Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Peachtree Audio iNova Integrated Amplifier and Design 5 Loudspeaker Review

    thumb-l-system.jpgOver the last year I participated in a few computer audio seminars around the country with Peachtree Audio’s David Solomon. During the events I spent a fair amount of time listening to the Peachtree Design 5 loudspeakers. Every time I listened to these speakers I commented positively about either the aesthetic design, build quality, or impressive sound quality. The one thing left to do was listen to the D5 speakers in my own listening room where familiarity with the environment would lead to much more accurate judgments. Fortunately David offered a pair of D5s for review while we discussed my review of the new iNova integrated amplifier. I accepted the offer to review the speakers and the amplifier as a complete system. There was no hiding the fact I liked the D5s based on previous experience. That also meant I had high expectations for these speakers. On the other hand I hadn’t listened to the iNova enough to leave a lasting impression in my mind. That said I still had high expectations because of its lineage. I liked the original Nova very much. In fact I liked it too much according to some Computer Audiophile readers. It was time to find out if the Design 5 speakers were as good as I previously thought, if the new iNova was anything more than an original Nova with an iPod dock, if Peachtree refined the highly regarded Nova into something better, or simply sat on its laurels riding the previous wave of success.

    [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>Peachtree Audio iNova</b> ($1,799)

     

    <a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/inova/l-inova-ipod-black-made-for-pod.jpeg" class="thickbox" rel="satisfaction"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/inova/thumb-l-inova-ipod-black-made-for-pod.jpg" alt="satisfaction" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 5pt;" align="left"></a>Computer audiophiles seeking simplicity, options, and great performance in a single box will be impressed with the new iNova. This unit is a preamplifier, amplifier, and digital to analog converter (DAC) all in one component. Connect a pair of speakers and the audio system is complete. There is no hierarchy of deep menus to navigate just to play music. Simple yet elegantly illuminated round buttons on the front panel are self explanatory for nearly every human being. This simplicity should not be mistaken for lack of capabilities. The feature set on the iNova is similar to the original Nova. Digital inputs for optical S/PDIF, electrical S/PDIF (upgraded), USB (upgraded), and iPod (new) join analog inputs including one with a home theater bypass function. This bypass feature is really nice for people combining a two channel and five channel home theater system. It allows pure playback of two channel through the iNova directly to the speakers bypassing all the processing of a home theater receiver. Like the previous Nova the iNova's solid design handles noise from grounding and switching power supply problems through galvanic isolation and transformer coupling the digital inputs. This isolation is no small matter especially for components designed to function with computer sources.

    <center><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/l-nova-rear-700.jpg"></img></center>

     

     

    There are four major differences between the original Nova and the new iNova. The three performance based differences were easily identifiable during my listening sessions while the one external difference (iPod dock) was identifiable by simply looking at the component.

     

    <b>One</b>

    The iNova contains a higher resolution DAC chip than the original Nova. After extensive testing Peachtree elected to use the ESS 9016 Sabre<sup>32</sup> Ultra DAC <a href="http://files.computeraudiophile.com/2011/0304/ES9016-PB-Rev-0.6-110117.pdf">[PDF]</a>. The ESS 9016 re-clocks the incoming digital audio before processing this signal. According to Peachtree this reduces jitter to less than three picoseconds. In addition to better specs the new ESS 9016 enables the iNova to handle incoming digital audio from 16 bit / 44.1 kHz CD quality up through 24 bit / 192 kHz high resolution via its coaxial (electrical) S/PDIF input. The original Nova could not accept audio over 24/96 via any input. The iNova also introduces the capability to handle 32, 44.1, 48, and 96 kHz via its USB input. Astute computer audiophiles will notice the iNova's lack of 88.2 kHz support. I discussed this with David Solomon and Jim Spainhour of Peachtree shortly after receiving the review sample. David and Jim told me they elected to use the Tenor USB chip without 88.2 kHz support as partly as cost decision and time to market decision. That's an answer I can accept from Peachtree selling a $1,799 all-in-one product such as the iNova. When I reviewed the $4,800 Esoteric D-07 DAC the fact that it did not support 88.2 kHz via USB was a very serious issue. The D-07 is a purpose built digital to analog converter from one of the premiere digital audio companies in the world. I believe a product from Esoteric at $4,800 that has a sole purpose of D to A conversion must support 88.2 kHz. It would be very nice if the iNova supported 88.2 kHz, especially to play the new Rolling Stones HDtracks releases, but I don't believe it's a show-stopper. The more technically inclined readers will be interested to know the iNova is an Isochronous adaptive data endpoint as opposed to an Isochronous asynchronous data endpoint. In other words the iNova is an adaptive USB DAC not an asynchronous USB DAC.

     

     

    Information received via USB Prober:

    Audio Class Specific Audio Data Format

    Audio Stream Format Type Desc.

    <ul>

    <li>Format Type: 1 PCM</li>

    <li>Number Of Channels: 2 STEREO</li>

    <li>Sub Frame Size: 3</li>

    <li>Bit Resolution: 24</li>

    <li>Sample Frequency Type: 0x04 (Discrete)</li>

    <li>Sample Frequency: 32000 Hz</li>

    <li>Sample Frequency: 44100 Hz</li>

    <li>Sample Frequency: 48000 Hz</li>

    <li>Sample Frequency: 96000 Hz</li>

    </ul>

    Endpoint 0x03 - Isochronous Output

    <ul>

    <li>Address: 0x03 (OUT)</li>

    <li>Attributes: 0x09 (Isochronous adaptive data endpoint)</li>

    <li>Max Packet Size: 582</li>

    <li>Polling Interval: 1 ms</li>

    </ul>

     

     

    <b>Two</b>

    The iNova, like the Nova, includes a vacuum tube buffer that can be turned off and on with the press of a button on the remote control. The original Nova used a 6922 tube whereas the new iNova buffer contains a Russian 6N1P tube. Some Nova owners have said the 6922 tube does not provide enough warmth or tube bloom to notice much of a difference when the tube is on. In a direct comparison between the Nova and iNova with its new Russian 6N1P tube I can attest that the difference is clearly audible. Whether one prefers this audible euphonic affect coupled with a humongous soundstage is another question.

     

     

    <b>Three</b>

    It's really nice to have solid reasons that backup one's listening impression. This helps eliminate the placebo effect when listening to one component versus another. Such was the case when listening to the Nova versus iNova. My listening notes include statements like "iNova more resolving in bass than Nova. More strength and control of the drivers. Very noticeable on Just a Little Lovin'" At the time I wrote the notes I was completely unaware that Peachtree upgraded the capacitors on the iNova amp seeking a <i>"more dynamic and punchier bass"</i>. The design change succeeded in its goal.

     

     

    <b>Four</b>

    The fourth major difference between the Nova and iNova is the addition of a digital iPod dock to the iNova. The iNova is a 100% compliant Made for iPod* device. There are no hacks or tricks involved to pull the digital audio stream directly from the iPod to the iNova's DAC. It's been my experience that pulling a digital signal from the iPod is by far the best way to get good sound. During this review I used my iPhone 4 connected to the iPod dock. Upon connection I received a warning about the iNova not being designed for my device, but this appeared to have no affect on usability. One method I used to send audio wirelessly from my computer to the iPhone 4 was with an application named <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/wifi2hifi/id417409424?mt=8">WiFi2HiFi</a><a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/wifi2hifi/id417409424?mt=8"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. The application works but there are very few details as to how it works and what type of audio it supports.

     

    *“Made for iPod” means that an electronic accessory has been designed to connect specifically to iPod and has been certified by the developer to meet Apple performance standards.

     

     

    Based on specs the iNova is certainly more than an original Nova with an iPod dock. The four major differences are equally as identifiable on paper as they are with one's eyes and ears in the listening room.

     

     

     

    <b>Peachtree Audio Design 5 Loudspeakers</b> ($999 pair)

     

    Note: Prior to 2011 the speaker brand name was era acoustics. The era acoustics brand has now been rolled into the Peachtree Audio brand.

     

    Pictures simply don't do the D5 loudspeakers justice. At $999 per pair it's not easy to find a speaker with such a nice fit and finish, and with build quality this solid. A standard knuckle rap on top of a D5 provides one that good feeling of fine craftsmanship. I received speakers with the Rosewood finish for this review. This finish matched the iNova's Rosewood finish perfectly.

     

    At less than one foot tall the D5s weigh nearly sixteen pounds. The 5" long excursion driver and 1" soft dome tweeter were designed by Michael Kelly of Aerial Acoustics. From the moment one firsts listens to a pair of D5s it's immediately evident that these speakers produce incredible bass for their size. Peachtree's goal was to create a small speaker that extended low enough to make a subwoofer optional. I believe Peachtree can check that box off the list of goals easily. The D5s extend down to 50Hz. This is not common for such a small audiophile grade speaker that retails for $999. I'm sure there are car subwoofers smaller that extend lower but the quality of those speakers is painfully horrendous. The D5s retain good quality sound down to the lowest supported frequencies.

    <center><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/d5/l-d5black.jpeg" class="thickbox" rel="d5"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/l-d5black-thumb.jpg" alt="d5-1"></a><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/d5/l-d5cherry.jpeg" class="thickbox" rel="d5"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/l-d5cherry-thumb.jpg" alt="d5-2"></a><a href="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/d5/l-d5rosewood.jpeg" class="thickbox" rel="d5"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/l-d5rosewood-thumb.jpg" alt="d5-3"></a></center>

     

     

     

    <b>Complete System</b> ($2,499)

     

    <img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/thumb-inov-ipod-cherry.jpg" style="padding: 5pt 10pt 5pt 5pt;" align="left">The iNova at $1,799 and Design 5 speakers at $999 are priced very competitively. There's real deal to be had by purchasing this as a complete system for $2,499 and saving $299. It's very tough to beat this level of sound quality for less than $2,499.

     

    I listened to the iNova is many different configurations using different inputs, sample rates, filter settings, and sources. The best sounding combination in my system was via USB input with the filter set to Non-oversampling (NOS). Readers familiar with my review of the original Nova may remember that coaxial S/PDIF was my preferred input on that unit. I obtained great sound from a Windows 7 / J river Media Center 16 server, Mac OS X 10.6.6 / Amarra and Decibel servers, as well as the Auraliti PK100 (S/PDIF only).

     

    I broke the iNova and D5 loudspeakers in for nearly a week playing reference Recordings' Grammy winning album <a href="http://www.referencerecordings.com/HRx120_DETAIL.asp">Britten's Orchestra at 24/176.4</a><a href="http://www.referencerecordings.com/HRx120_DETAIL.asp"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></img></a>. I continued to use this album for critical listening of the S/PDIF input long after the break-in period. Other albums used throughout this review were Shelby Lynne - Just a Little Lovin, A. A. Bondy - American Hearts, Adele - 21, Minnesota Orchestra - Bolero!, and I even used the Chesky Ultimate Demonstration Disc for the first time in recent memory.

     

    Listening to this Peachtree system with the new Russian 6N19 tube buffer was a very different experience than listening to the original Nova with the 6922 buffer. The 6N19 has a major affect on the sound of the iNova. Some readers will fall in love with the 6N19 while others will simply disable the tube buffer. In my system the new tube buffer muted the top extension somewhat resulting in a loss of shine or shimmer when I thought it should have been present. Overall this system sounded like it was about ready to let loose but never could get over the hump. The one benefit of the new tube buffer that may be enough to cause listeners to forget the aforementioned issues is the incredible soundstage. The system imaged from side to side, top to bottom, and front to back like nothing I've ever heard close to this price point. Playing well recorded and produced albums creates an almost autostereoscopic volumetric 3D presentation. Readers seeking great imaging and a large believable soundstage will almost certainly prefer this tube buffer over the 6922 buffer in the original Nova.

     

    Most of my listening took place with the tube buffer disabled as I thought this was a more accurate reproduction of the original source material. The 6N19 is a bit too bloomy and euphonic for my taste. Without this buffer enabled the upper frequencies were more defined and raw. There was no tube intermediary in between my ears and the solid state circuitry. With the top end now more open I sensed the tiniest bit of lost focus in the mid range. Like everything in life there was no free lunch when disabling the tube buffer. The incredible, perhaps over cooked, soundstage was no longer present. This will be good new for some and disheartening for others. The sound as a whole was still way above acceptable and very good.

     

    Continuing with the 6N19 buffer disabled I played a little Marcus Miller and Shelby Lynne. Miller's Introduction on the album Silver Rain is short but stellar. The electric bass is a wonderful test of a system's ability to control low frequency reproduction. The first words that came to mind when playing this track were Bass Monster. The Peachtree system was a bass monster. I mean that in the best sense of the words. This system is not the bass monster we've all heard at an intersection causing a small spike in the Richter Magnitude Scale and scaring retirees off the streets. Rather the Peachtree iNova and D5 loudspeakers are a controlled bass monster. Flat down to 50Hz as David Solomon says, these speakers with the control of the iNova amp and new capacitors completely outperform every satellite speaker I've heard close to $999. Even listening to Shelby Lynne's Just a Little Lovin' title track this Peachtree system rattled items in the immediate area. The baseline on this track, when reproduced with a controlled system, is pure magic. The iNova / D5 combo didn't reproduce the complete texture of the bass but certainly presented an awesome display of controlled low frequencies for such a small inexpensive loudspeaker. Versus the original Nova the iNova is more resolving in the low frequencies with better strength and control of the Design 5's drivers. From mid bass to the top frequencies both Novas sounded nearly identical via S/PDIF input. Via USB the iNova excelled beyond the capabilities of it's older sibling.

     

    Comparing the new iNova USB input to my preferred S/PDIF input on the original Nova was another good differentiator between the original Nova and the new iNova. The original Nova's USB input was pretty limited and not as good as its coaxial S/PDIF input. It's more appropriate to compare the best input of each product in an effort to determine ultimate performance and allow one to extrapolate from this conclusion. Playback via the iNova's USB input was more vibrant with more separation of each instrument and different frequencies than via the Nova's S/PDIF input. Soundstage via USB was a touch smaller than via S/PDIF but male and female vocals were very solid and dead center between the speakers on all planes. The more I listened to the iNova via USB the more I liked the sound and the more resolution I heard versus the coaxial S/PDIF input of the original Nova and the iNova itself. Comparing these two inputs on the iNova it's easier to hear more low level detail via USB. However this system does require a bit more volume, to bring out all the details and intricacies of the source material, than other systems. That said, the other more resolving systems I can think of cost several thousand dollars more than the iNova / D5 complete package.

     

    Peachtree Audio designs all its products with computer sources in mind. In fact they expect most users to have a computer source more so than anything else. Like all other Peachtree products the iNova's USB input is galvanically isolated. Peachtree has also wisely transformer-coupled every digital input on the iNova. This may seem like a logical design choice for all components but not all manufacturers have implemented such fine isolation.

     

    The only other speakers I had on hand during the review period that were remotely close in price to the Design 5s were the floor standing Avalon Acoustics NP Evolution 2.0 ($1,995 per pair). Connected to the iNova the Avalons did outperform the D5s as expected. The iNova power the NP Evolutions handily with as much control and more refined sound than the D5s.The main noticeable difference between the D5s and the Avalons was the absence of texture through the D5s. Listening to David Oistrakh / Bruch: Scottish Fantasia the texture of the violin was much more apparent through the Avalon loudspeakers than the Peachtree D5s. The Avalons did not extend as low as the D5s in my listening room. The bass through the D5s was a bit more authoritative than the Avalons but at times the D5s were a tad less tight.

    <center><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/graphics/2011/0305/inova/l-system.jpeg"></img></center>

     

     

     

    <b>Conclusion</b>

     

    This complete Peachtree system has is strengths and weaknesses like every audio system at any price. The Design 5 loudspeakers are every bit as good as I previously thought even though I was able to find a few weaknesses while in my own listening room. Comparing these speakers to my Avalons revealed a little softness and lack of texture that I wasn't aware of from my computer audio seminar listening sessions. The Avalons are twice the price but I was easily able to flesh out what's possible from the $1,995 speaker versus the $999 Peachtree Design 5 while being driven by the iNova. The question of worth and value for the extra $1k always comes down to each individual buyer. Peachtree has once again solidified its good standing in the industry with the iNova. This integrated amplifier with built-in DAC is more than a small improvement over the original Nova. The sonic upgrades are audible to all but the most casual or background listener. The added convenience of a completely digital iPod dock may be enough by itself for some readers to consider upgrading or going down the Peachtree path for the first time. I can unequivocally say the Peachtree Design 5 loudspeakers and the new iNova integrated amplifier meet and surpass respectively my high expectations.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    <b>Product Information</b>

    <ul>

    <li>Price - iNova ($1,799), Design 5 ($999), Package ($2,499)</li>

    <li> iNova Product Page - <a href="http://signalpathint.com/index.php/iNova/iNova-55hty.html">Link</a><a href="http://signalpathint.com/index.php/iNova/iNova-55hty.html"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></a></img></li>

    <li> Design 5 Product Page - <a href="http://signalpathint.com/index.php/Design-5-Series/">Link</a><a href="http://signalpathint.com/index.php/Design-5-Series/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></a></img></li>

    <li>Package Purchase Page - <a href="http://signalpathint.com/index.php/iNova-Combos/">Link</a><a href="http://signalpathint.com/index.php/iNova-Combos/"><img src="http://images.computeraudiophile.com/ca/icons/ex.png" style="padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 3pt;" alt="link"></a></img></li>

    </ul>

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Associated Equipment:

     

     

     

    <a href="http://avalonacoustics.com/">Avalon NP Evolution 2.0 Loudspeakers</a>, <a href="http://www.computeraudiophile.com/content/Computer-Audiophile-Pocket-Server-CAPS">C.A.P.S. server</a>, <a href="http://www.audioquest.com">AudioQuest Diamond USB Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.audioquest.com">AudioQuest Eagle Eye 75 Ohm BNC Digital Cable</a>, <a href="http://www.audioquest.com">AudioQuest Redwood Loudspeaker Cable</a>, <a href="http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=SPZfqXDJvadmFPoh&templete=2">ASUS Xonar HDAV 1.3 Slim</a>, <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/">Apple iPad</a>, <a href="http://www.amarraaudio.com/">Sonic Studio's Amarra</a>, <a href="http://sbooth.org/Decibel/">Decibel</a>.

     

     

     

     




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    I have had the iNova for about six weeks and the musicality is great. My impression so far is the most rewarding sound comes from the iPod dock. I don't own many 24/96 files so I can't comment on that, but my lossless files sound really crisp and deep through the dock. That is not to say that my USB connection is not really good as well. Possibly my lossless files coming directly from the iPod into the iNova without cables is the reason - less complicated movement of sound. Concerning the tube, I read Chris' review many, many times and I want to hear a difference between the tube on and off I really do but...it's a struggle. I find myself straining to hear the slightest difference and then I do and I wonder if I'm fooling myself. I didn't do a comparison between the iNova and Nova. Oh well. Sounds good either way.<br />

    <br />

    Anyone else that owns the iNova have any thoughts?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree. Although I've barely done any listening in the few weeks I've had the unit due to travel. Maybe in 3-4 months when it's all broken in, I'll have a better idea. The HUGE difference I have noticed is how much better Mp3 and other compressed files sound. Because of my line of work, I get serviced with a lot of promotional downloads, and higher-rez files are rarely an option. So that's nice. <br />

    <br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I was very excited about the ipod dock can pull digital data out of the ipod. I placed my order after reading this review and received my iNova in two days. It was defected upon arrival. Power shuts down automatically every two to three seconds. Since I have been an owner of nova for a year, I'm pretty sure everything is hooked up correctly. The retailer was kind enough to offer me a replacement and sent to me overnight. <br />

    <br />

    Everything works fine this time except the ipod dock. I put my 80G ipod in the dock but it does not start to play. I thought maybe there's something wrong with that ipod, so I put a 160G ipod on, but it still stays idle. I started to think that I might just have received another defected unit. So I decided to give it a last chance and see if it works with my iphone before I return the unit. After mounting and un-mounting my iphone several times, it finally worked. I put the 160G ipod back on, it was still dead quiet. Finally, I decided to use the magic method- rebooting my ipod! Guess what, it worked. <br />

    <br />

    This is not a very smooth experience compared to that of the original Nova. I also believe that the system reacts a little slow when switching input sources. I do hope that the iNova is as well built as the original nova.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I stumbled across this review several months after purchasing a pair of Design 5s for my main listening environment (a smallish living room). I absolutely love the look and sound of my Design 5s, and I agree that they represent a formidable value. <br />

    I chose not to purchase the iNova, and instead went with three components: a Musical Fidelity VDAC, Apple TV, and a NAD C 326BEE. I'm really glad I made this choice.<br />

    The reason is that DACs keep getting better and cheaper. Heck, there's already a VDAC 2. But when the DAC is combined with your iTunes interface, amp, and preamp (like with the iNova), upgrading will require replacing the whole thing, which itself may have lost resale value due to advances in technology. <br />

    The iNova is an elegant package and I am sure it sounds amazing. But if you need a little more power, want to take advantage of a new Apple technology like Airplay, or find that the next generations of DACs offer better performance and value, you are stuck with replacing the iNova and starting over.<br />

    I like how my system sounds, and I also like knowing that I can make incremental improvements as they become available.<br />

    <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You can take advantage of airplay with the iNova (or any other DAC or integrated system with an optical input) for $100 by buying it an ATV2, just like you did with your system. Personally, for that I think the iNova would be overkill, given the inherent limitations imposed by the ATV2, so you did the right thing, but the main point is that the iNova would unlikely be limiting in an ATV2-based system in the future.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I catch your drift. In fact, with such a setup, you could do casual listening with the ATV2, and play high-quality tracks from an iPod or iPhone connected directly to the iNova. Fidelity from the iPod dock would no doubt outperform my system due to the superior bit rate of the file and the high-quality internal DAC of the iNova.<br />

    My comments were merely to explain my preference for a system based on separate components in the light of rapidly improving price/performance of DACs.<br />

    I suspect within 2 years a cheap little DAC will be available that outperforms the one installed in the iNova, and the ATV3 will offer bit perfect performance just like the Airport Express. I'll upgrade both components for a few hundred bucks at that time.<br />

    As this post will no doubt live forever on the internet, we'll see if my prediction comes true in 2013. <br />

    Luckily, my current setup leaves my ears with nothing left to be desired while I wait. <br />

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Whatever suits you ... I'm really pleased with how the iNova functions in a multi-purpose media system ... I get terrific sound on Blu-Rays, and thru the iPod dock. And when I get around to other sources, it can handle those. I'm not really concerned about newer, better, cheaper DACs. I am concerned with convenience + high quality + versatility + cosmetics ... I hate having a bunch of wires and cables everywhere (like there aren't enough already). And I have never gotten this much enjoyment out of my iPod.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I hate exposed cables, too! And I must agree that by combining your iTunes interface, DAC, preamp, and amp by purchasing the stylish (and no doubt awesome sounding) iNova, you are eliminating some cables. Unfortunately, the typical computer audio setup has a lot more components. Mine includes a DVD player, HDMI switcher, cable box, wireless router, backup hard drive, and some unrelated items such as a laser printer on top of the VDAC/ATV2/C326 Bee amp previously discussed.<br />

    <br />

    For this reason, I determined that a more lasting solution to hiding my cables was necessary. Luckily, I was able to put everything in a conveniently placed living room closet. I drilled two large holes in the back corners of the shelves (one for audio/video/networking cables, the other for power cables), and I even took the extra step of hanging fabric with velcro along the walls of the closet to hide the cables behind the components. I may post some photos once some new speaker stands arrive.<br />

    <br />

    It was a lot of work, but in the end, my desire to own a component system while maintaining aesthetic integrity is achieved.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    " hanging fabric with velcro along the walls of the closet to hide the cables"<br />

    <br />

    Make certain you haven't created a fire hazard.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Guest
    This is now closed for further comments




×
×
  • Create New...