Jump to content
  • Kathy Geisler
    Kathy Geisler

    Sonata Music Server Review

    logo.pngMy first impression is that I could be convinced to listen to music with the Sonata Music Server software. Just imagine… A vast selection of music presented in the easiest to locate method. Your tastes catered to with a simple touch. In this case a Dell ST2220T Multi-touch monitor. It doesn't hurt to have the Arcam asynchronous USB rDAC, Stax SR-007 headphones and matching headphone amplifier which add that je ne sais quoi -- over the rainbow quality to the entire experience. Clearly, Digibit has positioned Sonata as the sommelier of music servers. The downside is that all of this is just a loan of gear and tomorrow I have to go back to being a classical music Cinderella. But let's not spoil the moment.

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

    Whether you listen for simple enjoyment, enhancement of the ambiance of your high-end crash pad or just can't get enough Bach (moi), the pleasure of this classy robot librarian is evident. I'm only sorry that the Sonata software does not run on an apple, which could possibly make something like this even a little prettier. While the Sonata Music Server doesn't attempt to replace the physical experience of having an album in your hands to study and quietly absorb while the musical osmosis surrounds your senses, it does turn your listening environment into a haven of instant gratification. That has to be worth $130 (99€), doesn't it?

     

    Now time to get serious.

     

     

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/PlusMinus.gif" style="padding: 1pt 5pt 1pt 0pt;" align="left"><i>Editor's Note: This is new contributor Kathy Geisler's first article for Computer Audiophile. Additional information about Kathy and the unique perspective she brings to CA can be found in my <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Introducing-New-CA-Contributor-Kathy-Geisler">introductory post</a><a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Introducing-New-CA-Contributor-Kathy-Geisler"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>.</i>

     

     

    <b>The Sonata Server by Digibit</b>

     

    <b>What is it?</b>

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/playon-hd2-dlna-1000w.jpg" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 0pt;" align="left">The Sonata Music Server is software (hardware sold separately) designed to meet the broader criteria required for classical music, and all other genres for that matter, mainly enhanced metadata capabilities (see the Computer Audiophile FAQ section for an in-depth definition of metadata). Specifically, Sonata is a highly customized OEM version of the audiophile favorite JRiver Media Center application. Thus the system is capable of accommodating a variety of audio file types and audio output modes, such as WASAPI, WASAPI - Event Style, ASIO, Kernel Streaming, to satisfy the most discerning audiophile and function flawlessly with nearly any DAC on the market. If, like many audiophiles, you’ve been waiting for an inexpensive music server designed to work with classical music, in all of its variety of criteria, Sonata may be it. You can throw virtually any recording at it and end up with a set of classifications to suit. Yes, in the end, you will have what you want and how you want it, pretty much. But if you want all that definability, you will have to do a few things first.

     

     

     

    <b>The Basics</b>

     

    How you approach the Sonata Music Server ecosystem will depend on the audio format or playback application you want to load in. A system that can accommodate almost anything requires rules of engagement. The customized ripping software that accompanies the Sonata Server, dBpoweramp, has a specific set of instructions that you must follow. The manual is required reading until you get to know the 'Simon Says' routine. The Sonata system isn't quite as direct as putting a CD into iTunes, but then you are getting FLAC files in addition to all of the groovy metadata that iTunes doesn’t support. Expending a little effort to get it right might be expected.

     

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/sonata-cdripper-1000w.jpg" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 0pt;" align="left">I attempted to rip a CD before reading the manual and was quite confused when it was ejected with an error message. The manual explains that this will happen if your media is not recognized by any of the databases (GD3 & SonataDB - Primary, FreeDB & MusicBrainz - Secondary) used by Sonata and that you just have to reinsert the disc. In this case, you have to plan to do your own tagging as well as locate the cover art online. Further, you must learn how to insert the cover art, which although this is covered in the manual, I found this part to be challenging and ended up receiving some instruction from the technical specialist at Digibit who was able to walk me through the process. (Note: An updated manual detailing how to import covers is due from Digibit this week. - Editor)

     

    This is a one size fits many system. There are a variety of ways to configure it both as a smart jukebox and a kind of virtual sound-zone manager. The Sonata manual, independent JRiver website, or CA forum are good places to understand some of the possibilities of which Sonata is capable. This is important especially if you have plans to integrate Sonata into a complex design for how you access audio in your environment. For instance, you may want to extend to a remote listening station through your iPad and also run a playlist of your opera albums to listen to while you are in your shower, while you have a Mozart piano concerto play in the kitchen -- all at once. You have to be somewhat of a control freak to want Sonata to do all that it can do, and this is the thing, it can do a lot.

     

    Let's just say that in terms of high end audio, you are covered here, both for what you put in and what you get out. It’s what you can do with the digital files that makes this system so completely unique at this price point. At its core, Sonata addresses the question: in this age of digital music, what is the best way to retrieve classical music from a digital database? The answer: to integrate a series of identifiers that are specific to aspects of classical music and organize them into a network of paths. These paths expose a collection of albums in a multi-perspective unfolding of choices that ultimately lead to a destination track of music. Another way to think about it is one door leading to another and another--a bit like a treasure hunt, which is why this system might appear almost as a game to some.

     

    It is a huge leap forward to finally have fields that are specific to classical music in combination with a database that can fill these fields via automatic Internet search. That combination alone has positive implications for classical music in general. Nearly every music media player coming before this has been designed for what we might label as 'trend' music while classical music has had to fit into something that rarely gave a thought to any of its criteria. At a certain point, the over simplification of classical music has become its compromise, limiting the information to appear only as one very long two dimensional jumble: album title, composer, work title, movement number, movement name, and opus number jammed together as one field. Enter Sonata, which is instead about expanding the possibilities. It is just a completely different way of thinking, and because of that, I recommend taking a moment to see what is being offered here.

     

     

     

    <b>The Details</b>

     

    <p><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/now-playing-1000w-150.jpg" style="padding: 0pt 10pt 5pt 0pt;" align="left">Eighteen defined fields of metadata out of the gate. Sonata is an intelligent browsing system for classical music. You don't have to be the architect of your information. There is a default system in place for how the metadata is organized (with those 18 fields). This standard that Digibit has created represents just one way to conceive of your database, and you will want to be aware of this almost before you begin.

    </p>

     

     

     

    <ol>

    <li>Album - Album name</li>

    <li>Artist - Artist in the album</li>

    <li>Genre - Genre of the album (Pop, Rock, Classical, Jazz, etc.)</li>

    <li>Date or Year - Year of the release of the album</li>

    <li>Track Name</li>

    <li>Track Number</li>

    <li>Period - Ancient, Renaissance, Baroque, Classic, Romantic, Modern and Contemporary</li>

    <li>Style - Ballet, Chamber, Choral, Religious, Concerto, Incidental, Lieder, Marching Band, Opera, Operetta, Recital, Soundtrack, Symphonic and Zarzuela</li>

    <li>Instrument - Brass, Cello, Choral, Guitar, Harpsichord, Organ, Percussion, Piano, Strings, Violin, Vocal and Woodwind</li>

    <li>Composer – Sorted by Name</li>

    <li>ComposerSort – Sorted by Last Name</li>

    <li>Soloists – Sorted by Name</li>

    <li>SoloistsSort - Sorted by Last Name</li>

    <li>Conductor - Sorted by Name</li>

    <li>ConductorSort - Sorted by Last Name</li>

    <li>Orchestra - Orchestra</li>

    <li>Label – Record label</li>

    <li>Catalog # – Catalog number of the album</li>

    <li>Custom – free field for your own needs</li>

    </ol>

     

     

     

    These metadata fields are part of the story of each track and by selecting one of the field classifications from the sub-menu, an entire group of albums emerge. It’s as if you are viewing them through one side of a multi-faceted prism with which you can easily change how you would like to view your collection. It isn’t a list that you see on a two dimensional excel sheet but rather a multi-dimensional view of how your metadata creates sets, subsets and even integrated subsets appearing in a continuously unfolding linear hierarchical order. At first it can feel like making your way through a carnival fun house until you get used to the various combinations of fields. (For example: selecting 'Classical' leads to 'Instrument' leads to 'Period' or if you like, 'Period/Instrument' can be one elided field. It can be confusing when you are not used to thinking this way and have to decide that you will always want to think this way going forward. Such is the issue with a world of so many possibilities.)

     

    It is how you tag your music with the information that goes into all of these fields that makes a track so infinitely findable. The whole notion of tagging is to free you from having to search endlessly for something. At the same time with Sonata it almost becomes an obsession because there is so much information that goes into completing the fields for any one track. You have to ask yourself how far you want to take this. Want more fields? You can create more, ad infinitum. In this way you can tailor the system to any collection. However, if you do want to add fields you’ll have to make a new hierarchical view so that the additional fields appear unless you only want to see them via the all powerful search function. Sonata is so flexible you’ll want to get to know the system first before entering any data so that you can decide if you want to push the envelope or not.

     

    While the Sonata server software does allow you to make choices in how you would like to label or define your music, the real offering here is a specific set of fields which represent the first inexpensive and extensive metadata standard for classical music. Currently, only the Sonata system uses this set of 18 standard fields, but there is reason to believe it could catch on. In addition to the pre-defined 18 fields, they have inserted a 19th optional field that is ready to be used for custom labeling.

     

    The people at Digibit / Sonata have done something very important here. They have redefined the media player from the perspective of classical music. They have done something very bold too. They saw the way millions of existing songs in databases are stored and turned their collective noses up at that and decided to blaze a new trail. More than just a labor of love, the Sonata system takes the business of classical music seriously, which is considered a niche for all intents and purposes, and they have brought to the market a high-end system that even a five year old can operate (at least the playback side of the system).

     

    Digibit also offers its services as an outsource ripper. Through this, Digibit has been building a database of its own named SonataDB. If you load in one of those lucky titles (currently over 40,000), you will instantly have 18 fields of metadata automatically filled in. Otherwise, the system will go down the list of other databases and if found, will fill in the standard four fields of metadata that are currently in use by all of the major database companies. And in case you want to insure that you never lose your precious cargo, they have a free cloud storage service in cooperation with <a href="http://www.audiosafe.com">AudioSAFE</a><a href="http://www.audiosafe.com"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> where you can back up your entire collection free of charge. Sonata really is a one stop shop offering a vast array of options.

     

     

     

    <b>Locating music</b>

     

    There are a number of preset display views that come with the system. It is with the Theater View that it all comes together -- this is where the experience of the Sonata Music Server truly begins. At first glance, in the 'Home' menu, you see what appears to be a very minimal list of possibilities or categories, as they call them.

    <center>Click To Enlarge</center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/jjp/full/Home-Audio-2.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review-Home"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/jjp/700/Home-Audio-2.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

    Once you leave 'Home,' the world gets significantly more complex. Going into 'Audio,' which takes you to the main window to browse through the various fields, you are greeted by a plethora of album covers.

    <center>Click To Enlarge</center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/classical-composer-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review-Audio"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/700/classical-composer-1000w.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

    This is where the possibilities of where to start are so varied as to be overwhelming. In my own explorations of the system, I have to admit that the 'Back' button is the one button I clung to most. This is because all roads do not lead to Rome. It’s more the opposite. Once you leave the top most hierarchy, it is easy to get lost in the possibilities and then where exactly do you want to get back to? But this is the richness that we have been missing all this time, and the organization of all those fields of data naturally creates a new universe of dimensions and possibilities that can be disorienting.

    'Home' is also the location of 'Search.'

    <center>Click To Enlarge</center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/jjp/full/Search.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review-Search"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/jjp/700/Search.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

    The 'Search' function trumps all. It can be a more fun and satisfying way to find something in the database. You can type anything and before you get to the second letter a list of possibilities appear instantaneously, each line complete with a miniature picture of an album cover. It is so responsive that you might decide to avoid browsing through your complex set of fields to find something. However, you spent all that time setting them up and part of the reward is being able to see your collection organized that way, and I repeat, since you did go to all of that trouble curating your music collection. Other default 'Views' are less complex in their options and more standard in terms of what we have been used to, since Sonata is built on the existing JRiver application.

     

    It would be nice, if the 'Search' function was accessible from the 'Audio' window, which would allow you to switch gears away from scrolling through the classifications in just one click. And displaying 18+ field classifications as menu items on one page, all at once, has been done in a slightly less than intuitive fashion by Digibit. The list scrolls sideways, something that many of us aren't that used to doing. But it is all there -- complaining even a little feels so ungrateful, and I must restrain myself from doing so because the Sonata system has attempted to champion the cause on so many levels. In a way it is kind of amazing that this even exists, and for $130 (99€).

    <center>Click To Enlarge</center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/zone-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/zone-1000w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/style-683.png" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/style-683.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/SoloistSort-683w.png" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/SoloistSort-683w.jpg"></a></center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/period_romantic-683w.png" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/period_romantic-683w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/instument-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/instument-1000w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/image001-621w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/image001-621w.jpg"></a></center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/genre-1000w.png" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/genre-1000w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/Composer-683w.png" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/Composer-683w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/classical-composer-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/classical-composer-1000w.jpg"></a></center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/sonata-cdripper-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/sonata-cdripper-1000w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/playon-hd2-dlna-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/playon-hd2-dlna-1000w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/playlists-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/playlists-1000w.jpg"></a></center>

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/period-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/period-1000w.jpg"></a>   <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/full/now-playing-1000w.jpg" class="thickbox" rel="Sonata-Music-Server-Review"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/now-playing-1000w.jpg"></a></center>

     

     

     

    <b>Powerful and Versatile</b>

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/sonata_server_tv_remote_control-566w.jpg" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 0pt;" align="left">Sonata is an advanced system. If you are interested in this, you probably know something about classical music and are not a novice there. But even still, whether you consider yourself part of the classical music cognoscenti or want to give your five year old a leg up on his or her Mozart piano sonatas, you can now have a system that speaks 'classical,' and it can do so in eleven languages and counting (five of which can be used for the field titles themselves). And just a note here, the system is set up to accommodate any type of music, all appearing in a complete view. So all you triple Virgos, take heart, you can organize any part of your collection and make any references you want for anything you can imagine.

     

    I have a sense that while this qualifies as a very powerful tool for serious listeners, it also appears to be something for professional applications because it offers a rather large dynamic range of programmability. Web radio, listening libraries and archives currently either have to devise proprietary systems or operate in transition, waiting for something with enough diversity and capability to handle their specific needs. We are talking about power users who would use Sonata for work instead of play. I suspect the system would have to adapt to have more of a fixed path so that finding things could be more direct and require fewer steps across the data for these more purposeful operators. While somewhat antithetical to what the Sonata system brings to the table, I could see expanding the use of the impressive on board search tool as an option for the more sophisticated or professional user.

     

    But look, just because it has a lot of muscle, the people at Digibit don't want you to be afraid of the server. And I agree with them. Sonata succeeds in merging two things that haven't been integrated before: the world of classical music metadata with a media player that can support this level of complexity and at such an inexpensive price. This could very well be the dream server for the eclectic collector and audiophile unwilling to shell out thousands of dollars for a complete Meridian Sooloos system. Just so it’s clear, this is no small issue that has been dealt with here. The people behind Sonata have solved a series of problems that are so extensive and diverse it is a true tour de force that it has all been handled by one single company. And because it is software, I would expect there to be other versions in the future, including plugins for entering data, and even possibly other choices for how the interface looks and feels.

     

    Personally, I'm not crazy about the actual interface. First of all I'm not a big fan of black backgrounds because they are a little harder to read and secondly the slippery slidey way the screen reacts when you mouse across things to scroll through the selections can be rather dizzying at times. Which, as a note, is not so bad if you are using a touch screen and you are going directly onto a point on the screen. It’s when you use a mouse traveling across the screen that a lot of elements are moving that you aren't going to be selecting. If you are inputting data for instance, and I assume if you are using this you will be, it is likely you would be using a mouse and keyboard. But these are very superficial things that many might actually disagree with me about. These items are just little distractions to an extraordinarily versatile and well informed system.

     

     

     

     

    <b>Conclusion</b>

     

    Sonata claims to be operable with little or no computer experience, but I personally found that there is a slight learning curve to understanding how it functions and it did require a certain amount of hand holding to get things to work the way they were supposed to. This is a fantastic system from which to experience classical music, particularly for the uninitiated. Sonata spells out what is essentially a series of routes on a map, each trail leading through a series of basic classifications (the ABCs of classical music) that are simple enough to understand (for example start with ‘Baroque’ and go to ‘Violin’ and you might get to ‘Vivaldi’). The Sonata Music Server software encourages an awareness of various aspects of classical music through its use and would be a wonderful addition to a family environment. Sonata presents a capable, intelligent, innovative and versatile package. If you’ve been waiting for a way to put your 5,000 albums into a server that can handle with equal care any format or genre, playable through a multitude of audio configurations, you will want to look into the Sonata. They have a try before you buy option, a clearly written downloadable manual and a super conscientious support team. Considering the number of things that this product offers, the Sonata server does not miss a beat.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Product Information:

    Product: <a href="http://www.sonataserver.com/">Sonata Music Server</a><a href="http://www.sonataserver.com/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>

    Price: $130

    Where To Buy: <a href="http://www.sonataserver.com/index.php/en/download/software-trial.html">Via Download</a><a href="http://www.sonataserver.com/index.php/en/download/software-trial.html"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>

    Specifications: [<a href="http://www.sonataserver.com/index.php/en/sonata/specs.html">Link</a><a href="http://www.sonataserver.com/index.php/en/sonata/specs.html"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>]

    User Manual v1.4: [<a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/files.computeraudiophile.com/2012/0124/Sonata_SW_english_V1.4.pdf">Link (8.5MB PDF)</a><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/files.computeraudiophile.com/2012/0124/Sonata_SW_english_V1.4.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>]

    Data Sheet: [<a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2012/0124/Sonata_Music_Server_USA_data_sheet.pdf">Link (6.1MB PDF)</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2012/0124/Sonata_Music_Server_USA_data_sheet.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>]

    Sonata v. JRiver: [<a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2012/0124/SonatavsJRiverMC.pdf">Link (PDF)</a><a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2012/0124/SonatavsJRiverMC.pdf"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>]

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>About The Author</b>:

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2012/0124/thumb/kathy-10-1.jpg" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 0pt;" align="left">A graduate of the Juilliard School, Kathy Geisler has producer credits on more than 35 albums for the Well-Tempered Productions label, many of which were recorded at the world-class Skywalker Ranch scoring stage. Besides her work for Well-Tempered, Ms. Geisler has been instrumental as the recording liaison for the Russian National Orchestra, notably putting together the orchestra recording logistics for their Grammy Award winning album ‘Wolf Tracks,’ featuring Sophia Loren, Bill Clinton, Mikhail Gorbachev, and conducted by Maestro Kent Nagano. She has produced several videos including dozens of interviews for the online magazine Fresh Digital Produce. Her live music production credits include several concerts and tours in the United States and in 2010 she produced orchestra concerts in Hungary and Italy featuring pianist and conductor <a href="http://blog.konstantinlifschitz.info/">Konstantin Lifschitz</a><a href="http://blog.konstantinlifschitz.info/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. She is currently engaged in launching <a href="http://blog.festivalparadiso.com/">Festival Paradiso</a><a href="http://blog.festivalparadiso.com/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a> in Tiburon, California.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Nice review!<br />

    <br />

    My question goes into the same direction. How would a transition from J River to Sonata work? Would additional tags such as 'composer' and so on just get added automatically?<br />

    <br />

    Thanks for you great work here!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It would also be great to know the upgrade policy for Sonata. JRiver asks for something between $20 and $30 for each upgrade. Also, which version of JRiver is Sonata based on? 16? 17? Are all bug fixes transferred to Sonata?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    First off: how does Sonata deal with multiple entries in a single field. e.g. Where you have two soloists, does it list separately compositions performed by Soloist A; Solist B and those where Soloist A and B perform together?<br />

    <br />

    Second: how does Sonata cope with adding jazz, rock, pop, etc. in with your classical?<br />

    <br />

    Eloise

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ms Geisler,<br />

    A very nice review. Thank you.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sonata is a special configuration of JRiver Media Center plus dbPoweramp and some other add-ons. The database is JRiver MC's.<br />

    <br />

    Fields that were added by Sonata can also be added in JRiver Media Center, and if they are populated, will show up in MC. Just adding them in MC won't populate them though. The data usually comes in via the special version of dbPoweramp that can access the Sonata database or G3.<br />

    <br />

    When it rips a CD, JRiver Media Center uses its own YADB database of metadata, and FreeDB.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Does the metadata update work equally well on existing material as it does on new rips, or is the metadata retrieval primarily for new rips?<br />

    <br />

    Hoping the answer above will be "equally well for new and existing", my followup is: For non-classical music, is the metadata retrieval as good or better than any other data look-up software, i.e. for existing non-classical music, is this the best SW to populate/fix/update metadata for a collection? <br />

    <br />

    Finally, in all cases where the SW updates metadata, can all the metadata be written to the file (or a sidecar file) so it is embedded or otherwise accessible outside of this specific database (including JRiver MC)?<br />

    <br />

    Nice review and welcome!!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Your question is already answered in our forum, Sonata will automatically tag "any" CD (not just classical) that is contained in any of the 4 databases the Sonata ripper looks up. <br />

    We don't have any capability as yet for automatic tagging of the extended metadata using the 18 fields, but this is something we're investigating.<br />

    If you want to tag more fields, you can do that manually or re-rip your classical CDs again. There's an affordable and automatic solution, you can use a ripping robot that rips up to 100 CDs automatically, dBpoweramp provides a software working with it. You can also use a ripping service to rip your collection.<br />

    regards<br />

    DigiBit<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can manually create more tags in JR MC as composer, but you'll not get our automatic tags coming from our SonataDB. Sonata will return you automatic tags and hi-res cover art as long as your classical CD is one of our current +40,000 CDs we have in SonataDB.<br />

    Thanks.<br />

    DigiBit

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the reply. I am trying to understand it:<br />

    <br />

    Are you saying: <br />

    <br />

    For New Rips: For any album contained in the 4 databases you use, up to 18 fields will be populated,to the extent such field metadata exists in any of the databases.<br />

    <br />

    FOR EXISTING RIPS: This will be the same as for new rips, but the number of fields will be reduced.<br />

    <br />

    If not please clarify.<br />

    <br />

    Are you able to address the other part of my question about if the metadata populated by your SW is written to the music file (or a sidecar file) which can be referenced outside of your program and outside of JRiver MC?<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    May I also followup by asking: For any rip (existing or new),where there is conflicting metadata in the databases you use, is the user able to select which of the conflicting data to use, on a field by field basis?<br />

    <br />

    You mention that these questions are already answered. Do you have links to such answers?<br />

    <br />

    I look forward to better understanding the tagging capabilities for existing and new rips, as this would be a strong reason to purchase this.<br />

    <br />

    Thanks very much

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    We're currently based on MC16 but we plan a MC17 version in Q1. As we only offer the audio (music) module of JR MC, we may or may not charge for the upgrades, this would depend on the number and character of new features, we've not done any so far, so we'll decide when we release the MC17-based version.<br />

    regards<br />

    DigiBit

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    No, only the SonataDB, one of the four databases we look up at, have the 18 fields tagged. GD3 have also added extended tags but generally not all the 18.<br />

    <br />

    For existing rips, you can import your ripped collection to the Sonata, but metadata will show as is, you'll have to add the extended fields manually with the integrated tagging tool.<br />

    <br />

    Yes, the metadata of the 18 fields is in the file, but you'd need a player that supports the 18 fields and allows the views of the 18 fields and that is compatible with the tagging standard we use. <br />

    Example: you can't import the files to Mac iTunes. <br />

    Only JR MC allows that, but not automatially as Sonata does. Furthermore, any NAS with Asset UPnP software from Illustrate can also serve the extended fields to any UPnP Control Point software, but you'd lack all the other nice features of Sonata/JR MC. <br />

    <br />

    Out of the 4 databases, SonataDB has priority when a classical CD is ripped, if not found, then it’ll look up in the other 3. <br />

    Yes, you can manually pick any of the 4 databases results, but dBpoweramp ripper will automatically provide you’re the best metadata from the 4 databases; this unique feature is called Perfect Meta, that allows to pick the best metadata from the 4 databases or even combine the results from them. <br />

    Tagging and metadata is an extremely complex issue. I recommend you download our manual and read the chapters dedicated to it. Most databases suffer the same problem, most of the entries are submitted by users, that would use different criteria for tagging, not our case (or GD3) that is only done by professionals always using the same tagging criteria, so assuring consistency on the metadata. <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'm probably missing something, but I can't see the way to tag the work and opus number, which is for me the most important metadata. How can I look for all the versions of Bach's BWV 232??

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thanks for the full explanation. That helps.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Eloise,<br />

    I usualy follow your interesting comments.<br />

    <br />

    My tagging expert will answer your first question in deep. But if you search by Soloist A, all albums and tracks where soloist A plays will be shown, alone or with other soloist/s. But if you want to isolate soloist A performances, you can use the field "Style" and then choose "Recital" and then "Soloist A", and then only the solo recitals of soloist A would show up.<br />

    <br />

    Second question: Sure! as good as any other player. The extended fields are generic to ANY genre, you can customize as many as you want and name it as you like. We have a customer that has used the 18 fields to tag his 5,000 CDs Jazz collection with fields he defined: Performance venue, jazz Style, year of recording, etc. <br />

    The main advantage of classical is that if you rip any of CDs we have in our +40,000 SonataDB, the 18 fields will appear automatically as we defined, but you can edit and change any tag if you want to.<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Very simple, you just go to Search menu and type : Bach BWV 232 and it will show you the tracks/albums containing the work BWV 232..<br />

    <br />

    The BWV or Opus numbers are in the tracks field and album field. You can also view all your collection by Composer/Bach/Album, or more complex: Composer/Bach/Instrument/Soloist/Album <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Any combination of the 18 fields is possible for very accurate searches in very big collections.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    " I have to admit that the 'Back' button is the one button I clung to most. This is because all roads do not lead to Rome. It’s more the opposite. Once you leave the top most hierarchy, it is easy to get lost in the possibilities and then where exactly do you want to get back to? But this is the richness that we have been missing all this time, and the organization of all those fields of data naturally creates a new universe of dimensions and possibilities that can be disorienting."<br />

    <br />

    I think that interfaces that show values for one tag at a time are unnecessarily restrictive. As the review notes, you get lost in the hierarchy of levels.<br />

    <br />

    In JRiver MC, I use standard view with several panes to browse classical music as shown below.<br />

    <br />

    <img><br />

    />

    </img><br />

    <br />

    Each pane has a list of values for that tag. When I select a value for one tag, all the other tag lists are filtered to show only tag values present in files with the selected tag(s). In the screenshot, I've selected Sub_genre=orchestral, composer=Beethoven and Work Name=Symphony No. 1. The Artist list shows performances of that work in my collection. The version tag distinguishes reissue version (Essential classics versus Original Jacket).<br />

    <br />

    This view lets me see what's in my collection. At every step, I can see what matches the selections I've made. I can remove selections to browse in different ways. I can always see where I am in the browsing process. The JRiver s/w remembers what's in my collec tion so I don't have to. Forgotten music comes to mind as I browse; those discoveries add to the pleasure of using a computer to play music.<br />

    <br />

    I chose not to use cover art for several reasons. It isn't relevant in choosing a composer or a work. Album covers are not useful in distinguishing different works on the same CD. I don't find most classical CD album covers to be memorable either. I'd rather use screen real estate in other ways than displaying cover art.<br />

    <br />

    I don't know whether it is possible to use Sonata in the way I use JRiver MC.<br />

    <br />

    Bill<br />

    <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The beauty of JR MC is its ability to use multiple tags and display them, so you’ve manually tailored your tags as you like it. We had to choose some custom tags when ripping classical music, as we said, user can change, delete or add more. Regarding whether using covers or not, it’s a question of taste, most people prefer to view covers. The advantage of Sonata is that you don't have to worry about tagging for +40,000 classical CDs (growing every month). Not all people have the time and/or ability to manually tag all their collection. We have customers with over 20K classical CDs. <br />

    DigiBit

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well done and good to stay informed on this.<br />

    <br />

    I've put together a MAC/Pure Music/iTunes >> DAC >> HiFi playback system, controlled with a iPOD Touch running the free Apple Remote App.<br />

    <br />

    I think a lot of folks have a similar setup.<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I put an IR remote control on our J. River install last night, and my lands - the difference it makes is night and day. If you still have the setup, might want to try one. Means you don't have to be right at the computer or touch screen to play the music. :) <br />

    <br />

    -Paul<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The example shown above of Beethoven Sonatas vol. 1, vol. 2, etc illustrates why I think it is silly to organize classical music by album instead of work (composition). In 95% of classical albums, it is irrelevant which works happen to be packaged together on a single album. The works themselves are what matters, not the album. Computer audio frees classical music from the constraint of albums.<br />

    <br />

    Also, the common practice of including in the track name tag the entire name of a work followed by the movement causes the track names to be too long to display.<br />

    <br />

    For both these reasons, I enter the name of the Work in the album tag, and I enter only the movement in the track name tag for multi-movement works.<br />

    <br />

    I use the Group tag in iTunes to store the label and album title, but usually I don't need to display this info.<br />

    <br />

    (I hope no one minds my repeating this comment, which I've made before in other threads.)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    <br />

    You're absolutely right, for classical it makes more sense to organize by composition instead of album but you can do that as well, just creating a new field called composition or work. Also, the search engine allows you to find any work isolated from any album. <br />

    The source of the SonataDB database are ripped physical CDs, so we decided to tag as they're are in the CD is, but nothing prevent users to change that. Music labels continue to source their downloads from physical CDs and include the covert art of the whole CD, although most now offer the possibility to only buy tracks or a work. <br />

    Digibit<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    .... which may show my ignorance:<br />

    When I rip a CD into iTunes it accesses the Gracenote database for free. It is exceedingly rare for this not to be able to find details for a CD and I have ripped some very esoteric material that I've bought around the world over the years. Why cannot this database be used at least as a back up to cover CDs not in your 40000 library?<br />

    <br />

    David<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    David,<br />

    Gracenote is a good database but it does not provide good results for classical. Also, as many CDs are fed by end users, it has a lot of inconsistencies; you may find the same album in the database because it was tagged differently by different users, example. The Beatles; Beatles, The; Beatles, etc. If iTunes was good enough TuneUp would not make such a good business fixing Gracenote’s metadata errors.<br />

    GD3 and SonataDB are created by the companies behind, not end users, so they (we) follow a strict tagging set of rules, so, it'd be nearly impossible to find the same album in the database. Furthermore, neither iTunes nor Gracenote support extended fields for metadata. Just try to find any CD with a Style, Instrument or a Period tag.<br />

    Regards<br />

    DigiBit<br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...