filter 9, another rarity. Shadders 1 Link to comment
Shadders Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 1 hour ago, mansr said: To get some idea of the filter and sample rate distribution, I grabbed some samples from the Tidal Masters Essentials and New Arrivals playlists. The table below shows the number of tracks with each combination of filter and sample rate, totals on the right and bottom. | 44.1 48 88.1 96 192 352.8| --+------------------------------------------------+---- 4| 36 14 4 35 | 89 6| 1| 1 8| 19 | 19 11| 2 | 2 --+------------------------------------------------+---- | 36 14 4 35 21 1| 111 A few observations: Nearly half the tracks (50 of 111) have an original sample rate of 44.1 or 48 kHz. All tracks with an original rate of 96 kHz or less use filter 4. In tracks with an original rate above 96 kHz filter 8 is the most common. Filters 6 and 11 make rare appearances. We have previously seen filter 6 in a few of the 2L samples. Here it is used in a track from the INTERACTIONS album, also a 2L recording. Filter 11 is found on The Doors and New York by Lou Reed. Looking at the Lou Reed album, we find this distribution: | 192| --+--------+---- 8| 5| 5 9| 3| 3 11| 6| 6 --+--------+---- | 14| 14 In addition to filter 11, we also find filter 9, another rarity. Hi, Thanks for this. So, if people like the 44.1kHz or 48kHz original samples in MQA format, then they subjectively like ultrasonic noise ? For the Lou Reed album, are we then saying that the 5 track, 3 track, and 6 track groups, each had a different mastering and temporal smear, and as such those groups have a different filter ? How did the record company know this to select the right filter to deblur ?. Or, are we being played - each filter is meant to make the tracks sound "nice" so subjectively we think MQA is great ? Regards, Shadders. Link to comment
abrxx Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 46 minutes ago, Shadders said: Hi, Thanks for this. So, if people like the 44.1kHz or 48kHz original samples in MQA format, then they subjectively like ultrasonic noise ? For the Lou Reed album, are we then saying that the 5 track, 3 track, and 6 track groups, each had a different mastering and temporal smear, and as such those groups have a different filter ? How did the record company know this to select the right filter to deblur ?. Or, are we being played - each filter is meant to make the tracks sound "nice" so subjectively we think MQA is great ? Regards, Shadders. Remember that MQA is a process and that there are three potential places a file may have filters applied: 1) The post mastering, remove "ADC blur" stage 2) The SRC stage (i.e. converting a 192kHz MQA file into a 96Khz core) 3) The DAC stage I believe mansr is describing the filter which is applied by the MQA DAC. The majority of the deblurring already happened at stage 1 (and optionally 2). My own guess is that the selection of the filter may depend on the content itself (i.e. what type of music) as well as any technical criteria (original sample rate etc). Probably selected by ear ("this ones sounds the best"). But just my guess. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now