Jump to content
  • The Computer Audiophile

    Audiophile 5: Elac DDP-2 DAC / Preamp / Streamer In 5 Minutes

    Here's my five minute take on the Elac DDP-2 Alchemy Series DAC, streamer, preamp. Everything you need to know in five minutes, and nothing more. Look for the full written review here on Audiophile Style very soon. 

     

    Subscribe to our YouTube channel, if you're so inclined, here.


    DDP-2 Product page - link

     

     

     


     

     



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I don't use Roon, so until DDP-2 UPnP support is available my interest in this product is on hold.  It does have some very attractive features.  Any idea whether it's AKM or ESS DAC?  I'd also have to be certain that MQA can be completely disengaged.

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 minutes ago, Danny Kaey said:

    nice video Chris! 😉

    It has that old school radio call-in show feel to it with Peter's comments added from our phone call. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Great teaser! I really liked Peter Madnick's explanations of the design. Having an on-board streamer synch with the DAC clock via I2S is brilliant. Hopefully the DLNA issue is resolved soon.

     

    I used an Audio Achemy DDE3, DTI and PS2 in the 90's. I sold a bunch of old gear recently and connected the AA stuff to my main system to ensure everything worked. It did, and was a bit shocked at how good the old AA stuff sounded.

     

    Peter's a talented designer with decades of experience, and the DDP-2 includes everything I want in a DAC/Preamp. It's definitely on my short list. I'm looking forward with great anticipation to the full review, and hopefully some comparisons.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Peter Madnick is brilliant and I thought the Acoustic Alchemy products were just fantastic so this is almost guaranteed to sound amazing.

     

    I'm wondering if this product's industrial design will make it a tough sell? It reminds me of a satellite TV receiver - not very kind of me to say I realize. The last round of DAC's and amps from AA had such a cool and hip industrial design.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    15 minutes ago, loop7 said:

    Peter Madnick is brilliant and I thought the Acoustic Alchemy products were just fantastic so this is almost guaranteed to sound amazing.

     

    I'm wondering if this product's industrial design will make it a tough sell? It reminds me of a satellite TV receiver - not very kind of me to say I realize. The last round of DAC's and amps from AA had such a cool and hip industrial design.

    Agree on all points. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I remember my first external DAC back in the mists of time was the Audio Alchemy DAC-in-the-Box!

     

    Did Peter design that too? 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 minute ago, austinpop said:

    I remember my first external DAC back in the mists of time was the Audio Alchemy DAC-in-the-Box!

     

    Did Peter design that too? 

    Oh yes. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    On 7/16/2019 at 2:12 PM, loop7 said:

    Peter Madnick is brilliant and I thought the Acoustic Alchemy products were just fantastic so this is almost guaranteed to sound amazing.

     

    I'm wondering if this product's industrial design will make it a tough sell? It reminds me of a satellite TV receiver - not very kind of me to say I realize. The last round of DAC's and amps from AA had such a cool and hip industrial design.

    I was going to say the same thing. Looks like they took close out cable boxes and put them to use. Not very pretty indeed

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    The look won't discourage me from buying, but I do need to see how the sound compares to other DAC/Preamps in this price range, e.g. Mytek Brooklyn DAC+, Benchmark DAC3, iFi Pro DSD, etc, and how the inboard streamer stacks up vs. separates from Sonore or SOtM. The PS Audio Stellar Gain Preamp with an Ultrarendu would be an interesting comparison and very close in price .

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Is DSD incorporated? I didn't hear that mentioned but Roon users will be happy to hear about this product.

    Since I'm favorable to Audirvana, I'm awaiting to learn more. 

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Well I basically do not trust ANY company trying to push MQA.

    So this company is of the list

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    17 hours ago, yahooboy said:

    Well I basically do not trust ANY company trying to push MQA.

    So this company is of the list

    So you wouldn't buy anything from Elac, over this? I see no evidence that they are "pushing" MQA. The only reference I can find is a simple statement that the DDP-2 is MQA capable, but not functional yet. I assume this is a business decision. The marketing department likely determined that leaving MQA out would negatively impact sales more than including it. 

     

    I'm not a fan of MQA processing. I believe the technology will fail and die, but no one knows for certain. My overriding interest is in buying the best sounding DAC/Preamp I can afford, with the features I want. MQA is not one those features, but inclusion will not affect my purchase decision. The DDP-2 is a contender, with all the features on my needs list, and the right price.

     

    My main system has three clocks right now, in the wi-fi/ethernet bridge, renderer and DAC/Pre. I am well aware of the benefits of a single clock from past experience. The fact that this unit has I2S wi-fi puts it ahead of the others on my short list.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    4 hours ago, audiobomber said:

    So you wouldn't buy anything from Elac, over this? I see no evidence that they are "pushing" MQA. The only reference I can find is a simple statement that the DDP-2 is MQA capable, but not functional yet. I assume this is a business decision. The marketing department likely determined that leaving MQA out would negatively impact sales more than including it. 

     

    I'm not a fan of MQA processing. I believe the technology will fail and die, but no one knows for certain. My overriding interest is in buying the best sounding DAC/Preamp I can afford, with the features I want. MQA is not one those features, but inclusion will not affect my purchase decision. The DDP-2 is a contender, with all the features on my needs list, and the right price.

     

    My main system has three clocks right now, in the wi-fi/ethernet bridge, renderer and DAC/Pre. I am well aware of the benefits of a single clock from past experience. The fact that this unit has I2S wi-fi puts it ahead of the others on my short list.

     

    It's about the signal that ELAC sends as a company, by including it in their product they are endorsing all the ills that MQA is.

    One way to rid the world of this illness, is letting manufacturers know that any association with a company that has been shown to have a strange take on the truth, looses them sales.

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    3 hours ago, yahooboy said:

    One way to rid the world of this illness, is letting manufacturers know that any association with a company that has been shown to have a strange take on the truth, looses them sales.

    Certainly that is your right. It's a no-win situation for the manufacturers. I have a friend who's also shopping for a DAC, and will not consider anything lacking MQA. As mentioned, I don't care that it has MQA or doesn't, I just want the best value DAC/Pre I can find. I suspect both opinions are more prevalent than someone who will boycott a company because they've included it.

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    10 hours ago, audiobomber said:

    Certainly that is your right. It's a no-win situation for the manufacturers. I have a friend who's also shopping for a DAC, and will not consider anything lacking MQA. As mentioned, I don't care that it has MQA or doesn't, I just want the best value DAC/Pre I can find. I suspect both opinions are more prevalent than someone who will boycott a company because they've included it.

     

    I do believe as a manufacturer You should back each and every part of Your product. If You include MQA, that's an endorsement. As a constructor/manufacturer You are informed by MQA what that entails. In the case of ELAC (for instance) the information about the ills was available when the DDP-2 was under construction.

     

    I have talked to a lot of manufacturers whose product i liked but that included MQA, almost all of them had included MQA because it was the latest buzzword. A lot of them don't even understand how MQA works (or the implications of this) So the manufacturers just included it to have another thing on the checklist.

     

    When I buy from a manufacturer, I don't want buzzwords or "features" that have been proven to not do anything (good) for the sound

     

    And I will not support anyone that endorse MQA

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...