Popular Post StreamFidelity Posted August 18, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 18, 2019 18 hours ago, ted_b said: Is it a plus for the I9-9900k then (as the 9700k does not support hyperthreading)? Hyperthreading has advantages in my system (i9-9900K). I can run ASDM7EC smoothly with most filters. The CPU utilization is about half lower than without hyperthreading.The cores speed at 4 GHz is much lower, which has a positive effect in my mostly fanless PC on the temperature. After everything I've read here, the i7-9700K has to run with much higher speed (4.7GHz). The benchmark comparison shows the higher performance of the i9-9900K vs. i7-9700K. But is also around 100 US $ more expensive.https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/Intel-i9-9900K-vs-Intel-i7-9700K/3334vs3335 The picture below shows that only one Case Fan (140 mm) is active with very low rotation. The fan is off for operation without EC modulators. Conclusion: the selection of the CPU depends on the PC system and the wallet. 😁 k6davis and asdf1000 1 1 Grigg Audio Solutions Owner StreamFidelitys Setup: Sonus Faber Amati Futura | T+A M10 | T+A SDV 3100 HV | fis Audio PC & Server | GigaWatt PC4-EVO+ | JCAT OPTIMO S ATX | FARAD Super10 & Super3 | Keces P8 | Afterdark Buffalo Switch | fis Audio Cables | Solidsteel HJ-3 / HY-A | Formfeld 1 | ABSORBER LIGHT | Link to comment
rando Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Intel has said all future i3 - i9 will have hyperthreading. With only just over 100 shopping days until Black Friday who knows what they will actually bring to market in 4th quarter. When something does finally come expect to need a new mb though, again. Link to comment
Rune Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 12 minutes ago, rando said: who knows what they will actually bring to market in 4th quarter. According the various hardware sites it will only be mobile CPU which have a turbo boost to 4.1GHz so not interesting in a HQPlayer context. There might be a higher binned i9-9900K called i9-9900KS which will have a all core turbo bost to 5GHz. Link to comment
rando Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 Intel is a notoriously unreliable source of information about themselves and their releases. Unlike Juusi and Signalyst products such as HQP4. Link to comment
sbenyo Posted August 18, 2019 Share Posted August 18, 2019 I am using hqplayer with ryzen threadripper 1920x. It works fine most of the time with the most demanding filters (xtr-lp) up sampling to DSD512. From some reason I cannot use CUDA offloading properly. I have Nvidia gtx 1060 6GB which should be compatible. When I turn it on music staggers. I have to use it on partial which indicates convolution only but when playing a song it displays CUDA offload details which says: upsampler=disabled convolution=disabled. I also don't see any GPU usage in the task manager for hqplayer. Does anyone experience the same thing? Does anyone know why I cannot offload to GPU? Link to comment
elan120 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Not sure if this is the correct place for this question, if not, please help direct this to the right place. I had a power glitch a day ago, after having everything recovered, I find HQPlayer can no longer recognize NetworkAudioAdapter, where the selection show blank. I have reboot the NUC multiple times and tried another NUC with same result. In addition, I also tried loading HQPlayer to another computer, again, same result. My question is, what could be the cause(s) to this problem? TIA for any help provided. Link to comment
elan120 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 53 minutes ago, sbenyo said: I am using hqplayer with ryzen threadripper 1920x. It works fine most of the time with the most demanding filters (xtr-lp) up sampling to DSD512. From some reason I cannot use CUDA offloading properly. I have Nvidia gtx 1060 6GB which should be compatible. When I turn it on music staggers. I have to use it on partial which indicates convolution only but when playing a song it displays CUDA offload details which says: upsampler=disabled convolution=disabled. I also don't see any GPU usage in the task manager for hqplayer. Does anyone experience the same thing? Does anyone know why I cannot offload to GPU? I have the same card, and had the similar issue until I upgrade to the latest driver. Link to comment
LoryWiv Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 4 hours ago, sbenyo said: I am using hqplayer with ryzen threadripper 1920x. It works fine most of the time with the most demanding filters (xtr-lp) up sampling to DSD512. From some reason I cannot use CUDA offloading properly. I have Nvidia gtx 1060 6GB which should be compatible. I agree with @sbenyo that video card driver update is usually the 1st step in troubleshhooting, and may be all that is needed. I also have a GTX 1060 which works reliably well with HQ Player Desktop 4.01 and my Intel i7-7700 4.2 GHz. I run ASDMEC / poly-sinc-xtr-mp-2s and average cpu usage is 15-20%, GPU 7-10% which keeps temps nice and cool,. no stutter even when multi-tasking. Desktop: HQ Player --> Singxer SU-1 --> Matrix X-Sabre Pro --> McChanson SuperSilver UltimatE Headphones: Audeze MM-500, Meze Audio Elite, Focal Utopia 2022, Focal Bathys (Wireless) Portable Gear: Hiby RS6, xDuoo XD05 Bal 2, FiiO BTR7, Creative BT-W5, FiiTii HiFiDots TWS Nearfield Active Speakers: Audioengine HD3 Power Conditioning: Furman Elite-15 PFi Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 18 hours ago, StreamFidelity said: Hyperthreading has advantages in my system (i9-9900K). I can run ASDM7EC smoothly with most filters. The CPU utilization is about half lower than without hyperthreading.The cores speed at 4 GHz is much lower, which has a positive effect in my mostly fanless PC on the temperature. After everything I've read here, the i7-9700K has to run with much higher speed (4.7GHz). Very interesting! Is that with PCM192kHz to DSD256 with ext2 and ASDM7EC ? Can anyone else running i9-9900K confirm cores are running at ~4.0 GHz? With PCM192kHz to DSD256 with ext2 and ASDM7EC @Ales Prochazka @JTS Link to comment
emc_1984 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 7 hours ago, sbenyo said: I am using hqplayer with ryzen threadripper 1920x. It works fine most of the time with the most demanding filters (xtr-lp) up sampling to DSD512. From some reason I cannot use CUDA offloading properly. I have Nvidia gtx 1060 6GB which should be compatible. When I turn it on music staggers. I have to use it on partial which indicates convolution only but when playing a song it displays CUDA offload details which says: upsampler=disabled convolution=disabled. I also don't see any GPU usage in the task manager for hqplayer. Does anyone experience the same thing? Does anyone know why I cannot offload to GPU? Do you use Windows or Ubuntu? In my case CUDA offload( diffrent graphic cards) dont work with old nvidia drivers, try install latest drivers. Link to comment
Ales Prochazka Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 3 hours ago, asdf1000 said: Very interesting! Is that with PCM192kHz to DSD256 with ext2 and ASDM7EC ? Can anyone else running i9-9900K confirm cores are running at ~4.0 GHz? With PCM192kHz to DSD256 with ext2 and ASDM7EC @Ales Prochazka @JTS With setting PL1 120W and PL2 160W, poly-sinc-xtr-mp filter and convolution on, the cores run most of the time at ~ 4.7GHz (352.8 ---> DSD256). asdf1000 1 Developer of HQPDcontrol. Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, Ales Prochazka said: With setting PL1 120W and PL2 160W, poly-sinc-xtr-mp filter and convolution on, the cores run most of the time at ~ 4.7GHz (352.8 ---> DSD256). That is non-2s right? So poly-sinc-xtr-mp will be more CPU intensive than ext2? Link to comment
Ales Prochazka Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 21 minutes ago, asdf1000 said: That is non-2s right? So poly-sinc-xtr-mp will be more CPU intensive than ext2? Yes, non-2s version. And yes, the non-2s version is probably more intensive than ext2. asdf1000 1 Developer of HQPDcontrol. Link to comment
Popular Post StreamFidelity Posted August 19, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted August 19, 2019 5 hours ago, asdf1000 said: Is that with PCM192kHz to DSD256 with ext2 and ASDM7EC ? Yes, that works without problems. Even with the lowest latencies. The Task Manager displays the average CPU frequency 3,75 GHz. This is the advantage with hyperthreading, which always runs enough cores with 4 GHz. Therefore, the EC modulators work without dropouts and with acceptable temperature load, since I only have a slow rotating case fan. asdf1000 and k6davis 1 1 Grigg Audio Solutions Owner StreamFidelitys Setup: Sonus Faber Amati Futura | T+A M10 | T+A SDV 3100 HV | fis Audio PC & Server | GigaWatt PC4-EVO+ | JCAT OPTIMO S ATX | FARAD Super10 & Super3 | Keces P8 | Afterdark Buffalo Switch | fis Audio Cables | Solidsteel HJ-3 / HY-A | Formfeld 1 | ABSORBER LIGHT | Link to comment
sbenyo Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Thanks for all recommendations about the GPU. I have the latest driver (from 23/7/2019). I still don't see any GPU usage on hqplayer process. I look in task manager on the GPU columns. 🤨 Not sure what else to do or try. It is frustrating as I am sure it should work better if GPU could be used. Link to comment
sbenyo Posted August 19, 2019 Share Posted August 19, 2019 Other issue which is probably related, is the CPU usage. I just moved from 3.25 with xtr to hqplayer 4.1 and using poly-sinc-xtr-lp. As far as I know this should be the same filter. CPU usage with hqplayer 4 is now between 50-99%. With hqplayer 3 it was stable around 40%. I wonder why there should be such a difference... Link to comment
Miska Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 On 8/19/2019 at 2:27 AM, sbenyo said: From some reason I cannot use CUDA offloading properly. I have Nvidia gtx 1060 6GB which should be compatible. When I turn it on music staggers. I have to use it on partial which indicates convolution only but when playing a song it displays CUDA offload details which says: upsampler=disabled convolution=disabled. I also don't see any GPU usage in the task manager for hqplayer. 4 hours ago, sbenyo said: I still don't see any GPU usage on hqplayer process. I look in task manager on the GPU columns. If you have enabled GPU only for convolution, are you doing any convolution with convolution engine or pipeline matrix? Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
sbenyo Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 6 hours ago, Miska said: If you have enabled GPU only for convolution, are you doing any convolution with convolution engine or pipeline matrix? Not sure about it. I am just using hqplayer with simple xtr-lp filter to convert to DSD512. I don't use anything else. Link to comment
Miska Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 56 minutes ago, sbenyo said: Not sure about it. I am just using hqplayer with simple xtr-lp filter to convert to DSD512. I don't use anything else. That's why the offload is not coming on for convolution, because the convolution is not in use... Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
Lukasluis Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Is the upgrade discount still applicable to existing version 3 licensee? I could not seem to figure out how to apply the discount code at the checkout. I'm looking at purchasing a license for HQPe. Link to comment
k6davis Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Lukasluis said: Is the upgrade discount still applicable to existing version 3 licensee? I could not seem to figure out how to apply the discount code at the checkout. I'm looking at purchasing a license for HQPe. It may be that the discount is only applicable when upgrading from Desktop V3 to Desktop V4. Roon Server: Core i7-3770S, WS2012 + AO => HQP Server: Core, i7-9700K, HQPlayer OS => NAA: Celeron NUC, HQP NAA => ISO Regen with UltraCap LPS 1.2 => Mapleshade USB Cable => Lampizator L4 DSD-Only Balanced DAC Preamp => Blue Jeans Belden Balanced Cables => Mivera PurePower SE Amp => Magnepan 3.7i Link to comment
Yviena Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Been testing a little with core affinities, and yeah with my 3700x, unticking SMT threads, letting hqplayer only have 4 real threads which is enough for ASDM7EC DSD256 with 96khz rates, consistently reduces cpu usage of HQplayer from 26-28% to 17-19%, @Miska is there any reason why the cpu overhead is so large when more cores/threads are selected, or is it just not optimized enough? Link to comment
Miska Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 8 hours ago, Lukasluis said: Is the upgrade discount still applicable to existing version 3 licensee? I could not seem to figure out how to apply the discount code at the checkout. I'm looking at purchasing a license for HQPe. Coupon code works only for the same product, so Desktop v3 upgrade discount coupon code works for Desktop v4. Embedded is a different product and the upgrade discount is not applicable cross-product. Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
randytsuch Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 30 minutes ago, Miska said: Coupon code works only for the same product, so Desktop v3 upgrade discount coupon code works for Desktop v4. Embedded is a different product and the upgrade discount is not applicable cross-product. Somewhat related. If I buy an embedded license, can I use that license for desktop? I'm planning to use embedded, but may decide later to use desktop. I think I read somewhere if I buy a license, and I'm the only one who ever uses the license (so it would never be used on two machines at the same time), then I can use it on different machines and use either desktop or embedded, but I didn't see anything on your website about it. Thanks Randy My system Link to comment
asdf1000 Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 Hi @Miska If I up-sample RBCD to DSD256 using ext2 ASDM7EC Does HQP actually up-sample RBCD to PCM 64bit 11.2896 MHz first. And then the modulator (ASDM7EC in this example) is what actually converts this to 1 bit 11.2896 MHz ? Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now