Jump to content
IGNORED

MQA is Vaporware


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, crenca said:

I doubt things are as they appear.  The losses, which may or may not be an accounting maneuver, must be serving a function (tax?) to the parent company.

 

It occurred to me that maybe they did not want it known that there was an infusion of money into the scheme.  If a major investor is putting money into the scheme at this point it is because they expect a major cash stream in the future.  The only way for that to happen at this point is for the MQA players to force MQA down the throats of the music industry.  Do the MQA backers and their allied labels have the clout?  Do they risk the backlash?  Sony received major backlash for the root kit fiasco.

Boycott Warner

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, that income is amazingly poor. Heck, I knew headphone amp makers that were making over $1m/year. Heck, years back, one guy who was making portable headphone amps was raking in so much he bought a Lambo. And if you want talk about tiny markets, headphones amps are a poster child.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Bob’s first step in getting the olympics broadcast with MQA. 
 

https://www.mqa.co.uk/news/post/mqa-wowow-collaboration

 


Good time to remind folks my best musical experience in 2014 was The Killers live from Hangout Fest. TV to stereo with a y-cable.

 

Now off to test prototype Titleist golf balls.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, lucretius said:

MQA stock is really beginning to look like it was a pump and dump stock. I'm wondering how much of the share ownership was via private placements? Were the record labels who invested duped? Was Reinet duped?

 

The business plan projected MQA as being the standard used in the music industry.  As such it would have had a lock on the entire music chain, collecting royalties at each step.  They were expecting it to be a cash cow.  All at the expense of the music consumer.

 

As I said,  the window of opportunity for MQA was ten or fifteen years ago.  As time goes by MQA is seen as being more and more useless and as being simply a tax on the music consumer.  Collectively, the music consuming public needs to drive a stake through the heart of MQA.

Boycott Warner

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Bob’s first step in getting the olympics broadcast with MQA. 
 

https://www.mqa.co.uk/news/post/mqa-wowow-collaboration

 

 

Grasping at straws?  Kind of like a Presidential candidate going to a local grease pig contest looking for votes.

 

Is there any theoretical value to using MQA to broadcast an athletic event?

Boycott Warner

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Bob’s first step in getting the olympics broadcast with MQA. 
 

https://www.mqa.co.uk/news/post/mqa-wowow-collaboration

 

Does this mean that MQA wants to put a decoder on every cable set top box and Apple TV/Roku/Amazon Fire TV in the world?

NUC7PJYH/AL --> Berkeley Alpha USB --> Jeff Rowland Aeris --> Jeff Rowland 625 S2 --> Focal Utopia 3 Diablos with 2 x Focal Electra SW 1000 BE subs

 

i7-6700K/Windows 10 Version 2004/HDPLEX 300W/HDPLEX 400W DC-ATX --> EVGA Nu Audio Card --> Focal CMS50's 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

If only we knew his real name, then the article would be truthful :~)

 

If there is anything more truth than 'truth is subjective' in audiophiledom, I don't know what it is.

 

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...