Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Sonore opticalRendu & Signature Rendu SE Optical Review | Part 2

    On June 26, 2019 I wrote,

     

    "Just when some are doubting the need or capability of D to D converters, Sonore releases the opticalRendu, Signature Rendu SE optical, and enables local storage on the platform. There isn't a single box solution available with the same level of performance, flexibility, and cutting edge features as the Rendus. In addition, there isn't a yearly, monthly, or lifetime fee associated with all this greatness from Sonore. As soon as my new speakers are installed I'll be listening through the noiseless optical network connection of the Signature Rendu SE optical and publishing an extensive review of its sound quality in a reference system. Stay tuned." (Part 1)


    The time has come for me to stop listening and start writing about the Sonore Signature Rendu SE optical in my reference system. I don't want to stop listening. I'm writing this from my listening chair, with my feet up, and the volume at a nice -33 dB on an EMM Labs DV2 reference level DAC. Midnight Sugar from the Tsuyoshi Yamamoto Trio is playing through my Constellation Audio monoblocks and Wilson Audio Alexia Series 2 loudspeakers. It's truly delightful. 

     

    Given that the technical details have been covered in my video and part 1 of this review, I'm sticking to the fun stuff this time around. I will note that the opticalRendu and Signature Rendu SE Optical I have are nearly identical. The "Signature" has a custom built-in power supply while the opticalRendu has a custom external power supply. The supplies are the same. The difference for the end user is s/he can use the all-in-one system of the Signature, or try different power supplies by going with the opticalRendu.

     


    On With The Show


    My reference system has been in place for a few months and my speakers were official setup by John Giolas from Wilson Audio about a month ago. The system has never sounded better and I've never had better sound in my house than I have currently. With that out of the way, let's dig into the performance of the Signature Rendu SE optical. 

     

    We all agree that what's on a recording is 100% of the music we have a chance of hearing through our systems. It isn't 100% of the music usually, because the analog or digital capture probably left a little bit in the recording studio or live venue. Thus, we can only hope to reproduce 100% of what's on the recording. Audio equipment can do one of three things to a recording during playback, reduce this percentage from 100% to something less, add sonic color, or completely preserve it. Based on my extensive and critical listening through the Signature Rendu SE optical, I have no doubt this component completely preserves every last magical ounce of music. 

     

    Over the last few weeks, I've spent a considerable amount of time comparing the Signature Rendu SE optical to different methods of sending music to DACs. The one absolutely major, can't miss, unmistakable performance aspect that the Signature Rendu SE optical brings to the table better than anything I've yet heard, is its ability to preserve transients. Yes, it preserves so much more than this, but its preservation of the attack, decay, sustain, and release of transients is otherworldly. 

     

    Sonore-Signature-Rendu-SE-Optical-01.jpgListening to the aforementioned Midnight Sugar album (Three Blind Mice / First Impression Music), this transient preservation is evident in spades. On the title track, Isoo Fukui's opening bass lines lumber forward and lay a foundation for Tsuyoshi Yamamoto to work his piano magic from about the 0:20 mark onward. The decay, sustain, and release of this first spattering of piano notes is just wonderful through the Signature Rendu SE optical, but it's the attacks starting at about 2:25 that really get me going. When Yamamoto presses each key, and the hammer subsequently strikes the string, it's a jarring yet beautiful start to some true melodic magic. It's as if he's telling the audience to listen up, then rewards them with terrific follow up notes with lush overtones that seem to decay for miles while giving away ambient details about the recording environment.

     

    On track four, It Could Happen To You, everything is just right with this trio. Fukui's bass and Obara's drums are only there to support Yamamoto's brilliance on piano, and it comes through like a dessert for one's ears. There's a delicacy to Yamamoto's piano throughout this track, with subtle transient attacks and absolutely gorgeous decay, sustain, and release of the notes. The "SE optical" doesn't step on any of this enveloping sound that can transport the listening back to Tokyo in 1974. At roughly the two-minute mark of the track, Yamamoto plays a series of notes several times over. Each of these notes has a distinct and abrupt beginning with a lovely decay and glorious overtones that are pure pleasure for the ears. 

     

    I want to stress the exceptional ability of the Signature Rendu SE optical, with respect to transients, one more time because it's so critical to realistic music reproduction. Nothing makes me lose interest faster or makes me more bored with my favorite music than equipment that rounds the edges of transients. Conversely, when components get transients right, like my previous all Spectral Audio system, it leads to a transcendent listing experience. Yes, the activity of listening becomes an experience that can bring about goosebumps, chills, and even emotions. 

     

    To hammer this transient preservation home, let's tap on the Larry Karush recording titled May 24, 1976, available at 24 bit / 96 kHz for stream or purchase. Track one, [Untitled] is 3:17 of harmonic heroin. Right from the start, the fundamentals and overtones lay an eerie and beautiful path to the transient hammer strikes of Larry Karush. This is most evident from about 2:15 of the track until 2:42 when Karush starts a series of notes with violent hammer strikes that shoot up in frequency like the read-out of an electrocardiogram. The Signature Rendu SE Optical enabled both the dCS Rossini and EMM Labs DV2 DACs to reproduce these transients like nothing else I've heard in any of my systems over the years. The leading edge of the transient appears to shoot up like the face of El Capitan, then trail off as the overtones played out in beautiful fashion. 

     

    In addition to transient preservation, the Signature Rendu SE Optical preserves all the musical information without adding any secret sauce to flavor its output. This enabled the reference level DACs to which I connected it, to shine in ways I haven't heard surpassed. I did so many A/B listening sessions that my head spun like Regan in The Exorcist. I know what I heard over and over again as I tried different music and different interfaces on these DACs. I just had to be absolutely positive that the results were repeatable 100% of the time. I can unequivocally state that the differences I heard between the output of the Signature Rendu SE Optical flowing to USB inputs versus AES inputs and Ethernet inputs, were pronounced and the "SE optical" was as good or better in almost every way. 

     

    Note: My comparisons with the Aurender W20SE weren't thorough as I'd just received it for evaluation. But, there were some nuances in tone that I heard via the W20SE and not the "SE optical."

     

    When I switch to Ethernet and AES inputs I obviously had to use different sources because the "SE optical" only has a USB output. Thus, the sonic differences can't be pinned 100% to the Sonore component. However, given the real-world scenario of selecting a source component based on how it sounds with one's DAC, I have no issues with attributing my findings to the Signature Rendu SE Optical. For example, using Roon to send audio to the dCS Rossini's Ethernet interface versus using Roon to send audio to the "SE optical" that sends it on to the Rossini's USB interface, I'm 100% positive the path through the Sonore component is much better. This source selection is a real-world decision people will make, should they use Roon directly or through an optical Rendu? Sure, this can be sliced every which way, but in this real-world situation, I haven't heard anything deliver audio to the Rossini better. 

     

    I mentioned music and emotion a bit earlier. Note, Song and Emotion is a great track from Tesla's 1991 release Psychotic Supper. Anyway, music's ability to bring out emotion and suck listeners in is uncanny. When an audio system gets everything right, this can lead to experiences one never forgets. This is exactly what happened to me a couple of weeks ago, listening to Bob Seger's Greatest Hits. I know, of all albums, Bob Seger's Greatest Hits is the one that gave me chills, sent me back to the 1970s in a time machine, and pushed me to keep listening until the wee hours of the morning. I have no attachment to Bob Seger's music as I didn't really listen to it back in the day, but dang it sure was special the other night, through the same audio system as used previously.

     

    Sonore-Signature-Rendu-SE-Optical-02.jpgBob Seger's Turn The Page is a classic track that doesn't even rank on any audiophile approved music list. Instead, it's about the story, the way Seger weaves it through his lyrics, and the way he delivers it with a sense of authenticity. Through the "SE optical" I immediately established a vision in my head of Seger's tour bus rides, the restaurant into which he walks, and Cobo Hall in 1975 with him on stage. I was simultaneously in my listening room and on a long leg of a North American tour with the Silver Bullet Band. 

     

    The track is recorded live but it certainly sounds much more intimate than the 12,000 seat Cobo Hall (now TCF Center) on Washington Boulevard in Detroit. Right from the unmistakable opening saxophone melody, I connected with Seger's story. His vocals had this realness to them, not Maria Callas style with impeccable range and precision, but as if the guy next door grabbed a microphone and walked me through the last few months of his life. My audio system brought me closer than I've ever been to Seger's voice. I was captivated. I listened to the entire album several times over without a break. The entire time, I never lost the sense of closeness with the performers and the performance. OK, I skipped over "Old Time Rock & Roll" because I can't get the image of Tom Cruise dancing in Risky Business out of my head. I think that's called a buzz kill in certain circles. 

     

    On Night Moves, the opening acoustic guitar sounded nothing like that on a Reference Recordings release and Seger's was in the same less than audiophile category. But, given what I heard, I'd take this experience 100% of the time over something recorded pristinely at the highest resolution available. This Redbook 16/44.1 track, with goosebump inducing backing vocalists, was absolutely perfect. 

     

    I recently thought about that evening, trying to figure out why I was so moved and how to repeat this experience. How to listen to music which I'm not attached and have no real emotional connection from my youth, yet have a transcendent experience listening to it. I believe it was the perfect music being played effortlessly through a great system that was fed from a transparent source that didn't change what Bob Seger delivered and his recording engineer captured back in 1975. This was a remarkable audio experience I will never forget.

     

     

    Conclusion


    The Sonore Signature Rendu SE optical is quite a component. It delivers everything one could want to an audio system. That's its role. Don't change anything, don't add anything, just make sure that what's on the recording is delivered to one's DAC of choice pristinely. The "SE optical" is in an enviable position in that it's a component capable of improving almost every audio system. I say that because it improved every level of the system to which I connected it over the last few months. I consider its improvement in my reference level system to be indicative of its highest achievements. 

     

    One aspect of music that makes or breaks the illusion of reality and live performances in our listening rooms is transient attack, decay, sustain, and release. This is what real-life sounds like. A real hammer strike from a piano doesn't have a rounded edge, and it doesn't when played through the Signature Rendu SE optical. Compared to Ethernet and AES inputs on reference level components, the "SE optical" delivering audio to their USB inputs sounded better. Plain and simple. That's not a knock on the DACs, it's a huge compliment to the Sonore team for delivering perfect audio to and improving performance of some of the biggest hitters in HiFi.

     

    If the "SE optical" can make a dCS, EMM Labs, and Berkeley Audio Design DACs perform at an even higher level, I'd say the future is bright for almost anything to which it's connected. Right now we have a leader in the clubhouse for Audiophile Style 2019 Product of the Year. 
     

     

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Chris,

     

    Thank you for the update!  Can you tell us the software configuration you were using for the second part of the review?  Roon, LMS? Etc.  What was behind the scenes here?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 minutes ago, bobfa said:

    Chris,

     

    Thank you for the update!  Can you tell us the software configuration you were using for the second part of the review?  Roon, LMS? Etc.  What was behind the scenes here?

     

    Mainly Roon to the SE Optical.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,

    excellent review!

     

    Please, can you specify which equipment you used upstream to the Signature Rendu SE Optical for the review.

     

    Thanks

     

    Matt

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "Note: My comparisons with the Aurender W20SE weren't thorough as I'd just received it for evaluation. But, there were some nuances in tone that I heard via the W20SE and not the "SE optical"

     

    With the Aurender you used USB out directly into the DACs?

    Thanks

     

    Matt

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, matthias said:

    Chris,

    excellent review!

     

    Please, can you specify which equipment you used upstream to the Signature Rendu SE Optical for the review.

     

    Thanks

     

    Matt

     

     

    Here are the network pieces I used. These are connected to my main network via fiber as well.

     

    Ubiquiti UniFi Switch 8 (150W) - LINK

    Ubiquiti SFP Modules (UF-SM-1G-S) - LINK

    Single Mode LC to LC 10 Meter Fiber Cable - LINK

     

     

    Roon was running on three different platforms during this review. 

     

    1. ROCK / NUC

    2. CAPS Cortes / Windows 10 Pro

    3. QNAP NAS

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    21 minutes ago, matthias said:

    "Note: My comparisons with the Aurender W20SE weren't thorough as I'd just received it for evaluation. But, there were some nuances in tone that I heard via the W20SE and not the "SE optical"

     

    With the Aurender you used USB out directly into the DACs?

    Thanks

     

    Matt

     

    No, Aurender was used via AES and externally clocked via the dCS Rossini, and only via AES for the other DACs. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just checked my notes, and Chris' Signature Rendu SE is an original unit (pre-optical), then upgraded to the optical version, with the full tier 3 upgrade.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "For example, using Roon to send audio to the dCS Rossini's Ethernet interface versus using Roon to send audio to the "SE optical" that sends it on to the Rossini's USB interface, I'm 100% positive the path through the Sonore component is much better. This source selection is a real-world decision people will make, should they use Roon directly or through an optical Rendu?"

     

    My takeaway from Part 1 and 2 of the Review is that the optical element can raise the level of performance significantly. Do you have a Sonore OpticalModule on hand to feed the Rossini's Ethernet input from Ubiquiti?

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    28 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    No.

    Thanks for your reply Chris. That is one avenue worth exploring :)

    The best engineers in this business tell us that it's just data that arrives at the input, but products such as this and the recently released EtherRegen tell us there's more going on...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    /\/\ yes that would be, although very, very different platforms / implementations

     

    @The Computer Audiophile  nice review, thanks for the well thought out info.

     

    IMHO there are differences, quite noticeably at times, between optical and Ethernet.  Certainly many, many variables at play but it comes down to preference in the context of each system.  Would love to try a Sig SE someday.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    18 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Roon was running on three different platforms during this review. 

     

    1. ROCK / NUC

    2. CAPS Cortes / Windows 10 Pro

    3. QNAP NAS

     

    Which of the three platforms was the best sounding during the review?

    Thanks

     

    Matt

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I enjoyed reading your well written review Chris.

     

    It's hard to believe that it has already been over 6 months since I had my Signature Rendu SE updated to the optical version.  The SE's performance is very impressive.

     

    One area left for audiophile fine-tuning is the choice of one's USB cable to use with the SE. So far, my favorite is the Intona Reference.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    @vortecjr

    Is the input/output board on the Signature Rendu SE the same as the opticalRendu?

     

    I checked my units and it shows the Signature to have board V1.01 whereas the opticalRendu has board V1.1 and they look very similar in size and layout.  There must be something more to account for the price difference besides the inclusion of the power supply and cabinet on the Sig?

     

    Signature with Tier 2 upgrades is $4,490.  I don't see Tier 3 offered.  Adding an opticalMoudle and FO cable brings it to $4,740.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    6 hours ago, fpalm69 said:

    @vortecjr

    Is the input/output board on the Signature Rendu SE the same as the opticalRendu?

     

    I checked my units and it shows the Signature to have board V1.01 whereas the opticalRendu has board V1.1 and they look very similar in size and layout.  There must be something more to account for the price difference besides the inclusion of the power supply and cabinet on the Sig?

     

    Signature with Tier 2 upgrades is $4,490.  I don't see Tier 3 offered.  Adding an opticalMoudle and FO cable brings it to $4,740.

    The two are similar, but different production runs. The Signature Rendu SE was an ultraRendu and power supply in one enclosure. The Signature Rendu SE optical is an opticalRendu and power supply in one enclosure. The Tier 1 and Tier 2 upgrade paths are for fuses, shielding, and select power components. Some of these parts are hard to source or long lead items. FYI the parts for the Tier 2 upgrade arrived so that unit is back in stock as of today.   

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris, I noticed that you stacked the Emm Labs DV2 on top of the Rossini DAC.  I am sure you are aware that doing that would certainly affect the performance of the DV2. Also, all hi fi components benefit greatly from resonance control footers under it, such as the Ansuz Acoustic Darkz dtc that I used under all my components. They also benefit greatly when stacked on resonance control hi fi racks such as the Critical Mass Systems Maxxum rack and amplifier stand that I used.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    8 hours ago, JohnDonaldson said:

    @The Computer Audiophile

    After reading your review I gave the Seger Greatest Hits album a listen.  My system is considerably more modest than your's but my experience was absolutely WOW as well.  In my case I was feeding my opticalRendu  with files on one of the Sonore 400GB microSD cards.  In my system the microSD card takes the opticalRendu to the next level.  This is especially true for a good many of my Redbook rips, I sit and listen in amazement at the improvement this upgrade has made to my system.  A highly recommended upgrade.

     

    I've been curious about that. A bit pricey I was thinking, esp after investing in Roon, opticalModules etc but you say....? I guess it would be for the creme of the crop. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    28 minutes ago, Andy Yuen said:

    Hi Chris, I noticed that you stacked the Emm Labs DV2 on top of the Rossini DAC.  I am sure you are aware that doing that would certainly affect the performance of the DV2. Also, all hi fi components benefit greatly from resonance control footers under it, such as the Ansuz Acoustic Darkz dtc that I used under all my components. They also benefit greatly when stacked on resonance control hi fi racks such as the Critical Mass Systems Maxxum rack and amplifier stand that I used.

     

    Hi Andy - If your assertions are correct, the performance of the DV2 should be increased by its placement on top of the Rossini because the Rossini has its own feet and limited built-in vibration control. Thus, I'm doubling up.

     

    I'm not a big believer in the vibration control components because I've yet to hear it really do much. I know many people who swear by the stuff and I'm not discounting their experiences at all. I can only go by what I've experienced. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, I do believe Andy has a point about component stacking. It would adversely affect both Rossini and DV2, because the footers cannot completely eliminate resonance, although designed to do their best to their own unit. Placing a weight or unit compromises things further. dCS even mention it in their manuals - why go through the trouble writing it and not mention other elements such as cabling etc. ?

     

    Vibration control would have played less importance in your previous setup with TAD monitors and matched stands. But you now have Wilsons that have orders of magnitude of energy moving the air and floor. You done the hard bit with acoustic management, but if you speak to your expert networks, they might offer more physics-based knowledge on this.

    Screenshot 2019-10-12 at 10.32.34.png

    Edited by k-man

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...