Jump to content
IGNORED

PlayClassics Truthful Recording Technology v1.1


Recommended Posts

Yes, I do recall the "giveaway" and when it meant I had to send a PM for a download code I elected not to do so. I'm deeply suspicious by nature and have always been wary of a "free gift".

 

If you would like people to enjoy samples of your recordings, then make them available as a download with no questions asked.

 

If your interest is with building a potential client list for commercial purposes, I'm not interested in that type of marketing approach.

 

Thank you.

 

What was the purpose of this post? If you don't want a free sample, don't ask for one. It's your choice, so stop whining about it.

 

Of course this giveaway is a marketing strategy. That doesn't mean there are any hidden strings attached.

Link to comment
Point made. I agree I was being a bit reactionary. My concern is that living in a digital world I'm cautious about whom I allow past the gates. Anyone wanting personal information needs a better reason than my being able to hear a song.

 

You're already posting on this forum. No information beyond your nickname here was requested.

Link to comment
  • 2 weeks later...
I have a new one. This would be version 1.1c.

 

I have uploaded all the version comparison demos on to a free access directory so that anyone can download them without the need for a code. Here are the links to all the version comparison demos:

 

http://www.playclassics.com/v1.0.zip

http://www.playclassics.com/v1.1a.zip

http://www.playclassics.com/v1.1b.zip

http://www.playclassics.com/v1.1c.zip

 

v1.0: this is the one from the original giveaway thread

v1.1a: this is our first attempt to try to take away the resonance on the low part of the spectrum (95Hz)

v1.1b: after trying to take away the resonance the overall balance changed, so here we tried to restore it

v1.1c: here I measured again for the resonance. This time I came up with 85Hz (not 95Hz). I did not touch the overall balance.

 

The resonance we are trying to fix is on the left hand of version 1.0 from second 36 to second 46.

 

Doing a spectrum analysis of the files, I notice two things:

 

1. The filter around 85 Hz in 1.1c is sharper than the one used in 1.1a/b.

2. 1.1a/b has a dip at 500-600 Hz, 1.1c does not.

 

Listening, I honestly don't hear all that much difference. Perhaps it would have been easier to notice with a less busy piece of music.

Link to comment
Hi Mansr,

Since you did not mention 1.0 at all, may I ask:

1. whether or not it does not have any filtering around 85 Hz as indicated in your point 1;

2. whether or not it has no dip at 500-600 Hz as in point 2.

And

Does it have any other differences compared with 1.1c?

 

Those observations were with 1.0 as reference. Sorry for not being clear about that.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...