rhodyavphile2 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I am going through an evolution in my 2 channel stereo to make it easier to archive vinyl, hopefully improving the sound, but not hurting it at all. I would appreciate some feedback about my potential changes. Current setup: Spectral DMC30SS preamp Spectral DMA360 amps Basis Debut Vector Koetsu Jade Tag Mclaren PPA30 phono stage Slim Devices Transporter(server running on Mac Mini) Esoteric DV-50s Universal Player Alesis Masterlink(for vinyl archiving) Proposed system changes: Remove the Tag phono stage, Alesis Masterlink and Transporter and replace it with Gordon Audio mic pre, Prism Orpheus A/D/A, Mac Mini with Pure Vinyl Thoughts or alternate suggestions, Rhody... Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Hi Rhody - Looks pretty good to me. What other A/D/As have you considered? Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
rhodyavphile2 Posted February 25, 2009 Author Share Posted February 25, 2009 I have been looking at all the options that include firewire and 24/192... Apogee, Aurora, Lavry, Weiss, etc... It is particularly challenging to make choices without ever hearing anything. Once I narrow it down then I will try and acquire a couple of demo units... I really liked the thought of the Aurora/Apogee, but not a huge fan of needing customized cables or lots of unused connectors dangling around. I actually buy into some of the snake oil related to cable choices and impact on sound quality having upgraded over the years through the various types and quality with electronics staying constant with various upgrades. Just a little concerned now about SRC on the Mini impacting the output to the A/D/A... Too bad the Transporter doesn't allow for 24/192... Do you know of any players hardware or software that might be a good choice to avoid SRC issues? Regards Link to comment
The Computer Audiophile Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Hi Rhody - The Mini won't do any SRC unless you tell it to do SRC. Founder of Audiophile Style | My Audio Systems Link to comment
cfmsp Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I"m curious why you feel the need for a separate mic preamp in front of an Orpheus, unless you're talking a money no object type of system. clay Link to comment
Blu Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 The best use of the Pure Vinyl software is to use a mic pre instead of a phono pre, so that you record without applying the RIAA equalization. You apply the equalization in the digital domain, which is said to give a better result. Pure Vinyl is on discount until the end of February at present. Anyone tried it yet? If so your comments would be welcome, Mikey Fremer from Stereophile thought it was the best digitized vinyl he has heard, and that was using a phono pre, he has yet to try with the Mic pre. Blu http://www.computeraudiophile.com/members/Blu Link to comment
Dan1970 Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 May I ask why you are replacing the Transporter; is it just because it doesn't handle 192k? Are you happy with it for the rest? D. Link to comment
rhodyavphile2 Posted February 25, 2009 Author Share Posted February 25, 2009 Clay, The mic pre in front of the Orpheus would be because my cartridge only outputs .2mV and believe that to be too low or the gain in the Orpheus. At least that is what their website seems to indicate. Dan, Yes I am overall very happy with the Transporter and would not get rid of Slim Server outright as I use a Boom as an alarm clock and a Squeezebox in my office. Since the above solution puts a mac mini and a DAC in my stereo rack there is no real need for the Transporter there. Similarly the Alesis can go and the phono pre. I would have to consider whether I would hang on to the Esoteric also as I do not own many SACD or DVD-A discs and just might record those bypassing the mic pre a sell the Esoteric. I think between the 4 devices I could get rid of I might cover a little over half my outlay for the new configuration... Thanks Steve Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now