Jump to content
IGNORED

MQA is Vaporware


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, beetlemania said:

 

I think that Pono was, in part, scared off by the proprietary format Meridian wanted. Also, I heard that NY listened to a half-dozen or more high-end DACs and said "that one", pointing to an Ayre.

 

EDIT: I see an earlier post from JA suggesting that the MQA unfold was too hard on the battery!

 

JA, basically suggesting the Pono player would have had MQA if it weren't for the  battery life? BS!

Link to comment
3 minutes ago, mansr said:

I assume Charley was paraphrasing, so don't read too much into the specific choice of words.

 

Noted.  I wonder (and like you said we will probably never know for sure) to what extent Meridians ability to tell the truth vs Ayre's impacted the decision to stop working with Meridian and go with Ayre.

Hey MQA, if it is not all $voodoo$, show us the math!

Link to comment
2 hours ago, mansr said:

"I don't know whom else Pono contacted, but when they contacted Ayre they asked "Isn't there some way to downsample the file for storage, and then upsample it during playback to achieve true-high res without the large storage requirements?" Of course they were told there was no possible way of doing it. Information theory sets a limit which simply cannot be broken. After some discussion with Ayre Pono broke off the relationship with Meridian and turned the audio design over to Ayre."


Is this then correct: ?

So the second (un)fold idea which is nothing more than down/upsampling, came from Pono. They quit working with Meridian. And then later Meridian made a codec out of that idea, thus combining their previous knowledge of MLP packing for their first (un)fold, combined with the down/upsampling idea from Pono ... 

Designer of the 432 EVO music server and Linux specialist

Discoverer of the independent open source sox based mqa playback method with optional one cycle postringing.

Link to comment
2 minutes ago, FredericV said:


Is this then correct: ?

So the second (un)fold idea which is nothing more than down/upsampling, came from Pono. They quit working with Meridian. And then later Meridian made a codec out of that idea, thus combining their previous knowledge of MLP packing for their first (un)fold, combined with the down/upsampling idea from Pono ... 

No

Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems AudiophileStyleStickerWhite2.0.png AudiophileStyleStickerWhite7.1.4.png

Link to comment
10 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

OMG, Neil saw, what people have been saying here from the beginning, with respect to Bob and MQA. 

 

Ill stop now and just keep reading. 

 

Too bad it's scheduled for release just after, instead of just before, RMAF.

One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller

The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein

Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature.

Link to comment
17 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

Very BS according to the book. But in fairness to @John_Atkinson he may not have been given the complete picture. 

Or the book isn't giving an accurate picture, either?

Main listening (small home office):

Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments.

Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three .

Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup.
Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. 

All absolute statements about audio are false :)

Link to comment
31 minutes ago, firedog said:

Or the book isn't giving an accurate picture, either?

 

It is NY's take on the situation, obviously. There are at least 2 takes on every situation and depends where your loyalties lie.

Current:  Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM

DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC 

Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590

Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier

Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers

Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects

Link to comment
1 hour ago, mansr said:

Or in cases like this, royalties.

True.

Current:  Daphile on an AMD A10-9500 with 16 GB RAM

DAC - TEAC UD-501 DAC 

Pre-amp - Rotel RC-1590

Amplification - Benchmark AHB2 amplifier

Speakers - Revel M126Be with 2 REL 7/ti subwoofers

Cables - Tara Labs RSC Reference and Blue Jean Cable Balanced Interconnects

Link to comment
1 hour ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

 

It’s actually more than Neil’s take in the book, but you’re correct this can’t be ruled out. However, the takes are very specific and worthy of libel if not true. 

Are you able to say whether it has something to do with Meridian being untruthful about being real >96Khz?

Link to comment
3 hours ago, John_Atkinson said:

 

You should note that I wrote "There were other issues but according to Charley Hansen, it was primarily battery life." I didn't think it appropriate to expand on the "other issues" as they involved personal matters that Charley had told me in confidence..

 

John Atkinson

Technical Editor, Stereophile

 

Are these issues speculated by John Darko to be: "On the plus side, we thank our lucky stars that no-one uttered the words “Just as the artist intended”. That thought then triggered the question: is MQA why Neil Young walked away from Meridian’s partnership with Pono?"

 

In my experience and research "just as the artist intended" is quite an issue. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...