Jump to content
IGNORED

HQPlayer's Network Audio Adapter


Recommended Posts

Jussi, question?

 

Does HQ player use more CPU processing when upscaling from wave 96khz 24bit to DSD128, compared to upscaling wave 44.1khz to DSD 128?

 

Both are upscaling to DSD128. Just the original source format is different?

 

Why am I asking this? All my wave 44.1khz work on setting I like, but when I go to 96khz 24bit with same settings it skips. So I thought HQplayer has more processing to do on 96khz files?

Link to comment
  • 2 months later...
15 hours ago, HardrockInMiniMac said:

1. Thanks for taking time to clarify this

2. Soundwise u have one of the - if not the best upsampling player in the world

3. Naim is Hifi highest end and superior to most of the brands mentioned on this entire forum

4. This alone would require u to support their protocol like Damien does and certainly not them - how dare u? Bryston, McIntosh, Accuphase, all of them and potentially others have to make nice for HQPlayer?

 

Is it so damn difficult to implement UPnP support side by side with your own protocol?

 

Chris

 

 

Naim is Hifi highest end and superior to most of the brands mentioned on this entire forum??? 
 

This is a very bold statement. I would say Naim is very good equipment, but would never go as far to say that. 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...