Jump to content
IGNORED

MQA is Vaporware


Recommended Posts

https://www.mqa.co.uk/newsroom/opinions/the-original-is-the-best?fbclid=IwAR2bdKzas1Ki-eCErhQhVLk8BSD03xIPgzQKUzl8IBRYcNur_d8nulsheZI
 

More BS.....

 

As another example. Donald Fagan Nightfly was produced in 16 bit using this recorder https://audiophilestyle.com/s3/files/2011/1028/the-3m-manual.pdf

Still Warner upsamples to 24/48 (Qobuz and HDtracks). MQA unfold to 24/96. I assume it’s done for almost every early 16 bit recording.

 

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

It really blows my mind that audiophiles are onboard with MQA. It has zero to do with sound quality.

 

Yeah, whoda thunk people who can be sold that magical stones make an audible difference would fall for the engineering equivalent to a North Korean general, just because he'd shout "Master Quality"...

 

 

zIBCyzJ.jpg

Link to comment
6 hours ago, lucretius said:

 

According to the patent diagram, the 0-24kHz is mapped to the 13 MSB bits .  The next 3 bits are then used to trigger the blue light and selection of the MQA filter, etc.*  That would make MQA-CD 13 bits -- not just 13 bits but 13 bit playback with a leaky filter.  [For 24 bit MQA, HF -- 24-48kHz -- seems to be packed into the 4 LSB bits (bit 21 to bit 24).]

 

*Further, more than 1 bit is needed to indicate authentication, filter selection and, possibly, sample rate.  Also, note that the 8 LSB bits in a 24 bit MQA file are not involved in the MQA authentication process -- the file will still authenticate when those bits are dropped.

 

That doesn't appear to happen in practice:

 

 

Having said that there does appear to be scope in the actual MQA decoder to allow just 8 bits PCM (0-24kHz), so far worse than mentioned in the patent!

 

We are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.

-- Jo Cox

Link to comment
3 hours ago, Cebolla said:

 

That doesn't appear to happen in practice:

 

 

Having said that there does appear to be scope in the actual MQA decoder to allow just 8 bits PCM (0-24kHz), so far worse than mentioned in the patent!

 

 

Sure, like mansr said, any specific numbers mentioned in the patents may just be examples.  However, 3 or 4 bits do not become 1, etc.  And we know from tests, that the 8 LSB bits in a 24 bit MQA file are not involved in the MQA authentication process. And, in the case of 16bit MQA, there's no way one bit alone is used to indicate authentication, filter selection and sample rate  -- so, I doubt that mansr seen files with 15 bits of PCM and 1 bit MQA.  Note that mansr's last statement (re 14-bits) contradicts what he said about 15 bit PCM/1 bit MQA files.

 

 

mQa is dead!

Link to comment
1 hour ago, lucretius said:

 

... And, in the case of 16bit MQA, there's no way one bit alone is used to indicate authentication, filter selection and sample rate  -- so, I doubt that mansr seen files with 15 bits of PCM and 1 bit MQA. ...

 

 

1 bit is enough. It's a bitstream, not a flag or switch. That is, all of the required info is encoded as a series of 1 or 0 bits which are stored in the LSB of successive samples.

 

 

"People hear what they see." - Doris Day

The forum would be a much better place if everyone were less convinced of how right they were.

Link to comment
42 minutes ago, Don Hills said:

 

1 bit is enough. It's a bitstream, not a flag or switch. That is, all of the required info is encoded as a series of 1 or 0 bits which are stored in the LSB of successive samples.

 

 

 

Then wouldn't that be a problem for determining the start and end of a series of bits?  Note that you can take a slice from an MQA file and the MQA encoding still works.

mQa is dead!

Link to comment
2 hours ago, lucretius said:

 

Then wouldn't that be a problem for determining the start and end of a series of bits?  Note that you can take a slice from an MQA file and the MQA encoding still works.

 

The decoder looks for a particular bit sequence that marks the beginning of a series. The series repeats at regular intervals. Editing a section out of an MQA file only breaks one instance of the series.

"People hear what they see." - Doris Day

The forum would be a much better place if everyone were less convinced of how right they were.

Link to comment

So we could have three variables to play with reading into all this.......

 

CD  13 bit reserved for audio (with 3 bits for MQA data blue/green light / filters & upsampling ?)

 

16/44.1 file 14/15 Bit reserved for audio (with 1 /2 bit for MQA data blue/green light / filters only no upsampling ?) 

 

24/44.1 (48) file 17 bit reserved for audio (with 7 bits MQA data blue/green light / filters & upsampling ?)

 

What a god damn mess 
 

Link to comment

From the product page for the new iFi desktop DAC:

https://ifi-audio.com/products/neo-idsd/

 

Quote

This means that the full ‘three unfold’ decoding process is performed internally, as opposed to only the final unfold in the manner of an MQA ‘renderer’.

 How can they even write this stuff? There is no third unfold.

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three BXT

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
6 hours ago, Don Hills said:

 

The decoder looks for a particular bit sequence that marks the beginning of a series. The series repeats at regular intervals. Editing a section out of an MQA file only breaks one instance of the series.

 

Are you saying that this is a possibility or that the MQA decoder actually works this way?

mQa is dead!

Link to comment
53 minutes ago, lucretius said:

 

The 13 bits (LF - 0 to 24 kHz) comes from the patent diagram (there is no upsampling with MQA-CD so that the 3 bits does not have to indicate any upsampling scheme).

Thanks for the info,

 

I have a few ripped MQA CD's that show 16/44.1 as base data but expands to 352.8 (8x) on the output screen when played back, does this mean their is no upsampling be it even lossy in these files so it just  BS ?

Link to comment
1 minute ago, UkPhil said:

Thanks for the info,

 

I have a few ripped MQA CD's that show 16/44.1 as base data but expands to 352.8 (8x) on the output screen when played back, does this mean their is no upsampling be it even lossy in these files so it just  BS ?

 

What output screen?  Roon or the DAC?

mQa is dead!

Link to comment
53 minutes ago, UkPhil said:

Hi

 

It appears on the DAC 

 

There are two sources for MQA-CD. The first is where the master is 44.1/16 bit. The second is where an MQA 16-bit file was made by removing the lower 8 bits of an 24 bit MQA file (this appears to be the case for the file you noted). And in this latter case, it would appear that there are no unfolds or upsampling. I could be wrong -- there definitely is no unfold to 88.2/96k but there could be straight-up upsampling?

 

mQa is dead!

Link to comment
11 hours ago, lucretius said:

 

Sure, like mansr said, any specific numbers mentioned in the patents may just be examples.  However, 3 or 4 bits do not become 1, etc.  And we know from tests, that the 8 LSB bits in a 24 bit MQA file are not involved in the MQA authentication process. And, in the case of 16bit MQA, there's no way one bit alone is used to indicate authentication, filter selection and sample rate  -- so, I doubt that mansr seen files with 15 bits of PCM and 1 bit MQA.  Note that mansr's last statement (re 14-bits) contradicts what he said about 15 bit PCM/1 bit MQA files.

 

Odd that given the many of those tests & the conclusions were made by mansr himself, you doubt his observation in tests of never having seen an MQA-CD file with more than 1 bit for MQA authentication and further, prefer to believe that this contradicts his observation in tests of never having seen an MQA file with more than 2 bits for MQA authentication.

We are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.

-- Jo Cox

Link to comment
1 hour ago, lucretius said:

 

Are you saying that this is a possibility or that the MQA decoder actually works this way?

 

Goodness, please go back & actually read about some of those 'tests', eg:

 

We are far more united and have far more in common with each other than things that divide us.

-- Jo Cox

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...