loop7 Posted October 26, 2015 Share Posted October 26, 2015 I sometimes complain when I pay $18+ for a high resolution album via download but I recently stumbled upon a 1956 tape recording (RCA) that would have likely been the top of the mountain in terms of resolution at release time. The tape's three tracks only combine for about 27 minutes of music so, even if we cut the price by 50% to $5.48, it still leaves us with an inflation adjusted 2014 price of $47.08 which would be prohibitively expensive unless one can afford DSD? Or, is the current pricing inline with the 1956 prices? Link to comment
tubes59 Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Great food for thought. But if a 27 minute tape was the standard high-end music offering at the time (was it?) shouldn't we use the full inflation adjusted price of $94.16 per album (instead of cutting it in half) as representative of how a high-end album in 1956 compares to today's high-end offering (even though the music plays longer today) in terms of price? Today seems a much better bargain price-wise. Link to comment
wgscott Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 What is it in California dollars? Link to comment
loop7 Posted October 27, 2015 Author Share Posted October 27, 2015 Great food for thought. But if a 27 minute tape was the standard high-end music offering at the time (was it?) shouldn't we use the full inflation adjusted price of $94.16 per album (instead of cutting it in half) as representative of how a high-end album in 1956 compares to today's high-end offering (even though the music plays longer today) in terms of price? Today seems a much better bargain price-wise. you make a good point and I was on the fence about treating the 27 tape as a complete album. Link to comment
bmoura Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 I sometimes complain when I pay $18+ for a high resolution album via download but I recently stumbled upon a 1956 tape recording (RCA) that would have likely been the top of the mountain in terms of resolution at release time. Depends on where you buy your downloads. HDTracks is selling Stereo DSD Downloads for $17.99 - before that 15% discount (or $15.29) - starting today. Homepage | HDtracks - The World's Greatest-Sounding Music Downloads Link to comment
ajoe Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Pay close attention: It is not just stereophonic, it is orthophonic. Just try to find a good orthophonic recording today for under a $100. Link to comment
4est Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Bingo! Not to mention that with the tape someone had to actually make it. Making a tape is a more involved/time consuming process than pressing a record. Pay close attention: It is not just stereophonic, it is orthophonic. Just try to find a good orthophonic recording today for under a $100. Forrest: Win10 i9 9900KS/GTX1060 HQPlayer4>Win10 NAA DSD>Pavel's DSC2.6>Bent Audio TAP> Parasound JC1>"Naked" Quad ESL63/Tannoy PS350B subs<100Hz Link to comment
bmoura Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 Pay close attention: It is not just stereophonic, it is orthophonic. Just try to find a good orthophonic recording today for under a $100. But is it Binaural? Or in Surround Sound? Choices, choices.... Link to comment
loop7 Posted October 27, 2015 Author Share Posted October 27, 2015 I think you guys just started the next big thing: Orthophonic DSD Link to comment
bmoura Posted October 27, 2015 Share Posted October 27, 2015 I think you guys just started the next big thing: Orthophonic DSD Haven't seen that yet. But there are albums now available in Binaural DSD. https://www.nativedsd.com/homepage/binaural_dsd_music Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now