Orko Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 He is suggesting that Dylan's work is great when sung, especially by Dylan, but when simply read off the page, perhaps without recourse to hearing them sung, not many of the songs qualify as great literature. So, quite simply, not Nobel worthy as just a read, as if to say if Dylan had never put these words to music and performed them, he would probably not have been nominated as a poet. Isn't that subjective though? Godwin's objection then is that he does not like Dylan's work all that much. I'm sure every year there would be some people disapproving of the Nobel committee's choice. Personally, I cannot read the lyrics without "hearing" the way they were sung so it's impossible to gauge how they would read without having heard Dylan first. Which makes me wonder whether it matters at all. Should only that which primarily resides on a page be called literature, or should literature be a celebration of words regardless of whether they were printed, spoken or sung? I don't think there's an easy answer and I'm all for a blurring of the lines. Link to comment
christopher3393 Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Well said. Godwin does begin by writing “I’m a huge fan of Dylan. But Nobel literature laureate? I’m not so sure." So I think one can really appreciate Dylan's work and not see it as poetry. Is that subjective? I think it is to some extent and the lines are blurry--free verse, for example. I also find it hard to recite Dylan's lyrics without hearing his voice in my head. But when I don't recall a song or have never heard it and tried reciting the lyrics, I haven't found it very impressive. Maybe it's my training in oral interpretation of literature. Perhaps readers who are unfettered and experimental could do something really good with them without having to sing or imitate. I used to do a fair amount of public recitation, participation in poetry reading groups, and attend readings. Usually, nobody sang. Allen Ginsberg is one exception I recall. And I've never heard anyone read Dylan's lyrics in a compelling way. Dylan himself said "If I can sing it, it's a song. If I can't sing it, it's a poem". Maybe it doesn't matter anymore. Maybe it never did and just seemed to. Godwin ends by saying "At the very least, I suppose, the Nobel committee has given us an opportunity to reexamine our notions of what defines literature in the modern age.” Or post-modern age. Link to comment
cbee Posted October 25, 2016 Share Posted October 25, 2016 Following is a quote from World Oral Literature Project : About "Definitions and understandings of oral literature Oral literature is a broad term which may include ritual texts, curative chants, epic poems, musical genres, folk tales, creation tales, songs, myths, spells, legends, proverbs, riddles, tongue-twisters, word games, recitations, life histories or historical narratives. Most simply, oral literature refers to any form of verbal art which is transmitted orally or delivered by word of mouth. Orature is a more recent and less widely used term which emphasises the oral character and nature of literary works." If Poets and Playwrights can be considered for the Literature prize then Bob Dylan as an Orature(?) can also. Link to comment
thebeck Posted October 27, 2016 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Apparently the Nobel committee does not does not acknowledge refusals. So it looks as if Bob is refusing to acknowledge its existence. Well done Bob. Yes Dylan is just being Dylan and the committee is whining. What did they expect? Link to comment
Orko Posted October 28, 2016 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Yes Dylan is just being Dylan and the committee is whining. What did they expect? Obviously the members of the committee haven't read the opening lines to Someday Baby Link to comment
christopher3393 Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 "... in a call with Sara Danius, the permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, Dylan said: “I appreciate the honour so much,” adding: “The news about the Nobel prize left me speechless.” And, in a separate interview with the Daily Telegraph – his first since the award – he said he would “absolutely” attend an award ceremony “if it’s at all possible”. Dylan told the paper: “It’s hard to believe … amazing, incredible. Whoever dreams about something like that?” https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/oct/29/im-speechless-says-nobel-winner-bob-dylan-as-he-breaks-his-two-week-silence Link to comment
sphinxsix Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 [h=1]Bob Dylan Thanks Nobel Prize Committee in Acceptance Speech for Honoring His Songs as Literature.[/h] Bob Dylan Thanks Nobel Prize Committee in Acceptance Speech for Honoring His Songs as Literature Link to comment
Ralf11 Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 what would Chaucer think? or that dude the Beowulf poet? Link to comment
craighartley Posted December 11, 2016 Share Posted December 11, 2016 what would Chaucer think? Ye knowe eek, that in forme of speche is chaunge With-inne a thousand yeer, and wordes tho That hadden prys, now wonder nyce and straunge Us thinketh hem; and yet they spake hem so, And spedde as wel in love as men now do. Sent from my iPhone using Computer Audiophile Link to comment
wgscott Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 I am forever traumatized by being forced to memorize the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales in Middle English when in High School. Link to comment
sphinxsix Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 Patti Smith - A Hard Rain's A-Gonna Fall (Nobel 2016 ceremony) Link to comment
sphinxsix Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 And BTW the cover of Patti Smith bootleg (Live in Stockholm 1976) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now