Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Review

    AlphaBlu2.jpgOver the last few months I've talked more about the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC than perhaps any other product. The Alpha DAC appeared on the CASH List from the very beginning and has since been the subject of several reader discussions here on Computer Audiophile. Under normal circumstances I would be concerned as frequently discussed products often don't live up to the hype they've generated. This however is not a normal circumstance. The Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. At $5k it's a relative bargain in high-end audio terms and there is nothing like it available today.

     

     

     

     

    Berkeley Audio Design

     

    Berkeley Audio Design was founded by René Jaeger, Michael “Pflash” Pflaumer, and Michael Ritter. All three gentlemen are well known for their previous work at Pacific Microsonics. Pflash Pflaumer is the co-inventor of the HDCD process, in addition to writing all the digital algorithms used in the Pacific Microsonics Model Two. The Model Two is commonly thought to be the best ADC / DAC produced in recent memory. Unfortunately there were only 150 Model Twos produced and they have long since been out of production. This past weekend on my trip to Seattle and the San Francisco bay area I had a chance to meet with all three founders of Berkeley Audio Design. I talked to René Jaeger over breakfast in Seattle, before heading to the Bay Area. Then I spoke with Michael and Pflash during lunch at Eccolo in Berkeley, CA. All three Berkeley Audio Design founders are first class guys who were very eager to discuss the Alpha DAC and computer based audio in general. After discussing some technical details about the Alpha DAC with Pflash I realized that he has likely forgotten more information than I'll accumulate over the course of my entire life.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Features

     

    As I said in my opening paragraph, the Alpha DAC is seriously out of this world. Sonically I've never heard better. In addition to sound quality the Alpha DAC has some fabulous features that are indispensable. The single most important feature of this DAC is its ability to decode HDCD and illuminate an HDCD indicator when HDCD encoded content is detected. One constant in the world of computer based audio is the worry that looms over listeners wondering if their computers are outputting bit perfect data to their DACs. The HDCD indicator on the Alpha DAC is not foolproof, but there is a 99.99% chance that a computer is outputting bit perfect data if the HDCD indicator is illuminated upon playback of an HDCD encoded track. This is because the HDCD flag is located on the 16th and 24th bit of 16/44.1 and 24/44.1-192 content respectively. As I noted in a response to a reader in September, "If the HDCD indicator illuminates on the Alpha DAC, the data is uncorrupted. Theoretically, it is possible to alter HDCD data using specialized software while not touching the LSB, but all of the typical mechanisms that might alter data in a computer environment such as level shifting, dither, SRC’s, etc. will definitely affect the LSB. And, if the LSB is altered the HDCD code is lost. So, as a practical tool, presence of the HDCD light indicates no alteration of the data file."

     

    The Alpha DAC's front panel display indicates the current sample rate or volume level depending on the listeners selection. This is an easy way for listeners to verify that data coming out of their computer has the correct sample rate. Avoiding software sample rate conversion (SRC) is a high priority for many listeners. The Alpha DAC display removes almost all ambiguity from the computer playback process. If you're playing a 24/176.4 track from Reference Recordings and the Alpha DAC is not indicating the presence of HDCD and the sample rate is not indicating 176.4, then you know you have some configuration issues. Compare this to a user without the Alpha DAC who thinks his computer is performing at its highest level even though the sound is not quite right. I think we'd all like to know when the sample rate is wrong and remedy the situation ASAP so we can get back to listening unaltered music. We've all had issues with our audio systems, traditional or computer based, and we've all jumped for joy when inserting a component that solves the issue or when removing a component causing the trouble. I've said to myself more than once, "how could I have listened like that for weeks without knowing something was wrong?" The Alpha DAC gets us one step closer to identifying sources of imperfect sound. In my conversation with Pflash a couple days ago he stated that the display of the Alpha DAC is updated at the very beginning of a track. Thus, the Alpha DAC reads a 176.4 track and updates the display instantly upon playback. Following the sample rate update the display totally "disengages" (my word, not Pflash's) from the rest of the DAC. This is among many other design elements that contribute the Alpha DAC's stellar sound quality.

     

    Possibly the most underrated part of the Alpha DAC is its ability to bypass a pre amp and connect directly to a power amp(s). The Alpha DAC has its own digital volume control that is as well implemented as I've ever heard. Trust me, I'd have a pre amp in my system in a heartbeat if I thought the Alpha's volume control degraded the sound in any way. As a test I connected the Alpha DAC to a pre amp and was so disappointed I reverted to the pre amp-less configuration in under two tracks. I spoke to Berkeley Audio Design's Michael Ritter about the digital volume control and he indicated that even the best pre amps in the industry can degrade the sound coming from the Alpha DAC. The digital volume control and analog output stage in the Alpha DAC are very solid. That said, I do know people using pre amps with their Alpha DACs. Some people must use a pre amp for the analog inputs and others just like the sound of their system using a pre amp. When the Alpha DAC is used with a pre amp the optimal volume setting on the DAC is 54 dB. The main point to keep in mind is the Alpha DAC offers listeners options. The Alpha DAC has traditional DAC inputs and outputs. Both single ended RCA and balanced XLR connections are available for the analog output. The usable inputs are limited to AES/EBU, S/PDIF, and Toslink.

     

    Shortly after the Alpha DAC arrived I noticed a barely audible hum coming from the DAC. I immediately thought something was wrong so I contacted Michael Ritter seeking an answer. What Michael told me only solidified my belief that sound quality was the foremost concern of the Berkeley Audio team. He explained that the Alpha DAC has two totally separate power supplies for digital and analog, and two power transformers. The dual bobbin transformers used in the Alpha have very high isolation between the primary and secondary windings that provides maximum immunity from line noise. One side effect of this high isolation is a narrow area of magnetic field that causes the bottom of the DAC to hum a little bit. Berkeley Audio Design could have opted for an absolutely silent solution at the cost of sonic degradation. Listeners will be happy to know the hum is inaudible when listening to music even at the lowest volume the Alpha DAC is capable of producing, 0.1 dB.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The Sound

     

    During the Alpha DAC review I used two different computer sources. One source was my Mac Pro running OS X and a Lynx AES16e PCI-Express digital I/O card outputting AES/EBU to the Alpha DAC. The other source was my very inexpensive Dell Inspiron 530 running Windows XP and the Lynx AES16 PCI digital I/O card. I played back WAV and AIFF files with sample rates from 44.1 to 192 kHz. The software applications used were iTunes 8 (OS X), Amarra (OS X), Foobar2000 (XP), and MediaMonkey (XP).

     

    The single most recognizable and talked about characteristic of the Alpha DAC is its soundstage. I describe the soundstage as expansive, transparent, and three dimensional. The soundstage produced from the Alpha DAC is unlike anything else. It is perhaps what makes the music reproduced through the Alpha DAC sound live instead of recorded. Listening to Crown Imperial from the Dallas Wind Symphony at 24/176.4 was truly an awesome experience. The music appeared to float in front of my listening chair and reach all the way to the back wall of my listening room at times. The transparency of the Alpha DAC is unparalleled by any DAC I've heard in recent memory. This includes some very highly regarded DACs at the 2008 Rocky Mountain Audiofest. The Alpha DAC's ability to remain extremely resolving at very high and low frequencies is astounding. Very complex orchestral material is no challenge for the Alpha DAC. Each instrument has clear separation from the top to the bottom of the spectrum. Since the Alpha DAC / Lynx combination supports everything up to 24/192, I listened to a plethora of high resolution albums during the review period. In fact I must have played the Reference Recordings HRx material at 24/176.4 more times than I can count. In order to truly give the Alpha DAC a workout and push the DAC to its limits, high resolution material is a must. Don't get me wrong the Alpha DAC handles 16/44.1 material like no other, but why listen to low resolution when you don't have to? Transients through the Alpha DAC were highly dependent on the source material and components. This is another feather in the Alpha DAC's cap as the DAC does not produce sound that it isn't presented. For example, using iTunes and the AES16e card on my Mac appeared to produce what I call rolled transients. The sound didn't quite have the edge present in the original recording, but this was not a fault of the Alpha DAC. Switching over to my XP machine with a Lynx AES16 and MediaMonkey the transients were clearly present with authority. Listening to Fanfare for the Common Man at 24/88.2 (HDCD) was an eye-opener. The attack of the drums was intense at high volumes. I almost felt like the "blown-away guy" photographed by Steve Steigman for the popular Maxell advertisements of the late 1970s and 1980s. I did listen to each interface on the Alpha DAC and settled on the AES/EBU as my favorite. I must admit this was not an apples-to-apples comparison because I used the Lynx card as my digital I/O for the AES/EBU output and I used the Mac's built-in TosLink output as another digital I/O. Hardly a fair comparison, but I used available interfaces that many readers will consider when using the Alpha DAC or the DAC of their choice. Overall the sound of reproduced music through the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC was absolutely stunning. I have very good reason to include the Alpha DAC on the CASH List without hesitation.

     

    My review of the Alpha DAC would not be complete with comparing it to the competition. I consider the two premiere DACs at the moment to be the Alpha DAC and the Weiss Minerva. (When the full Sonic Studio Amarra software/hardware package is released I expect it to be very compelling as well). I came to this conclusion through my own listening tests, as I did have both units here at the same time, and based on the frequent communication I have with Computer Audiophile readers. Even at Rocky Mountain Audiofest I ran into a very nice CA reader who was inquiring about an Alpha DAC versus the Minerva. It's a very hot topic to say the least. First and foremost both DACs are capable of incredible sound, as evidenced by my reviews of each DAC. Provided you have the proper interface you won't be disappointed by either DAC. Deciding which DAC to chose is entirely personal and depends greatly on the listener's taste, available interfaces, and feature requirements. Both DACs are right around $5,000. In my opinion the major sonic difference between the two is soundstage. I described the Alpha DAC's characteristics in detail above so I'll get right to the Minerva. The Minerva has a much more focussed soundstage that may be narrow to some listeners. On the other hand this focussed and tight soundstage is exactly what some listeners are seeking. In a way the Minerva is like plugging into the soundboard to make a live recording and the Alpha DAC is like placing microphones elsewhere in the venue. Next those considering each DAC should consider the interface required. If you need FireWire the choice is rather easy. The Minerva has FireWire 400 in addition to other interfaces whereas the Alpha DAC has the three aforementioned traditional interfaces. The Minerva also has digital outputs should you need it as a FireWire to AES interface. To further narrow down the choice between DACs the listener should consider the features of each DAC. The Alpha DAC is very strong in this department with the built-in volume control, remote control, ability to bypass a pre amp, HDCD decoding and indicator of bit perfect audio, and the sample rate display on the front panel. In addition to these considerations I strongly recommend potential purchasers contact a local dealer to discuss their needs. Berkeley Audio Design and Weiss have lists of dealers available on their websites.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

    There is a very valid reason why Berkeley Audio Design is selling Alpha DACs as fast as it can produce them. The Alpha DAC is simply stunning. The Berkeley Audio Design team is one of the most respected in the industry. They have succeeded in their goal of making a very high level of fidelity available to music lovers everywhere. That is unless the music lover is in a ROHS required country, but that's a story for a different day. At $5,000 the Alpha DAC is a high-end audio bargain. This level of quality and features could honestly sell for twice or three times the price. Every Alpha DAC owner and audiophile I've talked to who has heard the DAC has been very impressed. In a recent DAC shootout for the Bay Area Audio Society the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC took first place hands down. I would not be surprised to see the Alpha DAC ascend to the top of many lists and receive much deserved accolades in the weeks and months ahead. Whether I'm using Mac OS X or Microsoft Windows the Alpha DAC from Berkeley Audio Design is my reference DAC for the foreseeable future.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Manufacturer: <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/">Berkeley Audio Design, LLC</a>

    Phone: 510-277-0512

    Email: [email protected]

    Alpha DAC Price: $5,000

    <a href="http://www.berkeleyaudiodesign.com/dealers.html">Dealer List</a>

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment: Mac Pro, Lynx AES16e card, Kimber USB cable, Cambridge Audio DacMagic, Weiss Engineering Minerva, Benchmark DAC1 PRE, Kimber Select cable, Avalon Acoustics speakers, Focal Electra Be series speakers, McIntosh tube amplification, Virtual Dynamics power cables, Richard Gray's Power Company cables, Bel Canto USB Link.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Alpha DAC Details from berkeleyaudiodesign.com:

     

     

     

     

    PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS

    •Highest audio quality DAC

    •All distortion products below one part per million

    •Unequalled interpolation technology up-samples 44.1kHz CD’s to almost 176.4kHz quality and

    provides superb fidelity at all sampling rates from 32kHz to 192kHz

    •IR remote control of all functions including volume and balance allows direct connection to power amplifiers

    •Advanced input signal jitter rejection

    •BADA encrypted input allows future support of HDMI and other DRM formats

    •Designed by Pacific Microsonics Model One and Two design team

     

     

     

    CONTROLS & INDICATORS

    •Input selects AES, SPDIF, Toslink or BADA inputs

    •Lock LED indicates input signal lock

    •HDCD LED indicates HDCD code detected

    •Phase sets absolute phase

    •Invert LED indicates absolute phase inverted

    •3 digit LED display of Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type

    •± controls set attenuation level and select Filter type

    •Mode selects Stereo/L/R attenuation, Sampling Rate and Filter type display modes

    •Dim selects multiple display brightness levels

     

     

     

    SPECIFICATIONS

    •Input sampling rate: 32kHz to 192kHz

    •Input word length: 24-bit

    •Two channel analog stereo outputs: XLR balanced and RCA unbalanced

    •Digital Inputs: AES - Single XLR 110?, SPDIF - BNC 75?, Toslink – Optical, BADA encrypted - RJ-45

    •HDCD decoding detects 16-bit flag at 44.1kHz or 24-bit flag at all sampling rates

    •Multiple digital filter options

    •Multiple units can be combined for multi-channel/surround reproduction

    •Balanced analog output level: +18dBu maximum, +12dBu or lower recommended

    •Unbalanced analog output level: 3.25Vrms maximum, 2Vrms or lower recommended

    •Digital attenuation and balance control: 0.1dB/step with .05dB/step trim, 60dB range

    •Frequency response at ? 88.2kHz sampling rates: ± 0.1dB from < 0.1Hz to 35 kHz, - 3dB at 59kHz for 176.4kHz and 192kHz sampling rates

    •Distortion at recommended levels: all products ? -120dBFS

    •THD+N at maximum level: < -110dBFS

    •Setup stored in non-volatile flash ROM

    •Firmware field upgradeable through signal inputs

    •Enclosure dimensions: 1.75”H X 16.5”W x 10.4”D, 19” rack mount option

    •Mains voltage: 100/120/240VAC, 50/60Hz

    •Power consumption: 25W

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I was thinking of a DAC that had its own digital volume control.<br />

    <br />

    You're right that the best way to implement digital volume control in computer software is to first convert 16-bit to 24-bit before applying the digital attenuation.<br />

    <br />

    Sorry for my confusion.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    can't seem to find this info anywhere, and have not yet seen an openup / teardown of the Alpha DAC to know precisely which components are used in its conversion architecture. Can anyone confirm:<br />

    <br />

    1/ if the Alpha uses a commercial D/A IC, and if so, which one (it's also possible that there may be several of the same IC used in a parallel configuration)? If not, any info on what hardware is performing the D/A conversion function, ie a module with any visible identification?<br />

    <br />

    2/ does the architecture include any obviously-visible device which could perform signal processing (FPGA, digital filter chip, DSP devices ie ADI SHARC or Blackfin, or TI or other) as a preprocessor to the D/A IC/module? Most probably this is the case, as (at mimimum) vol control and HDCD decode functionality must be performed<br />

    <br />

    3/ a DAC "box" can *accept* up to and including 192 kHz inputs, but the internal D/A conversion ICs do not necessarily operate at this sampling frequency. One example is the Benchmark DAC1, which *accepts* 32-192 kHz, but resamples any input sample rate to approx 110 kHz before conversion as part of their jitter-minimization strategy and to run the ADI D/A chip at an optimal performance-vs-sampling-frequency operating point (which was an ingenious system solution for the time when the DAC1 was designed, using D/A chips which are now of course many years old in design). Does anyone have info confirming that the Alpha DAC will actually operate at 176.4 and 192 without resampling? Does the user guide contain any info in this regard, and any performance-vs-operating-frequency characteristics? The website has only some leading- but definately marketing-speak information.<br />

    <br />

    Any pics of internals to be posted?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris and Computer Audiophiles,<br />

    <br />

    Just a brief note to say that my Berkeley Audio Alpha DAC arrived yesterday -- the missing piece to put my high-rez music server in operation. I had a wait of a bit less than six weeks, due in part to Berkeley revising production for EIC certification.<br />

    <br />

    The Alpha has been thoroughly discussed here and in other reviews, so I won't go on and on. Suffice to say that it completely lives up to its billing. High resolution files via the Alpha are stunning -- easily the best digital playback I've had the pleasure to hear.<br />

    <br />

    There was some concern about the power supply noise of the early versions of the Alpha DAC. Evidently that has been successfully addressed in the latest DACs now shipping; my Alpha is completely silent and I've noticed no external hum from the unit.<br />

    <br />

    There is nothing original in my music server system -- all of the ideas pretty much originate from Computer Audiophile postings, and I'm very appreciative of have such a great forum to get this information out here. Keep up the good work!<br />

    <br />

    Steve Z<br />

    <br />

    Mac G4 Powebook/Thecus N5200BR Pro/iTunes > Weiss AFI1 firewire to AES > Berkeley Alpha DAC

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris,<br />

    what's the power amp used in this review? BTW, do you a think the Berkeley AlphaDAC will work fine as preamp for a Mc275?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just the end of August, after reviewing this any several other reviews, all giving the Alpha high marks, I bought one for myself, unheard- and have no regrets at all- the performance is impeccable, and has raised CD playback to levels I once thought not possible- a typical example being the Sheffield CD of the Harry James "King James Version", taken from the 1976 recording; for the first time, this disk starts to approach what the vinyl delivered, which is no mean achievement. In this regard one can say it truly demolishes anything else I've heard at $6K or less. Imaging, transient envelopes, midrange textural trueness, are essentially in a class of it's own at this price. Obviously, the recordings that benefit the most are good ones, but there are other recordings that have not been perceived in the past as all that good because they are so demanding or punishing in some respect, but are now reproduced much more realistically and satisfyingly. <br />

    <br />

    The Alpha DAC does deserve the appellation of "closer to the mic feed" and I find it money well very well spent. Mine is currently being used with a Cambridge Audio CD player as transport and with AES/EBU output from a Fireface 800 connnected to Mac Mini, at various data rates and source types. Next to investigate is a card which converts DSD to 24/192 for SACD, to see how the Alpha works with that material. <br />

    <br />

    Thanks for your review Chris.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    however what are you trying to accomplish when you say you need "to investigate is a card which converts DSD to 24/192 for SACD, to see how the Alpha works with that material"?<br />

    <br />

    What is your source for DSD material? Are you looking to rip or digitize SACDs?<br />

    <br />

    I had been contemplating the Korg MR-2000S to digitize vinyl at either:<br />

    <br />

    -PCM audio format: 88.2 kHz @ 24 bit, 96 kHz @ 24 bit,176.4 kHz @ 24 bit, 192 kHz @ 24 bit<br />

    <br />

    or<br />

    <br />

    -1-bit audio format: 2.8 MHz @ 1-bit DSD, 5.6 MHz @ 1-bit,DSDIFF format (extension .dff), DSF (extension .dsf),WSD (extension .wsd)<br />

    <br />

    The Korg AudioGate software can convert the DSD formats to a lower PCM audio format.<br />

    <br />

    I assume if you are looking to tap into the SACD layer this would be the legal and relatively inexpensive way to go barring the expense of needing an excellent SACD player. From the reviews and user feedback of the Korg MR-2000S, the DSDIFF result is indistinguishable from the original SACD played back on an excellent SACD player. Of course you lose a little something if you convert to PCM.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I guess I have similar questions as Audiozorro -- what is your source for DSD material? I've been doing a fair bit of research and haven't found a cost-effective way of extracting the DSD information from a commercial SACD. I own an Esoteric X-03 player which can be set to output the encoded DSD stream from an SACD via iLink (firewire), however short of pro gear to decode and/or do sample rate conversion, I haven't seen anything that will let me capture the stream as a file, let alone do decoding and SRC.<br />

    <br />

    I have a Korg MR2000S, the latest firmware and software (which, BTW allows burning a DSD DVD that can be played) but AudioGate will not capture streaming PCM or DSD. 2L Recordings has about 25 minutes DSDIFF music files at their website that can be downloaded and experimented with (and AudioGate will recognize and manipulate them).<br />

    I'd love to find a source of DSD music files. Live music recording with the Korg isn't very feasible for me here in rural Montana -- there just aren't many concerts around here. <br />

    <br />

    For archiving vinyl I highly recommend using DSDIFF, either sampling frequency. DSD can be converted to high resolution PCM without the decimation issues and degradation that can occur with PCM to PCM SRC. I haven't compared the Korg/AudioGate "DSD disk" against DSD converted to 24/192 or 24/176.4 yet, but vinyl recorded to DSD and then converted to 24/192 and 24/176.4 and played via my Berkeley Alpha DAC is very, very good. I haven't developed a firm preference yet for 24/192 or 24/176.4 when converting from DSD, though I have read some theoretical and one or two practical comments that express a preference for 24/176.4 when doing SRC from DSD.<br />

    <br />

    I'd like to learn about others' experiences with DSD and DSD SRC to PCM.<br />

    <br />

    Best regards,<br />

    <br />

    Steve Z<br />

    Montana, USA

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Steve et al.<br />

    I was facing similar problems since the only method of getting music off a SACD is to convert to PCM. I found the solution below and it works great for me. Output is 24/96 and with Lynx, Amarra and alpha DAC the result is more than acceptable. For recording I use Amadeus Pro.<br />

    <br />

    http://freerider.dyndns.org/anlage/HiresAudio_E.htm<br />

    <br />

    Greetings Stephan

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, my interest is possible methods of SACD capture for the music server (Mac Mini). I do have a high quality SACD player already, and with Pure Vinyl it's possible to do a good capture at 24/192 and create music tracks in AIFF. Pure vinyl also has the ability to create fairly high quality 44.1 from the high rez capture and has an upsampling playback engine that can integrate with iTunes (Mac), though I haven't tried that out yet. Many things on the to-do list at this point, as I'm also finishing up a major speaker project. <br />

    <br />

    But this weekend I'm buying a used Pioneer DV-79 with the intention to install a board from these people: <br />

    <br />

    http://audiopraise.com/vanity/overview.php<br />

    <br />

    which would do a DSD to PCM conversion and output at 24/192- through SPDIF- which I will try with the Berkeley Alpha DAC. I suspect that may be the way to go, and as mentioned earlier, would use Amadeus Pro or another of the audio stream capture utilities available for the Mac to capture the incoming bit stream. Possibly a dicey concept, but I'd really like to get my SACD's on to the music system, especially the single layer ones with no hybrid RB layer which I can't back up in any form currently and can only play on the SACD player (Marantz SA-11). <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,<br />

    I'm confused again. Ugh. In rereading the Alpha DAC review, you state (I think) that the DAC rolled off transients when used with the MacPro and Lynx AES16e card compared to Media Monkey and the legacy card in the Dell PC. If so, why do you still use the mac as your server? Have the newer iTunes or Amarra made the issue better? I bought a Berkeley, and need to decide on server type. Currently have a MacPro dual core 2Ghz with all my music under iTunes. Should I use this or boot under Windows 7 and use Media monkey or J.River?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks in advance.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi rlodad - Good observation and question. Currently I use a Mac Pro OS X Snow Leopard & Win 7, Mac G5 OS X Tiger, MacBook Pro OS X Snow Leopard, Dell Windows XP, and two custom built Linux servers I am working on. They all have different characters to the sound. I need to use all of them to keep up on everything that's out there :~)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks, Chris, but let's cut to the chase. Do you prefer one over the others with your current system? Amarra vs. "virgin" iTunes vs. Win 7? Can you give any subjective listening qualities of each/ We know you think the transients are rolled off some in whatever version of iTunes you were using for the berkeley review, any change with new iTunes. I know you are avoiding the subject, how about just a hint?<br />

    <br />

    :^)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ha! I'm really not trying to avoid the subject :~) I just don't want people to think there is one "best" solution for all systems. Right now my go-to server for sound quality is the Mac G5 running OS X Tiger, iTunes & Amarra, and outputting audio via a Lynx AES16 PCI card.<br />

    <br />

    Each of my systems has weak points. I think the G5 has fewer weak points or maybe just weak points that aren't as apparent in my system.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,<br />

    Thanks for the information. Any idea why the G5 might sound better in your system than the Intel MacPro? We are all assuming it is not because you're a dummy and built a poorly matched system, oh great leader... I have a 2gHz Intel Mac Pro (32bit, bummer...) and am wondering if you have any subjective evaluation of the difference in sound b/t the two and why the G5 might sound "better" or different.<br />

    <br />

    Thanks again.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi rlodad - The following (on-going) thread has more insight into this topic than I could ever write myself. Check it out if you haven't already. The Mac Pro is definitely capable of wonderful sound that's better than physical disc spinners, but the G5 has a little something extra. The Mac Pro seems to sound a little dull compared to the G5 and my WIndows XP music server. I stress that this is in my system because a big factor may be the Lynx card. The AES16e is the only card to fit in the Mac Pro whereas the AES16 PCI cad fits into the G5. I'll have to do much more listening with non-AES DACs to better understand the differences between Mac Pro and G5, but that takes a ton of time.<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Magic-Words-Power-Mac-G5-versus-Mac-Mini

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have Berkeley Alpha DAC & LYNX AES16 computer interface card.<br />

    <br />

    The Alpha DAC, even by itself with inexpensive CD player digital out, sounds much better than my Wadia DAC - a surprise to me.<br />

    <br />

    High res files, like 24/96, etc., thru computer LYNX AES16 is best I've heard so far - price no object.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Bill,<br />

    <br />

    Which Wadia are/were you using ?<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    OK, The Linx card seems to be the way to go for desktop applications but how are people attaching to the Berkeley if you have a laptop? Firewire through ? to what? USB to ? to what? S/PDIF if you are lucky enough? I'm trying to get some ideas as I should be able to get my hands on a DAC next week to try in my home system but I have an older laptop with Firewire and USB only. Thanks in advance for any replies. I'm just trying to get some indication as to what most people who are lucky enough to have this DAC are driving it with.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Wattage - Patience will help you on this one. Great Asynchronous USB 24/194 to S/PDIF converters are on the way in a month or two from top notch manufacturers. I know quite a few people using optical TosLink out of MacBooks waiting for these converters.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    any update on the Berkeley USB to S/PDIF converter? And have you ever tried the M2tech hiFace, that seems a bargain at that price?<br />

    <br />

    Have a nice day,<br />

    Fabrizio

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I've always wondered why no one makes a software HDCD converter i.e. after you rip an HDCD disc it would trans-code the data and create a 20-bit (or 24-bit) file. That way you would not have to worry about the LSB being lost in the playback chain. In my case, since I use digital room correction and have tons of HDCD discs, it would be really helpful!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The HDCD indicator light on my Berkeley Alpha lights on 44.1 HDCD recordings from Reference Recordings, but it does not light when playing back the Hrx Sampler which came with the Alpha. I am playing the original Wav files off the DVD. The sound of the Hrx Sampler is fantastic, but no HDCD indicator light.<br />

    <br />

    Does this mean my system is not bit perfect on Hrx? Also does anyone know if the 96/24 and 88/24 Reference recordings use HDCD<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Mac Mini (March 2010 model), firewire to Weiss AFI1, AES/EBU to Berkeley alpha. Dartzeel pre and main amp, Wilson Maxx2<br />

    TNT HRX

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, it means the high res HRx recordings don't use HDCD encoding; his was a process developed for CD's.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Jeffrey - All RR tracks use High Definition Compatable Digital (HDCD). No matter what the sample rate the HDCD indicator should be illuminating on your Alpha DAC. <br />

    <br />

    Are you closing iTunes, changing the sample rate in Audio Midi, them reopening iTunes? If not I can see why only the 44.1 tracks are showing as HDCD. Have you tried Amarra or Pure Music with iTunes? Either one will take care of the sample rate changes for you automatically.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...