Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Audio Research DAC 9 Review

    The sound of Minneapolis can't be nailed down to anyone or anything specific, but if I had to select an artist and equipment on which to play this artist, I would likely select Prince and components from Audio Research Corporation. Prince and Audio Research provide the quintessential sound of Minneapolis. Both are originals, both have large well-deserved fan bases earned over decades, and both are at the top of their industries. Prince and the ARC is one band name that we'll never get to see officially replace the NPG, but those of us lucky enough can listen to Prince & ARC in our homes seven nights a week. 

     

    Over the last several weeks, I've combined Prince's amazing music with the Audio Research DAC 9 on many occasions. The results have been fabulous. Listening to Prince's song Avalanche from his One Nite Alone album, one can really get a sense for his talent. This track is far from overproduced with an R128 dynamic range score of 10 / 9.6 LU. The track features Prince and his piano, that's it. Through the Audio Research DAC 9, the opening notes of his piano ebb and flow from mellow taps to sudden strikes of the keys. The transients in these strikes are reproduced wonderfully in that they help each abrupt note serve up the rest of the rolling melodic beauty on a platter. 

     

    Listening to the remaining four minutes of Avalanche, Prince's main and backing vocals have an incredibly natural, raw, and unaltered sound through the DAC 9. Even if one disagrees with Prince's politicized lyrics, it's nearly impossible to not feel the emotion and conviction in his voice. Had the DAC 9 imparted an overbearing sonic signature on this track, much of the emotion would've been lost. The ARC DAC 9 provides Prince and his piano a chance to naturally aspirate and appears to be right in its wheelhouse reproducing the acoustic artistry of this Minneapolis treasure. 

     


    DAC 9 Details

     

    I certainly can't be accused of burying the lede in this review or stringing readers along like Allen Collins and Gary Rossington during the four minute guitar solo in Free Bird (link), but I should dig a bit deeper into what makes the DAC 9 tick.

     

    The Audio Research DAC 9 is a major step up from the DAC 7 and a solid step up from its predecessor the DAC 8. Whereas the DAC 8 was a purely solid state design, the DAC 9 has an advanced tube output stage with solid state regulation. This analog design was taken from elements of the ARC LS27 and LS28. This design stops short of what's available in flagship products such as the REF 6 preamp and Reference DAC, both with analog volume controls.

     

    Digitally the DAC 9 evolved from the ARC GSi75 integrated. Audio research engineers started with the GSi75 digital platform, and advanced it significantly. Of note, is one piece of technology that will frustrate some people and excite others. 

     

    There is a digital chip in the DAC 9 that is being used for purposes other than its intended design. This chip is not available in any other ARC DAC. Squeezing information about this chip from the Audio Research team is tougher than finding highly classified information online. This is the frustrating part for many people. As consumers we are just supposed to believe ARC and rely on the fact the company has a very stellar reputation. Fortunately, we can check their work in a different way, by listening to the final product. 

     

    Secret design or not, if the DAC 9 sounds good, then most people will be excited about the product. Some control freaks won't rest, or even trust themselves that they like the sound, until this secret is unmasked. Oh well, keep waiting while everyone else enjoys thousands of hours worth of great music.

     

    Before detailing some of the better features of the DAC 9's digital side, I must mention my biggest issue with this product. The USB interface used in the DAC 9 is less than great. It's the only part of this DAC that's not first class. The current DAC 9 USB interface is manufactured by Switzerland's RigiSystems. In and of itself this interface isn't all that bad, but in practice there are some serious issues. 

     

    Most important to many computer audiophiles will be RigiSystems' lack of Linux support. Several years ago this wasn't really an issue because "nobody" used Linux computers for audio playback. Now however, many people are using Linux based products from Aurender, Auralic, Sonore, SOtM, etc... None of these devices work with the RigiSystems USB interface used in the DAC 9. I tried to get Sonore to support the DAC 9 on its microRendu, but without serious assistance from RigiSystems, it just won't happen. 

     

    The USB interface also has some issues with Apple computers. In the recent past, after an OS update, Apple computers running OS X / macOS lost the ability to send audio to the DAC 9 at sample rates higher than 192 kHz. In addition to this current sample rate limitation, the DAC 9 is also limited to PCM playback when connected to a Mac. The DAC 9 uses macOS built-in Class 2 USB drivers, thus it has to accept DSD over PCM (DoP). Therein lies the issue. The RigiSystems USB chip doesn't use a version of DoP that works with Macs. 

     

    I have a positive feeling about the long-term outlook for the DAC 9 and its USB interface. Audio Research has committed to a solution by the end of 2017. I'm unsure if this will involve a firmware update, software update, or hardware update. 

     

    Some additional nuggets of information I picked up from my discussions with Audio Research are that the USB interface in the DAC 9 is internally powered. The DAC 9 doesn't accept power over the 5V VBUS wire in USB cables. The DAC doesn't feature galvanic isolation on the USB input, but this power configuration may serve to partially nullify this need. 

     

    With respect to MQA, the DAC 9 doesn't currently support this technology, but Audio Research may provide an MQA upgrade in the future for the DAC. Any MQA upgrade for the DAC 9 would require an internal hardware change.

     

    Briefly touching on some of the specs, the DAC 9 features two distinct digital audio paths, one for DSD and one for PCM. The DAC has two TCXO crystal master oscillators from Integrated Device Technology, one for 44.1 kHz base sample rates and the other for 48 kHz base sample rates. 

     

    The DAC 9 has quad D to A converters onboard. Both the left and right channels use dual stereo DACs in a mono configuration. This is supposed to increase dynamic range, currently at 114 dB (AES17), and reduce the noise floor. 

     

    Two other features that are user selectable are native rate upsampling and digital filters. The DAC 9's upsampling can be enabled for all PCM content. It will upsample this content to either 352.8 kHz or 384 kHz, depending on the base sample rate of the original music (44.1 or 48). The digital filter can be toggled between a fast or slow roll-off, directly from the remote control for easy user A/B'ing. Upsampling can also be enabled/disabled via the remote, with only a short one second pause in playback. 

    DAC-9


    Listening Through The DAC 9

     

    I listened through the Audio Research DAC 9 with most of the same components that are in my system for all reviews. The TAD CR1 loudspeakers, Constellation Audio Inspiration Mono amps, and preamp, and Wire World cabling are all stalwarts of my system. One addition to the system was the dCS Network Bridge. I used the Bridge as an Ethernet to AES/EBU converter that sent audio signals to the AES input of the DAC 9. Given that the DAC 9 has no volume control, a preamplifier was required. 

     

    Last weekend the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame inducted my favorite band, Pearl Jam. Given this, what kind of PJ fan would I be without one of its songs in the review? I dug deep for this one and it payed off. 

     

    In 2004 ten members of the Walmer High School choir from Port Elizabeth, South Africa traveled to Seattle, Washington. During their stay, the choir recorded an album with Pearl Jam's Eddie vedder. The album is titled the Molo Sessions and it contains three Pearl Jam tracks. It's not a traditional audiophile recording, but it has a dynamic range score of 15 and the music beats out any Diana Krall piece of "muzak" any day of the week. 

     

    betterman My favorite track on the Molo Sessions is Betterman. Right from the opening chord of Eddie Vedder's acoustic guitar, the track sounds naked. I don't notice any DAC 9 flavor covering the music. The guitar sounds very natural as Eddie's fingers can be heard sliding back and forth over the frets and across the strings. Unedited and untouched describe the sound really well. 

     

    The best part of the track is at the 2:42 mark, when the South African kids chime in singing the chorus. Through their thick accents, they sound like ten real kids singing in the room as they repeat:

     

    She loved him, yeah, she don't want to leave this way
    She feeds him, yeah, that's why she'll be back again
    Can't find a better man

     

    Of course they are real kids, but on so many recordings and through products with much less fidelity, real kids may not sound like real kids in one's room. There can be an artificial distance placed between the artist and the listener. Not so with this non-audiophile recording through the Audio Research DAC 9. Great stuff. 

     

    Moving to a bit more complex material, I tapped play on a favorite of mine, Michael Stern conducting the Kansas City Symphony in Britten's Orchestra. This is an out of print recording by Keith Johnson and Reference Recordings. Due to the agreement with the Symphony's union, RR can't sell any additional copies of this album. 

     

    Track nine, Passacaglia, is always fun and a good system test. As the music starts from a barely audible creep, the strings are very sweet sounding. One can almost smell the wood of the instruments, if the listening room lights and one's mind are turned off. As the horns slip in, they have great definition even at very low volume levels. This is always the mark of a good DAC. 

     

    One area where the DAC 9 falls short of reference DACs may be with full scale symphonic transients. Around 5:00 minute mark of Passacaglia things start to heat up with major string, horn, cymbal, and drum action. 45 seconds later when everything comes together in a big bang, the DAC 9 sounds a little slow or perhaps less fantastic on the transients than it was with simpler music. I don't sense any shift in tone of the instruments or compression of the dynamic range, just a bit of rounding of the edges where I've previously heard them as razor sharp. If anything, this may make the case for the Audio Research Reference DAC, if one is very focused on music of this ilk. 


    Before finishing up with another song from Prince, it's worth mentioning another sonic characteristic of the DAC 9. Keeping in mind that all components impart a sonic characteristic on the music, I can best explain this with a visual photography analogy. Whereas some DACs can be like glossy photos / reproductions, the ARC DAC 9 leans toward a matte finish. It's not a dull DAC, just right of center on the glossy - matte continuum. This sonic signature can be heard through Nat King Cole's music on the album The Very Thought of You (Analogue Productions remaster). 

     

    On both the opening title track and But Beautiful, Nat's vocal can be gloriously glossy. The glossy effect of smoking KOOL menthol cigarettes right before entering the recording booth, was something Nat thought he needed to perform. Right or wrong, the gloss can and should be heard. That said, without being at the recording the first week of May, 1958, I have no idea if the recording should be as glossy as I am used to hearing it or if the DAC 9 presents a more accurate picture. Like all things in this wonderful hobby, it comes down to taste and preference.

     

    Getting back to the Minneapolis magic that is Prince and Audio Research, I must also go back to the One Nite Alone album. Those unfamiliar with Prince's true artistry and musical genius, must find a copy of this album. One Nite Alone ... Solo Piano and Voice by Prince is the official title. This isn't the three disc live set from his 2002 One Nite Alone tour, it's an NPG Music Club limited release album never sold in stores. On the album, Prince's talent can be heard without any trouble or the wading through of overly sexual lyrics and a massive band. 

     

    case-of-uAs only Prince can do, he delivers a cover of Joni Mitchell's A Case of You by skipping the first three verses and starting with "I am a lonely painter, I live in a box of paints." The backing music on this track is nothing to write reviews about, but I love Prince's elegant vocal performance on this one. The DAC 9 reproduces his high, low, loud, and soft vocal swings wonderfully. His voice sounds very smooth in both the highest and lowest registers. This is a tribute to his vocal ability and the DAC 9's ability to let this through without imparting too much warmth or enhancing the edges with unnatural noise. In typical Minneapolis fashion both Prince and the DAC 9 are, for the most part, understated and comfortable away from anything that causes the spotlight to shine in their direction on this track.

     


    Conclusion

     

    The quintessential sound of Minneapolis is an apropos description of Audio Research, the company that trademarked High Definition in 1977. Its DAC 9 digital to analog converter is the best DAC ARC has released to date, short of its reference series. The DAC 7 and DAC 8 have both been eclipsed by design, technology, and sound quality. In my extensive listening sessions with the DAC 9, I heard unaltered, raw, and natural sound on some of my favorite recordings. This DAC will of course reproduce audiophile standards and performances captured by Reference Recordings, but the most enjoyable experiences I had while listening through the DAC 9 were with standard definition, "regular" music. I frequently listened through the DAC 9 while sitting at my computer working all day and while sitting in my listening chair in front of two loudspeakers. Either way, listening fatigue didn't even enter my mind. The only thing I wanted from my system during the Audio Research DAC 9's residency, was more music. 

     

     

     

    Product Information:

     

    • Product - Audio Research DAC 9 ($7,500)
    • Product Page - Link
    • User Manual - Link

     

     

     

    Where To Buy (CA Supporter):

     

     

     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    1 hour ago, miguelito said:

    Oh cmon... The name means sound quality. Obviously they screwed up on the USB interface, how they sort that out will be testament to whether they are a great company or not. 

    Scary AR would push a product out that they KNEW had problems with the hope that they could fix it down the line.  Unconscionable IMO. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, Doak said:

    Scary AR would push a product out that they KNEW had problems with the hope that they could fix it down the line.  Unconscionable IMO. 

     

    Perhaps I have a different idea of what unconscionable means. Dropping sarin gas on one's own people = unconscionable. Releasing a product with a less than great USB interface = not the best move. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    OK>.. a it strong, but when a company charges $7500 for a supposedly premium product this type of thing IMO is unacceptable.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    21 hours ago, Doak said:

    OK>.. a it strong, but when a company charges $7500 for a supposedly premium product this type of thing IMO is unacceptable.

    +1000.  For this type of high end product, users can not be beta testers

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    At this price point, those shortcoming are unacceptable.... way too many DAC's that can offer none of these problems. ARC is not the same company. Trading on name recognition will not get the new owners very far. 

     

    Too bad...ARC was once a very respectful American brand. It died...along with the purple pill popper.....

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, Miko said:

    Too bad...ARC was once a very respectful American brand. It died...along with the purple pill popper.....

    Although I can't put my finger on anything specific I personally feel that the brands in the holding company have lost their mojo in some way, not only AR.

     

    Too bad there were no internal pictures, wonder how much empty space is there in order to conform to the pretty rigid corporate product identity.

     

    And, by the way, the 80's called, they want their faux rack handles back! :)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, nice review.

     

    One question though - do you have a policy of not making product comparisons? You, probably more than most of us, must have access to a bigger suite of products on hand at any given time.

     

    With products like these, and at price points like these, the information I want is not - does it sound wonderful? It had better damn do so! No - I want to know how it sounds relative to something else. That something else could be at a comparable price point, which would assess the review piece with its direct competition. And/or, it could be at a lower price point - for example, something well-known, like the Yggy- to answer the question: what does buying up gets you?

     

    That is, after all, what we discuss on these forums on a daily basis!

     

    Bus perhaps you're going after a different audience in these reviews?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 minutes ago, austinpop said:

    Chris, nice review.

     

    One question though - do you have a policy of not making product comparisons? You, probably more than most of us, must have access to a bigger suite of products on hand at any given time.

     

    With products like these, and at price points like these, the information I want is not - does it sound wonderful? It had better damn do so! No - I want to know how it sounds relative to something else. That something else could be at a comparable price point, which would assess the review piece with its direct competition. And/or, it could be at a lower price point - for example, something well-known, like the Yggy- to answer the question: what does buying up gets you?

     

    That is, after all, what we discuss on these forums on a daily basis!

     

    Bus perhaps you're going after a different audience in these reviews?

     

    Hi austinpop - Thanks for the comment. I have no such policy with respect to comparisons. Comparing components sounds like the answer to cancer, but in reality it's much different. I do it on occasion when I'm inspired to compare some products. for example in the Yggdrasil review I compared some of the sonic qualities to the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC RS.

     

    For the most part, these comparisons cause more problems than they solve. Publishing articles like Top 10 USB DACs or DAC Shootout are terrific clickbait for search engine traffic and lead people to believe they are getting the real answers they need / want, but in reality these kinds of articles are a disservice and are solely for the publisher looking to boost the bottom line. 

     

    In this context specifically, there is no end to what could be compared. For example, below is a list of DACs on the CASH List right now. What would it mean if I compared the DAC 9 to one of them. What about two of them? Who would that comparison really help? These are somewhat rhetorical questions. 

     

    A couple other points; the length of a review is unlimited in theory but very limited in reality. Nobody wants to read a 6,000 word review. In fact, many people read the first paragraph and the conclusion. It's (modern) human nature I guess. In addition, it's a tricky situation for manufacturers that send me gear. Not necessarily those sending me gear for the review at hand. Would a manufacturer want to send me gear for review, knowing that a couple weeks after the review I may use it in several comparisons (without sending the comparisons to them for fact checking or further manufacturer's comments, etc...)? I doubt it. It's not that most manufacturers don't have confidence in their products, it's more of the subjective nature of this hobby that worries them and the system dependencies that can throw off reviews big time. Some manufacturers won't let me review the component unless they personally visit my listening room for setup. They are careful and know how strange things happen that lead to unnecessary negative reviews. If I do a comparison of three DACs, it's just not feasible to have three manufacturers present for the comparison. 

     

    Can you think of a comparison involving the DAC 9 that would really benefit readers? I'm honestly open to the discussion. Perhaps we should start a separate forum thread to discuss the issue.

     

     

    Audio Alchemy DDP-1 DAC / Preamp & PS-5 Power Supply $1,995 & $595

    AudioQuest DragonFly Red & DragonFly Black $199 & $99

    Auralic Vega $3,500

    Ayre Acoustics QB-9DSD DAC $3,250

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC $5,000 (Replaced by Alpha DAC Series 2 in 2011)

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC Reference Series 2 $19,500

    Chord Electronics QBD76HD / QBD76HDSD $7,000 / $8,500

    EMM Labs DAC2X $15,500

    exaSound e12 $1,999

    exaSound e28 (Multichannel) $3,299

    Hegel Music Systems HD30 $4,800

    Lumin Network Music Player $7,200

    Luxman DA-06 $6,000

    Meitner Audio MA-1 $7,000

    Meridian Explorer $299

    MOON by Simaudio Neo 380D DSD $5,500 with MiND, $6,100 with MiND and variable analog outputs

    Mytek Brooklyn DAC $1,995

    Schiit Audio Yggdrasil $2,299

    T+A Elektroakustik Music Player Balanced $4,500 ($310 for optional preamp module)
     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Without getting into 6000 words, I will say that your reviews are usually very good and I look forward to reading them. But, they do mostly exist in a bubble of sorts. They float without being connected to the reality of the reader. So I do agree that some comparisons that would anchor them would be most welcome from my perspective as well.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes, a comparison involving the DAC 9 and the Yggy would really benefit readers - even if the Yggy "loses" it costs a lot less

     

    personally, I'd really like to know what "extra" I get when I move from say $500 to $2,000 to $5,000 etc.  (not gonna buy a $30,000 DAC)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    16 minutes ago, Ralf11 said:

    Yes, a comparison involving the DAC 9 and the Yggy would really benefit readers - even if the Yggy "loses" it costs a lot less

     

    personally, I'd really like to know what "extra" I get when I move from say $500 to $2,000 to $5,000 etc.  (not gonna buy a $30,000 DAC)

     

    There's the rub. Where do the comparisons start and stop? Not only for you, but the next guy who wants a comparison to something else. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    15 hours ago, Miko said:

    purple pill popper.....

    Hey! Prince was a genius.  Respect!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    7 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    DAC9_gallery_zoom_3.jpg

    Ok so it's not an ifi nano in a big case. Good to know...

     

    Come to think of it, it would've not had any USB issues if it had been a nano! BADAM!!!

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I would like a few comparisons as well. I think those are pretty hard to do to be honest - I certainly have trouble describing in words what I hear, but I do know what I like.

     

    For example, I would like to know sound comps between the following DACs:

     

    Group A - the 5 figs fam

    Nagra HD/EMM Labs DA2/dCS Rossini (with and without ext clock)/TotalDAC D12/MSB Analog DAC/Lampizator Golden Gate + DSD

    (dCS Vivaldi and MSB's top of the line interesting as well)

     

    Group B - the 4 figs fam

    T+A DAC8/Ayre QB-9DSD/Auralic Vega/ARC DAC9/Yggy

     

    Group C - the 3 figs fam

    iFi micro black/Dragonfly Red/others...

     

    And in all these cases I would like to know comps with HQPlayer upsampling both to PCM384 and DSD128 as well as not upsampled.

     

    Get to work! ;)

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, miguelito said:

    Hey! Prince was a genius.  Respect!

     

    I have zero respect for junkies.. how many of these talented people have had their lives cut short because of addition?

     

    How many of these same addicts without the financial means to support their habit have killed innocent people?

     

    Mother Nature will separate the Wheat from the Chaff.... Just another statistic.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 minutes ago, Miko said:

     

    I have zero respect for junkies.. how many of these talented people have had their lives cut short because of addition?

     

    How many of these same addicts without the financial means to support their habit have killed innocent people?

     

    Mother Nature will separate the Wheat from the Chaff.... Just another statistic.

     

    Wow, the guy was prescribed opiates by a physician for pain after joint replacement. He got physiologically addicted to them and accidentally died. 

     

    I have tons of respect for his work and feel sorry for him and his family. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The real players just have a Doctor/Drug Dealer on hand 24/7... like M.J....

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

     

    There's the rub. Where do the comparisons start and stop? Not only for you, but the next guy who wants a comparison to something else. 

     

    Sure.  But any comparison ought to be better than no comparison.

     

    I'd love to see you compare the DAC in the forthcoming Oppo disc player to the yggy.

     

    While waiting to get an Oppo unit you could compare the Yggy to a well-reviewed $5,000 DAC.  There is certainly a lot of ... um.... interest in the yggy vs. others.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

     

    There's the rub. Where do the comparisons start and stop? Not only for you, but the next guy who wants a comparison to something else. 

     

    Chris, I appreciate your dilemma, as mentioned in your previous response and this one. And I appreciate the logistical and political realities you have to deal with as a reviewer. These are precisely the same realities that reviewers at "the stereo magazines" must deal with, and you know how highly those are regarded in this forum. 9_9

     

    But with that said, I guess the question to ask is - what are you trying to achieve with a formal review with all these limitations? Does it help drive eyeballs and revenue to your site? If so, that's good to know. I'm all for that, if it helps fund the forums, for example.

     

    Perhaps the ideal reviewer is someone who's independently wealthy, incredibly knowledgeable and passionate about high-end computer audio, and who has the leisure time to write truly critical, comparative reviews with equipment they purchased outright, with no strings attached. Incredibly enough, I know more than 1 or 2 CA'ers who would fit that description!

     

    And that takes me to my final point. Like a lot of CA'ers, I've come to rely, far more than reviews, on the expertise of some truly outstanding participants in the forums, whose advice has consistently paid off, and who give so unselfishly of their time and expertise. 

     

    Maybe instead of writing formal reviews, you might consider applying all that time and effort to do it informally in a discussion thread on the forum, where you don't feel constrained in the way you described? Just wondering.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 hours ago, Miko said:

    I have zero respect for junkies.. how many of these talented people have had their lives cut short because of addition?

    Damn... You must be listening to Christian Rock all day... Not even... Nothing else is drug free.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Layne from Alice In Chains...that really disappointed me. No, I don't listen to any Religious music (that is topic I'm not even getting involved in).

     

    And I have done my share and a few other people's worth of drugs in my life. I know what it does and I know what it's like to lose friends that way. Hence my disdain for an artist I would have not figured to be so hooked into it that he kills himself. 

     

    So so please don't get the wrong impression. I didn't say his music sucked, quite the contrary. I have enjoyed his music for many years. I just was saying that anyone who allows themselves to get to that point, with all the resources at their disposal is sad and I cannot empathize.

     

    This is my last statement on that as I'm not a hijacker by nature. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hope the Yggdrasil messes up the entire High End pricing paradigm....$7500 when the Yggy will at the very least, keep up with it....for less than a 1/3 of the price!O.o

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    14 minutes ago, LarryMagoo said:

    I hope the Yggdrasil messes up the entire High End pricing paradigm....$7500 when the Yggy will at the very least, keep up with it....for less than a 1/3 of the price!O.o

     

    Have you heard both DACs? Or, are you going by anonymous internet opinions. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...