Jump to content
IGNORED

AES/EBU....


 Share

Recommended Posts

Is AES/EBU a preferred digital transmission from source to DAC compared to rca?

 

Thanks for any help.

 

Digital:  SonicTransporter I5 powered by Uptone JS-2,  Ghent Ethernet throughout, Ultra-Rendu's, Ghent DC cables, Curious and Ghent USB

Living Room:  Rethm Trishna, MicroZotl2, Auralic Vega, Rel E112 sub (High Fidelity ic's, DIY pc's and speaker wire from VH Audio)

Office:  Chord Hugo2, Feniks Essence, Rel 218, Noble Kaiser Encores, PM3

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you'll get a dozen answers...

 

Some say AES3 (via XLR) is great, others say the only reason for the standard being via XLR is the abundance of (mechanically) suitable cables in studios, etc.

 

BNC is generally considered superior to Phono for digital signal as it's a true 75ohm connector.

 

Eloise

 

Eloise

---

...in my opinion / experience...

While I agree "Everything may matter" working out what actually affects the sound is a trickier thing.

And I agree "Trust your ears" but equally don't allow them to fool you - trust them with a bit of skepticism.

keep your mind open... But mind your brain doesn't fall out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coax cables with BNC connectors would appear to be the best, since RCA and XLR connectors are not designed to have a predictable impedance at RF frequencies.

 

However, when I tested different computer interfaces for my Bryston DAC, I found using a borrowed Sonic Studio 4 as a firewire-to-AES converter worked better than the alternatives described in my earlier post. The Sonic Studio 4 provides AES output only at a DB-25 connector, which I doubt has a specified RF impedance. The cable assembly I used had an Amphenol DB-25 connector on one end, 4 Neutrik XLR's at the other end, and 4 Mogami cables (I did not note the type).

 

My guess is that the connector is so small relative to the wavelength that good impedance matching is accomplished by proper resistive termination inside the hardware on each end and a cable with proper characteristic impedance, regardless of the connector's characteristic impedance.

 

Mac Mini (2012 i7) > HQPlayer > RME ADI-2 v2 > Benchmark AHB-2 > Thiel 3.7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

"others say the only reason for the standard being via XLR is the abundance of (mechanically) suitable cables in studios, etc. "

 

If true, it's yet another example of ubiquity winning out over performance. I would argue that's also the case with USB's dominance over Firewire. I've found not a single shred of compelling evidence (to me as a consumer) to support use of USB over Firewire, other than the sheer number of USB devices.

 

clay

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a discussion with a friend of mine. He doesn't understand why the AES Committee endorsed the XLR wiring for a digital audio transmission standard. It is really bad for high frequency application, due to noise, particularly at the connectors.

 

The best cabling is coaxial with BNC connectors which has the highest noise immunity.

 

Perhaps, there were surplus inventory of analog XLR parts, in every studio. ;-)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



×
×
  • Create New...