goldsdad Posted September 25, 2015 Share Posted September 25, 2015 The third one is especially weird. Upsampled from 48 kHz to 96 kHz fs. The content above 24 kHz is a less intense mirror image of the content below 24 kHz because it has been gently rolled-off instead of being aggressively eliminated by a brick wall low-pass filter. There are a few other examples in the forum. Link to comment
goldsdad Posted September 25, 2015 Share Posted September 25, 2015 I think the difference between good and bad music is beyond graphs, but I could be easily wrong. You're not getting it. This isn't about the music. It's about receiving phoney merchandise in return for good money. Link to comment
goldsdad Posted September 25, 2015 Share Posted September 25, 2015 Bill, I take it you bought this from dead.net and there was no warning of upsampling. HDTracks.co.uk presently warns that some tracks are upsampled from 44.1 kHz. Link to comment
goldsdad Posted September 25, 2015 Share Posted September 25, 2015 I wonder what they think of number 1 and number 7 (the first two I posted)? Still, this is a major step forward for them. Track 1 seems to have been missed by HDTracks, but "number 7" (disc 3 track 7 of the CD set?) is track 23 at HDTracks, and they have warned about that one. By the way, you posted a graph of track 1 twice. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now