Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile
    The Computer Audiophile

    Audiophile Optimizer Raises The Bar

    Hi Guys, just a quick update from my travels this week. I’m currently flying over northern California on my way home to Minneapolis. I’ve been in the Bay Area for four days working on a couple music servers. My task was to install Windows Server 2012 R2 and Audiophile Optimizer to squeeze every ounce of sound quality from a computer. The end result surprised me very much. I had some reservations about the install and the efficacy of going to such great lengths tweaking a PC. I figured the sound would improve, but I didn’t figure it would improve by so much. This week I heard the best digital playback I’ve ever heard. Period.

     

     

    I’m not at liberty to divulge the entire hardware formula used this week, but I will talk about the software and the final outcome. What I found was similar to what many computer audiophiles have been saying for quit a while, the combination of Windows Server 2012 R2 and Audiophile Optimizer is fantastic.

     

     

     

    I started the project by getting a copy of Windows Server Essentials 2012 R2 and downloading Audiophile Optimizer. I prepared the hardware with a new SSD for the operating system and a couple 1TB SSDs for music storage. Installing 2012 R2 was pretty simple and nearly identical to installing any new Windows OS. On the other hand, installing and configuring Audiophile Optimizer is a different story. This software isn’t for those who can’t or won’t read the 52 page setup guide. Fortunately the setup guide is thorough and provides enough information for users to at least get their systems up and running.

     

    After installing AO and going through all its options a few times I got the hang of the program. One problem I ran into revolved around AO’s Core Mode. Core Mode pretty much turns the PC into an appliance with nothing but a command line or a playback application running. The issue I had was that it took about 30 minutes for AO to get the PC into core mode and another 30 minutes for AO to get the PC out of core mode. This is likely because the low horsepower of the computer I was using rather than a real issue with AO. For most people this may not be an issue because they will put their PCs into Core Mode and call it a day. However, I needed to go into Core Mode and come out of Core Mode several times while I tested different configurations and made software configurations changes that were only possible in AO’s GUI Mode. Again, this isn’t a big deal but readers should consider the speed of their hardware and try to complete all tasks (other than playing music) before setting their PCs into Core Mode.

     

     

    The final configuration of the PCs I setup was AO Ultimate Mode, Core Mode, and JRiver Media Center set as the Shell. In this config the PC booted right into JRMC in an appliance-like fashion.

     

     

    Once configured, the PCs were placed in a system with Berkeley Audio Design and Constellation Audio components, and Magico M Project loudspeakers. The sound I heard when the AO optimized PC was played for the first time, and throughout my stay, was stunning. We even had an identical computer setup, but running Windows 7 and without AO and its optimizations, for comparing sound quality. This enabled us to do A/B comparisons between the Windows 7 computer and fully optimized 2012 R2 / AO computer with the only difference being the optimization of software. The sonic differences were easily apparent. The optimized computer made it possible to hear the smallest details in recordings at incredibly low volume levels. For example, we had a microphone placed half way between the loudspeakers and the listening position. The microphone was connected to a small display that showed us the decibel level during our listening sessions. It wasn’t uncommon for the display to read volume levels around 60 dB (keep in mind that the listening position was at an even lower level) and for us to hear everything a recording had to offer. Turing up the volume didn’t increase our ability to hear details, it just made the music louder.

     

     

    We continued to listen to all kinds of music and continued to hear incredible sound quality. Everything from soundstage to reverb trails to the ambiance of a concert hall was improved with these software optimizations. On one track the drummer struck a bell and the sound seemed to hang in the air for ever while at the same time being completely distinct from the rest of the sounds. Every instrument had its place and its space. The listening experience was truly something to behold.

     

     

    I’m sure this experience will raise more questions than answers for many people. They will want such an optimized system compared to every server under the sun and I don’t blame them. Who wouldn’t want that information? However, we must be careful. Just because a system is great for one person doesn’t mean anything for someone else. The Windows Server 2012 R2 / Audiophile Optimizer system isn’t for the faint of heart. Depending on how far one optimizes the system, there may be no Ethernet connection and it may require a keyboard, mouse, and monitor for operation. Plus, installation is much more involved than purchasing a server like an Aurender and having one’s dealer visit to set it up and get everything running smooth.

     

     

    Based on my experience this week, the sound quality bar has been significantly raised.




    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    CA Forum has just jumped up several notches for me as a respected site for some real world discussions on CA based playback after this review.

    Great to see we have finally broken through this perceived glass ceiling which has been dogging software based discussions here for some time.

    I expect there will be some backlash now from the bits are bits crew but bring it on and the future will reveal all.

    AO is a must in any serious music playback chain built around windows on a PC or dare I say it on a dual PC setup (Double AO power) even better!!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    CA Forum has just jumped up several notches for me as a respected site for some real world discussions on CA based playback after this review.

    Great to see we have finally broken through this perceived glass ceiling which has been dogging software based discussions here for some time.

    I expect there will be some backlash now from the bits are bits crew but bring it on and the future will reveal all.

    AO is a must in any serious music playback chain built around windows on a PC or dare I say it on a dual PC setup (Double AO power) even better!!

     

    +1.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just wait until you here Windows 2012 Server R2/AO 1.31/JPLAY 6.1/Bug Head Infinity Blade SQ / Fidelizer Pro / Process Lasso!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Kudos to you, Chris, for being open minded enough to finally try AO. Now you have experienced what we are all raving about. I knew very little about computers when I started and Phil's patience and support helping me setup were beyond anything I ever experienced before. Audiophile Optimizer and AudioPhil get my very highest customer satisfaction rating.

    ..............I won't spoil my nice post by saying anything about the "J" controversy..........maybe you can try that one too!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    sligolad

     

    CA Forum has just jumped up several notches for me as a respected site for some real world discussions on CA based playback after this review.

    Great to see we have finally broken through this perceived glass ceiling which has been dogging software based discussions here for some time.

    I expect there will be some backlash now from the bits are bits crew but bring it on and the future will reveal all.

    AO is a must in any serious music playback chain built around windows on a PC or dare I say it on a dual PC setup (Double AO power) even better!!

     

    +1.

     

    +2!

     

    Very happy to see Chris do a review like this.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    ..............I won't spoil my nice post by saying anything about the "J" controversy..........maybe you can try that one too!

     

    Chris probably smoked a Joint in college... But he didn't inhale.. ;)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Just wait until you here Windows 2012 Server R2/AO 1.31/JPLAY 6.1/Bug Head Infinity Blade SQ / Fidelizer Pro / Process Lasso!

     

    6 pieces of software to listen to music? Doesn't that seem a little absurd, even for hardcore tweakers? It's things like these that make me wonder if listening to music is some peoples goal or just messing around with their computer! I don't mind minor tweaking but give me something like the forthcoming Aries Mini and I am happy listening to music!

     

     

    I am looking forward to AO for Windows 10 too!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, I understand you usually don't like to do comparisons, but are you unequivocally saying that this setup sounded better than the Lumin, the Aurender servers, the Aries, the various CAPS servers and ARM-based Linux servers and renderers you have built, and any CD player you have ever heard? How much do you think this could have been attributed to the hardware of the server or the other components? Have you tested AO in your home system and done similar comparisons yet?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    This site is turning into a snake oil pusher. Taken from the Optimisers website. Anyone who is endorsing Jplay cannot be trusted as Jp[lay is a complete joke

     

    " Does not need JPLAY, but works exceptionally well together with it"

     

     

     

    Three of us, with decades of listening to various systems, including one of the world's leading audio engineers, listened to Jplay 5 vs. JRiver 19. We might have been doubters before but it was night and day obvious by listening to the same track that Jplay made things so much better: more detail, more bloom, bigger soundstage...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, I understand you usually don't like to do comparisons, but are you unequivocally saying that this setup sounded better than the Lumin, the Aurender servers, the Aries, the various CAPS servers and ARM-based Linux servers and renderers you have built, and any CD player you have ever heard? How much do you think this could have been attributed to the hardware of the server or the other components? Have you tested AO in your home system and done similar comparisons yet?

     

    +1

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Three of us, with decades of listening to various systems, including one of the world's leading audio engineers, listened to Jplay 5 vs. JRiver 19. We might have been doubters before but it was night and day obvious by listening to the same track that Jplay made things so much better: more detail, more bloom, bigger soundstage...

     

    Be Aware that the lastest version Jriver nowadays is 20.0.115. LoL

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I notice that SSD drives have been used for music storage on the reviewed mystery system running Audiophile Optimiser. I've heard it being said that SSD drives do a lot of data optimisation in the background and that it can affect sound quality. The recommendation was to use conventional HDD instead. Chris (and others), is it true? If so, does the OA stops data optimization of the SSD drive to improve sound?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    6 pieces of software to listen to music? Doesn't that seem a little absurd, even for hardcore tweakers? It's things like these that make me wonder if listening to music is some peoples goal or just messing around with their computer! I don't mind minor tweaking but give me something like the forthcoming Aries Mini and I am happy listening to music!

     

     

    I am looking forward to AO for Windows 10 too!

     

    Windows 2012 Server R2: Server OS

    AO 1.31: Server OS Tweaker for audio

    JPLAY 6.1: Dedicated Audiophile output system

    Bug Head Infinity Blade SQ: Audiophile Player

    Fidelizer Pro: Windows Audio engine optimizer

    Process Lasso: Process manipulation tool

     

    I don't think it looks absurd. They're six different kinds of software. Not a single one of them having duplicated functions. It'd be absurd if he uses the same kind of software.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Windows 2012 Server R2: Server OS

    AO 1.31: Server OS Tweaker for audio

    JPLAY 6.1: Dedicated Audiophile output system

    Bug Head Infinity Blade SQ: Audiophile Player

    Fidelizer Pro: Windows Audio engine optimizer

    Process Lasso: Process manipulation tool

     

    I don't think it looks absurd. They're six different kinds of software. Not a single one of them having duplicated functions. It'd be absurd if he uses the same kind of software.

     

    Personally, I am from the K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid) school of thought and for me OS + AO + HQPlayer would be enough. I am past the age where fiddling with my computer is a big interest (it is an interest, but much smaller now!) but I don't knock that you might enjoy it!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Personally, I am from the K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid) school of thought and for me OS + AO + HQPlayer would be enough. I am past the age where fiddling with my computer is a big interest (it is an interest, but much smaller now!) but I don't knock that you might enjoy it!

     

    Real KISS is one decent OS and one decent player meaning you shall not touch AO as well as that won't be anywhere near simple. But each person's enough is different. Generally, most people would find one decent player and few more enhancement tools suiting their needs.

     

    From my opinion, going little extra miles for JPLAY/Fidelizer doesn't look like much work after AO. AO is the biggest step among them making all others look trivial. Process Lasso maybe some what power user stuff but I don't see how adding JPLAY/Fidelizer would sound absurd except for a few people with limited budget. But hey, that works too comparing to paying for more expensive audiophile cables.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, thanks for the great write up.

     

    Phil, will this be coming for the Mac?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Chris, when you did "A/B testing" with a (I am presuming ?identical / similar spec'd) Win 7 machine ...was it blinded? If not blinded, sorry but I don't put much weight in this.... Expectation bias is a hugely powerful phenomenon and anyone in our audiophile hobby who thinks they are immune is being foolish (or naive..or arrogant).

     

    This is exactly the scenario that could of be tested blinded as you have the resources at hand that most of us don't: 2 computers one "tweaked", one not. Even 20 trials would perhaps only take an hour.

    Setup playlists on both machines, then a random blinded switching of the source etc (for example) by a 3rd party.

     

    If the difference is as obvious as reported "the sonic differences were easily apparent" - should obviously still be there if you (or your colleague) don't know which machine is connected to your DAC. I would be very, very interested in the outcome.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    So this is better than every proprietary music server? Aurender, Bel Canto & Auralic?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "This week I heard the best digital playback I’ve ever heard. Period."

     

    How much clearer do you guys want it? :)

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    "This week I heard the best digital playback I’ve ever heard. Period."

     

    How much clearer do you guys want it? :)

     

     

    Well is doesn't make sense that all the purpose built music servers are suddenly outperformed by an old fashioned computer with all of it's supposed problems with noise and jitter etc.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well is doesn't make sense that all the purpose built music servers are suddenly outperformed by an old fashioned computer with all of it's supposed problems with noise and jitter etc.

     

     

    Where did you read noisy old fashioned computer? I must have missed that...

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really though is to much to expect a genuine comparison of products in the same system?

     

    I am guessing that the majority of us have to settle on a single source based at least partly on many of the comments we read here.

     

    Has Chris listened to this system, probably at a dealers, consisting of Constelation electronics and Magico speakers before? Compared an of the shelf Aurender, or other server, or CAPS etc on this very system?

     

    I am not being critical of the review, I want to read more, but do I buy an Aurender or try this approach, which seems at at least a little difficult to implement?

     

    The audio market is an open playing field, why is it seemingly politically incorrect to simply state that in system A product XYZ was better?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Really though is to much to expect a genuine comparison of products in the same system?

     

    I am guessing that the majority of us have to settle on a single source based at least partly on many of the comments we read here.

     

    Has Chris listened to this system, probably at a dealers, consisting of Constelation electronics and Magico speakers before? Compared an of the shelf Aurender, or other server, or CAPS etc on this very system?

     

    I am not being critical of the review, I want to read more, but do I buy an Aurender or try this approach, which seems at at least a little difficult to implement?

     

    The audio market is an open playing field, why is it seemingly politically incorrect to simply state that in system A product XYZ was better?

     

    Even better would be a *blinded* music server shootout between (for example) Aurender ?N100, Auralic Aries, CAPS + AO. Could start with trials determining if the "obvious sonic differences" of PC + AO and other servers were confimed blinded. With Chris' experience I would be thrilled to see one of these solutions come out a clear winner *blinded*. If one came out a blinded winner, I am very likely to go down that solution.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now




×
×
  • Create New...