Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Review

    AlphaBlu2.jpgOver the last few months I've talked more about the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC than perhaps any other product. The Alpha DAC appeared on the CASH List from the very beginning and has since been the subject of several reader discussions here on Computer Audiophile. Under normal circumstances I would be concerned as frequently discussed products often don't live up to the hype they've generated. This however is not a normal circumstance. The Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. At $5k it's a relative bargain in high-end audio terms and there is nothing like it available today.

     

     

     

     

    Berkeley Audio Design

     

    Berkeley Audio Design was founded by René Jaeger, Michael “Pflash” Pflaumer, and Michael Ritter. All three gentlemen are well known for their previous work at Pacific Microsonics. Pflash Pflaumer is the co-inventor of the HDCD process, in addition to writing all the digital algorithms used in the Pacific Microsonics Model Two. The Model Two is commonly thought to be the best ADC / DAC produced in recent memory. Unfortunately there were only 150 Model Twos produced and they have long since been out of production. This past weekend on my trip to Seattle and the San Francisco bay area I had a chance to meet with all three founders of Berkeley Audio Design. I talked to René Jaeger over breakfast in Seattle, before heading to the Bay Area. Then I spoke with Michael and Pflash during lunch at Eccolo in Berkeley, CA. All three Berkeley Audio Design founders are first class guys who were very eager to discuss the Alpha DAC and computer based audio in general. After discussing some technical details about the Alpha DAC with Pflash I realized that he has likely forgotten more information than I'll accumulate over the course of my entire life.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Features

     

    As I said in my opening paragraph, the Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. Sonically I've never heard better. In addition to sound quality the Alpha DAC has some fabulous features that are indispensable. The single most important feature of this DAC is its ability to decode HDCD and illuminate an HDCD indicator when HDCD encoded content is detected. One constant in the world of computer based audio is the worry that looms over listeners wondering if their computers are outputting bit perfect data to their DACs. The HDCD indicator on the Alpha DAC is not foolproof, but there is a 99.99% chance that a computer is outputting bit perfect data if the HDCD indicator is illuminated upon playback of an HDCD encoded track. This is because the HDCD flag is located on the 16th and 24th bit of 16/44.1 and 24/44.1-192 content respectively. As I noted in a response to a reader in September, "If the HDCD indicator illuminates on the Alpha DAC, the data is uncorrupted. Theoretically, it is possible to alter HDCD data using specialized software while not touching the LSB, but all of the typical mechanisms that might alter data in a computer environment such as level shifting, dither, SRC’s, etc. will definitely affect the LSB. And, if the LSB is altered the HDCD code is lost. So, as a practical tool, presence of the HDCD light indicates no alteration of the data file."

     

    The Alpha DAC's front panel display indicates the current sample rate or volume level depending on the listeners selection. This is an easy way for listeners to verify that data coming out of their computer has the correct sample rate. Avoiding software sample rate conversion (SRC) is a high priority for many listeners. The Alpha DAC display removes almost all ambiguity from the computer playback process. If you're playing a 24/176.4 track from Reference Recordings and the Alpha DAC is not indicating the presence of HDCD and the sample rate is not indicating 176.4, then you know you have some configuration issues. Compare this to a user without the Alpha DAC who thinks his computer is performing at its highest level even though the sound is not quite right. I think we'd all like to know when the sample rate is wrong and remedy the situation ASAP so we can get back to listening unaltered music. We've all had issues with our audio systems, traditional or computer based, and we've all jumped for joy when inserting a component that solves the issue or when removing a component causing the trouble. I've said to myself more than once, "how could I have listened like that for weeks without knowing something was wrong?" The Alpha DAC gets us one step closer to identifying sources of imperfect sound. In my conversation with Pflash a couple days ago he stated that the display of the Alpha DAC is updated at the very beginning of a track. Thus, the Alpha DAC reads a 176.4 track and updates the display instantly upon playback. Following the sample rate update the display totally "disengages" (my word, not Pflash's) from the rest of the DAC. This is among many other design elements that contribute the Alpha DAC's stellar sound quality.

     

    Possibly the most underrated part of the Alpha DAC is its ability to bypass a pre amp and connect directly to a power amp(s). The Alpha DAC has its own digital volume control that is as well implemented as I've ever heard. Trust me, I'd have a pre amp in my system in a heartbeat if I thought the Alpha's volume control degraded the sound in any way. As a test I connected the Alpha DAC to a pre amp and was so disappointed I reverted to the pre amp-less configuration in under two tracks. I spoke to Berkeley Audio Design's Michael Ritter about the digital volume control and he indicated that even the best pre amps in the industry can degrade the sound coming from the Alpha DAC. The digital volume control and analog output stage in the Alpha DAC are very solid. That said, I do know people using pre amps with their Alpha DACs. Some people must use a pre amp for the analog inputs and others just like the sound of their system using a pre amp. When the Alpha DAC is used with a pre amp the optimal volume setting on the DAC is 54 dB. The main point to keep in mind is the Alpha DAC offers listeners options. The Alpha DAC has traditional DAC inputs and outputs. Both single ended RCA and balanced XLR connections are available for the analog output. The usable inputs are limited to AES/EBU, S/PDIF, and Toslink.

     

    Shortly after the Alpha DAC arrived I noticed a barely audible hum coming from the DAC. I immediately thought something was wrong so I contacted Michael Ritter seeking an answer. What Michael told me only solidified my belief that sound quality was the foremost concern of the Berkeley Audio team. He explained that the Alpha DAC has two totally separate power supplies for digital and analog, and two power transformers. The dual bobbin transformers used in the Alpha have very high isolation between the primary and secondary windings that provides maximum immunity from line noise. One side effect of this high isolation is a narrow area of magnetic field that causes the bottom of the DAC to hum a little bit. Berkeley Audio Design could have opted for an absolutely silent solution at the cost of sonic degradation. Listeners will be happy to know the hum is inaudible when listening to music even at the lowest volume the Alpha DAC is capable of producing, 0.1 dB.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Sound

     

    During the Alpha DAC review I used two different computer sources. One source was my Mac Pro running OS X and a Lynx AES16e PCI-Express digital I/O card outputting AES/EBU to the Alpha DAC. The other source was my very inexpensive Dell Inspiron 530 running Windows XP and the Lynx AES16 PCI digital I/O card. I played back WAV and AIFF files with sample rates from 44.1 to 192 kHz. The software applications used were iTunes 8 (OS X), Amarra (OS X), Foobar2000 (XP), and MediaMonkey (XP).

     

    The single most recognizable and talked about characteristic of the Alpha DAC is its soundstage. I describe the soundstage as expansive, transparent, and three dimensional. The soundstage produced from the Alpha DAC is unlike anything else. It is perhaps what makes the music reproduced through the Alpha DAC sound live instead of recorded. Listening to Crown Imperial from the Dallas Wind Symphony at 24/176.4 was truly an awesome experience. The music appeared to float in front of my listening chair and reach all the way to the back wall of my listening room at times. The transparency of the Alpha DAC is unparalleled by any DAC I've heard in recent memory. This includes some very highly regarded DACs at the 2008 Rocky Mountain Audiofest. The Alpha DAC's ability to remain extremely resolving at very high and low frequencies is astounding. Very complex orchestral material is no challenge for the Alpha DAC. Each instrument has clear separation from the top to the bottom of the spectrum. Since the Alpha DAC / Lynx combination supports everything up to 24/192, I listened to a plethora of high resolution albums during the review period. In fact I must have played the Reference Recordings HRx material at 24/176.4 more times than I can count. In order to truly give the Alpha DAC a workout and push the DAC to its limits, high resolution material is a must. Don't get me wrong the Alpha DAC handles 16/44.1 material like no other, but why listen to low resolution when you don't have to? Transients through the Alpha DAC were highly dependent on the source material and components. This is another feather in the Alpha DAC's cap as the DAC does not produce sound that it isn't presented. For example, using iTunes and the AES16e card on my Mac appeared to produce what I call rolled transients. The sound didn't quite have the edge present in the original recording, but this was not a fault of the Alpha DAC. Switching over to my XP machine with a Lynx AES16 and MediaMonkey the transients were clearly present with authority. Listening to Fanfare for the Common Man at 24/88.2 (HDCD) was an eye-opener. The attack of the drums was intense at high volumes. I almost felt like the "blown-away guy" photographed by Steve Steigman for the popular Maxell advertisements of the late 1970s and 1980s. I did listen to each interface on the Alpha DAC and settled on the AES/EBU as my favorite. I must admit this was not an apples-to-apples comparison because I used the Lynx card as my digital I/O for the AES/EBU output and I used the Mac's built-in TosLink output as another digital I/O. Hardly a fair comparison, but I used available interfaces that many readers will consider when using the Alpha DAC or the DAC of their choice. Overall the sound of reproduced music through the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC was absolutely stunning. I have very good reason to include the Alpha DAC on the CASH List without hesitation.

     

    My review of the Alpha DAC would not be complete with comparing it to the competition. I consider the two premiere DACs at the moment to be the Alpha DAC and the Weiss Minerva. (When the full Sonic Studio Amarra software/hardware package is released I expect it to be very compelling as well). I came to this conclusion through my own listening tests, as I did have both units here at the same time, and based on the frequent communication I have with Computer Audiophile readers. Even at Rocky Mountain Audiofest I ran into a very nice CA reader who was inquiring about an Alpha DAC versus the Minerva. It's a very hot topic to say the least. First and foremost both DACs are capable of incredible sound, as evidenced by my reviews of each DAC. Provided you have the proper interface you won't be disappointed by either DAC. Deciding which DAC to chose is entirely personal and depends greatly on the listener's taste, available interfaces, and feature requirements. Both DACs are right around $5,000. In my opinion the major sonic difference between the two is soundstage. I described the Alpha DAC's characteristics in detail above so I'll get right to the Minerva. The Minerva has a much more focussed soundstage that may be narrow to some listeners. On the other hand this focussed and tight soundstage is exactly what some listeners are seeking. In a way the Minerva is like plugging into the soundboard to make a live recording and the Alpha DAC is like placing microphones elsewhere in the venue. Next those considering each DAC should consider the interface required. If you need FireWire the choice is rather easy. The Minerva has FireWire 400 in addition to other interfaces whereas the Alpha DAC has the three aforementioned traditional interfaces. The Minerva also has digital outputs should you need it as a FireWire to AES interface. To further narrow down the choice between DACs the listener should consider the features of each DAC. The Alpha DAC is very strong in this department with the built-in volume control, remote control, ability to bypass a pre amp, HDCD decoding and indicator of bit perfect audio, and the sample rate display on the front panel. In addition to these considerations I strongly recommend potential purchasers contact a local dealer to discuss their needs. Berkeley Audio Design and Weiss have lists of dealers available on their websites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

    There is a very valid reason why Berkeley Audio Design is selling Alpha DACs as fast as it can produce them. The Alpha DAC is simply stunning. The Berkeley Audio Design team is one of the most respected in the industry. They have succeeded in their goal of making a very high level of fidelity available to music lovers everywhere. That is unless the music lover is in a ROHS required country, but that's a story for a different day. At $5,000 the Alpha DAC is a high-end audio bargain. This level of quality and features could honestly sell for twice or three times the price. Every Alpha DAC owner and audiophile I've talked to who has heard the DAC has been very impressed. In a recent DAC shootout for the Bay Area Audio Society the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC took first place hands down. I would not be surprised to see the Alpha DAC ascend to the top of many lists and receive much deserved accolades in the weeks and months ahead. Whether I'm using Mac OS X or Microsoft Windows the Alpha DAC from Berkeley Audio Design is my reference DAC for the foreseeable future.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Manufacturer: <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/">Berkeley Audio Design, LLC</a>

    Phone: 510-277-0512

    Email: [email protected]

    Alpha DAC Price: $5,000

    <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/dealers.html">Dealer List</a>

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment: Mac Pro, Lynx AES16e card, Kimber USB cable, Cambridge Audio DacMagic, Weiss Engineering Minerva, Benchmark DAC1 PRE, Kimber Select cable, Avalon Acoustics speakers, Focal Electra Be series speakers, McIntosh tube amplification, Virtual Dynamics power cables, Richard Gray's Power Company cables, Bel Canto USB Link.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Details from berkeleyaudiodesign.com:

     

     

     

     

    PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

    •Highest audio quality DAC

    •All distortion products below one part per million

    •Unequalled interpolation technology up-samples 44.1kHz CD’s to almost 176.4kHz quality and

    provides superb fidelity at all sampling rates from 32kHz to 192kHz

    •IR remote control of all functions including volume and balance allows direct connection to power amplifiers

    •Advanced input signal jitter rejection

    •BADA encrypted input allows future support of HDMI and other DRM formats

    •Designed by Pacific Microsonics Model One and Two design team

     

     

     

    CONTROLS & INDICATORS

    •Input selects AES, SPDIF, Toslink or BADA inputs

    •Lock LED indicates input signal lock

    •HDCD LED indicates HDCD code detected

    •Phase sets absolute phase

    •Invert LED indicates absolute phase inverted

    •3 digit LED display of Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type

    •± controls set attenuation level and select Filter type

    •Mode selects Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type display modes

    •Dim selects multiple display brightness levels

     

     

     

    SPECIFICATIONS

    •Input sampling rate: 32kHz to 192kHz

    •Input word length: 24-bit

    •Two channel analog stereo outputs: XLR balanced and RCA unbalanced

    •Digital Inputs: AES - Single XLR 110?, SPDIF - BNC 75?, Toslink – Optical, BADA encrypted - RJ-45

    •HDCD decoding detects 16-bit flag at 44.1kHz or 24-bit flag at all sampling rates

    •Multiple digital filter options

    •Multiple units can be combined for multi-channel/surround reproduction

    •Balanced analog output level: +18dBu maximum, +12dBu or lower recommended

    •Unbalanced analog output level: 3.25Vrms maximum, 2Vrms or lower recommended

    •Digital attenuation and balance control: 0.1dB/step with .05dB/step trim, 60dB range

    •Frequency response at ? 88.2kHz sampling rates: ± 0.1dB from < 0.1Hz to 35 kHz, - 3dB at 59kHz for 176.4kHz and 192kHz sampling rates

    •Distortion at recommended levels: all products ? -120dBFS

    •THD+N at maximum level: < -110dBFS

    •Setup stored in non-volatile flash ROM

    •Firmware field upgradeable through signal inputs

    •Enclosure dimensions: 1.75”H X 16.5”W x 10.4”D, 19” rack mount option

    •Mains voltage: 100/120/240VAC, 50/60Hz

    •Power consumption: 25W

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Hi Chris,<br />

    <br />

    Thanks for the reply.<br />

    <br />

    I tried shutting down itunes, changing the sample rate to 176/24 in Audio Midi, then relaunching itunes. Still no HDCD indicator light on the Alpha when playing Hrx wav files from the Hrx Sampler. <br />

    <br />

    As an aside, changing the sample rate back to 44.1 in Audio Midi while itunes was still running. still resulted in an HDCD light on, when playing 44.1 HDCD tracks, contrary to some of experiences reported.<br />

    <br />

    This weekend I'll try Pure Music to see if that helps.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Berkeley Alpha DAC: How can I tell if the the stereo audio ('48' kHz indicated on the display) digital stream is being decoded from DVDs @ 48kHz = only 16 bit word length, or full 24 bits? I can't tell if SPDIF stereo audio is 16 or 24 bits.<br />

    <br />

    I understand that typical movie DVDs output PCM stereo audio at 48 kHz (my Berkeley Alpha DAC display indicates '48 kHz' for DVDs, and perhaps most if not all DVD players truncate the digital word lengths to only 16 bits ? - I'm not sure though).<br />

    <br />

    How can I determine if the Berkely DAC is receiving 16 bits, or the full 24 bits from the digital ouput of the DVD player? - SPDIF, or Toslink)<br />

    <br />

    I have a Hyperion movie DVD: Angela Hewitt's "Bach Performance on the Piano" -- with her instructional lecture on how the piano student should play Bach. I connected SPDIF cable from a Pioneer DVD players digital output connector. As I recall, The Berkely DAC indicated 48 kHz when either PCM stereo, Dolby 5.1, or DTS-audio was selected in the DVD player's menu. Can anyone tell me if all DVD players, without exception, reduce the digital word length to only 16 bits for 48 kHz digital sample rate? <br />

    <br />

    Digital 24 bit encoding is an official format option for Dolby and DTS, but it seems that only 16 bits (truncated) digital audio word lengths is all we get from DVD players via SPDIF out? <br />

    The corporations that produce DVDs mandate reduced 16 bit digital for DVD player's SPDIF stereo audio output? <br />

    <br />

    The usual way to get 24 bit stereo audio is high-res computer files? <br />

    <br />

    I also have a Lumagen-Radiance-xD video processor that has HDMI inputs, and outputs SPDIF stereo digital 48 kHz audio (from the HDMI). Maybe can get full 24 bits audio @ 48kHz from DVDs this way? I tried going this HDMI route, and the Berkeley Alpha DAC indicated 48 kHz -- but still couldn't determine if the audio decoding was 16 or 24 bits.<br />

    <br />

    I have not yet found definitive info on the internet about SPDIF PCM 16 bit Vs. 24 bit audio from DVD players. <br />

    <br />

    Bill

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    jeroen020,<br />

    <br />

    Sorry that I didn't reply sooner.<br />

    <br />

    Comparison was to my modified Wadia 2000, x64 Digimaster algorithm.<br />

    <br />

    I don't recall the mod details.<br />

    <br />

    Perhaps many will disagree: I think that the newer models aren't 'all that much better' than my modified Wadia -- just an opinion, of course. <br />

    However, for some older 1980's era CDs the Wadia can sound better with it's time-domain processing (may help with old CD 'digititus') with the inherent high-frequency rolloff -- again, just my opinion (I often like the treble rolloff) . <br />

    Also, some people actually prefer typical Wadia midrange presentation (so I understand).<br />

    <br />

    Bill<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Bill,<br />

    <br />

    With the Berkeley Alpha DAC, it is easy to check if the SPDIF is at 16 or 24 bits. Simply press the Mode button till the Filter light is lighted. The display will either show "1.16" or "1.24" <br />

    <br />

    Geoff

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Geoff,<br />

    <br />

    Thanks for the info about how to display SPDIF 16 or 24 bits (using mode button).<br />

    <br />

    I will see if can get 24 bits audio from a DVD player, or via HDMI to Radiance xD video processor & connecting to the processor's SPDIF audio out.<br />

    <br />

    Appreciate your help.<br />

    <br />

    Bill

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sharing some experiences with trying to get bit perfect output from my Mac, which readers may find useful<br />

    <br />

    1. Itunes 9.1/ OSX 10.6.3 outputs bit perfect at 44.1/16, but NOT higher sample rates, unless additional software (such as Pure Music or Amarra is used). I have verified this doing all the prescribed steps: adjust Audio Midi sample rate and bit depth, then relaunch itunes, set volume at maximum. Verification of bit perfection was via playback of HDCD/HRx files, and using the HDCD indicator on the Berkeley Alpha.<br />

    <br />

    2. With Pure Music installed, the HDCD indicator lights up on HRx 176/24 and 96/24 Reference Recording files.<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Mac Mini Firewire to Wiess AFI1, Berkeley Alpha, Dartzeel Pre/Main, Wilson Maxx2, TNT HRX, Krell 505

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jeffrey - Don't jump to conclusions just yet :~)<br />

    <br />

    Amarra and Pure Music do nothing more than automatically do what your Mac is already capable of doing with manual adjustments. Please don't take offense but I've been doing this for years and it has always worked this way. <br />

    <br />

    I suspect you are closing the iTunes window by clicking the X in the upper left corner? This only hides the iTunes window. Please go to the iTunes menu at the top and select Quit iTunes. <br />

    <br />

    Let me know what you find :~)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,<br />

    <br />

    No offence taken at all. Appreciate the dialogue.<br />

    <br />

    Not only did I try quitting iTunes from the menu by selecting Quit iTunes, I also tried the following:<br />

    <br />

    1. Cold boot the Mac<br />

    2. Select Audio Midi Setup and configure the Weiss AFI1 to 96/24<br />

    3. Launch iTunes, and play RR's Exotic Dances from the Opera download which is in 96/24.<br />

    <br />

    No HDCD light on the Berkeley Alpha.<br />

    <br />

    I repeated 1-3, but this time for step 2, chose to output to the built in optical output, selecting 96/24 again. Got the same no HDCD result.<br />

    <br />

    When I launch Pure Music, I do get the HDCD light on this recording.<br />

    <br />

    Come to think of it, probably something to do with the bit depth rather than the sampling frequency.<br />

    <br />

    Chris, do you have a similar Mac-Berkeley setup and RR samples, and are you able to get the HDCD light on without Amarra/Pure Music? If so, then clearly my conclusions are wrong.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,<br />

    <br />

    No offence taken at all. Appreciate the dialogue.<br />

    <br />

    Not only did I try quitting iTunes from the menu by selecting Quit iTunes, I also tried the following:<br />

    <br />

    1. Cold boot the Mac<br />

    2. Select Audio Midi Setup and configure the Weiss AFI1 to 96/24<br />

    3. Launch iTunes, and play RR's Exotic Dances from the Opera download which is in 96/24.<br />

    <br />

    No HDCD light on the Berkeley Alpha.<br />

    <br />

    I repeated 1-3, but this time for step 2, chose to output to the built in optical output, selecting 96/24 again. Got the same no HDCD result.<br />

    <br />

    When I launch Pure Music, I do get the HDCD light on this recording.<br />

    <br />

    Come to think of it, probably something to do with the bit depth rather than the sampling frequency.<br />

    <br />

    Chris, do you have a similar Mac-Berkeley setup and RR samples, and are you able to get the HDCD light on without Amarra/Pure Music? If so, then clearly my conclusions are wrong.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jeffrey - I have a few Macs that I connect to my Berkeley DAC. All are capable of bit perfect output without Amarra or Pure Music. I had the Weiss Minerva here and I used it to convert FireWire to AES for my Alpha as a test of bit transparency. No problems.<br />

    <br />

    The other thing I was thinking of this afternoon is this. When you adjust the sample rate in Audio Midi do you make sure to select the correct audio output device on the left side?<br />

    <br />

    When you change the sample rates in Audio Midi manually does your Alpha DAC show the new sample rate immediately? Have you changed the filter on the Alpha? Have you tried rebooting your Alpha?<br />

    <br />

    Just so we are on the same page. You still get the HDCD indicator at 16/44.1 correct?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,<br />

    <br />

    Yes, the correct audio output device is showing on the left side.<br />

    Yes, when I change the sample rate in AMS, the Alpha display registers a change in sample rate display immediately. <br />

    No, I did not change the filter. The Alpha is correctly choosing 1.16 and 1.24 as appropriate.<br />

    Bit-correct HDCD at 16/44.1 is no problem, I get that without PM, and I get that whether I use the built in optical out or the AFI1.<br />

    <br />

    I rebooted the alpha and the AFI1. No change in behaviour.<br />

    <br />

    Have you tested bit correctness at 24/96 or 24/176 in Mac/iTunes without Amarra, PM or other software?<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,<br />

    when you change the volume in Amarra or at the Alpha DAC is there a loss of resolution? I am wondering if the Alpha DAC is doing this after the D/A stage because the HDCD light stays on. And what happens if you do this with the volume control of Amarra? Is there a loss of bit depth?<br />

    <br />

    So what would be the optimal setting?<br />

    <br />

    Thank you for clarification.<br />

    <br />

    Stephan

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Folks,<br />

    <br />

    After roaming this site for quite some time and getting up to speed with CA (NAS, MacMini, feeding my Wadia850i via toslink) I spotted a used BADA around the corner last week. That’s a rarity, since I live in the Netherlands and BADA’s don’t come by here often. Especially 6month old used ones with 1 year of warranty by a trusted dealer (of some other respected brands, no Berkeley dealerships in the EU to my knowledge) for 300 euro over a new QB-9. Being a used kit buff, that caught my interest... <br />

    <br />

    Listening session at dealer happened using redbook only, comparing the BADA to my Wadia850i (CD playing on Wadia versus CD in Wadia feeding BADA via SPDIF). Major difference was size of the sonic picture (I guess that is ‘soundstage’). BADA is much larger, more air, and most importantly, less ‘sticky on the speakers’. The highs on the BADA had a bit more sparkle (Wadia digimaster roll-off?) and in general there was more detail and texture to everything, including the bass. The Wadia however had more bass-pressure and a little more ‘bass induced drama’ because of that. I can understand that there are people out there that prefer the Wadia house sound because of that.. I liked the BADA a lot (over the Wadia) on redbook.<br />

    <br />

    So I took the plunge and the BADA is now sitting in my rack! I also upgraded the interface from the build-in toslink to HiFace (BNC) and installed Pure Music and I was playing HRx in 30 minutes.. wouwza.. And that auto sample-rate switching is nice!<br />

    <br />

    So now, need to get to grips with the new (&improved) sound and do the tons of tweaking & setup. Initial thoughts & questions for this forums BADA users:<br />

    <br />

    1. The hum issue<br />

    My BADA is NOT silent (far from it). In fact I think it is noisy. This thread so far mentions two hypothesis: <br />

    (a) It is an issue on earlier models and was fixed in later versions or <br />

    (b) It is a DC-offset issue. My Nemo’s do have a very minor hum also, whereas their previous owner stated they were dead-silent at his place..so I hope this is the issue.<br />

    <br />

    Does any of you folks have some final insight in this? Suggestions?<br />

    <br />

    2. HDCD light on HRx recordings. <br />

    Chris seems to be very sure that HDCD light must be lit, also on HRx recordings. It did not happen here playing HRx using PureMusic. Samplerate displayed ok. I used the demo tracks recently (06/24) posted here on CA by Chris. I downloaded in AIFF to circumvent potential MAX conversion issues. HDCD light on 44.1 is not a problem. Does that imply a bit perfect mess-up on HRx playback someplace? Word-lenght perhaps? The HiFace seems to know only 32bit...<br />

    <br />

    3. Rack mounting options: coupling vs. de-coupling of a BADA. <br />

    This thing weighs just about nothing! I am trying to figure out proper placement & mounting, currently using 3 magnetic floaters under, with 4 doorstops (4 x 1.1kg) op top of the BADA for added weight. Experiences please!<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Gosh, such a nice hobby this is. Hate to think that I was done....<br />

    <br />

    Hans<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Hans, congatulations on getting the BADA.<br />

    I notice you use magnetic floaters under yours. I have also tried this, but the result was a quite high noise from the power supply. I could hear it 3 meters away. Try to remove the floaters and see if the noise goes away. <br />

    <br />

    Maybe your floaters are different than mine, but those magnets clearly had a bad effect on the power supply of the dac.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    DC offset in the AC mains can cause mechanical hum in power transformers (especially toroids), but it does not cause hum in the audio signal, so it would not cause hum that is reproduced by the loudspeakers.<br />

    <br />

    Usually only the large power transformers in power amps are susceptible to such hum, not the small power transformers in low power equipment such as a DAC.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Hans - <br />

    <br />

    <i>"1. The hum issue"</i><br />

    The BAD uses an advanced power supply that causes the slight hum because it vibrates the chassis. Berkeley could have used the standard power supply but thought the hum was worth the sonic benefit. You may try setting something on top of the unit. If I press down on the top of mine the hum is reduced greatly.<br />

    <br />

    <i>"2. HDCD light on HRx recordings."</i><br />

    If you don't have the light on HRx material you're not getting bit perfect output from your computer. I just tested all the files (again) using a hiFace and all illuminated the HDCD indicator. Without this illuminated you aren't getting all the resolution the BADA is capable of. Do you have a volume slider not at 100% somewhere?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    LesPaul,<br />

    <br />

    You were absolutely correct. Removing the floaters & putting the BADA on it's own feet reduced the power supply noise by a huge amount. It is still there, but only minor & not something to be bothered by. Thanks for the tip! <br />

    <br />

    PS. It seems more some sort of a mechanical/ accoustic / vibration effect, rather than a magnetic influence to me, but I am not 100% sure..<br />

    <br />

    Hans

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,<br />

    <br />

    Thanks!<br />

    <br />

    R.e. the hum: did exactly that. Using magnetic decoupler feet greatly amplified the effect (boat-horn!). I'm experimenting where to put weight & how much. How have you setup your BADA (coupled, de-coupled, 3, 4..)?<br />

    <br />

    R.e. HDCD. I think I was drunk (or my Mac was). HDCD light is there on all my HRx tracks.. solved. Feedback greatly appreciated. B.t.w., HRx is mind-blowing if all you ever heard is redbook. I need to get more of those / find Dutch point of sales.<br />

    <br />

    Also: <br />

    - do you guys ever switch off power (I can easily do that with my Quintet) or do you leave it powered on all the time?<br />

    - is the BNC terminal on your BADA as flimsy as mine..?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks for the info!<br />

    Hans

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Hans - Great to hear. I have my Alpha DAC sitting in one of two places. You can see in the photo below. It's either where the amp is sitting or on the platform where the dCS Debussy is sitting. Funny that the Alpha wasn't in use when I took the photo. The platform is from First Impression Music. It has three metal balls in between two pieces of wood.<br />

    <br />

    <center>Click to enlarge<br />

    <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0629/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS1.jpeg" class="thickbox" rel="system"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2010/0629/C.A.P.jpeg" style=" alt="LinnDS-I-08"></a><br />

    </center>

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    beautiful listening area there Chris!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The unit is actually supposed to vibrate like it does. They are well aware of it and could fix it, but at the sacrifice of sound quality.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    On the subject of hum busting & DC offset, there is some info on this Dutch manufacturers site:<br />

    <br />

    http://www.kempelektroniks.nl/Line-Conditioners/Power-DC-X-terminator.aspx<br />

    <br />

    If I read that correctly, perhaps, you both could be right. In effect maybe the choice for the BADA transformer was purely based on musical performance, and NOT on susceptibility to DC offset, in which case an alternate transformer might not have induced the hum & vibration, but would have degraded the DAC's sound...<br />

    <br />

    The Kemp site does state however that DC offset is a changing influence. If the hum is always there & always the same it is bound to be the transformer its-self (which puts Chris through to the next round.. )<br />

    <br />

    We know for sure if someone has fed his BADA with 100% clean power (the likes of PS Audio power plant..) eliminating any DC offset. Anyone? Do you have vibration, or not?<br />

    <br />

    ok. now, one more Crown Imperial :~)<br />

    <br />

    Hans

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Hans - The vibration remains no matter what is used for power. <br />

    <br />

    Am I through to the next round with Crown Imperial for everyone :~)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...