Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    CAPS v4 Maroubra and Bundoran

    thumb.png

    This is the final installment of the CAPS v4 series! It will cover both the Maroubra and Bundoran servers because they are very closely related. This is the first time a CAPS design has been based on an Intel NUC. Part of me feels bad because there isn’t much to “design” when using the NUC platform, but I am more excited than anything because there is a lot of user demand of NUC based servers. For readers unfamiliar with the Intel NUC, it’s a very small motherboard with the CPU soldered to the board. It’s one of the platforms Intel has decided to keep supporting, unlike its traditional motherboard business. Anyway, the main purpose for NUC based CAPS servers is size. These servers will fit into almost any component rack or fit nicely hidden behind a DAC. There isn’t much hardware experimentation to be done when using a NUC, but I believe I’ve found a couple ways to make these last two designs a bit more audiophile than a standard off-the-shelf server. The Maroubra and Bundoran servers aren’t for everyone, especially those who like to try different things and tweak their systems a bit. These servers are simple solutions that don’t cost an arm and a leg and fit nicely into any existing audio system. I hope readers don’t see this installment of CAPS v4 as anticlimactic but rather something offering two sensible solutions for specific members of the CA Community.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]

     

    800.jpg

     

    CAPS v4 Maroubra

     

    This NUC server is based on the Intel NUC Kit D54250WYKH ($379). The board holds a 1.3 GHz Core i5 processor, four USB 3.0 ports, and a SATA connection to power the custom USB audio card or in the case of the Bundoran server an extra hard drive if needed. The motherboard supports up to 16 GB of 1.35v DDR3L memory. Users must be very careful selecting memory because this board will not support standard 1.5v DDR3 memory. For this build I selected G.Skill Ripjaws Series Laptop Memory F3-1600C9D-16GRSL ($162).

     

    A surprising amount of people have less than one terabyte of music stored on their local hard drive. This is another reason the NUC is a great platform. The board doesn’t have endless SATA HDD ports like many full size boards, but it does support a single mSATA SSD. The mSATA drive I selected for this server is the 1TB SAMSUNG 840 EVO MZ-MTE1T0BW ($450).

     

    The Maroubra server features a custom USB audio card from SOtM, similar to the SOtM cards many members of the CA Community already use. What’s special about this card is it’s powered via internal SATA power connection or an external source. This USB card is also shaped specifically to fit side-by-side with the motherboard in an ML320 fanless case from Logic Supply. However, a custom rear panel is required. Small Green Computer will be handling all the CAPS v4 Maroubra orders for people interested in this custom USB card / case / rear panel. Price to be determined.

     

    The Intel NUC Kit D54250WYKH comes with a very standard switch mode power supply. I haven’t specified a separate power supply for this server, but I am certain many of those already available will work just fine. The server requires 65W / 19V / 3.42A / socket C6 (barrel output connector has 2.5mm internal diameter and 5.5mm external diameter).

     

    There’s not much else to say about this server because there’s not much one can do to customize it. I envision this server for cost-conscious computer audiophiles seeking a small server with clean USB audio output and either a small local library of music or a larger NAS based collection. This isn’t a server for tweak geeks :~)

     

    ml320-haswell-fanless-nuc-case.jpg

     

     

    CAPS v4 Bundoran

     

    This server is almost identical to Maroubra with the exception of an optional hard drive and a different USB audio solution. This server is for computer audiophiles with less than 2TB of music who either A) don’t need USB power to their DACs (i.e. Are QB-9 DSD) or B) want to experiment with different external USB power conditioning rather than the internal SOtM card.

     

    What’s different from Maroubra? In addition to the 1TB mSATA SSD users can select any size 2.5” SSD or HDD. I prefer the Samsung 1TB Evo SSD. This will provide the user with 2TB of space for music. In the Bundoran the SOtM card is replaced with this 2.5” hard drive. Thus, users seeking USB power conditioning must look for an external solution. I’ve been using the Teddy Pardo TeddyUSB PSU for USB powered equipment ($399) with great success. The TeddyUSB accepts USB input from the server and outputs the USB audio stream with a clean linear based 5V signal, stripping away the dirty USB power from the server.

     

    The standard Logic Supply ML320 ($139) case is all that's required for this model. No special rear panel.

     

     

    teddyUSB2.png

     

     

     

    Software

     

    Like all CAPS v4 computers, Pipeline runs on Windows 8.1 Professional 64-bit. I use the professional version because I connect to the server recently with Windows’ built-in Remote Desktop capability. It works great and doesn’t require an additional third party application for remote control of the actual server. The media management and playback application I use most often on Pipeline is JRiver Media Center because of its all encompassing capabilities and its great integration with JRemote for iOS.

     

     

     

    Wrap-up

     

    Due to the simplicity of these servers, I'm sure I missed a thing or two in the explanation. Please let me know what questions you have in the comments below.

     

    Note: The newer 5th generation NUC servers are available, but I don't believe there are any fanless cases available for them just yet. Thus, the 4th generation specified here is still recommended.

     

     

     

     

     

    A Note About Sponsorship

     

    Before going further I'd like to thank JRiver for sponsoring the entire CAPS v4 project. Researching and purchasing all the parts for CAPS servers takes time and money. In the past I spent over $10,000 just trying different motherboards, memory, SSDs, cases, etc… This time around I thought it would be prudent and a win-win for everybody if I obtained sponsorship for CAPS v4. I sought sponsorship from a handful of companies and before the "ink" on the email was dry JRiver stepped up to sponsor the whole project. This sponsorship enabled me to take the CAPS project further in a shorter period of time than I would have been able to on my own. The bottom line is that members of the CA Community benefitted from this sponsorship. Without this benefit to the entire Community I wouldn't have sought sponsorship. Period. Also, JRiver had no input on the design of the servers' hardware or software. Prior to contacting JRiver I had already decided what playback applications would be used for the CAPS v4 project. I also didn't let JRiver know this software decision, thus avoiding any semblance of impropriety. Again, thanks to JRiver for supporting CAPS v4 and the CA Community.




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Been curious about this one for over a year so I finally ordered one today.

     

     

    USB audio power supply, galvanical isolated, audiophile USB Power supply, isolated USB low noise transformer, USB DAC power supply, audiophile power supply

     

    If you want a lower cost outboard USB power supply, try this one. Another advantage is that it requires only one USB cable as the power injector is a USB-B female to USB- B male end.

     

    I currently use it with my Bel Canto U-Link with excellent results.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, the SotM USB card you used; is it the tX-USBhubIn mentioned on SotM's website?

     

    That is interesting. Is that some sort of the SOtM PCIe USB card replacement ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That is interesting. Is that some sort of the SOtM PCIe USB card replacement ?

    I'm not sure ... I thought (but may be wrong) that the SotM tX-USBhubIn is more akin to something like the iFi iUSB - more a power filter for USB.

     

    I'm slightly guessing that this is what Chris has used (he hasn't so far responded to my question) but the connectors look similar to those shown in the manual on the SotM site (from the link above).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, the SotM USB card you used; is it the tX-USBhubIn mentioned on SotM's website?

     

    Yes. The tX-USBhubIn was commissioned from SOtM specifically for this project. Also, this week Andrew received the first batch of the boards and he now has all the components to build the Maroubra server.

     

    CAPS-v4-Maroubra-CAPS-Maroubra

     

    Jesus R

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Actually yes you can. Here is a link to the work around. :)

     

    Intel NUC D54250WYKH: Installing LAN Driver on Windows Hyper-V Server 2012 R2 | JDeployment

     

    Yes I have seen a few people get this working. I have also seem some people who could not get it working. Basically Intel is trying very hard to keep it from working so future updates of the driver or Windows 2012 might break this hack.

     

    Don't seem like a good idea to go against Intel.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I'd like to revisit a section of the CAPS v3 build's write up as it pertains to this build:

     

    mSATA drives are much more like computer memory in size and appearance. These drives are solid state and fit directly into the motherboard without any cables. Even though the DN2800MT board has mSATA capability the Carbon design doesn't use this slot. The server is still very easy to build but absolute simplicity was outweighed by the desire for a lower power SSD that requires internal power and SATA cables.

     

    I guess my question is, why not use a mSata drive in v3 when it's the only way to go in v4? Is the technology better now? Is it because it's a means to an end in v4? Is it a power thing? Just curious.

     

    The CAPS v3 spec came out a while ago. At the time (2012) mSATA SSD drives were not as good as regular SSD drives. They were slower and used less reliable technology. Now (2015) that mSATA SSD drives are as good as SSD drives it makes sense to use them for any build.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Yes I have seen a few people get this working. I have also seem some people who could not get it working. Basically Intel is trying very hard to keep it from working so future updates of the driver or Windows 2012 might break this hack.

     

    Don't seem like a good idea to go against Intel.

     

    It is basically the driver signature, I would not call this a hack. There is never a reason to update a network driver once it is working.

     

    This is not going against Intel, they just do not see a market to have a server driver for non server devices, but that is not any reason to make it seem like doing this is wrong.

     

    It is actually an excellent idea IMO to enable one to run a better sounding OS on one's system if one want.

     

    regards

    Bob

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Are the parts for these supposed to be available on "small green computer" because they are not shown anywhere to buy. You can only buy the completed product.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    For those with the PPA USB card, is there anyway of incorporating it into this CAPS v4 build? It seems as if the NUC MB won't accept it right?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I just spoke with the supplier of the ML320 case. They told me they have no more and will not be manufacturing or sourcing anymore, as the Haswell NUC for which they were designed are no longer in production, replaced they say by the Broadwell chip models. Any recommendations of alternative sources of the cabinet?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am glad I found this series. I have been looking into the latest NUC. I have a Theta Gen VIII series three which has every type of SPDIF input, including the Single mode laser (or really ELED). The direction I am going to with extract the audio from the HDMI and convert it to SPDIF. ST Micro amongst others have an IC for this. This will allow transmission up to 192 kHz which the Theta can resolve. Next I plan on taking this signal and reclock with an WM8805 or DIV9001 then into a TTL to PECL converter and finally into a DFB laser module with about 1GHz bandwidth and <.1 nS rise time. I had worked with theta, developed their ST Laser interface. Originally we used and demonstrated a DFB laser at CES. The difference was night an day. The cost for the device was $2k. Impractical for even High End audio. So we went to an ELED which performed well. BTW, DFB lasers have come down in price dramatically. Another issue is the short fiber length and with TOSLIK, high index of refraction for the finer and back reflection at the interfaced and also inside the fiber. During this time I manufactured fiber optic cables for Straightwire and Audiquest. These use a higher bandwidth 50 um graded index fiber with angle polishes. If done right the optical interface can outperform all others. Unfortunately, these high performance lasers (these days up to 40 GHz) are in wavelengths of either 1300 or 1550 nm. Not compatible with TOSLINK's 628 nm.

     

    I am photonics packaging engineer by trade and device cooling is one of the main hurdles. Lasers have a high thermal flux than u-processors. on top of this they have to typically be kept to a tenth of a degree of the set point over say the military temperature range (-40 to 85 C). A lot different than making sure an IC doesn't exceed 125 C. So to remove the fan I will go with a thermal electric cooler (TEC). With this instead of the processor being some delta above ambient, I can have it at 10 to 20 C below. A simple supply is needed if there is no set temperature. the Heat sinks will work harder, but that's where you want it to happen. This will still use reflex condensers (heat pipes)

     

    Modifications to the NC will be, drill holes for the laser interface and PSU, additions of a heat sink to top or bottom or sides, and separate liner supplies for the HIDM to SPDIF conversion board, the NUC itself and the thermal management system.

     

    At first glance it appears all this can fit into the NUC case.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I am glad I found this series. I have been looking into the latest NUC. I have a Theta Gen VIII series three which has every type of SPDIF input, including the Single mode laser (or really ELED). The direction I am going to with extract the audio from the HDMI and convert it to SPDIF. ST Micro amongst others have an IC for this. This will allow transmission up to 192 kHz which the Theta can resolve. Next I plan on taking this signal and reclock with an WM8805 or DIV9001 then into a TTL to PECL converter and finally into a DFB laser module with about 1GHz bandwidth and <.1 nS rise time. I had worked with theta, developed their ST Laser interface. Originally we used and demonstrated a DFB laser at CES. The difference was night an day. The cost for the device was $2k. Impractical for even High End audio. So we went to an ELED which performed well. BTW, DFB lasers have come down in price dramatically. Another issue is the short fiber length and with TOSLIK, high index of refraction for the finer and back reflection at the interfaced and also inside the fiber. During this time I manufactured fiber optic cables for Straightwire and Audiquest. These use a higher bandwidth 50 um graded index fiber with angle polishes. If done right the optical interface can outperform all others. Unfortunately, these high performance lasers (these days up to 40 GHz) are in wavelengths of either 1300 or 1550 nm. Not compatible with TOSLINK's 628 nm.

     

    I am photonics packaging engineer by trade and device cooling is one of the main hurdles. Lasers have a high thermal flux than u-processors. on top of this they have to typically be kept to a tenth of a degree of the set point over say the military temperature range (-40 to 85 C). A lot different than making sure an IC doesn't exceed 125 C. So to remove the fan I will go with a thermal electric cooler (TEC). With this instead of the processor being some delta above ambient, I can have it at 10 to 20 C below. A simple supply is needed if there is no set temperature. the Heat sinks will work harder, but that's where you want it to happen. This will still use reflex condensers (heat pipes)

     

    Modifications to the NC will be, drill holes for the laser interface and PSU, additions of a heat sink to top or bottom or sides, and separate liner supplies for the HIDM to SPDIF conversion board, the NUC itself and the thermal management system.

     

    At first glance it appears all this can fit into the NUC case.

     

    Some great info and an interesting project ! Keep us posted.

     

    BTW - are you saying that TosLink cables have similar issues with reflection as regular cables ? Can you minimise that by using longer TosLink cable ? What would be the minimum receomended lenght ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi canyoncruz,

     

    Welcome to CA! The more experience we have we USB, the more we realize that it has it's has serious flaws. We await with great interest your explorations on optical connection to DAC's

     

    May I humbly suggest that you include handling data rates needed for DSD 512 in your studies.

     

    Quite a few of us here are upsampling Redbook and Qobuz / Tidal 16/44 streams to DSD 128 and DSD 256 using HQ Player

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi canyoncruz,

     

    Welcome to CA! The more experience we have we USB, the more we realize that it has it's has serious flaws. We await with great interest your explorations on optical connection to DAC's

     

    May I humbly suggest that you include handling data rates needed for DSD 512 in your studies.

     

    Quite a few of us here are upsampling Redbook and Qobuz / Tidal 16/44 streams to DSD 128 and DSD 256 using HQ Player

     

    Toslink has a few problems. The cables" the plastic ones have a very high index of refraction and are not AR (Antireflection) coated and hence a large amount of light entering and leaving the fiber will be reflected, Upward of 10%. With Fused Silica (Quartz) it is about 4%. Though Toslink uses LEDs which are broadband, the back relection sets up an optical cavity causing the LED to favor some discrete wave length with in the their broad line witdh. This can cause modulation of the source and modulation withing the fiber due to Etalon effects. Next the band width of the fiber does not really support the crazy low jitter (ps) in SPDIF transmission. Glass toslink uses bundles wgich is slightly better in bandwidth but now you have multiple signals which can modulate (interefometric effects) at the detector. The core size of these fibers still do not support large bandwidths with the toslink sources.

     

    With the so-called AT&T systems, they use single mode optical fiber though some where multimode. Single mode is best. But lasers used in them are sensitive to back reflection. There is a type of laser, the DFB (Distributed Feed Back) that have internal grating to stabilize and reduce reflection effects but they are expensive. With the laser signle mode fiber systems back reflection to the laser are the biggest contributor to jittie. Single mode optical fiber can easily transmit 100 GHz as is the knew state of the are these days. A 2.5 Ghz laser and detector (transmitter and receiver) are commodity devises these days.

     

    For audio, the fiber runs are extremely short so back reflections withing the fiber are high. There are solutions: For the fiber purchase one with an "APC" polish (And angled conical polish) with AR coating. for 1.3 um. Here's a 5 meter patch cable with APC polished FC type connectors for $10. AR coating will probably add another $20 to $40.

     

    FIS Simplex 3mm SM FC/APC-FC/APC Ultra Fiber 5 Mtr - Fiber Instrument Sales

     

    For the Transmitter and Receiver: I would go with the 1.25 GHz 1300 nm (1.3um) FB (Fabry Perot) Laser because this one gives you the choice of PECL or TTL and DC or AC coupling.

     

    http://appointech.com/TRX/Tx-Rx/SM%201.25G%20Transmitter-Receiver%20_May%2014_.pdf

     

    These are similar to what Theta Digital offered but at a way lower Bandwitdh.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Some great info and an interesting project ! Keep us posted.

     

    BTW - are you saying that TosLink cables have similar issues with reflection as regular cables ? Can you minimise that by using longer TosLink cable ? What would be the minimum receomended lenght ?

     

    You best bet would be to polish with a 6 - 8 Deg angle. What this does is push the back reflection away from the LED by use of its lens and also increase the angle of back reflection within the fiber such that is no longer contained by TIR (total Internal Reflection) and escapes the fiber - but you still have the band width problem as far as low jitter is concerned

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is i3 based NUC is good for a server,which model ? I got PPA V2 card + Terdack LPSU

     

    Would like to use the same cabinate to save money ?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is i3 based NUC is good for a server,which model ? I got PPA V2 card + Terdack LPSU

     

    Would like to use the same cabinate to save money ?

     

    That should be sufficient for music. If you want to stream 4K video, you might want to look at the high end models. For music, you might also want to look at the Pentium quad core models. As far as keeping the same case, I would suggest the PPA be placed above the cooling fan. and wired down the side to the internal USB 2 connector. The lid is plastic so you could 3D print a taller one which would house the PPA. Intel has the mechanical models available for the case. If you need help, I could CAD up a lid and you could shop it out for fabrication.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is Small green Computer still selling the completed versions of CAPS? I'm specifically interested in purchasing Maroumba unless there's a better solution out there for an entry level music server with the SOtM USB.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Ignore my post above. Just discovered the wealth of info in the CA Forums.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...