Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Sonore Signature Series Rendu Review

    thumb.png

    1-Pixel.png

    I’ve been using the Signature Series Rendu for several months in combination with several audio system components. Whether I’ve connected the “SSR” straight to a DAC or to an integrated amp with built-in DAC, the results have been the same, steady and superb. The performance of the Signature Series Rendu has enabled my other components to really shine because they are receiving a very clean and I assume low jitter signal from the SSR. Not only this, but the SSR turns all my components into network capable DLNA devices. Superb sound and expanding the capability of one’s favorite components are what the Signature Series Rendu is all about. The SSR isn’t a jack of all trades, rather it’s a purpose-built Ethernet to S/PDIF or I2S converter. In other words a DLNA renderer built for a single purpose and built to accomplish its job as well as possible. Members of the CA Community looking for a way to use their favorite DAC or integrated as a network / DLNA device must consider the Sonore Signature Series Rendu as it has enabled the sound of my audio system to soar as high or higher than any component I’ve heard previously. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

    What Is It?

     

    The Sonore Signature Series Rendu is a simple, yet very well engineered, device that converts an Ethernet signal into either S/PDIF (BNC) or I2S (HDMI). There is no wireless, no USB, no digital to analog conversion, no AES/EBU, no AirPlay, and no streaming service support with the Signature Series Rendu. The SSR is also known as a DLNA renderer to those learned in the world of UPnP/DLNA.

     

    I see at least three very solid use cases for the Signature Series Rendu.

     

    1. Users who don’t want traditional computers in their listening rooms.

    2. Users who want to add network / DLNA capability to existing systems without replacing other components.

    3. Users who have components that already support Ethernet / DLNA but want better performance than the native component interface provides.

     

     

     

    Users who don’t want traditional computers in their listening rooms will likely prefer a component such as the Signature Series Rendu due to its similarities with traditional audio components. It’s fanless, linear power, metal chassis design looks very nice next to many other components and wont’ pollute the room or the electrical system with noise. A typical system in this scenario would have a NAS or NAS-like computer, running DLNA server software, sitting elsewhere in the user’s house. The NAS would simply serve audio to the Signature Series Rendu via standard Ethernet or even power line networking.

     

     

    Users who want to add network / DLNA capability to existing systems without replacing other components are the largest group of potential users in my estimation, followed closely by the group in the next paragraph. When using my reference system I fall into this category. I use the Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC RS DAC. This DAC doesn’t include an Ethernet interface, or even USB interface for that matter. It’s the best DAC I’ve heard and there is no way I’m going to replace it just to get a unit that supports Ethernet / DLNA. It makes no sense to me to get a lesser quality DAC just because I want network capability. Thus, the Sonore Signature Series Rendu comes into play perfectly.

     

     

    Users who have components that already support Ethernet / DLNA but want better performance than the native component interface provides are the second largest group of potential users of the Signature Series Rendu. By better performance I mean both sonically and functionally. When discussing DLNA I always like to call it the most non-standard standard. What I mean is that there are literally billions of DLNA devices on the planet yet most have a difficult time communicating with each other when it comes to non-trivial tasks like gapless playback. Members of the Computer Audiophile Community know full well that DLNA devices can have many issues, as evidenced by the frustrated PS Audio Bridge users. At the same time, it’s not simple to build a DLNA renderer / high end audio component. That’s where Sonore steps in with the Signature Series Rendu. The SSR is pretty much application agnostic, meaning that its users can control playback with any number of DLNA control points. I prefer using JRiver Media Center with the JRemote iOS application. This combo works terrifically with the SSR. In addition to users seeking better functionality with their existing DLNA capable components, users can also add the Signature Series Rendu in an effort to increase sonic performance. A good example of this is Ted Brady’s review of the PS Audio DirectStream DAC. Ted squeezed the best sonics out of the DirectStream by connecting a Signature Series Rendu to the unit via I2S. Ted reported that this increased performance sonically over the standard built-in interfaces.

     

    Sonore-Signature-Series-Rendu-rear.png

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    My SSR Experience In A Couple Systems

     

     

    System One: My Reference

     

    Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC RS > Pass Labs XA160.5 monoblocks > TAD CR1 Loudspeakers.

     

    I added the Sonore Signature Series Rendu to this system by connecting its S/PDIF BNC output to the Alpha DAC RS S/PDIF BNC input. I used a CAPS v4 Cortes running JRiver Media Center as the DLNA server feeding the SSR over Ethernet and JRemote as the control interface on my iPad. The sound of this system as a whole was pure joy. I don’t have playlists long enough to support my listening habits when this system is in use. For example, John Martyn’s Some People Are Crazy track from his Grace & Danger album is just so smooth and has just such a good clear baseline that I couldn’t stop listening. The Sonore Signature Series Rendu enabled me to hear something on Sonny Rollins album Way Out West that I hadn’t previously heard in all my listening sessions with this album. During the second track, Solitude, I was able to hear some squeaking reminiscent of John Bonham’s foot pedal squeaking in Since I’ve Been Loving You from Led Zeppelin III. granted what I heard on the Solitude track wasn’t near as loud as Bonham’s un-oiled pedal, but now that I know a squeak exists I can’t not hear it. I like to hear all the warts and irregularities of recordings and I attribute this latest revealing to the Sonore Signature Series Rendu. In my reference system the Sonore Signature Series Rendu is as good or better than any server I’ve used previously. There’s definitely something to be said for linear power supplies, getting the right engineers involved, and a solid 75 Ohm S/PDIF BNC connection.

     

     

     

     

    System Two: Devialet

     

    Devialet 400 monoblocks > TAD CR1 Loudspeakers

     

    I added the Sonore Signature Series Rendu to this system not necessarily to improve sound quality, but to add DLNA capability to an already very advanced audio component. The Devialet 400 monoblocks feature an Ethernet input, however this input only supports Devialet’s proprietary AIR streaming method. Using this method I was able to configure applications to output through the Devialet AIR virtual device, i.e. JRiver Media Center and TIDAL HiFi, but I was unable to take advantage of any other DLNA software. Thus, I connected the SSR to the Devialet’s digital 2 input and I was soon streaming flawlessly to a DLNA renderer / Devialet system. Functionality of the Sonore / Devialet system was terrific. Sonically I can’t say I heard an improvement over the built-in Ethernet Devialet AIR streaming method, but that’s not why I connected the SSR in the first place. Adding DLNA capability where none previously existed is what this exercise was all about. That said, sonically the Devialet monoblocks with the Signature Series Rendu were superb.

     

    Note: Readers looking to save money in this type of scenario may consider the SOtM sMS-100 Mini Server that features Ethernet input and USB output. This little server would have functioned fine with the Devialet’s USB input, but wouldn’t have worked at all with Berkeley Audio Design Alpha DAC RS because it lacks a USB input. I was unable to directly compare the sonic differences of using this low cost Mini Server versus the Signature Series Rendu. The two have opposite design approaches, but would make an interesting comparison in the appropriate system.

     

     

     

     

     

    Conclusion

     

    cash-logo-black-thumb.jpgThe Sonore Signature Series Rendu is a purpose-built DLNA renderer. That’s it. What it does, it does very well. Both sonics and functionality on the SSR were terrific. During my several months of use I didn’t experience a single issue related to the DLNA capability of the Signature Series Rendu. That’s much more than can be said for most DLNA devices I’ve used previously. This thing is designed to be a renderer, and a stellar one at that. The possibility of firmware updates exists with the SSR, but none were released during my months-long review period. The Signature Series Rendu is perfect for users seeking to 1) Exclude a traditional computer from their listening rooms, 2) Augment a non-networked system with DLNA capability, or 3) Improve functionality or sonic quality of an existing network enabled component. Sonically the Signature Series Rendu is as good or better than the best sources I’ve heard, including my reference music server the Aurender W20, SOtM servers, all the CAPS servers, and the Auralic Aries. Thus, the SSR is C.A.S.H. Listed without question.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

    • Product - Sonore Signature Series rendu
    • Price - $2,899
    • Product Page - Link

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    Associated Music:

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

    1-Pixel.png




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I hope that someone with an AudioByte Hydra-Z can compare its sound quality with the Sonore (both on I2s) feeding the DirectStream. I have the Hydra-z in my possession (feeding the DS).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    One interesting observation from the review. Chris didn't hear any improvement using signature rendu vs Devialet AIR streaming. This implies how good sound quality the Devialet AIR streaming has. Devialet must be an amazing value - you get SOTA integrate amp and dac with streaming as good as signature rendu, aurender w20 and any caps server.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    As Barrows mentioned the output board in the signature was an all out attempt at getting the lowest noise, lowest jitter output we know how to do.

     

    The S/PDIF output circuit is very unusual producing a significantly cleaner, lower jitter signal that is carefully impedance matched for driving a 75 ohm coax. Everything on the PCB is impedance controlled (both outputs) to radically cut down on reflections .

     

    The I2S output uses an LVDS transmitter that has an order of magnitude lower jitter than what is found in other LVDS I2S outputs. This is critical for I2S since the master clock is sent over the interface.

     

    All this is supplied by a highly optimized power network on the board which in conjunction with the main power supply in the chassis produces very low noise to each part, letting them achieve the low jitter performance they are capable of.

     

    None of this changes the functionality, it just produces extremely low noise, extremely low jitter outputs.

     

    I also consult for Simple Design/Sonore.

     

    John S.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also consult for Simple Design/Sonore.

     

    Uh, John, are you sure Jesus is okay with you coming out about that? I've been keeping that secret for you two for almost two years, and with the Signature Rendu release/review I've been grinning like the cat that ate the canary!

    Obviously I've been very public about our close association, but to-date Sonore has desired to keep theirs quiet. But that other awesome project is still a secret, right?

     

    Anyway, Chris' terrific review of the Signature Rendu comes as no surprise at all to me. John's circuits and topology for the S/PDIF and I2S outputs are absolutely unique and state-of-the-art, and Jesus did not constrain him in any way when it came to the parts (great clocks, isolators, and regulators are not cheap and really add up).

     

    As to the overall price, I can also point out (hopefully without upsetting Jesus) that the Ethernet input/DLNA renderer module Sonore incorporates into the Rendu (both models) costs them over $400 (even at sizable quantity, and that's from a 2012 OEM price schedule I have). So based on my guess at total bill-of-materials alone, the Sonore Signature Series Rendu is very fairly priced for a pinnacle product of its function.

     

    Congratulations to Sonore (and now I guess I can say to John as well) on the first of many great reviews. Think you have got another winner!

     

    Best,

     

    --Alex C.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I cannot see what IP John Swenson disclosed in his thread?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Uh, John, are you sure Jesus is okay with you coming out about that? I've been keeping that secret for you two for almost two years, and with the Signature Rendu release/review I've been grinning like the cat that ate the canary!

    Obviously I've been very public about our close association, but to-date Sonore has desired to keep theirs quiet. But that other awesome project is still a secret, right?

     

    Anyway, Chris' terrific review of the Signature Rendu comes as no surprise at all to me. John's circuits and topology for the S/PDIF and I2S outputs are absolutely unique and state-of-the-art, and Jesus did not constrain him in any way when it came to the parts (great clocks, isolators, and regulators are not cheap and really add up).

     

    As to the overall price, I can also point out (hopefully without upsetting Jesus) that the Ethernet input/DLNA renderer module Sonore incorporates into the Rendu (both models) costs them over $400 (even at sizable quantity, and that's from a 2012 OEM price schedule I have). So based on my guess at total bill-of-materials alone, the Sonore Signature Series Rendu is very fairly priced for a pinnacle product of its function.

     

    Congratulations to Sonore (and now I guess I can say to John as well) on the first of many great reviews. Think you have got another winner!

     

    Best,

     

    --Alex C.

     

    All this news makes the Rendu even more enticing. Is it the ABC PCB Ebel board that was used by chance?

     

    So that is how you knew that if we use the I2S output from the Rendu, we will bypass any SPDIF conversion, which is great. :)

     

    Now if only there was an option where we could use the master clock of the DAC to grab the I2S stream in balanced fashion like MSB's I2S pro and a LAN output made for this MSB connection I would be well chuffed.

     

    Cheers

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    All this talk about the low jitter performance of the Signature Rendu puzzles me. Why should it matter when connected to a Directstream which doesn't take its clock from the source anyway?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    johann - LMS will not be supported except as a standard DLNA/UPNP server. The Rendu series is not based on SqueezeLite and therefore will not show up as a selectable output in LMS.

     

    rodrigaj / esimms86 - We didn't want existing customers to feel compelled to upgrade to the Signature Series Rendu after spending good money on the standard Rendu so we offered most of them an alternate solution.

     

    MikeJazz - The Signature Series Rendu is a small production run based on demand and it's really hard to justify investing in a CE rating.

     

    tranz - Ideally you want a BNC connector for SPDIF and a digital cable rated for 75 ohm. Some devices can be modified to BNC, but a good digital cable with the correct connectors on both ends is fine. We offer our customers custom cables from Cardas as needed with the proper connectors.

     

    palpatine242 - Send me an email.

     

    kunarx - We do all we can with the Sonic Orbiter design in that price point. We had Sonore USB Music Server with dual power supply that approached 5K. However, when we shifted gears to the Rendu series all that fell by the way side.

     

    DanRubin - The Rendu's focus is strictly on playback of locally stored content. If and when streaming services become available we will do what we can to offer it. However, no purchase of a Rendu should be made anticipating support for streaming services.

     

    mtan002 - Your not factoring in all the other costs associated with using a USB converter. Computer, software, USB cable, upgrade output card, upgrade power supply. Chances are a standard Rendu is less money and less headaches.

     

    Distinctive - It's going to be really hard to compare these things because they are very different approaches. With a USB device the computer, software, USB cable and a bunch of other stuff can all get in the way of the sound.

     

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Alex - You crack me up. There is no conspiracy here...I only asked John and you not to discuss secret projects:) I don't want to discuss secret projects or tease about them here because they are to far off the reservation to even be considered products at this time. That said, we are not working on a third generation Rendu so Signature Series Rendu customers have nothing to worry about.

     

    trans - Been there and done that and it's not worth the trouble trying to interface with that system. Have MSB give you a BCN input connector (if you don't have one already) and use the SPDIF output on the Rendu. That combination supports PCM and DSD/DoP and I promise you won't regret it.

     

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm still trying to figure out how this product could even help me.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Alex - You crack me up. There is no conspiracy here...I only asked John and you not to discuss secret projects:) I don't want to discuss secret projects or tease about them here because they are to far off the reservation to even be considered products at this time.

     

    My sincere apologies Jesus. I certainly did not mean to imply any conspiracy. I just was always under the impression--from my phone conversations with you--that you preferred it not be disclosed that you are a client of his. And today he seemed to be letting that cat out of the bag, which surprised be.

    Given my desire--for the 10 years I have known John--to see him receive the respect and recognition his extraordinary mind and talents deserve, I have always been proud of the projects and modules he has completed, whether for me or anyone else.

     

    And of course I respect confidentiality and won't reveal secret projects--certainly not those of other clients. As it is, I feel like I've already gotten into enough warm water by sharing advanced info on my own pending products with John. I really should take Jason Stoddard's (Schiit Audio) advice and STFU about future stuff. ;)

     

    Anyway, you know I am a fan of all you are doing at Sonore. And I'm thrilled that John has managed to find a nice balance between our respective projects. Hopefully, if we monopolize all his time, then Sonore and UpTone will continue to reap the rewards of his greatest inspirations (compensating him nicely in the process). :)

     

    Sorry to all for the off-topic. Back to the awesome Sonore Signature Rendu!!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It would be a no brainer to lend one to REShaman and have him report on his experience with the SSR and his Wyred4Sound DAC 2 DSDse (with it's I2S input option).

     

    Jason, the SSR sounds like it could work exceedingly well with the Auralic Vega going S/PDIF BNC out to the Vega's S/PDIF BNC in. Of course, it would then make the Aries superfluous in your system unless you wanted to move the Aries to your second system. You'd also have to commit to jriver or some other DLNA compliant software.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm still trying to figure out how this product could even help me.

     

    Well in your system Jason, it would replace your Aries as the DLNA renderer on your network, and would then feed your Vega via S/PDIF. Whether or not that would be an SQ improvement has a lot to with the quality of of the Vega's USB input versus being driven by the first-rate S/PDIF from the Rendu.

    That is how it would fit into your system anyway. Too bad the Vega does not have an I2S input. Then the Signature Rendu would most certainly be a musical step up.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well in your system Jason, it would replace your Aries as the DLNA renderer on your network, and would then feed your Vega via S/PDIF. Whether or not that would be an SQ improvement has a lot to with the quality of of the Vega's USB input versus being driven by the first-rate S/PDIF from the Rendu.

    That is how it would fit into your system anyway. Too bad the Vega does not have an I2S input. Then the Signature Rendu would most certainly be a musical step up.

     

    Well, get back to work on the Regen! Lets go!!!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well in your system Jason, it would replace your Aries as the DLNA renderer on your network, and would then feed your Vega via S/PDIF. Whether or not that would be an SQ improvement has a lot to with the quality of of the Vega's USB input versus being driven by the first-rate S/PDIF from the Rendu.

    That is how it would fit into your system anyway. Too bad the Vega does not have an I2S input. Then the Signature Rendu would most certainly be a musical step up.

     

    Jesus,

    Can you use the hdmi i2s into a dac with RJ45 i2s input? Is there a suitable cable?

    Craig

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jesus,

    Can you use the hdmi i2s into a dac with RJ45 i2s input? Is there a suitable cable?

    Craig

    The RJ45 one is probably not PS Audio standard used in the Rendu.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, get back to work on the Regen! Lets go!!!

     

    +1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ...

     

    trans - Been there and done that and it's not worth the trouble trying to interface with that system. Have MSB give you a BCN input connector (if you don't have one already) and use the SPDIF output on the Rendu. That combination supports PCM and DSD/DoP and I promise you won't regret it.

     

    Jesus R

     

    Thanks Jesus. I have heard the benefit of bypassing SPDIF conversion, so that is my next goal. I guess that ted_b found the I2S output better sounding as well.

     

    Cheers

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    alcarp - Master clock and jitter immunity aside these two units are connected to each other and there are still three other signals in the i2s pipe line that are use by the DS.

     

    esimms86 - I would be open to sending Richard a unit to try. I'll PM him and see if he is open to a demo.

     

    craighartley - I emailed your DAC manufacturer out of curiosity even though it appears to be a different format. There is a simple yet expensive (for a one off) way to support your DAC with the standard Rendu. However, I can't promise it at the moment.

     

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

     

    craighartley - I emailed your DAC manufacturer out of curiosity even though it appears to be a different format. There is a simple yet expensive (for a one off) way to support your DAC with the standard Rendu. However, I can't promise it at the moment.

     

    Jesus R

     

    Thanks for going to that trouble.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    alcarp - Master clock and jitter immunity aside these two units are connected to each other and there are still three other signals in the i2s pipe line that are use by the DS.

    ........

     

    Jesus R

     

    Thanks Jesus. Can you elaborate on what these signals are?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks Jesus. Can you elaborate on what these signals are?

     

    The LVDS i2s output on the Rendu series is made up of a bit clock, word clock, serial data, and master clock. Not all devices use the master clock. For example, the Raleigh Audio RAKK DAC and the PSA PWD MKI and MKII utilize the Rendu's master clock while the PSA DS DAC and the W4S DAC-2 do not use the Rendu's master clock. LVDS stands for Low Voltage Differential Signal and it's a balanced transmission method for sending TTL level i2s over a cable to a DAC. TTL stand for Transistor-Transistor Logic. Here is the Phillips Semiconductor - i2s Bus Specification https://www.sparkfun.com/datasheets/BreakoutBoards/I2SBUS.pdf. I'm not sure if it's the latest and the specification does not cover LVDS i2s transmission.

     

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Jesus, You mentioned earlier that there is no support for streaming services yet, only local file playback. Would streaming services (like Tidal and Qobuz) work if the serving computer was running JRiver and the streaming service was run thru the JRiver sound engine via the new JRiver MC 20 WDM Driver and then to the Rendu from JRiver.Won't the Rendu see JRiver as an output option no matter where JRiver is getting the data. Am I missing something else going on here? Thanks, Bob

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    JRiver says that currently their WDM driver does not work over DLNA (i.e when using JRIver as the DLNA server).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    JRiver says that currently their WDM driver does not work over DLNA (i.e when using JRIver as the DLNA server).

     

     

    I knew there must be something I was missing. Hopefully they will add that functionality in the future. It will really be useful for the 24 bit streaming services that are beginning to arrive (Orastream/Naxos). The other way for this to happen would be for the streamers to integrate into JRiver without having to use the WDM driver.

     

    Great review and thanks for answering all these questions.

     

    Bob

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...