Miska Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Won't that require the use of ECC memory the way ZFS does? Won't that limit the usefulness on consumer hardware? No, it is unrelated to type of memory. There's no reason why type of RAM would have anything to do with filesystem level fault tolerance implementation. Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
Bob Stern Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Brilliant, Bill! One great feature of Apple's afhash program is that it appears to compute the hashcode from the audio data only, excluding the tags. This is good for those of us who modify the tags from time to time, since the original hashcode should remain invariant. That's an advantage over the Linux approach which that change the hashcode whenever you modify a tag embedded in an audio file. HQPlayer (on 3.8 GHz 8-core i7 iMac 2020) > NAA (on 2012 Mac Mini i7) > RME ADI-2 v2 > Benchmark AHB-2 > Thiel 3.7 Link to comment
Jud Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Besides how can you take an article seriously by someone using the Unity interface? Word. One never knows, do one? - Fats Waller The fairest thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science. - Einstein Computer, Audirvana -> optical Ethernet to Fitlet3 -> Fibbr Alpha Optical USB -> iFi NEO iDSD DAC -> Apollon Audio 1ET400A Mini (Purifi based) -> Vandersteen 3A Signature. Link to comment
Miska Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 That's an advantage over the Linux approach which that change the hashcode whenever you modify a tag embedded in an audio file. It doesn't matter from corruption detection point of view, because checksums are compared against the latest modification point. And with log structured file systems like Btrfs you can also make snapshots and compare old and new versions of the file or revert the changes you made. And of course it is not bound to any particular file type, same checks apply to all files regardless of content. Signalyst - Developer of HQPlayer Pulse & Fidelity - Software Defined Amplifiers Link to comment
wgscott Posted January 23, 2014 Author Share Posted January 23, 2014 You realize, I hope, that you are in danger of bringing this thread back around to being on topic? Link to comment
wgscott Posted January 23, 2014 Author Share Posted January 23, 2014 More stable link: bitrot: A shell script to detect changes in the audio component of ALAC files - Blogs - Computer Audiophile Here is my first attempt to write a shell script to detect bitrot (changes) in ALAC files. bitrot Download, make sure the file is called bitrot with no suffix, and change the executable bit, i.e., chmod a+x bitrot Now put it in your $PATH cd to a directory that contains your ALAC files you want to protect. Run the shell script like this to create the checksums: bitrot -w It will write a checksum for the audio part of the file (which should never change) to a new metadata attribute in the resource fork of each audio file (assuming you are on an Apple HFS+ filesystem). The advantage of doing this is the shell script doesn't touch your actual audio file (and it makes the shell script easier to write for me at least). To check the files at a later time, simply run the same command, but with -c instead of -w. bitrot -c Here is some sample output, after I deliberately damaged one of the files (using vim): [ATTACH=CONFIG]10390[/ATTACH] Link to comment
cmiu Posted January 23, 2014 Share Posted January 23, 2014 Just to be sure I took the NAS aproach - freenas. I'm using six hdds configured as zfs raid-Z and scrub my data periodically (30 days). and smartctl weekly checks for every hdd in order to predict hdds failures. It is not bullet proof but add another layer of checks for reliability of the hardware. and most important I use off site back-up as well. google search "bit roting zfs" ZFS - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - Data integrity http://www.freenas.org/ pretty easy to install and configure and the documentation/community support is very good. You can even create one click virtual machines for upnp server or various services. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now