Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile

    CA is now Audiophile Style!

    When I started Computer Audiophile in 2007 the site was a one man blog that educated audio enthusiasts about computer based playback and covered the slow industry uptake of high tech. From day one the user community was the most important part of the site, and still is to this day, because it was already onboard with high tech HiFi. In the early days I remember writing articles about the emergence of asynchronous USB and Apple keyboards that caused audible pops and ticks during music playback when connected to the "wrong" USB port. I also remember writing a script that closed iTunes, asked the user to set the correct sample rate, and reopened iTunes for bit perfect output of high resolution audio. Then came Amarra with its auto sample rate switching in iTunes and the world was a better place.

     

    Those willing to tweak a Windows XP computer and bypass the KMixer could also be treated to high quality audio back in the day. As long as they didn't adjust any settings while music was playing. Friends of mine blew several pairs of beryllium tweeters after their XP machines went haywire and sent static noise through to their speakers. The wonderful Wild West of digital audio for those seeking a better experience than physical media based listening could provide.

     

    High end music servers slowly started to trickle into the market over the years and have since become commonplace. Now we can do pretty much anything we can think of and we have the option of a traditional computer or component designed and delivered by a number of HiFi manufacturers. We also have incredibly powerful devices in our pockets that can stream a trillion lossless tracks nearly anywhere in the world. 

     

    In the past, present, and future everyone of these digital devices was, is, and will be a computer. That device in your pocket that can make telephone calls is a computer just the same as the most high end music servers and the MacBook Pro on which I type this announcement. A CPU, RAM, disk, operating system, inputs, outputs, etc... They're all there in one for one another, but somehow the word computer has become a four letter word. 

     

    Over the years I've met many people who have no idea what the words computer and audiophile have to do with each other. Sure there are the old school analog guys, but that's OK. The larger issue was all the people who thought this site was dedicated to computer speakers like those from Logitech, Creative, and of course Bose. I met someone who had been in the industry for decades and I blew his mind when I explained to him all that Computer Audiophile encompasses. This was two months ago. Seriously. 

     

    Combine the stigma of geeks in their mother's basements listening to Logitech 7.1 systems and the fact that the word computer is being used against us with a  what I'm about to explain next and it's easy to see why Audiophile Style is the future of HiFi. 

     

    In January 2018 we launched the Superphonica marketplace as the first step in our long term plan. It's site that enables people to buy and sell HiFi gear, with the revenue generated going to produce more content for audiophiles right here on this site. Due in part to the success of Superphonica we put out a call for additional paid writers. The response was overwhelmingly positive. 

     

    With the foundation in place it was time to take the major step of re-branding Computer Audiophile. This has been on my mind for about five years, but I've always put it on the back burner. Until now. The time is perfect for something new, something fresh, and to shed the stigma that we are a bunch of Geek Squad technicians. Not only that, but re-branding puts us in a perfect position to pull in a wider audience and at the same time lay the groundwork to overtake the old guard of the HiFi industry. 

     

    When I was fresh out of college in 1998 I remember reading The Absolute Sound and dreaming about putting together a system like those reviewed in its pages. In the years since, I started CA and with the help of the best user community in HiFi we are now bigger than TAS. I have no ill will toward TAS or any of the old guard, but in the minds of many, it's time for a change. 


    This brings us to Audiophile Style and the questions, why the name Audiophile Style and will anything else around here change?

     

    The name Audiophile Style was selected for several reasons, but one that reflects what this site is all about. Style is a manner or way of doing things. When I built my new office, I did it audiophile style and made it a listening room as well. When I put all-in-one speakers around my house, I did it audiophile style and selected the best sounding speakers I could afford. 

     

    Think of it in an educational sense, and ask yourself how would someone go about putting together the best music playback system, what's the best way to stream high resolution, how can someone get the most out of their favorite music no matter the source? The best way to find out is to ask someone who understands quality, someone who cares about music and music reproduction. An audiophile would go about this in a specific way or a certain manner. In other words, the audiophile would do this audiophile style. 

     

    I certainly shoot for obtaining that absolute sound or perfect reproduction of an unamplified signal, but I also know that getting less than perfect sources to sound as good as possible is equally important. In addition to my passion for perfection in my listening room, I have a passion for improving sound in less than ideal circumstances. 

     

    People in my extended family use Apple Music and Pandora. They've tried Tidal, but it lasted a week. Everyone they know uses Apple Music, so that's their single paid streaming service. Period. If they can't decide what to listen to, they use Pandora's free tier. The fun part for me in all of this is getting their lossy streaming services to sound spectacular and introducing them to HiFi on their own turf. When I first put Dynaudio Xeo loudspeakers in my brother's office, the sound quality was so much better than his Bose bluetooth speaker that the entire family noticed. Comments like, "hey what's this" or, "What changed" were common. Even my brother-in-law can't get over the sound of the Klipsch all-in-one called The Three. He is the last person I'd expect to call me and rave about sound quality, and ask me if he can connect his TV to the speaker.

     

    The bottom line is that doing things in an audiophile style means doing them the best way possible. Audiophile style is a manner of doing things. 


    style | stīl |
    noun

    1. a manner of doing something: different styles of management.
    • a way of painting, writing, composing, building, etc., characteristic of a particular period, place, person, or movement.
    • a way of using language: he never wrote in a journalistic style | students should pay attention to style and idiom.

     

    Sure the name has changed from Computer Audiophile to Audiophile Style, but things won't change much. We'll still bring you the best digital audio content available, and our core will always be digital. Digital is our foundation. It makes zero sense to stray from that foundation. It's the topic about which I'm most passionate. Fortunately, our new writers have additional passions and expertise. For example, Danny Kaey's review of the Boulder 1100 series amp and preamp was published simultaneously with this announcement, along side in-depth digital articles and even one from Josh reviewing the new Sennheiser closed back HD820 headphones. Expanded content won't equal less digital content. 


    Think of Audiophile Style as giving you what Computer Audiophile always did and more. In addition to more written reviews, today we're launching our new video series called Audiophile 5. Audiophile 5 is a series about you, not us, where we cover products and topics that interest you. And, we do it all in 5 minutes. We hate long videos as much as the next guy because time is the most valuable thing have. We don't like to waste it hearing about what the presenter had for breakfast and what he and his significant other did last night. If you like that kind of stuff, fine. It just isn't us. We much prefer the slogan, all killer no filler.

     

    The first Audiophile 5 video covers the Aurender ACS10 content server. Look for a full written review later this month. We shot this video in early December and have since learned quite a bit and developed the concept much further. We can't wait for you to see what's next. 

     

    That's it for now. As we start 2019 right, I want to thank the community who makes this site what it is. Without contributions from all of you this site wouldn't exist. I'm consistently amazed at the breadth and depth of you knowledge and willingness to share it with complete strangers. The whole of this community is much greater than the sum of its parts. 

     

    Let's get 2019 going audiophile style. 


     

     



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    2 hours ago, wgscott said:

     

    Analogue ones with tubes are ok.

     

    Punch card readers are ok because they are somewhat retro.

    Hey I can do 13,000 strokes per hour on the keypunch.   Maybe more if I had a date coming up.  🤪

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 1/1/2019 at 4:12 PM, The Computer Audiophile said:

    Do you still think of fruit when you see a business named Apple 😁

     

    It makes me think of a young man coming back from an apple farm. Perhaps your diet is a balanced one?

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well, nah, I don't like the change. I used to belong to a online stereo group that was all about high end, from stereos to watches to cars, on and on. I got quite sick of the whole "style" thing, even though there was great input on music and gear by a few core folks. From a biz perspective, yes, good to move off of what at first seems a narrow "geek" perspective, but I hope you and others here stay true to the essentials, namely pushing the envelop and helping everyone find enjoyable listening at all levels of income and taste. Having said that, I recognize that going from a blog to a full business is tough, and I applaud what is happening. All the best to everyone! 

     

    JJinPDX  

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Just now, JJinPDX said:

    Well, nah, I don't like the change. I used to belong to a online stereo group that was all about high end, from stereos to watches to cars, on and on. I got quite sick of the whole "style" thing, even though there was great input on music and gear by a few core folks. From a biz perspective, yes, good to move off of what at first seems a narrow "geek" perspective, but I hope you and others here stay true to the essentials, namely pushing the envelop and helping everyone find enjoyable listening at all levels of income and taste. Having said that, I recognize that going from a blog to a full business is tough, and I applaud what is happening. All the best to everyone! 

     

    JJinPDX  

    Thanks for the feedback. Don't worry about us becoming more about style than substance. To us, style is all about the way in which we do things. For example, right now I'm researching small single board computers that support Windows so I can try some leading edge renderers. The only style about that is that it's the way an audiophile / music aficionado would do it :~)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I’m going to be blunt because I want to help you. “Audiophile Style” is not a creative name. It’s bland and generic. To be specific, in my case, I no longer feel a sense of excitement when I visit the site where I did previously. I don’t think anyone would be disappointed if you changed the name soon either back to Computer Audiophile or something better. I’m sure you can come up with something from the suggestions already made. 

     

    Change is good.

     

    Bad change is not good.

     

    This is a bad change (in my opinion as an end consumer of your content).

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    40 minutes ago, rhmmmm said:

    I’m going to be blunt because I want to help you. “Audiophile Style” is not a creative name. It’s bland and generic. To be specific, in my case, I no longer feel a sense of excitement when I visit the site where I did previously. I don’t think anyone would be disappointed if you changed the name soon either back to Computer Audiophile or something better. I’m sure you can come up with something from the suggestions already made. 

     

    Change is good.

     

    Bad change is not good.

     

    This is a bad change (in my opinion as an end consumer of your content).

    No worries about being blunt and honest. I respect you for that. 

     

    I disagree 100% but that’s OK. 

     

    P.S. Thanks for contributing to the site since 2010. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Interesting. There are countless links in countless audiophile forums that pointed to discussions and technical information on Computer Audiophile. These hyperlinks all over the Internet are now all broken and useless. These links from other sites brought you extra traffic and new subscribers.

     

    A simple website name change did not require a complete change in the domain. Domain and URL hyperlinks are what computers use to communicate. People see only what is presented to them and won’t care about URL details. You could have changed content and presentation without changing URL naming and locations for all your content.

     

    This aspect was very badly thought out. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    19 minutes ago, Norton said:

    So, as we’ve dropped the computer but kept the audiophile, can we have a “Turntables, Tonearms and Tape” sub-forum?

     

    We’re walking before we run. We’ll get there. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...