Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Review

    AlphaBlu2.jpgOver the last few months I've talked more about the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC than perhaps any other product. The Alpha DAC appeared on the CASH List from the very beginning and has since been the subject of several reader discussions here on Computer Audiophile. Under normal circumstances I would be concerned as frequently discussed products often don't live up to the hype they've generated. This however is not a normal circumstance. The Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. At $5k it's a relative bargain in high-end audio terms and there is nothing like it available today.

     

     

     

     

    Berkeley Audio Design

     

    Berkeley Audio Design was founded by René Jaeger, Michael “Pflash” Pflaumer, and Michael Ritter. All three gentlemen are well known for their previous work at Pacific Microsonics. Pflash Pflaumer is the co-inventor of the HDCD process, in addition to writing all the digital algorithms used in the Pacific Microsonics Model Two. The Model Two is commonly thought to be the best ADC / DAC produced in recent memory. Unfortunately there were only 150 Model Twos produced and they have long since been out of production. This past weekend on my trip to Seattle and the San Francisco bay area I had a chance to meet with all three founders of Berkeley Audio Design. I talked to René Jaeger over breakfast in Seattle, before heading to the Bay Area. Then I spoke with Michael and Pflash during lunch at Eccolo in Berkeley, CA. All three Berkeley Audio Design founders are first class guys who were very eager to discuss the Alpha DAC and computer based audio in general. After discussing some technical details about the Alpha DAC with Pflash I realized that he has likely forgotten more information than I'll accumulate over the course of my entire life.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Features

     

    As I said in my opening paragraph, the Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. Sonically I've never heard better. In addition to sound quality the Alpha DAC has some fabulous features that are indispensable. The single most important feature of this DAC is its ability to decode HDCD and illuminate an HDCD indicator when HDCD encoded content is detected. One constant in the world of computer based audio is the worry that looms over listeners wondering if their computers are outputting bit perfect data to their DACs. The HDCD indicator on the Alpha DAC is not foolproof, but there is a 99.99% chance that a computer is outputting bit perfect data if the HDCD indicator is illuminated upon playback of an HDCD encoded track. This is because the HDCD flag is located on the 16th and 24th bit of 16/44.1 and 24/44.1-192 content respectively. As I noted in a response to a reader in September, "If the HDCD indicator illuminates on the Alpha DAC, the data is uncorrupted. Theoretically, it is possible to alter HDCD data using specialized software while not touching the LSB, but all of the typical mechanisms that might alter data in a computer environment such as level shifting, dither, SRC’s, etc. will definitely affect the LSB. And, if the LSB is altered the HDCD code is lost. So, as a practical tool, presence of the HDCD light indicates no alteration of the data file."

     

    The Alpha DAC's front panel display indicates the current sample rate or volume level depending on the listeners selection. This is an easy way for listeners to verify that data coming out of their computer has the correct sample rate. Avoiding software sample rate conversion (SRC) is a high priority for many listeners. The Alpha DAC display removes almost all ambiguity from the computer playback process. If you're playing a 24/176.4 track from Reference Recordings and the Alpha DAC is not indicating the presence of HDCD and the sample rate is not indicating 176.4, then you know you have some configuration issues. Compare this to a user without the Alpha DAC who thinks his computer is performing at its highest level even though the sound is not quite right. I think we'd all like to know when the sample rate is wrong and remedy the situation ASAP so we can get back to listening unaltered music. We've all had issues with our audio systems, traditional or computer based, and we've all jumped for joy when inserting a component that solves the issue or when removing a component causing the trouble. I've said to myself more than once, "how could I have listened like that for weeks without knowing something was wrong?" The Alpha DAC gets us one step closer to identifying sources of imperfect sound. In my conversation with Pflash a couple days ago he stated that the display of the Alpha DAC is updated at the very beginning of a track. Thus, the Alpha DAC reads a 176.4 track and updates the display instantly upon playback. Following the sample rate update the display totally "disengages" (my word, not Pflash's) from the rest of the DAC. This is among many other design elements that contribute the Alpha DAC's stellar sound quality.

     

    Possibly the most underrated part of the Alpha DAC is its ability to bypass a pre amp and connect directly to a power amp(s). The Alpha DAC has its own digital volume control that is as well implemented as I've ever heard. Trust me, I'd have a pre amp in my system in a heartbeat if I thought the Alpha's volume control degraded the sound in any way. As a test I connected the Alpha DAC to a pre amp and was so disappointed I reverted to the pre amp-less configuration in under two tracks. I spoke to Berkeley Audio Design's Michael Ritter about the digital volume control and he indicated that even the best pre amps in the industry can degrade the sound coming from the Alpha DAC. The digital volume control and analog output stage in the Alpha DAC are very solid. That said, I do know people using pre amps with their Alpha DACs. Some people must use a pre amp for the analog inputs and others just like the sound of their system using a pre amp. When the Alpha DAC is used with a pre amp the optimal volume setting on the DAC is 54 dB. The main point to keep in mind is the Alpha DAC offers listeners options. The Alpha DAC has traditional DAC inputs and outputs. Both single ended RCA and balanced XLR connections are available for the analog output. The usable inputs are limited to AES/EBU, S/PDIF, and Toslink.

     

    Shortly after the Alpha DAC arrived I noticed a barely audible hum coming from the DAC. I immediately thought something was wrong so I contacted Michael Ritter seeking an answer. What Michael told me only solidified my belief that sound quality was the foremost concern of the Berkeley Audio team. He explained that the Alpha DAC has two totally separate power supplies for digital and analog, and two power transformers. The dual bobbin transformers used in the Alpha have very high isolation between the primary and secondary windings that provides maximum immunity from line noise. One side effect of this high isolation is a narrow area of magnetic field that causes the bottom of the DAC to hum a little bit. Berkeley Audio Design could have opted for an absolutely silent solution at the cost of sonic degradation. Listeners will be happy to know the hum is inaudible when listening to music even at the lowest volume the Alpha DAC is capable of producing, 0.1 dB.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Sound

     

    During the Alpha DAC review I used two different computer sources. One source was my Mac Pro running OS X and a Lynx AES16e PCI-Express digital I/O card outputting AES/EBU to the Alpha DAC. The other source was my very inexpensive Dell Inspiron 530 running Windows XP and the Lynx AES16 PCI digital I/O card. I played back WAV and AIFF files with sample rates from 44.1 to 192 kHz. The software applications used were iTunes 8 (OS X), Amarra (OS X), Foobar2000 (XP), and MediaMonkey (XP).

     

    The single most recognizable and talked about characteristic of the Alpha DAC is its soundstage. I describe the soundstage as expansive, transparent, and three dimensional. The soundstage produced from the Alpha DAC is unlike anything else. It is perhaps what makes the music reproduced through the Alpha DAC sound live instead of recorded. Listening to Crown Imperial from the Dallas Wind Symphony at 24/176.4 was truly an awesome experience. The music appeared to float in front of my listening chair and reach all the way to the back wall of my listening room at times. The transparency of the Alpha DAC is unparalleled by any DAC I've heard in recent memory. This includes some very highly regarded DACs at the 2008 Rocky Mountain Audiofest. The Alpha DAC's ability to remain extremely resolving at very high and low frequencies is astounding. Very complex orchestral material is no challenge for the Alpha DAC. Each instrument has clear separation from the top to the bottom of the spectrum. Since the Alpha DAC / Lynx combination supports everything up to 24/192, I listened to a plethora of high resolution albums during the review period. In fact I must have played the Reference Recordings HRx material at 24/176.4 more times than I can count. In order to truly give the Alpha DAC a workout and push the DAC to its limits, high resolution material is a must. Don't get me wrong the Alpha DAC handles 16/44.1 material like no other, but why listen to low resolution when you don't have to? Transients through the Alpha DAC were highly dependent on the source material and components. This is another feather in the Alpha DAC's cap as the DAC does not produce sound that it isn't presented. For example, using iTunes and the AES16e card on my Mac appeared to produce what I call rolled transients. The sound didn't quite have the edge present in the original recording, but this was not a fault of the Alpha DAC. Switching over to my XP machine with a Lynx AES16 and MediaMonkey the transients were clearly present with authority. Listening to Fanfare for the Common Man at 24/88.2 (HDCD) was an eye-opener. The attack of the drums was intense at high volumes. I almost felt like the "blown-away guy" photographed by Steve Steigman for the popular Maxell advertisements of the late 1970s and 1980s. I did listen to each interface on the Alpha DAC and settled on the AES/EBU as my favorite. I must admit this was not an apples-to-apples comparison because I used the Lynx card as my digital I/O for the AES/EBU output and I used the Mac's built-in TosLink output as another digital I/O. Hardly a fair comparison, but I used available interfaces that many readers will consider when using the Alpha DAC or the DAC of their choice. Overall the sound of reproduced music through the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC was absolutely stunning. I have very good reason to include the Alpha DAC on the CASH List without hesitation.

     

    My review of the Alpha DAC would not be complete with comparing it to the competition. I consider the two premiere DACs at the moment to be the Alpha DAC and the Weiss Minerva. (When the full Sonic Studio Amarra software/hardware package is released I expect it to be very compelling as well). I came to this conclusion through my own listening tests, as I did have both units here at the same time, and based on the frequent communication I have with Computer Audiophile readers. Even at Rocky Mountain Audiofest I ran into a very nice CA reader who was inquiring about an Alpha DAC versus the Minerva. It's a very hot topic to say the least. First and foremost both DACs are capable of incredible sound, as evidenced by my reviews of each DAC. Provided you have the proper interface you won't be disappointed by either DAC. Deciding which DAC to chose is entirely personal and depends greatly on the listener's taste, available interfaces, and feature requirements. Both DACs are right around $5,000. In my opinion the major sonic difference between the two is soundstage. I described the Alpha DAC's characteristics in detail above so I'll get right to the Minerva. The Minerva has a much more focussed soundstage that may be narrow to some listeners. On the other hand this focussed and tight soundstage is exactly what some listeners are seeking. In a way the Minerva is like plugging into the soundboard to make a live recording and the Alpha DAC is like placing microphones elsewhere in the venue. Next those considering each DAC should consider the interface required. If you need FireWire the choice is rather easy. The Minerva has FireWire 400 in addition to other interfaces whereas the Alpha DAC has the three aforementioned traditional interfaces. The Minerva also has digital outputs should you need it as a FireWire to AES interface. To further narrow down the choice between DACs the listener should consider the features of each DAC. The Alpha DAC is very strong in this department with the built-in volume control, remote control, ability to bypass a pre amp, HDCD decoding and indicator of bit perfect audio, and the sample rate display on the front panel. In addition to these considerations I strongly recommend potential purchasers contact a local dealer to discuss their needs. Berkeley Audio Design and Weiss have lists of dealers available on their websites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

    There is a very valid reason why Berkeley Audio Design is selling Alpha DACs as fast as it can produce them. The Alpha DAC is simply stunning. The Berkeley Audio Design team is one of the most respected in the industry. They have succeeded in their goal of making a very high level of fidelity available to music lovers everywhere. That is unless the music lover is in a ROHS required country, but that's a story for a different day. At $5,000 the Alpha DAC is a high-end audio bargain. This level of quality and features could honestly sell for twice or three times the price. Every Alpha DAC owner and audiophile I've talked to who has heard the DAC has been very impressed. In a recent DAC shootout for the Bay Area Audio Society the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC took first place hands down. I would not be surprised to see the Alpha DAC ascend to the top of many lists and receive much deserved accolades in the weeks and months ahead. Whether I'm using Mac OS X or Microsoft Windows the Alpha DAC from Berkeley Audio Design is my reference DAC for the foreseeable future.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Manufacturer: <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/">Berkeley Audio Design, LLC</a>

    Phone: 510-277-0512

    Email: [email protected]

    Alpha DAC Price: $5,000

    <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/dealers.html">Dealer List</a>

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment: Mac Pro, Lynx AES16e card, Kimber USB cable, Cambridge Audio DacMagic, Weiss Engineering Minerva, Benchmark DAC1 PRE, Kimber Select cable, Avalon Acoustics speakers, Focal Electra Be series speakers, McIntosh tube amplification, Virtual Dynamics power cables, Richard Gray's Power Company cables, Bel Canto USB Link.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Details from berkeleyaudiodesign.com:

     

     

     

     

    PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

    •Highest audio quality DAC

    •All distortion products below one part per million

    •Unequalled interpolation technology up-samples 44.1kHz CD’s to almost 176.4kHz quality and

    provides superb fidelity at all sampling rates from 32kHz to 192kHz

    •IR remote control of all functions including volume and balance allows direct connection to power amplifiers

    •Advanced input signal jitter rejection

    •BADA encrypted input allows future support of HDMI and other DRM formats

    •Designed by Pacific Microsonics Model One and Two design team

     

     

     

    CONTROLS & INDICATORS

    •Input selects AES, SPDIF, Toslink or BADA inputs

    •Lock LED indicates input signal lock

    •HDCD LED indicates HDCD code detected

    •Phase sets absolute phase

    •Invert LED indicates absolute phase inverted

    •3 digit LED display of Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type

    •± controls set attenuation level and select Filter type

    •Mode selects Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type display modes

    •Dim selects multiple display brightness levels

     

     

     

    SPECIFICATIONS

    •Input sampling rate: 32kHz to 192kHz

    •Input word length: 24-bit

    •Two channel analog stereo outputs: XLR balanced and RCA unbalanced

    •Digital Inputs: AES - Single XLR 110?, SPDIF - BNC 75?, Toslink – Optical, BADA encrypted - RJ-45

    •HDCD decoding detects 16-bit flag at 44.1kHz or 24-bit flag at all sampling rates

    •Multiple digital filter options

    •Multiple units can be combined for multi-channel/surround reproduction

    •Balanced analog output level: +18dBu maximum, +12dBu or lower recommended

    •Unbalanced analog output level: 3.25Vrms maximum, 2Vrms or lower recommended

    •Digital attenuation and balance control: 0.1dB/step with .05dB/step trim, 60dB range

    •Frequency response at ? 88.2kHz sampling rates: ± 0.1dB from < 0.1Hz to 35 kHz, - 3dB at 59kHz for 176.4kHz and 192kHz sampling rates

    •Distortion at recommended levels: all products ? -120dBFS

    •THD+N at maximum level: < -110dBFS

    •Setup stored in non-volatile flash ROM

    •Firmware field upgradeable through signal inputs

    •Enclosure dimensions: 1.75”H X 16.5”W x 10.4”D, 19” rack mount option

    •Mains voltage: 100/120/240VAC, 50/60Hz

    •Power consumption: 25W

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    The BADA I had here hummed, and could be heard from 7'(2.3m) away. That was w/o DC as I tried it with an ultra isolation transformer too. Intrinsically the secondary of a transformer should not have any appreciable DC. <br />

    <br />

    I sent it back partly due to this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I own the BAD Alpha DAC and want to concur with virtually everything Chris says about this DAC. Although I have not heard the Weiss DACs, I have owned several DACs and, to my ear, the BAD Alpha is in a class by itself. Indeed, I think it is a "statement" product: it has improved the sound of my system more than any other component I have had. <br />

    In terms of allowing one to dispense with the preamp, the BADA DAC is a godsend. I had a new (two months old) VAC Rennaissance III preamp, which was very good, but I sold it off because the sound was simply much better going from the BADA DAC directly to my power amp. (Wish I had discovered the BADA DAC before the preamp.) <br />

    As to the character of the sound, I would second the wonderful sound stage that Chris commented upon. But to me the biggest benefit is that, while retaining great detail, this DAC has a rich, warm, natural, beautiful sound that is like a live performance. <br />

    Now, if Berkeley will only announce its long-awaited, USB to AES/EBU converter, I may be able to find computer audio Nirvana.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What amps are you guys using when going straight from the alpha DAC into an amp? Do you think the no-preamp setup would be superior to having a preamp that is perfectly impedance matched to the amp (like the Krell setups or PBN Olympia preamp and amp?) <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I use a musical fidelity KW750. The BADA directly into the amp is MUCH better than through the KWP preamp. With my TT, I love the preamp. I don't know if it is an impedance mismatch or not, but the difference is huge, not subtle. Try both, you'll see.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have a BADA, fed directly from the panel with a 20amp line. There is nothing else on the line except my preamp which is not used with the BADA. I have neither heard any hum, nor felt any vibration whatsoever in 2 years with the BADA.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One other comment I would like to make. Since set up, I have used a G5 with Tiger (OS 10.4), as Chris thinks it is the best sounding G5 software.The problem (discussed ad infinitum on this site) is that Pure Music needs OSX 10.5 (leopard) or later. This weekend, I gave in. I thought my system with the server and BADA was great, but my mid fi analog rig had greater PRAT. The analog was just more listenable. I installed Leopard and the current version of Pure Music, and HOLY MOTHER OF GOD! was the sound improved. If anybody else is using a similar set up, get Pure Music. I now better understand much of what is said about the BADA and its sound, especially vis-a-vis hi res. The 24/96 and especially 24/174 recordings are now unlike anything I have ever heard outside of a live performance. Humongous stage, improved PRAT, much more listenable. I sat with my 4 year old daughter and listened to the 24/96 version of Relaxin' with the Miles Davis Quartet, and it was over before I knew it. Interestingly, she sat and listened to the whole thing too! I had listened to the Amarra trial with 10.4 and it didn't seem to do much. Can't tell you why. Never considered it, because the trial wasn't good enough to hear a difference, and the cost is too high.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    rlodad,<br />

    <br />

    That is some serious power behind the BADA. Also, that is a nice pre-amp 'outgunned' by the BADA direct config. I run NEMO's (similar in the power department). Don't know how input sensitivities compare between our two power amps. What volume setting can/do you usually run on your BADA driving the KW750? You obviously do not miss anything due to bits being dropped..<br />

    <br />

    I haven't tried driving the Nemo's direct with BADA till now.. (that's on my 'stuff to do' list), lack of urgency caused by:<br />

    - I think it is kind of scary to put software based attenuation in front of big power amps.<br />

    - (theoretical) loss of fidelity due to digital attenuation (loss of bits)<br />

    - I want to be able to hook up HT surround sound (hence a pre-amp with theater throughput) & use my mains for FL and FR channels. <br />

    <br />

    If BADA direct sounds a great deal better I have to re-think my setup & try to combine my BADA with surround somehow. Any BADA users out here that are running their surround setup main 2 channels into the BADA somehow (preserving channels 3 to 7 via a different path)? <br />

    <br />

    My thoughts so far:<br />

    - I remember reading on HDMI break-out boxes here on CA.. Can't find the tread. Any tips are welcome. Are there any boxes out there that break-out LF + LR LPCM out of 7.1 LPCM or bitstreamed HD surround?<br />

    - Are there any multi channel amps with HDMI (pref 1.4) input that breakout & output the LF & RF signals over SPDIF?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks<br />

    Hans<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    In a recent communication from Berkeley (12/17/2010) they indicated the following in response to any inquiry from me..."Thank you for writing and for your interest in the Alpha DAC.<br />

    <br />

    We will soon introduce a new product, but it will be a USB computer interface designed to work with the Alpha DAC, not a new USB version of the Alpha DAC itself.<br />

    <br />

    The new external USB to balanced AES converter will provide up to 192 kHz, 24 bit signals to the Alpha DAC with very high noise isolation and very low jitter. It will be simple to use and will work with both Macs and PC’s. It is scheduled for release in January.<br />

    <br />

    We deliberately do not have a USB or FireWire input on the Alpha DAC due to the noise it would potentially introduce from a computer.<br />

    <br />

    D to A converters are both digital and analog devices, and for the best possible audio quality it is very important to keep the electrical environment inside the DAC enclosure as isolated and quiet as possible.<br />

    <br />

    We feel the best way for a DAC to accept a USB signal is to convert it to a balanced AES3 digital audio signal in an external device and only connect the isolated and re-clocked AES signal to the DAC.<br />

    <br />

    Since the external USB to AES3 converter is designed to work with the current Alpha DAC there will be no DAC upgrade required and no product obsolescence.<br />

    <br />

    Thank you again for your enquiry and I hope I have answered your question satisfactorily."<br />

    <br />

    Best regards,<br />

    <br />

    Michael Ritter<br />

    Berkeley Audio Design, LLC<br />

    1-510-277-0512<br />

    www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The KWs are high power and high current, but that is necessary for the Maggies. The combo with the BADA just sings, especially with Pure Music 1.7. I would not worry at all about using the BADA as a preamp. As Chris has said, start the BADA first, then turn on the amplifier. I have never had a pop, click or moan during start up. I wouldn't worry at all. Forget about what you are doing, and just pretend the preamp is still there. (At least until you realize how much better the sound is without it, after which there is no going back...) It depends on the music recording level and type of music, but I run the BADA at levels from 35 to 55 usually. Again, those are not very useful, as the Maggies are very taxing with sensitivities in the 87 range. With a more efficient speaker, the BADA/KW combo might blow you through the back wall at a volume level of 55, so your mileage may vary.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Glad to hear you're enjoying it- I'm getting great use out of mine for nearly two years, now. I do use it direct without a preamp- if you haven't tried that mode yet, give it a whirl. <br />

    <br />

    ~Jon

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Congrats! Any chance you are using a Mac or PC as transport ?<br />

    How did you connect the computer transport to the Berkeley ?<br />

    Thanks !

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    are made with a Hiface EVO for Mac interface, and a Cambridge Audio ID100 for direct digital; also use AES/EBU with a Tascam CD transport. Digital jitter filtering and re-clocking done with a Brainstorm DCD-8 - the last thing added to the system.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jon<br />

    <br />

    Of the 3 sources you have: Mac, Cambridge, Tascam, which of the 3 is the best sounding ?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks.<br />

    SLM

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, any thoughts on the new Alpha DAC 2? And the new USB device?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks<br />

    <br />

    Hasan<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...