Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Computer Audiophile Pocket Server C.A.P.S. v4 Pipeline

    thumb.jpg

     

    CAPS v4 Pipeline is more traditional than CAPS Cortes because it’s designed to connect directly to one’s audio system. The server has space to add in cards such as USB, AES/EBU, or S/PDIF. In addition to cards, the server has plenty of room for power products and large desktop hard drives. Pipeline offers plenty of room and power for user experimentation as opposed to the mini servers of the caps v3 ilk. I’ve been using the server in a 100% silent configuration with a linear power supply and solid state hard drive with great success. I can’t wait to see what members of the CA Community do to this server to take it beyond my standard configuration and push it to the max with tips, tricks, and tweaks.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

    Hardware

     

    The hardware used for the Pipeline design was selected because of the great response to the powerful CAPS v3 Zuma server and because my testing proved this new hardware was not only as good as Zuma but offered much more versatility and longevity. I believe this server has awesome potential in its current form and all the directions users will take the design.

     

    I selected the Supermicro X10SLH-F motherboard ($215) mainly because of its seven year life-span, support for E3-1200 v3 family of Xeon processors and 1600MHz ECC memory, extra PCIe slots, and support for IPMI 2.0 with KVM. While designing the server I talked to one person who asked why even update the Zuma server if I don’t have any revolutionary changes. I explained my big reasons for the update and really stressed the fact that this motherboard will be available and supported for seven years. I love the fact this board has such long term support, especially because keeping up with end of life components is a pain in my neck once the CAPS servers are published. It’s also a pain in the neck for all the members of the CA Community who want to purchase or build a sever for which they can’t obtain new parts.

     

    The X10SLH-F’s support for Xeon processors was important to me because Pipeline is essentially a server for data, not multimedia. The server doesn’t need integrated video form an i7 series processor. Users should be aware that the x16 PCIe slot on this motherboard only supports x8 speeds, thus adding a video card if needed may be tricky. The Xeon processor selected, E3-1241 v3 (BX80646E31241V3) ($273), supports error correction and features quad core 3.5 GHz performance with a TDP of only 80 watts. Some Xeon processors “feature” a TDP of nearly double that of the E3-1241 v3. The low-ish TDP of 80 watts is required to use the fanless case with heatipes selected for this server.

     

    Identical to CAPS Cortes, both this CPU and this motherboard support ECC or error correcting code memory. This type of RAM detects and corrects common types of data corruption. Pipeline features 16GB of Crucial (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM ECC Unbuffered DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Server Memory (CT2KIT102472BD160B) ($179) Random Access Memory (RAM). The SuperMicro X10SL7-F board supports up through 32GB of RAM should one wish to increase from the specified 16GB.

     

    The X10SLH-F motherboard supports six SATA III drives and even a SATA DOM power connector. During my testing I used one Samsung 850 Pro SSD ($130) with SOtM SATA power filter ($70) and pulled music from my Cortes NAS replacement server. The reason I mention the fact that this server supports six drives, even though I only use a single drive, is because this allows additional SSD or spinning hard drives to be connected to the server internally without using the USB bus. In the past I’ve been wary of using spinning hard drives, but several other members of the CA Community have used them with great success (and less neurosis). Just as in CAPS Cortes, I recommend 6TB Seagate drives for users seeking to contain all their storage inside the Pipeline chassis. With six SATA drive ports it’s also possible to use enough SSDs to contain a user’s library given that many users, according to the CA drive space survey, have less than several Terabytes of music to store.

     

    Expansion via PCIe is also very easy with the X10SLH-F motherboard. Pipeline features 1x PCI-E 3.0 x8 (in x16), 1x PCI-E 3.0 x8, and 1x PCI-E 2.0 x4 (in x8) slot. In the single PCIe 2.0 slot I have the SOtM tX-PCIexp card ($350) for increased USB audio performance over the standard built-in USB ports. Powering this card I also recommend the HDPlex Power Supply, described below, because it’s critical to supply the cleanest power signal possible. Given the server’s direct connection to a DAC or other audio component, a dirty power signal will have negative effects on audio performance unless the audio component used features 100% isolation from the server (I.e. Are QB-9 DSD). The number of slots in the Pipeline server also allow for AES/EBU cards from companies such as Lynx or RME and for S/PDIF cards from companies such as ASUS and ESi. I searched for a way to add Thunderbolt to this server through a PCIe card, but was unable to find a card that didn’t require an on-board Thunderbolt header on the motherboard. Users that aren’t afraid of wireless interference (RFI) can use both an SOtM tX-PCIexp and an ASUS PCE-AC68 802.11ac card connect to the motherboard at the same time.

     

    Another nice feature of this server motherboard is the USB 3.0 capability. I say this not for audio playback but for backup purposes. Connecting a large USB 3.0 drive to Pipeline enables users to backup a music library and take the external drive off-site for safer storage (presumably).

     

    The last piece of the X10SLH-F motherboard that I absolutely love is the integrated Intelligent Platform Management Interface (IPMI) 2.0 with KVM and dedicated LAN port. This interface enables the user to connect to the server via web browser and access it as if the user was physically at the server with a keyboard, monitor, and mouse. The IPMI even enables the user to connect to the server when the power is off, get into the BIOS, and restart the server if the operating system hangs. It’s a great feature for the Pipeline server because this server is likely to sit in an audio rack without any monitor attached.

     

    Case options for the Pipeline server were very limited because I wanted the server to look like an A/V component. One of the only cases that fits the size and versatility requirements is the Streacom FC10 ($330). This is a “full” size chassis without a single fan. In order to run the server fanless users must purchase the Streacom ST-HT4 CPU Cooler Riser ($30) and Streacom ST-LH4 Pipes ($25) that extend further out over the motherboard than the included heat pipes. Working on a server in this case, compared to the small CAPS cases, is akin to working on an old American automobile when there was enough room under the hood for a person to stand next to the engine.

     

    The power supply I’m using for the CAPS v4 Pipeline server is an HDPlex Linear Power Supply ($358) in combination with the HDPlex 250W Internal DC-ATX PSU ($85). Once the power hits the motherboard there isn’t much any of us can do to clean it up. However, using a linear supply for the main power and the USB card power we can effectively create a barrier of clean power around the server. The linear supply won’t feed the typical switching noise back into the power line and on to the audio components and the same linear supply feeding the USB card will make sure the direct connection to the audio system is as clean as possible. In other words, it’s like a moat of clean power surrounding the dirty PC power.

     

    The HDPlex linear supply features a 100VA R-Core transformer and ELNA audio capacitors with extremely low ripple noise of less than 3mv. This PSU also features four individual outputs on the back for 5v, 9v, 12v, and 19v power needs. I am using both the 9v for the SOtM card and the 19v for the server main power connection. This main power connection is the HDPlex 250W DC-ATX PSU. I was very happy to find this PSU because it features all the connections needed for the fairly large server sized motherboard (Supermicro X10SLH-F). Finding another DC to ATX converter than can support this board is nearly impossible.

     

     

    Software

     

    Like all CAPS v4 computers, Pipeline runs on Windows 8.1 Professional 64-bit. I use the professional version because I connect to the server recently with Windows’ built-in Remote Desktop capability. It works great and doesn’t require an additional third party application for remote control of the actual server. The media management and playback application I use most often on Pipeline is JRiver Media Center because of its all encompassing capabilities and its great integration with JRemote for iOS.

     

    This combination of hardware and software makes Pipeline endlessly flexible. As always, my component selections aren’t the only selections that will make a successful server. Members of the CA Community are encouraged to use Pipeline as a platform from which to experiment. Those readers seeking a complete solution should be pretty happy with Pipeline just as it’s designed. I encourage members of the community to post questions, concerns, and comments below.

     

    JRMark Score -

    === Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===

     

    Running 'Math' benchmark...

    Single-threaded integer math... 3.851 seconds

    Single-threaded floating point math... 2.365 seconds

    Multi-threaded integer math... 1.165 seconds

    Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.805 seconds

    Score: 2321

     

    Running 'Image' benchmark...

    Image creation / destruction... 0.301 seconds

    Flood filling... 0.556 seconds

    Direct copying... 0.847 seconds

    Small renders... 1.047 seconds

    Bilinear rendering... 0.817 seconds

    Bicubic rendering... 0.469 seconds

    Score: 5451

     

    Running 'Database' benchmark...

    Create database... 0.177 seconds

    Populate database... 1.116 seconds

    Save database... 0.387 seconds

    Reload database... 0.097 seconds

    Search database... 0.808 seconds

    Sort database... 0.743 seconds

    Group database... 0.808 seconds

    Score: 5198

     

    JRMark (version 20.0.44): 4323

     

     

    A Note About Sponsorship

     

    Before going further I'd like to thank JRiver for sponsoring the entire CAPS v4 project. Researching and purchasing all the parts for CAPS servers takes time and money. In the past I spent over $10,000 just trying different motherboards, memory, SSDs, cases, etc… This time around I thought it would be prudent and a win-win for everybody if I obtained sponsorship for CAPS v4. I sought sponsorship from a handful of companies and before the "ink" on the email was dry JRiver stepped up to sponsor the whole project. This sponsorship enabled me to take the CAPS project further in a shorter period of time than I would have been able to on my own. The bottom line is that members of the CA Community benefitted from this sponsorship. Without this benefit to the entire Community I wouldn't have sought sponsorship. Period. Also, JRiver had no input on the design of the servers' hardware or software. Prior to contacting JRiver I had already decided what playback applications would be used for the CAPS v4 project. I also didn't let JRiver know this software decision, thus avoiding any semblance of impropriety. Again, thanks to JRiver for supporting CAPS v4 and the CA Community.

     

     

    Gallery

     

     

     

    Links

     

    Motherboard: Supermicro X10SLH-F

    Case: Streacom FC10

    CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1241 v3 (BX80646E31241V3)

    RAM: Crucial (2 x 8GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM ECC Unbuffered DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Server Memory (CT2KIT102472BD160B)

    SSD: Samsung 850 Pro 128GB 2.5-Inch SATA III Internal SSD (MZ-7KE128BW)

    HDD: Seagate Desktop HDD 6TB 6Gb/s 128MB Cache 3.5-Inch HDD (STBD6000100)

    PSU: HDPlex Linear Power Supply in combination with the HDPlex 250W Internal DC-ATX PSU

    Music App: JRiver Media Center

    USB Card: SOtM tX-PCIexp

    SATA Filter: SOtM SATA power filter




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Any info on motherboard or processor temperatures with this fanless combo? Just curious how well the case can handle the 80W processor.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Nice build but i think the cpu power is a waste for only music playback. Streacom recommend only a 65W cpu for permanent use. Have you noticed any problems with the cpu getting too hot?

     

    greetings nu

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Chris

     

    Can you please provide more on what the two power supplies are supplying - motherboard and USB card respectively?

    Are they in the case or external?

     

    Thanks

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great new project Chris ! Rather expensive @ $2800, but indispensable for all of us wishing to explore more advanced up/resampling options available in programs like HQPlayer.

     

    I have aready ordered all parts. My build will feature much cooler (25W max TDP) but stil plenty powerful Xeon 1230L v3 processor, Jplay USB card and ATX linear PSU from Teradak.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's not designed only for audio playback. It's designed to also do pretty intensive tasks such as upsampling on the fly and DRC.

     

    Nice build but i think the cpu power is a waste for only music playback. Streacom recommend only a 65W cpu for permanent use. Have you noticed any problems with the cpu getting too hot?

     

    greetings nu

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    It's not designed only for audio playback. It's designed to also do pretty intensive tasks such as upsampling on the fly and DRC.

     

     

    Hallo firedog,

     

    yes i understand why but I'm using a Intel i5-4460T for upsampling und 2xDSD. With foobar2000 it works realy nice. So i ask why a quadcore with 3.5Ghz? Would'nt a 65W cpu better?

     

    greetings

     

    nu

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My Intel Celeron 1037 does upsampling without any issues, and DSD or 2xDSD is no problem, too. Nevertheless, I think Chris is right, this is a State of the Art CAPS ready for the next years. It's the best of the best - great!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My Intel Celeron 1037 does upsampling without any issues, and DSD or 2xDSD is no problem, too. Nevertheless, I think Chris is right, this is a State of the Art CAPS ready for the next years. It's the best of the best - great!

     

    Hi EuroChamp,

     

    "ready for the years" is a Illusion. What you've bought today is out at evening ?

     

    greetings

     

    nu

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have some confusion about how to use this in addition to the Cortes. I built the last iteration of this Caps sever and use it currently. Am very happy with it, thank your for the work you did to come up with the specs. You state you are running Windows with Jriver on the Cortes. You are running JRiver on this Pipleline Server as well. This has me confused. Which version of these multiple Jriver controls everything?

     

    I understand your arguments of the benefit of the Cortes over traditional nas.

     

    What is confusing me is your discussion of having Jriver on the Cortes machine with the music along with another instance running on the Pipeline which connects to the DAC. What I don't grasp is which instance of JRiver do I use? I don't want multiple instances of playlists etc... I do not understand how to integrate all of it.

     

    Hope my question makes sense.

     

    I think that in this case Chris use Cortes like any other NAS, just for storage, dont use JRiver, in this case Pipeline is main server for playback and Cortes only storage.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I have some confusion about how to use this in addition to the Cortes. I built the last iteration of this Caps sever and use it currently. Am very happy with it, thank your for the work you did to come up with the specs. You state you are running Windows with Jriver on the Cortes. You are running JRiver on this Pipleline Server as well. This has me confused. Which version of these multiple Jriver controls everything?

     

    I understand your arguments of the benefit of the Cortes over traditional nas.

     

    What is confusing me is your discussion of having Jriver on the Cortes machine with the music along with another instance running on the Pipeline which connects to the DAC. What I don't grasp is which instance of JRiver do I use? I don't want multiple instances of playlists etc... I do not understand how to integrate all of it.

     

    Hope my question makes sense.

     

    Good question. I would expect that the main reason for having JRMC on the server in this context is for tag editing, as the Pipeline is really acting as the media server and the Cortez just hosts the music library. I expect Chris will elaborate more when he unveils the two NUC based servers he mentioned in the CAPS4 introductory article. These NUC options are what I'm interested in, as the two offerings so far are technological overkill to a simple problem in my humble opinion.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi EuroChamp,

     

    "ready for the years" is a Illusion. What you've bought today is out at evening ?

     

    greetings

     

    nu

     

    Dear nu,

     

    IT is my profession, I know what you are talking about. Nevertheless, Chris makes a statement with this Pipeline - and finally, a customer can be really happy with this "streamer" for the next years.

    Chris will release solution No 3 and 4, they will be cheaper, I think. ;)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Were any other PCIe USB interface cards tested? (like JCAT or PPA Audio?)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Can someone tell me why newer Intel processors with very low TDP were not used (Broadwell).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I believe the Intel Xeon E5-1200 v4 „Broadwell” family of processors will be available from Q3 2015.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    You should be able to use the FC5WS case - you'd need to check the heat pipes can be adapted. One limitation is that there is only a single slot accessible in the FC5WS.

     

    Others can express an opinion but I'm unsure if there would be any advantage in "upgrading" to the CAPSv4 Pipeline if you currently have a Zuma.

     

    +1

    I also might be interested in this route IF it would fit in the FC5.

    Does anyone have a good recipe / solution for sorting the heat pipe problem getting this mobo into the FC5?

     

    thx,

    Hans

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris,

     

    I rather like the thought of the IPMI interface combined with a CPU without graphics support. It makes the thing very audio centric & lacking unused features. Thanks for the find & thought. However, it does require an additional LAN port (noise source & input) and some additional hardware overhead on the mobo (I presume).

     

    Questions:

    - Are you running that IPMI LAN port via/using a LAN isolator?

    - Any thoughts on the additional IPMI LAN port & HW overhead vs. a (hardly) used GPU inside a plain Haswell CPU? I guess this (partly) comes down to the question (allready asked): does it sound better than ZUMA, or, since ZUMA was 1155, have you compared it (SQ wise) to a haswell i-series configuration?

     

    thx,

    Hans

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I believe the Intel Xeon E5-1200 v4 „Broadwell” family of processors will be available from Q3 2015.

     

    Also, AFAIK Broadwell wil be different in terms of voltage regultation. Intell will move some of the regulation that was moved ONchip for Haswell back to the mobo for Broadwell. The logic behind that is said to be the ability to obtain higher clock-rates with regulation off-board. Since clock rates are not really a design objective for a music server, one can only guess if Broadwell will be an intrinsically better platform for a CAS than current low power Haswell.... ?

     

    In the example of using a Streacom case &passive heat pipe cooling , any heat caused by CPU based regulation will be dissipated using the CPU passive cooling method, whilst heat caused by mobo based regulation will simply be vented inside the case. One MIGHT argue that the first solution is likely to run cooler...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great new project Chris ! Rather expensive @ $2800, but indispensable for all of us wishing to explore more advanced up/resampling options available in programs like HQPlayer.

     

    I have aready ordered all parts. My build will feature much cooler (25W max TDP) but stil plenty powerful Xeon 1230L v3 processor, Jplay USB card and ATX linear PSU from Teradak.

     

    I wonder if one could use a lower spec computer with HQPlayer and connect to a DAC using a simple inexpensive NAA. To me this seems very expensive indeed...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Sure. This is a quiet but quite powerful server for people who don't choose the NAA route. I wish my server had a Xeon: I could try more kinds of upsampling, Mch, and room correction.

     

    Outstanding work Chris! You did this *Fast*!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I upgrade my NAS PS to LPS. The gain was worth it, for a reasonable cost.

     

    I use the Mac Mini and have the option of upgrading the PS to LPS. That should be some gain there. My Mini is the late 2011 model and has 4MB of L3 cache. I could upgrade to a Late 2012 Mini and increase the L3 cache to 6MB (With the additional LPS) or buy the same from professional tweakers.

     

    The CAPS V4 cost adds up to $2X00. For audiophile that is perhaps part of the initiation price into CAS? What I would like to know is that would this amount of cash justified from a sonic point of view, or could you get 95% mileage with other rendered (If the Pipeline is to be used with the NAS) such as souped up Mac Mini, etc?

    Perhaps someone with experience with the CAPS V3 Vs the Mac Mini, etc could perhaps give us their opinion.

    Thanks.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If I'm using Gigabyte H97M-D3H motherboard and i7 4770T CPU (TDP 45W), do I still need the extended heatpipes Streacom ST-LH4 Pipes? Is the standard length heatpipes that comes with Streacom FC10 is not enough? Boy, this chassis gets super expensive very fast.

     

    How about Streacom ST-HT4 CPU Cooler Riser? If this is mandatory, I wonder why this is not included in the package.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where are you guys buying your Streacom FC10 from? I see in USA, the prices are higher than the MSRP ($330), usually around $350 or more.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Where do you guys buying Streacom FC10 for $330 in USA? I see the prices are much higher online.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    How about Streacom ST-HT4 CPU Cooler Riser? If this is mandatory, I wonder why this is not included in the package.

     

    The riser is not needed for all MoBos. Unfortunately, the Supermicro proposed by Chris does need one to clear the RAM modules.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Dear nu,

     

    IT is my profession, I know what you are talking about. Nevertheless, Chris makes a statement with this Pipeline - and finally, a customer can be really happy with this "streamer" for the next years.

    Chris will release solution No 3 and 4, they will be cheaper, I think. ;)

     

    Hi EuroChamp,

     

    i don't care about money ? i compared dual with quadcores and never find a difference between them. I'm asking me what can i Xeon better Do than a normal Intel i5?

     

    i only found differences between linear and switching power supplys.

     

    greetings

     

    nu

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...