Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    T+A DAC 200 D/A Converter Review

     

     

    T+A has set the bar extremely high with the DAC 200. This DAC is one for the ages. It sounds fantastic, looks classic, functions seamlessly, is well supported, and is priced competitively. Based on my listening habits and experience with more DACs than I can remember, this would be my number one choice for a DAC anywhere near the DAC 200's price. Everything about the DAC 200 is just that good. Period.

     

    The T+A DAC 200 is so good, it brought me back to two channel stereo listening, from my one of a kind 7.1.4 Atmos system, and figuratively glued me to my chair. I'm enthralled with the music coming from my system, through the DAC 200. Given that my immersive system is capable of truly amazing performance, T+A is doing more than a few things right with the DAC 200.

     

    The first time I was dramatically drawn back to my two channel system, I was listening to Lady Blackbird's album Black Acid Soul. On tracks such as Five Feet Tall, and It'll Never Happen Again, Lady Blackbird just reached out through my Wilson Alexia speakers, grabbed me by the collar, and made me sit up straight in my listening chair. What I heard was so full of emotion, effort, and talent that I had to run my warm hand up and down my arm as the goosebumps sent a chill through my body. The DAC 200 pulls incredible music and performances from ones and zeros, like nothing in its class. 

     

    Let's dig into what makes the DAC 200 tick, before going further about its stellar performance.

     

     

    Publish T+A DAC 200 Front.jpg


     

    T+A DAC 200 Details

     

    The DAC 200 has a long list of meaningful features that don't just check a box for the consumerist with a spreadsheet. These are A List features for music aficionados that set this DAC apart from the competition. The most impactful of these features is the T+A Path Separation Technology. According to T+A, "Both PCM and DSD have their own converter, specifically tailored to their requirements ... For PCM signals we use our quadruple converter, whereas DSD files are processed using the T+A True 1-bit converter, which is unique in the world." The DAC 200 is literally two digital to analog converters in one chassis. It's the best of both worlds, without the requirement of purchasing two DACs and all the headache that would follow, when one needs to switch DACs between playing PCM and DSD. The DAC 200 reads the input signal and routes the audio accordingly. 

     

    T+A offers four different filters for internal upsampling in the DAC 200. If I had to guess, I'd say most DACs on the market don't offer manual filter selections. T+A prefers to give the listener options. The options are FIR 1 for extremely linear frequency response, FIR 2 for improved peak handling, BEZ 1 for Bezier interpolation and IIR filtering, and the BEZ 2 pure Bezier interpolator for "perfect" timing and dynamics. One great aspect of these filters is that there's no wrong choices. It's all about personal preference.

     

    Those who prefer non-oversampling (NOS) DACs because they like to use an application such as HQPlayer to upsample externally, are also in luck. The DAC 200 features two crucial pieces of this puzzle. First, it offers two different NOS modes. The difference between the modes is a low pass filter setting of 120 kHz or 60 kHz for 1x sample rate material. Second, the DAC 200 accepts ultra high sample rates up through 768 kHz PCM and DSD1024. High sample rate inputs are critical for those who upsample externally. 

     

    Publish T+A DAC 200System Angle.jpgBased on my extended listening through the DAC 200, the best sound in my system was achieved using HQPlayer to upsample all audio to DSD256, using poly-sync-gauss-long (1x), poly-sync-gauss-hires-lp (2x), and the ASDM7ECv2 modulator. If there was a "right" filter and modulator, there would be no choices available in HQPlayer. However, filter and modulator selection are all about personal preference, whether done externally or inside the DAC. 

     

    Similar to the T+A Path Separation Technology in concept, is the T+A Digital Analogue Separation System inside the DAC 200. This, "Utilizes ultra-fast digital isolators from Silicon Labs to provide galvanic separation between the analogue and digital sections. ... the mains sections for the analogue and digital signal paths are also completely separated galvanically." Takign this a step further, the timing critical clocking signals for the D to A converters are isolated using special high frequency impulse transformers to insure jitter free performance, that is unobtainable using integrated isolators. As readers can see, separation is a big deal to the T+A engineering team, and it should be a big deal for music lovers who care about sound quality. 

     

    On the outside, the DAC 200's design is elegant and technical at the same time. There are quite a few physical buttons, to access that which needs quick accessing, but they look nice and have a solid feel. The volume control features satisfying detents as it's rotated, and also has a very solid feel. The front display is large enough to be useful from the listening position, to see the selected input and current sample rate. However, the other items are quite small and require the listener be up close and personal with the DAC 200. 

     

    The stars of the front panel show are clearly the analog meters. The T+A engineering team hit a home run with these on many levels. Of course they look really nice and contribute to the "audio fireplace" effect. But, T+A took them even further by enabling the meters to work in three different modes, each selectable by the listener. The meters can operate in a more traditional VU scale monitoring the input or output level, display the temperature of the entire system and output stages separately, or display the quality of the incoming audio stream. According to the DAC 200 manual, "The left meter [scale - 0 +] shows whether the clock frequency of the incoming data stream of the currently active source is operating at the standard frequency. If the needle is exactly in the middle of the scale, the frequency of the source is exactly at the standard frequency. The display range covers -150ppm to +150 ppm. Digital sources complying to the standards should be in the range +/- 50ppm. The right meter [scale 0...100] indicates the error rate of the currently active input. With good transmission quality, the display should be at 0."

     

    Both internally and externally, the T+A engineering team has done a marvelous job pairing form and function, with the main goal of accurate music reproduction. 

     

     

    Publish T+A DAC 200 Rear.jpg

     

     


    Back To Listening

     

    Getting back into listening mode, I spent time using the DAC 200 in different digital configurations. I settled on two different sources. One, a custom built SOtM computer using the new SOtM sMB-Q370 Motherboard, PCIe USB card, Ethernet card, clocking add-ons and power supplies all supplied by SOtM. Two, my stalwart Sonore signatureRendu SE Optical running NAA software. These sources and HQPlayer Embedded came together to create a really special sound.

     

    folder.jpgListening to Esa-Pekka Salonen conducting the Los Angeles Philharmonic in Le Sacre du Printemps, really enabled the DAC 200 to shine in multiple areas. The best of those was reproduction of percussion, from tiny cymbal details to texture on drumheads to booming thunder-like strikes. Through some components we get either texture or boom, with one precluding the other. Not so, through the DAC 200. I heard it all with great detail and transients and power. I listened to Night On Bald Mountain several times through the DAC 200, each time as enjoyable as the previous one. The DAC 200 never disappointed. 

     

    Using the same track, but switching to the DAC 200's built-in Bezier filters and sending the DAC bit perfect 24/96 PCM audio, one could her an equally engaging performance with nuance and detail, but it was just a skosh softer than HQPlayer and DSD256. External upsample is the icing on the cake, while the cake is delicious in its own right. Listeners uninterested in external upsampling should consider this DAC a 10 out of 10, with the ability to go to 11 via HQPlayer if necessary.

     

    cover.jpgMoving back to HQPlayer upsampling to DSD256 on the SOtM computer, I played Greg Brown's album Honey in the Lion's Head. On the track Who Killed Cock Robin, I could smell Brown's coffee and cigarette laden breath. I don't know if he smokes or drinks coffee, but I won't let that ruin a perfect illusion brought on by such realistic audio reproduction through the T+A DAC 200. This track, and entire album, has a pure and organic realism through the DAC 200, that just isn't present in many competitive DACs. I was listening to tracks that I'd typically skip, because the sound was so good. This isn't a case of listening to music only because it sounds good, but rather, letting oneself be exposed to new music initially because of the sound, and realizing afterward that I was previously missing out on some really great music.

     

    Thanks to my 7.1.4 Atmos system, I've recently been exposed to some great prog rock. A new favorite of mine is the band Porcupine Tree and its album Closure/Continuation. Listening to the album in stereo is a very different experience, especially because band leader Steven Wilson's enthusiasm for immersive audio and talent mixing in Atmos, has lead him to produce incredible surround albums. 

     

    ppcc.jpgI was a touch nervous that the DAC 200 would fall flat when I listened to Porcupine Tree. Let's be real, any stereo DAC has its hands and feet tied together when competing against a 12 channel immersive system, playing an album created with Atmos in mind. Listening to the two channel stereo mix of C/C, the track Harridan sounds great through the DC 200. From the opening bass intro to the hard hitting kick drums to the immensely powerful guitar riffs that kick in after a slight lull in the music around the 3:15 mark of the track. Any fault I could hear in the sound was completely unrelated to the DAC 200, and solely because I was comparing the Atmos and stereo mixes in my head. Overall, the DAC 200 delivered everything there was to deliver on this album, and nothing more. Speed, power, and detail were all there, when present on the recording. Just as they should be.  

     

    One activity I wish I could've done is compare the DAC 200 with the DAC 8 from T+A. I really liked the DAC 8, as I do much of what T+A designes. It's solid engineering-based audio company that delivers on its promise. Going solely by memory, which is fraught with issues, I'd say the DAC 200 is in a completely different class from the DAC 8. It really isn't a fair comparison. The DAC 200 is far better than the price difference between the two suggests. 

     


    Conclusion

     

    cash@2x.pngMany years from now, when T+A ceases DAC 200 production, this DAC will have an immediate cult following, and values on the used market will shoot up. This is one of those DACs that'll be sought after for decades. It does so much, so right. It's a product for which the CASH List was created. The DAC 200 is among the leaders, at any price, on our list of recommended hardware, and easily the leader among its peers anywhere near its $7,125 MSRP. 

     

    This DAC was designed to use its internal filters or take advantage of the great horsepower of an external upsampling computer running HQPlayer. Either way, the T+A DAC 200 delivers the goods. It's a 10 out of 10 on its own, and an 11 out of 10 with the world class DSP from Jussi Laako's HQPlayer. 

     

    After listening through the DAC 200 for a few weeks, using it with different sources, reading the user manual a couple times, and exchanging emails with the T+A team, I realized that T+A gets it. I'm willing to bet that many readers will immediately understand what "it" is, because they've also been immersed in this world of digital audio for many years and tried many different solutions in an effort to perfect their audio systems. T+A enables many of us to have the best of both worlds because the company gets it on so many levels, embraces cutting edge technologies, and has set a new standard for digital to analog conversion at a competitive price.  

     

    Well done T+A, well done.


     

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

    Complete Audio System Details - https://audiophile.style/system

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    On 9/1/2022 at 6:10 PM, ALLDIGITAL said:

    Hi Chris. Thanks for an excellent review of the DAC200. I am considering a new DAC and dated on your enthusiastic review I will add the DAC200 to the list. I am seriously considering the Holo Audio May KTE DAC, based on many equally enthusiastic review from users and reviewers. I am interested in your opinion, if you have had an opportunity to listen to the May DAC and if so, your thoughts in comparison.

     

    On 9/1/2022 at 8:22 PM, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Hi @ALLDIGITAL unfortunately I’ve never listened to a single product from Holo Audio. There’s only so many hours in a day :~)

     

    Has anyone seen or can anyone offer a comparison of the T+A DAC 200 and the Holo Audio MAY KTE?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/1/2022 at 11:37 PM, The Computer Audiophile said:

    I didn’t use the preamp section, as I had it connected to my Constellation preamp. 

    Hi Chris, would you mind giving the DAC’s internal Preamp a spin and share your thoughts? Much appreciated!

     

    The T+A 200 DAC is on its way to replace the HoloAudio Spring 3 L2

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This may already be well known but it was a real help for me.  I'm visually impaired and can't use the remote for menu settings.  I can barely see the screen with a magnifying glass 1' away.... I really wanted to be able to compare the filters without having to go to the front panel each time.  If you go into the menu and go to the filter settings and select it you can leave it there and scroll through them one at a time.  They change as soon as you change without needing to "set" the selection.  You can move from left to right and back.  When you get to the first setting it stops and therefore makes it easy to know where you are without seeing the display.  Still breaking in but sounding really good.  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hey Chris - sorry to keep bugging you.  I don't think I missed it but wondered if you got a green unit and, if so, what your estimate of break in time was.  I have close to 100 on mine and sounds really good but not sure if it's there yet.  Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris regardless of the tremendous price gap,  curious on how you feel this T+A DAC 200 stacks up to the new Linn Klimax DSM (in terms of sound quality only) which you also gave a very high?  Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/7/2022 at 4:21 PM, ted_b said:

    Allan,

    Good point, so, to make my own point more specific, is it a lateral move from the May KTE to the Dac 200?  There clearly are differences when going up price-wise to the Mola Mola, so I know it's not as much a "knuckle" as bbosler believes...but of course YMMV.  :)

    Hey Ted,

     

    I was just checking in here and saw your question about DAC 200 vs the May, and the consideration of the Tambaqui.  As the Tambaqui is of course in another price category, it is a different thing, although I agree, I could certainly live with the Tambaqui and be happy forever, and not need any special servers or external oversampling, as you note, Bruno is a *ucking genius!  In any case, I cannot afford a Tambaqui...  IDK about May vs. DAC 200, one thing is, the T+A folks are very good with the analog circuitry, they use a discrete output stage also running at high voltage rails.  One thing I learned in my time at PS Audio was that running line level stages at much higher than normal, or conventional, voltages often gives sonic benefits, and can allow for very simple discrete circuits to achieve higher linearity (and can sound really good).  I have a bit of bias against Chinese products, especially if the distribution is not top class, and I personally have not been impressed with the US Distributor for Holo Audio (YMMV).  I would have a bias for the provenance of the T+A myself, whether this is valid in terms of performance, I have not made a comparison and could not say.  I just know I am a big fan of the converter tech, which is similar between the May, DAC 200, and even the Tambaqui-although for May and DAC 200 one would use HQPlayer to get the best out of them, and with the Tambaqui it is amazing just sending it whatever the native file is and letting it do its thing.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any news on this? How about users that were burning the 200 in a few weeks ago? Also having to decide May or 200.. i have Spring 3 now and this will be for a second setup.  Tks!!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Curious for comparisons between the DAC200 and any competitor, really. Reviews are scarce it seems. I wonder how this would compare to the Chord Dave or Weiss DAC501 or even the DcS Lina DAC. All of those are about 50% more expensive, but I'm hoping the DAC200 punches above it's weight.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How do you think this DAC compared to the Berkeley Audio you have also reviewed? It's reasonably priced compared to that and the DCS and EMM. The Weiss 501 would be another better comparison, and that has an onboard network player.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 9/6/2022 at 2:56 PM, MhtLion said:

    Great review! This review made in interested in T+A. A quick question to anyone who heard this DAC. How good is it compared to more everyday offering such as Yggdrasil LiM when not using HQPlayer? I have Ygg and wondering how much upgrade I can expect when I connect to a source directly. So, if anyone has heard both, I would truly appreciate it.

     

    Hi Chris, Any thoughts between the LIM and DAC200? I totally understand there's a significant price difference but nevertheless would love to hear your comparison.  Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The reviewer notes that it was only possible to compare the T&A 200 DAC with the T&A 8 DAC based on memory. I wonder if any other T&A owners have been able to perform a blind A/B test between both DACs?

     

    I've been unable to find many (any?) direct comparisons of the previous T&A model with the current one.

     

    This seems like a relevant and necessary comparison to make.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On 8/26/2023 at 9:29 PM, Apollo said:

    I will perform subjective listening tests (definitely not blinded), to see(/hear) if I can let go of the Violectric preamp.

     

    Allthough I am sure the dac 200 is the better one, I do not expect to hear big differences at dac level. I am now playing Roon - HQPlayerEmbedded , upsampling everything to DSD512

    Please forget what I wrote.

    Allthough the T+A 8 DSD dac is a strong performer, it is no match for the 200 dac.

    If you have limited budget, and can buy it for a good price, do not hesitate.

     

    But the dac 200 is really something else.

    Let me try to describe, but keep in mind I am not native English speaking.

     

    The dac 200 is more clear, more articulation, but without loosing any warmth, or more sounding more edgy.

    It sounds more sophisticated, but not softer, or more polite.

    And then bass, deeper and better controlled (probably the biggest change)

     

    The only thing where the difference between the 8 DSD and the 200 is not as obvious is soundstage.

    But keep in mind I am using HQPlayer and upsample everything to DSD512 (using the ‘wide’ position on both dacs).

     

    The pre-amplifier in the dac200 easily competes with my Violectric HPA 550 Pro.

    I cannot say which one is better without doing extensive listening tests, but if there are differences, they are minor.

    Not one single reason to keep the Violectric as I have sold my headphones ( I am just not a headphone listener, cannot get used to)

    In my personal opinion, if you are using HQplayer and upsample your music to DSD, and you have the budget, do not hesitate for a moment and try to get one for test.

    Or just buy one if they are still in stock , you will be very happy.

     

    Dirk

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My friend Pierre at diyaudio.com loves his Holo May DAC with his speakers, posts 15266, 15276. https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/beyond-the-ariel.100392/page-764

     

    But I don't think he uses subs, while I need to use a pair of these as my speakers only play down to 70Hz.  https://www.rythmikaudio.com/F12.html

    https://www.rythmikaudio.com/download/XLR2_sealed_quickguide.pdf

     

    All of my sources are digital via my pc, so use of room correction software is possible, but only if a multichannel DAC were used. But which of those truly  sound as good as this? https://www.kitsunehifi.com/product/holo-audio-may-dac/

     

    I suppose the best sounding compromise would be to only include the pair of powered subs into any room correcting DSP filter loop with only two DAC channels.  If yes, would someone please recommend the best paid or free software for this purpose?

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, nxrm said:

    My friend Pierre at diyaudio.com loves his Holo May DAC with his speakers, posts 15266, 15276. https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/beyond-the-ariel.100392/page-764

     

    But I don't think he uses subs, while I need to use a pair of these as my speakers only play down to 70Hz.  https://www.rythmikaudio.com/F12.html

    https://www.rythmikaudio.com/download/XLR2_sealed_quickguide.pdf

     

    All of my sources are digital via my pc, so use of room correction software is possible, but only if a multichannel DAC were used. But which of those truly  sound as good as this? https://www.kitsunehifi.com/product/holo-audio-may-dac/

     

    I suppose the best sounding compromise would be to only include the pair of powered subs into any room correcting DSP filter loop with only two DAC channels.  If yes, would someone please recommend the best paid or free software for this purpose?

     

    Did you post in the wrong thread accidentally?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, I see. Sorry about that; I saw someone's post here about the May DAC and I chimed in. Please excuse the intrusion.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, nxrm said:

    Yes, I see. Sorry about that; I saw someone's post here about the May DAC and I chimed in. Please excuse the intrusion.

    Wasn't sure if I should move it or if there was more context to the post.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have no objections if you would let me know where to.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All...I just want to take a moment to give thanks for the comments here. I finally pulled my system out of storage after 7+ years (relocation, new house, basement renovation). I know. haha. I'm still running my 2010 MacMini and 2012 EMM Labs DAC2 (not the "x"). Finally just got a Innuos Pulse Mini as my streamer.

     

    A buddy of mine loves his T&A 200. I'm looking into it and also may have a source for a pre-owned EMM Labs DAC2X V2. Should be an interesting ride.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...