Jump to content
IGNORED

ECdesigns


Recommended Posts

@Ben75

 

Yes, i tried but not charging at the same time, if that is what you are referring to. There is no point in doing that because batteries last a very long time with either the DAC or the U192... 

 

Don't focus too much on batteries. I have still been using a battery for the DAC because I have been moving it back and forth between my living room and home office, and it is simpler that way, but may change my mind after a while. 

 

This is not critical. If you purchase the DAC and other units, you can try it, it is simple, but it should not be a decision-criteria for purchasing them. 

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, realDHT said:

Less than a week since I recieved my ecd combo, I already started doing some modifications 😁 (bye-bye warranty). 

 

Since the enclosures are not shielded, except from the aluminium bottom plate, I tested placing them close to my amplifier transformers and could hear very noticable hum/interference pickup. I shielded the rest of the enclosures with 0.2 mm copper foil. This worked wonders, I can no longer provoke any interference pickup from the amp. At the same time I also installed foam vibration damping material under the circuit boards. 

 

Looks neat!

 

I would be interested to know how ECD owners place their devices. Stacking? Weights? Keeping distance between certain devices?

I was thinking to stack my U192+UPL96+SVC24 together using something like sugru for added weight and keep them at some distance from the DA96. Is that a good idea?

 

audio system

 

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, bodiebill said:

 

Looks neat!

 

I would be interested to know how ECD owners place their devices. Stacking? Weights? Keeping distance between certain devices?

I was thinking to stack my U192+UPL96+SVC24 together using something like sugru for added weight and keep them at some distance from the DA96. Is that a good idea?

 

I place my 2 devices closely side by side with the aluminium plates in contact. This is only because I find they need the same ground, otherwise I get ground loop hum. This only happens with my iFi power supply, not with the standard one from EC. Probably its a good idea to keep some distance from the DA96 as you say. Had not heard about sugru, checked it out and it looks like a very useful product!  

Link to comment

I also keep the DA96 at a distance from the other units. I think the U192 emits a little more noise than the UPL. Otherwise, if you stack them, I would put the DA96 on top, just below the SVC - perhaps a small aluminum plate on top of each unit would work instead of applying copper shielding inside ? @realDHT would that be beneficial in your opinion ? 

 

Sugru does look like a nice option 👍

Link to comment
34 minutes ago, hopkins said:

I also keep the DA96 at a distance from the other units. I think the U192 emits a little more noise than the UPL. Otherwise, if you stack them, I would put the DA96 on top, just below the SVC - perhaps a small aluminum plate on top of each unit would work instead of applying copper shielding inside ? @realDHT would that be beneficial in your opinion ? 

 

Sugru does look like a nice option 👍

I guess a top alu plate could be beneficial. If stacking units, also each bottom plate would shield cross-talk between units, this was probably the designers intent. With my shielding tweak, one needs to be careful so that no piece of foil can fall off and reach circuits.

 

 

       

Link to comment
1 hour ago, hopkins said:

I also keep the DA96 at a distance from the other units.

I think the U192 emits a little more noise than the UPL. Otherwise, if you stack them, I would put the DA96 on top, just below the SVC - perhaps a small aluminum plate on top of each unit would work instead of applying copper shielding inside ? @realDHT would that be beneficial in your opinion ? 

 

Indeed, so this is my plan, with the UPL in the middle as it emits less noise. And the UPL and U will never be active at the same time.

 

SVC24

UPL96

U192                                                            DA96

 

(Good to see we also found a tweaking playground in the parallel ECD mini-universe.)

 

audio system

 

Link to comment
4 hours ago, hopkins said:

 

On paper a lot of things look good. Difficult to know whether the extra price you pay for audiophile features (such as "cleaning up the USB signal") make much of a difference with the U192. 


Where did you geh this Quote from?

Maybe I got this wrong, but this bridge is connected to the allo sparky via i2s. So it would not “clean up” the signal, but make the signal itself with help of “good” clocks. 
Antonelli Caroli (GentooPlayer Linux) even made a distro for this thing. 
Maybe someone will give it a try. 
 

My brother has the former ECD usb-> toslink Converter (the very small one) and we were able to identify a difference between hooking this up to a MacBook on one hand, and to an Auralic Aries Mini on the other. 
I’m sure Gordon and John have produced a more sophisticated usb elektrotos Converter now, but this allo usbridge still might be worth a try. 
please do tell, if I got this all wrong. 

Greetings,

Jan

Link to comment
30 minutes ago, Jan.ho said:

Maybe I got this wrong, but this bridge is connected to the allo sparky via i2s. 

 

You are referring to the "old" USBridge which has been replaced by the USBridge Signature.

 

Matt

"I want to know why the musicians are on stage, not where". (John Farlowe)

 

Link to comment
3 hours ago, matthias said:

 

You are referring to the "old" USBridge which has been replaced by the USBridge Signature.

 

Matt


well, and the new signature uses something else out of the computing module?

In my own Defense :D I never said signature. Have you tried the “old” one?

Link to comment

Just received the Paul Hynes SR4T so I tried out powering the UPL as per screenshot. Without the (red) SBooster Vbus2, i.e. when the UPL receives power from the NUC, it works fine. However, when adding the Vbus2 and powering the usb hub separately with 5VDC from the SR4T, the Silicon Labs CP2010x device (which is needed for the UPL) is not recognized.

 

I will try whether it works with the U192 later...

 

image.thumb.png.c87575621b022bbe8a51462eef972462.png

 

audio system

 

Link to comment
20 hours ago, bodiebill said:

Just received the Paul Hynes SR4T so I tried out powering the UPL as per screenshot. Without the (red) SBooster Vbus2, i.e. when the UPL receives power from the NUC, it works fine. However, when adding the Vbus2 and powering the usb hub separately with 5VDC from the SR4T, the Silicon Labs CP2010x device (which is needed for the UPL) is not recognized.

 

I will try whether it works with the U192 later...

 

 

 

Hope you will get it working and looking forward to hear what difference it makes to the U192 sound.

Link to comment

I have experimented a little with upsampling using the U192/DA96. I played a few redbook recordings and compared the original 44.1 kHz with upsamling in Jriver to 88.2 kHz. I used the SoX resampling algorithm which is supposed to be the best. Since I don't have an attenuator yet, i'm using digital volume control so the chain is not bitperfect anyway. 

 

I found that with the upsampling, much of the magic was gone. It still sounded nice, but not as special as before.              

Link to comment
9 hours ago, realDHT said:

Hope you will get it working and looking forward to hear what difference it makes to the U192 sound.

 

Same problem: the U192 is not recognized with

 

NUC => SBooster Vbus2 => usb cable => usb hub separately powered => usb cable => U192

 

It is only recognized when I remove the Vbus2, i.e. when it receives power from the NUC (with or without separate power).

So this was not successful. I think @hopkins did manage to do it this way? Am I doing something wrong?

 

In the mean time I am waiting for the Ghent cable recommended by @Ben75; so will be continued...

 

 

 

audio system

 

Link to comment
On 2/16/2019 at 10:28 AM, hopkins said:

Seems they are having issues with the battery. No problem on my side. 

 

On the thread about SD card players SLC memory was mentionned. I purchased a 64gb USB SLC. It is quite expensive, but it is much faster than the standard USB keys i was using, which were quite slow on my computer. The SLC last longer, and seem to be more reliable. Anyway, it works well. I have given up on the idea of storing all my music collection on multiple keys, and just copy files on that one key as needed.

 

Here is the key:  https://www.amazon.fr/dp/B00K3XHF66/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_awdb_c_D5YzCb50NVGX6

Hi hopkins

Are you still using your SLC USB memory for the UPL or found something else as good or better?  Anyone else with a UPL try SLC type memory?

Thanks

Link to comment
1 hour ago, tims said:

Hi hopkins

Are you still using your SLC USB memory for the UPL or found something else as good or better?  Anyone else with a UPL try SLC type memory?

Thanks

 

Hi Tims, 

 

In the past few years since I first started using the UPL (first model), USB keys have improved and gotten cheaper. Using those (still) expensive SLC keys may no longer be relevant.

 

I use one of these:

 

https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Ultra-Flash-Drive-Version/dp/B00DQG9OZ2

 

Also, the current UPL no longer works on batteries and has enough power on its front USB port for larger USB drives. 

 

I format drives using Rufus, which lets you format any disk in FAT32. 

Link to comment
On 9/7/2020 at 10:18 PM, bodiebill said:

 

This thread inspired me to try just that. As I have this cable for my TakeT H2 and Hifiman HE-6 headphones (both really hard to drive) , with two 4 pin mini-XLR for the cans and one 4 pin male XLR on the other end, I ordered a 4 pin female XLR to be able to convert to 2 RCA's for the SVC24. 

 

I guess this will not work with the Taket (which needs its own special box), but it may well work with the Hifiman. 

 

image.thumb.png.55973dabe9e8a802d58a9868652f2b1b.png 

 

so I finally made an adapter cable for my mini-xlr to 4pin xlr headphone wire:

image.thumb.png.d333d6a30f057520288c5fb3d5f94f75.png

 

Alas, the Hifiman is much too demanding: directly from the DA96 the sound is much too soft. Ah well, it was worth trying.

 

audio system

 

Link to comment
58 minutes ago, bodiebill said:

Anyone knows the minimum sensitivity required for headphones to be used with the DA96 (+SVC24) and produce sufficient volume level? 

 

My Beyerdynamic are 96db and 250 ohm and can be played directly from the DA96 (slightly louder than normal). I just checked, your Hifiman are 83.5 db and 50 ohm, which is indeed unusual for headphones. I would think a minimum of 100db would work, but I think the impedance has to be taken into account as well. 

Link to comment

I checked the Hifiman He-6 spec and the sensitivity is low at 83.5 dB, but I think the real  problem here is that it has low impedance, 50 Ohm. The DA96 has 375 Ohm output impedance. 600 Ohm headphones might work well directly, but I think EC modified their DA96 to half output impedance when driving 600 Ohm headphones.   

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...