Jump to content
  • joelha
    joelha

    Guest Editorial: Why did audio stop being about audio?

    How many forum threads on this site (and others) devolve into heated exchanges about whether people actually hear what they say they hear? Without “proof”, listeners are often mocked, insulted and their experiences discredited.


    Challenges range from assuming the listener has been influenced by expectation bias (I believe it will sound good, so it does sound good) to faulting his unwillingness to rely on measurements or blind testing.


    What bothers me most is reputations are attacked so casually. Everyone from Chris Connaker (one of the most decent people I’ve known in the industry) to reviewers and manufacturers are accused of lying, cheating and taking bribes. People, whom I suspect in most cases haven’t even heard the product they’re attacking, will smear the reputations of others they probably don’t know. Those who are attacked rely on their reputations to earn a living. That’s to say nothing of the personal attacks on the listeners themselves. And the attackers attack anonymously. Unless the case is black and white i.e. I sent you money and you never shipped my product or there are repeated, unresolved product defects, trying to ruin a person’s name is evil. Nothing will undo a person’s life faster and more effectively than giving him a bad reputation. And doing it anonymously and without hard evidence is cowardly and arrogant. In such cases, it’s highly likely the charge is far more unethical than the action being charged.


    Some will say measurements make their case open and shut. But there are too many examples of how measurements fall well short of telling the whole story. There are tube amps with 3% - 5% distortion that sound better to many than amps with far better measurements. Are those products a scam? Vinyl doesn’t measure nearly as well as digital and yet many strongly prefer its sound. Should fans of vinyl be told that turntable, tonearm and cartridge makers are scamming them as well?


    For some of my audio choices, some would say I’m deluding myself. Let’s say I am. If I’m happy with my delusion, why should the nay-sayers care? It’s an audio hobby. Why can’t I enjoy my system and post about my experiences, allowing others to judge? The nay-sayers might say “That’s fine, we’re just posting to protect others from being taken in.”


    Fair enough. But these are not always cases of “I have one opinion and you have another”. Many of the arguments are too heated, personal and frequently repeated to only be about audio.


    I believe these debates are about religion and before you conclude that I’ve lost my mind, consider the following:


    Many claim they have experienced God or have witnessed miracles with little or no evidence. The debates concerning those claims are often very intense and personal. Challenges commonly include: Where’s your evidence? Where’s your data? Only because you want to believe do you believe.

     

    Sound familiar?


    This is why I believe the challengers care so much. Allowing audiophiles to post their subjective conclusions without proof brings them one step closer to accepting those who relate their religious experiences without proof. For them, science is god and a subjective conclusion upends their god and belief system. They fight hard so that doesn’t happen.


    This is audio folks. Whether I think I hear something or not isn’t that important. If my audio assessment matters that much to you, I’m guessing you’re anti-religion and/or anti-God. That’s fine. But that explains why something as innocuous as describing the sound of someone’s ethernet cable could elicit such strong and often highly inappropriate comments.


    I’m old enough to remember this hobby when people would meet at audio stores to just listen and schmooze. We’ve lost too much of that sense of camaraderie. We may differ on what we like, but we all care about how we experience music.


    Whether I’m right or wrong about any of the above, would it hurt to return to the times when people’s disagreements about audio were friendly? Can we stop assailing the reputations of the people who rely on this industry to care for their families and employees? Can we respect the opinions of those who differ with us by not trying to shut them down with ridicule?


    It’s not about “religion”. It’s just about audio.

     

    - Joel Alperson




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    5 minutes ago, joelha said:

    All I get is a link back to the article.

     

    Sorry, but I still don't see it.

     

    Joel

     

    The BB auto-formats the link I fed it.  If you click the "wgscott replied to a topic" link just above where it says "52 minutes ago", you will get the post.  In it, I highlighted the specific text.  It might be easier for me just to do it again.

    Screen Shot 2019-12-10 at 9.32.11 AM.png

     

     

    It is the same thing I think as what Chris (correctly) identified as being problematic.

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, joelha said:

    I'm afraid of nothing on this forum.

     

    Apparently, you get offended when you're confronted with a calm, rational article you disagree with.

     

    I agree with the calm part of your self-assessment.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mansr said:

    Think of it as signal to noise ratio. In today's hi-fi market, there is so much noise (snake oil) that it is difficult to find the signal (honest products that simply do what they say for a reasonable price). There's a hi-fi store a couple of blocks from my house. They sell only snake oil interconnects (AudioQuest and such), and the salesmen say silly things about silver. This isn't even a "high end" store. If I need an interconnect, my options are to buy bulk cable and mount connectors myself, or I can take my chances on Amazon with the risk of being scammed in the other direction (cheap crap that falls apart if you look at it the wrong way). Do you find this situation desirable? I do not.

    Well there are other alternatives to your example. There is Bluejeans cable and a couple of other online vendors who make quality cables of all types to order. More expensive than cheap clam shell stuff, but only tens of dollars instead of hundreds. BlueJeans even measures every cable to prove it 's up to spec and include the measurement with the shipment. No "silver" or "quantum" cables need apply. Based on stock like Belden and a few other reputable types. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    52 minutes ago, wgscott said:

    This "editorial" is essentially just another (albeit officially-sanctioned) troll-thread designed to bait "objectivists" and possibly to increase site traffic (and therefore advertising revenue).

     

    Really? How does that work? Maybe @The Computer Audiophile can comment on this because, AFAIK advertising rates here are fixed price, per year, for different sizes and placements, and having seen the rate sheet they have not changed much over the past 3 years.

    So more traffic here does not result in more revenue for the site. Though it might increase traffic to those of his advertisers.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 minute ago, wgscott said:

     

    The BB auto-formats the link I fed it.  If you click the "wgscott replied to a topic" link just above where it says "52 minutes ago", you will get the post.  In it, I highlighted the specific text.  It might be easier for me just to do it again.

    I found it, Bill. Thanks.

     

    And I think you're conflating "disagree" with "offense".

     

    And if you're really offended by that comment, I'm not sure how ideas (not personal insults) can be offered on this site without risking your being offended by them.

     

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, joelha said:

    I'm afraid of nothing on this forum.

     

    Apparently, you get offended when you're confronted with a calm, rational article you disagree with.

     

    If you think there's parity between that and calling specific people dishonest, then our view of reality is very different.

    Take a look in the mirror:

    Quote

    What bothers me most is reputations are attacked so casually. Everyone from Chris Connaker (one of the most decent people I’ve known in the industry) to reviewers and manufacturers are accused of lying, cheating and taking bribes. People, whom I suspect in most cases haven’t even heard the product they’re attacking, will smear the reputations of others they probably don’t know. Those who are attacked rely on their reputations to earn a living. That’s to say nothing of the personal attacks on the listeners themselves. And the attackers attack anonymously. Unless the case is black and white i.e. I sent you money and you never shipped my product or there are repeated, unresolved product defects, trying to ruin a person’s name is evil. Nothing will undo a person’s life faster and more effectively than giving him a bad reputation. And doing it anonymously and without hard evidence is cowardly and arrogant. In such cases, it’s highly likely the charge is far more unethical than the action being charged.

     

    Those are some pretty strong accusations.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    4 minutes ago, firedog said:

    Well there are other alternatives to your example. There is Bluejeans cable and a couple of other online vendors who make quality cables of all types to order. More expensive than cheap clam shell stuff, but only tens of dollars instead of hundreds. BlueJeans even measures every cable to prove it 's up to spec and include the measurement with the shipment. No "silver" or "quantum" cables need apply. Based on stock like Belden and a few other reputable types. 

    BlueJeans are also not a viable option in Europe due to shipping costs.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, mansr said:

    Take a look in the mirror:

     

    Those are some pretty strong accusations.

    You're right. But the term was "offense".

     

    Please tell me, of the paragraph you quoted, what you consider offensive.

     

    Joel

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just now, joelha said:

    Please tell me, of the paragraph you quoted, what you consider offensive.

    All of it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 minutes ago, mansr said:

    The entire article is little more than a parade of insults and accusations directed at a caricature of those you disagree with. You didn't name anyone explicitly, but you didn't need to. We all know who you had in mind.

     

    My question to you (and Chris) is, what are you so afraid of?

     

    I don't have any fear, I just want to see people enjoy themselves here. I suppose one could catastrophize and say I fear subjective AS users being run away from the site by an objective mob and I end up living in a van down by the river, but that's not based in reality for me. 

     

     

    12 minutes ago, wgscott said:

     

    The bit quoted here, especially that which I set in bold-faced:

     

    But let me add that I am glad you formulated your position in this way, because it gives invaluable insight into how at least one "subjectivist" proponent sees the opposition.

     

    I think everyone should see value in his honest editorial. If one doesn't agree at least it shows the reasoning and thought process of someone who doesn't think like you. It's all valuable. 

     

     

     

    1 minute ago, Superdad said:

     

    Really? How does that work? Maybe @The Computer Audiophile can comment on this because, AFAIK advertising rates here are fixed price, per year, for different sizes and placements, and having seen the rate sheet they have not changed much over the past 3 years.

    So more traffic here does not result in more revenue for the site. Though it might increase traffic to those of his advertisers.

     

    Given this is the lucrative world of niche online publishing, I expect to be swimming in my gold coins, a la Scrooge McDuck, later this evening because of this editorial. Honestly, I don't even take Bill's speculation seriously. 

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    3 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

     

    I think everyone should see value in his honest editorial. If one doesn't agree at least it shows the reasoning and thought process of someone who doesn't think like you. It's all valuable. 

     

    I agree with that, completely (and said so, above).

     

     

    3 minutes ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Given this is the lucrative world of niche online publishing, I expect to be swimming in my gold coins, a la Scrooge McDuck, later this evening because of this editorial. Honestly, I don't even take Bill's speculation seriously. 

     

    OK, maybe it is merely because it is entertaining to periodically stir up the animals, especially when 11 months of winter have returned...  

     

    As someone else mentioned, it sure beats TV.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, mansr said:

    Same thing. Why settle for 10% (or 100%) margin when you can have 10,000%?

     

    Perhaps we're saying fairly similar things. If "high end" cable didn't exist, audio stores would have to create it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    56 minutes ago, firedog said:

    Well there are other alternatives to your example. There is Bluejeans cable and a couple of other online vendors who make quality cables of all types to order. More expensive than cheap clam shell stuff, but only tens of dollars instead of hundreds. BlueJeans even measures every cable to prove it 's up to spec and include the measurement with the shipment. No "silver" or "quantum" cables need apply. Based on stock like Belden and a few other reputable types. 

    Blue Jeans cable also terminates and distributes the Belden Iconoclast cables which are very pricy compared to the standard offerings.  Who knows if they double dog blind tested them.
     

    Fire up the pickup trucks boys, we’ve got another cross to burn.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    13 hours ago, The Computer Audiophile said:

    This is how I feed my family. 

     

    A few days ago you said you didn't care about making any money from your site - it was only about the audiophile community

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, joelha said:

    I'm afraid of nothing on this forum.

     

    Apparently, you get offended when you're confronted with a calm, rational article you disagree with.

     

    If you think there's parity between that and calling specific people dishonest, then our view of reality is very different.

     

    Joel

     

    I certainly do not find your article calm or rational.

     

    It's been a few days, so would you look at it again and see if you don't think it is just a tad over the top?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    29 minutes ago, vmartell22 said:

     

    Of course - that's exactly what I said.  And that is the expression of one side of the argument trying to  change the framework... so they can have an argument... otherwise... well... 

    Again, gravity does not care if you don't believe in it... you will fall.

    But the reaction to your post if correct - veering off topic - last thing I will say on the matter.

    v

    No offence meant and I'm not trying to have an argument. I'm not sure what it would mean to veer off topic on this thread! 😱

     

    Of course you are correct about gravity, I'll be taking the lift leaving work today not jumping out the window... Context is everything however. In relation to the topic of this thread only I responded to your statement 'Science is not a belief system' as I am genuinely interested in how any belief whether defined by oneself or others as 'scientific', 'objective', 'subjective' etc frames how we see the world and what the motive is when we express ourselves. I have met very few people who are honest about this but maybe I don't get out enough 🤣. Just my thing... which I have spent a life time studying.  

     

    In the interest of this thread the arguments over the usual audiophile issues (dare I say subjectivist/Objectivist 😅) are not very interesting to me except the first few times I read them. What I find of interest is that in a conversation in person or online, there are different contexts being held, expressed and offered by each contributor. We affirm, bond with, react for or against whatever is our preference. When we are not understood or listened to seems to raise the thermometer pretty rapidly. Flexibility, openness, not being fixed, not needing to be right is hard won. 

     

    I think a question has been genuinely posed in this thread about how to solve the riddle of conflict which is small potatoes on here between individuals in the grander scheme of things but the same underlying issues are of increasing concern in our hyper connected/disconnected world and in larger political social arenas when fuelled by power... Like I said my thing... 🙏

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    39 minutes ago, DuckToller said:

    Hey,  Liverpool is playing now ... that is real Religion live on TV
    Cheers, Tom

     

    what brand of video cable are you using?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    1 hour ago, pkane2001 said:

     

    Why do you keep bringing up major corporations? These rarely cater to the tiny audiophile market. Mass consumer-oriented companies rarely care about improving SQ, about getting better, more realistic sound reproduction. Give the masses an iPhone with MP3 playback, with some wireless ear-buds and they'll be happy. 

     

    Exactly - major corporations rarely cater to our tiny market. Yet virtually every component that goes into our present DACs, amps, etc., is made by a major corporation. Tiny audiophile companies aren't making their own DAC or ADC chips. The same will be true of chips for better multichannel audio (and that's without even thinking about how much more affordable speakers would have to be; that would have to come from economies of mass production, it seems to me).

     

    We can get there through software now (HQPlayer at least; there may be others I don't know about), but it requires top of the line CPUs and GPUs to do the processing, so that's not realistically going to be available even to the wider audiophile market. Either computing will have to continue to get cheaper (major corporations), or we'll need chips (major corporations).

     

    We'll also need agreed on standards for end to end interoperable recording and playback, if you feel those for current multichannel won't suffice. That means standards bodies, usually staffed and/or aided by, yes, major corporations.

     

    So that's why I keep bringing it up. Do you see an alternative path to better multichannel affordable to most audiophiles with workable standards that proceeds through tiny custom operations?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...