Paul R Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 The earth is round but not spherical. The Earth is an oblate spheroid - meaning it is perfectly and precisely accurate to say the earth is not round. It would be more precise to say, "not perfectly round" of course, if I take your meaning correctly. It does point out that there can be more than one way to correctly describe something though. Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
Paul R Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 ... Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
mansr Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 The Earth is an oblate spheroid - meaning it is perfectly and precisely accurate to say the earth is not round. It would be more precise to say, not perfectly round of course, if I take your meaning correctly. Round is not synonymous with spherical. For instance, a circle is most definitely round. An equatorial cross section of the Earth is very close to circular. Ergo, the Earth is round, even in a strict sense. Link to comment
plissken Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Round is not synonymous with spherical. For instance, a circle is most definitely round. An equatorial cross section of the Earth is very close to circular. Ergo, the Earth is round, even in a strict sense. Paul is onto the next person he can be pedantic with... Good luck Mansr Link to comment
mansr Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Paul is onto the next person he can be pedantic with... Good luck Mansr Oh, I can play semantics games all day. Link to comment
Paul R Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Round is not synonymous with spherical. For instance, a circle is most definitely round. An equatorial cross section of the Earth is very close to circular. Ergo, the Earth is round, even in a strict sense. Missed the laugh huh? Yep, you are right, as round is a synonym for spherical. On the other hand, the earth is not a perfect sphere, so it is not perfectly round either. (grin) -Paul Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
Paul R Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Paul is onto the next person he can be pedantic with... Good luck Mansr Why don't you go back to trying to irritate other people with your sideshow nonsense? Anyone who considers protocol unimportant has never dealt with a cat DAC. Robert A. Heinlein Link to comment
whoozwah Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 WAV and FLAC files do or don't sound different based on the shape of the planet? If I am anything, I am a music lover and a pragmatist. Link to comment
mansr Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 WAV and FLAC files do or don't sound different based on the shape of the planet? You mean there might be tidal effects on sound quality? Link to comment
diggle Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 The entire process is screen cast so it's documented. And my original two evaluation scenarios still stand. I'm not giving anyone a simple 1 in 10 dart throw chance. Heck, I'll even prepare everything live. That is I can give you remote shared view of my system while I do it. You will see me generate the WAV file, do the MD5 hash, create all the copies, touch the creation/modification date to flatten them. Rename them 1 - 10. Alternately you can provide me with a WAV of your choosing. The only part I'll kick you out of is the random selection of which one I will FLAC/Zip/Unzip/UnFlac back to WAV and verify the MD5 Checksum. Will screen record the entire thing and post it on YouTube. Ok, $3000 2 directories, 10 files each, created and sent during one documented live session. I'm not a computer geek so I will need to consult somebody on the documantation procedure. May take a day or two unless some CA member will help. Will 3 days after I recognise the right files (I will deliver the original VAW, I don't like classical) be enough for you to send the money to a given European account? Link to comment
plissken Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 Ok, $3000 2 directories, 10 files each, created and sent during one documented live session. I'm not a computer geek so I will need to consult somebody on the documantation procedure. May take a day or two unless some CA member will help. Will 3 days after I recognise the right files (I will deliver the original VAW, I don't like classical) be enough for you to send the money to a given European account? No, $1K for a 1 in 100 chance at guessing. 2K for a 1 in 196 chance of guessing. I'll do $1500 for a 1 in 144 (12 tracks per). I'll send you a prepaid Visa. You'll send a screenshot of payment receipt to a charity. Link to comment
plissken Posted July 28, 2016 Share Posted July 28, 2016 $ 3000 ? I've got $2000 that I can spend. I'm not going above a ratio that I have set forth. Basically its $1000 per every 100 possible permutations. It's either take it or leave it at this point. It's way more than fair since I'm not asking for any matching funds. Your next answer is either yes or no to my proposal. Link to comment
whoozwah Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 You mean there might be tidal effects on sound quality? you post some of the derpiest responses to my quotes, although I am kinda setting them up for the derpitude. What I'm trying to say is, oh lawl. If I am anything, I am a music lover and a pragmatist. Link to comment
wgscott Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 You mean there might be tidal effects on sound quality? I thought Tidal was lossless. Link to comment
firedog Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 WAV and FLAC files do or don't sound different based on the shape of the planet? No, but they sound different if you are in the northern or southern hemisphere. Main listening (small home office): Main setup: Surge protector +>Isol-8 Mini sub Axis Power Strip/Isolation>QuietPC Low Noise Server>Roon (Audiolense DRC)>Stack Audio Link II>Kii Control>Kii Three (on their own electric circuit) >GIK Room Treatments. Secondary Path: Server with Audiolense RC>RPi4 or analog>Cayin iDAC6 MKII (tube mode) (XLR)>Kii Three . Bedroom: SBTouch to Cambridge Soundworks Desktop Setup. Living Room/Kitchen: Ropieee (RPi3b+ with touchscreen) + Schiit Modi3E to a pair of Morel Hogtalare. All absolute statements about audio are false Link to comment
diggle Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 Your next answer is either yes or no to my proposal. Don't put a pressure on me, man. This is you who is under pressure. Are you waiting for an opportunity to repeat 'crickets'? Link to comment
plissken Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 Don't put a pressure on me, man. This is you who is under pressure. Are you waiting for an opportunity to repeat 'crickets'? I simply said I'm only working with a yes/no answer to my proposal. Take some time. Either way I'm getting a data point so I'm under no pressure as it's a win/win for me either way in my opinion. At least if the answer is no I don't have to sweat a 1 in 100 change at losing $1k. Link to comment
whoozwah Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 No, but they sound different if you are in the northern or southern hemisphere. That makes sense. Waves go clockwise in the southern hemisphere so they must sound better there since that's the way the clock actually moves. It's just like a record player! If I am anything, I am a music lover and a pragmatist. Link to comment
sandyk Posted July 29, 2016 Share Posted July 29, 2016 I simply said I'm only working with a yes/no answer to my proposal. Take some time. Either way I'm getting a data point so I'm under no pressure as it's a win/win for me either way in my opinion. At least if the answer is no I don't have to sweat a 1 in 100 change at losing $1k. Make the cash prize directly available to him, instead of a donation to charity that you can then claim as a deduction on your income tax ! How a Digital Audio file sounds, or a Digital Video file looks, is governed to a large extent by the Power Supply area. All that Identical Checksums gives is the possibility of REGENERATING the file to close to that of the original file. PROFILE UPDATED 13-11-2020 Link to comment
plissken Posted July 30, 2016 Share Posted July 30, 2016 Make the cash prize directly available to him, instead of a donation to charity that you can then claim as a deduction on your income tax ! You should re-read the offer... Link to comment
wgscott Posted July 30, 2016 Share Posted July 30, 2016 You should re-read the offer... The offer differs depending upon the power supply that renders its font. Link to comment
Apesbrain Posted July 30, 2016 Share Posted July 30, 2016 At least if the answer is no I don't have to sweat a 1 in 100 change at losing $1k. I understand where you are going with your "challenge" but if 1% of people can repeatedly pass the test then there is a difference. Link to comment
plissken Posted July 30, 2016 Share Posted July 30, 2016 I understand where you are going with your "challenge" but if 1% of people can repeatedly pass the test then there is a difference. I agree ;-) Link to comment
cheezmo Posted July 30, 2016 Share Posted July 30, 2016 I understand where you are going with your "challenge" but if 1% of people can repeatedly pass the test then there is a difference. He is saying there is a 1% chance that someone will randomly be correct. He isn't saying that 1% of people could pass the test 100% of the time. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now