Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    The Definitive Sgt. Pepper's In High Resolution

    HD00602567163909_185.jpg

     

    Artist: The Beatles

     

    AlbumSgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Deluxe Anniversary Edition) 24 bit / 96 kHz

     

    From: HDtracks

     

     

     

     

     


    This write-up seems a little strange for me. I'm used to writing about subjects in which I have experience and expertise. The Beatles? Heck, I was born in 1975 and by that time the band was broken up for five years. It goes without saying that I'm no expert in the music of The Beatles, but I know good sound and more importantly, I'm not tied to a nostalgic sound that's engrained in my head and reminds me of high school. I've listened to all The Beatles' albums many times and have enjoyed them over the years. I recently introduced my five year old daughter to The Beatles. In fact she came down to my listening room while I was jotting down notes about this album, and she identified Paul McCartney from the Sgt. Pepper's album cover on my 27" iMac. 

     

    I can't underestimate my lack of feeling for or memory of the original Sgt. Pepper's album. It's great stuff, but I couldn't name a single track from the album if my life depended on it. Sure I know the tracks well, but before writing this I had no idea they were on the Sgt. Pepper's album. All of this matters because it enables me to have an open mind and enables me to sonically analyze and enjoy the album without any baggage. 

     

    Hoping to avoid easily avoidable mistakes about the album, I did some research. I found a wonderful interview of Giles Martin talking about who, what, when, where, and why of this new release. All the naysayers will quickly conclude that remixing Sgt. Pepper's in 2017 is all about money. Fine, don't buy it and ignore the facts that I'm about to present and why I think this is the definitive stereo version of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. 


    Who: The Beatles and the son of George Martin, Giles.
    What: Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Deluxe Anniversary Edition) 24 bit / 96 kHz
    When: Available for download from HDtracks December 2017
    Where: Abbey Road Studios, London, England 


    Why: This is the big question that everyone has, including me. The short answer to this question is, because it's possible. The long and much more interesting answer to why remix one of the greatest albums of all time, is because it was possible to create something better than was previously available. 

     

    Back in 1967 The Beatles and George Martin were all present for the mono mix of Sgt. Pepper's. The stereo mix was done as an afterthought without any Beatles involved. In addition, due to technological limitations of the four-track system used by The Beatles, the stereo mixes had serious limitations and didn't sound like the album created by the band (details below).


    According to Giles Martin, the 2017 remix of Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band is unlike any previous release from The Beatles. Giles and his team went back to the original tapes, no not the tapes used for the 2009 release or even the original releases of the album. The tapes used for this remix were earlier generations of tapes that hadn't been played for 50 years and were in pristine condition. Because this is a remix, Giles was able to use the tapes of the instruments that were later used to create the final mixes everyone is used to hearing. Using the already mixed tapes, would have made this a simple remaster, not a remix. 

     

     

    Let me try to explain this a bit better. 

     

    All other Beatles albums:
    A. Instruments were recorded to tape, sometimes one at a time or multiple instruments, in 1966 & 1967. 
    B. Several tapes were played through a console and the sound was mixed together, with the limitations of the four-track system in use.
    C. This mixed sound was output to a master tape, from which all albums of The Beatles were made (including the 2009 remasters).


    Sgt. Pepper's 2017 Remix:
    A. Instruments were recorded to tape, sometimes one at a time or multiple instruments, in 1966 & 1967. 
    B: In 2017 Giles Martin used these tapes to create new mixes through the same equipment at Abbey Road, with some technical help from modern day tools. 
    C. This mixed sound was output to a high resolution 24/96 file and made available for download.

     

     


    Examples & Sound Quality

     

    Here are my top ten reasons why the 2017 high resolution remix of Sgt. Pepper's is by far the best version of this album to date. 

     

    1. Overall, using the original pristine tapes (not the mixed tapes used for all previous versions) in 2017 enabled better quality to be pulled from the tapes than in 1967.
    2. On the definitive mono mix of Sgt. Pepper's, the track She's Leaving Home has the pitch a half-step up from the stereo mix. This higher pitch is how The Beatles wanted it to sound (Paul wanted his voice to sound younger). Remixing enabled Giles Martin to match the pitch from the mono version on the new high resolution stereo version.
    3. The original recording of the strings in She's Leaving Home was used to create this new remix, sounding much better than what was available for the 2009 remasters. 
    4. In the track Lovely Rita, Giles Martin was able to move instruments into the right channel rather than just the left channel because there were no technical limitations from the four-track system used back in 1967. This sounds much more like the mono than the 2009 stereo remasters.
    5. There is actually a good sounding kick drum in Lovely Rita's high resolution version because according to Giles Martin, remixing enables him to bring out each player individually and in this case give Ringo a big thump where it should be. On the original mixes, this drum was said to be veiled / pushed down because of the limitations of the vinyl playback medium and not wanting to knock the needle out of the groove (per Giles Martin).
    6. On Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds, Johns voice has really neat sounding ADT (artificial double-tracking). But this was only in the mono version of the album, again because of technical limitations. On the new high resolution version the ADT effect was brought into the stereo version as it should have been all along.
    7. Sgt. Pepper's Reprise was remixed to get the organ off to the left side, out of the center. This is how it should have been. Giles used meticulous notes of the recording sessions to closely follow what the band had wanted. 
    8. Giles doesn't like album clean-ups with modern technology because they don't sound good. He likes the dirt. Thus, the high resolution Sgt. Pepper's isn't one of those poor sounding clean up jobs. It's the definitive version. 
    9. On A Day in the Life, the strings are much more dynamic because of Giles going back to the original tapes (not master tapes already mixed). Also on A Day in the Life, Ringo's drums are much closer to the mono version. They sound like an explosion rather than the totally flat, zero impact drums on the 2009 stereo remasters. According to Giles, John's voice and George's bass are much deeper and precede on the 2017 remix as well. 
    10. The 2017 high resolution remix of Sgt. Pepper's like a stereo version of the mono, that The Beatles slaved over, but better.

     

     


    Other notes, the above list is a mix of technical / objective reasons and subjective reasons such as, it sounds better. There is no accounting for taste, but I believe most music aficionados / audiophiles will prefer this high resolution remix of Sgt.Pepper's. I listened to the album over and over after downloading it from HDtracks. I clicked between the mono and stereo 2009 releases (both 16 and 24 bit), and this new 24/96 version. The difference was immediately apparent and better. This isn't like the difference between putting one's speaker cables on maple blocks versus the floor. This is a real sonic difference that can't be denied. Perhaps some people won't like it, but they can't deny the better sonic quality over the 2009 remasters. 

     

    I used to listen to the 24/44.1 stereo version of this album from the green apple USB storage device released in 2009. That was my definitive version. The 2009 mono releases sounded like my dad's music. Something about them just didn't thrill me. Now, in the 24/96 stereo version of Sgt. Pepper's Giles Martin managed to take the artistic direction of the mono versions and create the new definitive version. Not just a remaster, but a remix from the original-original tapes. 

    Well done. 

     

    ADayInTheLife.png

    Technical Note: At 5:05 of track 13, A Day in the Life, there is very loud 16.026 kHz sound that plays for roughly four seconds. The tone is down -10.71 dB and very audible. When I first heard it, I felt like a dog being trained with a dog whistle. This 16k tone is present in the 2009 remaster of the album, but it's closer to -35 dB down and much less audible. 

     

    The image at left shows the 16 kHz tone at 5:05 of the track, as does the video below.

     

     

     

     

     

     


     

     

    Listen to Giles Martin explain the remix and provide examples of why I believe this is the definitive version of Sgt. Pepper's

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    HD00602567163909_185.jpg

    Where to Buy: HDtracks

     

    LinkSgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Deluxe Anniversary Edition) 24 bit / 96 kHz

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Listen to it a few more times without comparing and I bet you will like it more. It is more volume compressed than the 2009 remaster.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/20/2018 at 5:12 PM, firedog said:

    It is more volume compressed than the 2009 remaster.

    Where people were already complaining about the slight volume compression they had done. I was not one of them, though. I think they struck a pretty good balance in that respect on the 2009 remaster. 

     

    But I'll definitely give if some more listens. It's still interesting to hear details that couldn't be heard on the previous stereo versions. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/8/2018 at 4:09 AM, firedog said:

     

    If definitive means "best", then yes.

     

    This one has the advantage that the remaining principals approved it. 
    GM was quoted somewhere  saying that Paul and Ringo did ask for changes in some of the test mixes they received, so apparently their approval is something to be taken fairly seriously. 

     

    I am so pleased with the HDTracks version, just as I enjoy other Hi-Res Audio files.

    Wax nostalgic about the original version all you wish, but at that time my "stereo" was a Garrard turntable plugged into an Am-Fm table radio that had a line input.

    Hardly Audiophile listening.

    And I bet most 10-year-olds were not enjoying it on any better gear unless their father was an Audiophile, and the children were not allowed near "His System"

     

    Therefore, at the age of 60, and hearing the best of the Brit bands, performing their creative efforts, as they intended, on equipment that wasn't even envisioned at that time-- I am glad.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Long time listeners of this album may have a hard time loving this somewhat sunny remix.  The much lauded original and its multiple reissues had and retained a reflective and moody essence, which I'm sad to say has been wiped away in this "definitive" remix.  Smooth, creamy harmonies have replaced what were frequently a bit buried vocals, which even if unintentional at the time, contributed to the record's mysteriousness. You had to listen closely to hear what was sung, and that drew you in. That's gone now. It's all bright and shiny and effortless to listen to. This Pepper has more in common sonically with Abbey Road or even Love, than it does with Revolver. Listeners more open to a fresh sound will find a huge, wide open sound stage,  cleaner sound effects, and a few uncovered artifacts (the reprise has quite a bit you never heard before). Its all a bit airbrushed, rather like listening to Rumours, or Songs in the Key of Life. Like the renovation of the Sistine Chapel, I don't think anyone asked for it but we got it anyway, and surprise, surprise. This Pepper is gorgeous, if that's what you want. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I wouldn't call it "sunny", I'd call it "clear". 

    I saw one review where the reviewer said Paul McCartney's voice in "She's Leaving Home" had become angry or agressive or something like that in the remix. I don't hear that at all. 

     

    If someone likes the original mix that's fine; but I don't understand how hearing more of the detail and what's on the master tapes is a bad thing. The music and performance should be what draws you in, not the murkiness of the version. 

     

    That said, I would have preferred it if there was a  high-res version with a bit less volume compression. I think that would have given us the best of both worlds. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I think it's more that the reissue sounds too modern and not like a 1967 album. Compression is probably a big part of it, but I'm not sure it's the whole story, although I can't put my finger on exactly what it is. I don't have the mastering vocabulary for it. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 1/30/2018 at 1:30 AM, firedog said:

    I wouldn't call it "sunny", I'd call it "clear". 

    I saw one review where the reviewer said Paul McCartney's voice in "She's Leaving Home" had become angry or agressive or something like that in the remix. I don't hear that at all. 

     

    If someone likes the original mix that's fine; but I don't understand how hearing more of the detail and what's on the master tapes is a bad thing. The music and performance should be what draws you in, not the murkiness of the version. 

     

    That said, I would have preferred it if there was a  high-res version with a bit less volume compression. I think that would have given us the best of both worlds. 

     

    Do we know if the vinyl version as compressed as the CD and high-res?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Wow.  Just wow.

    I love it.  To me the only thing lost in the new release is the documentation of the recording constraints of the era.  I can’t imagine those recording/mixing compromises made in 1967 were part of the Beatles’ artistic intention.

    All I hear is goodness.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On ‎2‎/‎25‎/‎2018 at 10:04 PM, fritzg said:

     

    Do we know if the vinyl version as compressed as the CD and high-res?

     

    I would expect the vinyl to be MORE compressed, as that is how they deal with dynamics.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just got the vinyl edition today, and I can safely say that it is waaaayyyy better than the CD version. The CD version of the reissue sounds too modern and not like a 1967 album. On vinyl it sounds like a 1967 album, only better than the original (at least the original stereo).

     

    I simply couldn't stand listening to the CD reissue. It sounded too brutal somehow. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "customer" wants it loud - gets it loud.

    i don't doubt the time, effort and respect in this remix. "i think the beatles would have wanted massive compression effects had they been available in 1967". it sounds as if you are standing too close too the speakers.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm a big fan of the HDTracks release of this. They include work tracks that were components of the final track assembly. Back in the day, doing these kinds of albums was like putting together a complex aural puzzle, four tracks at a time. George Martin and the technical team at EMI were pioneers in this area.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In reason 9 of your list of why this new remix is the best and definitive available, you refer to "George's bass." Why? It's McCartney. That is, at least, according to the notes Mark Lewisohn referred to in writing his famous document of their recording sessions in 1988. (The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions in the UK, and The Beatles: Recording Sessions in the USA)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    47 minutes ago, Real_Pancho said:

    In reason 9 of your list of why this new remix is the best and definitive available, you refer to "George's bass." Why?

    Because that’s who I thought was playing bass. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...